Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1341. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Chromo blasters were the ****. They were the bomb-diggity. Then CCP ****** it up and are apparently afraid to make them useful again. Missiles completely wrecking Infantry, Installations and Veh...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 20:03:00
|
1342. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: I like the WP cost for vehicles. It doesnt have to be much, but it would justify the buffing of vehicles as they would be more 'valuable'. LAVs and DSs would keep their 'free' cost as some people need the help traversin...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:59:00
|
1343. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So...we're in agreement that we need a less hull-centric model for vehicles, with more of a focus on what modules are fitted, and with skills eff...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:54:00
|
1344. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Chromo blasters were the ****.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:25:00
|
1345. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So...we're in agreement that we need a less hull-centric model for vehicles, with more of a focus on what modules are fitted, and with skills effecting final stats? Yes. I'm still baffled WHY...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:22:00
|
1346. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So instead of increasing the base stats on the hulls, why not increase the HP given by armor plates themselves? (or re-examine the damage bonus from the tailpipe weakspot) Chromosome the base...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:19:00
|
1347. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
To the people who thinks that making blasters into a giant PLC is a good idea: How in the hell does a precision weapon such as a PLC makes sense? Also, would you ever use a PLC over a FG? Shotty blaster makes more sense.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:11:00
|
1348. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Okay, but adding proto vehicles equals one of two things: either AV balance remains the same and the vehicles receive an irrelevant increase in statistics making the pro...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 11:01:00
|
1349. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I don't play it, so how would I know? So you're judging something you haven't even tried? lol What am I judging again?...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 11:00:00
|
1350. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I don't play it, so how would I know? So you're judging something you haven't even tried? lol What am I judging again? You said that Ground forces style mechanics ad...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 03:33:00
|
1351. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Dear Players, We have wanted to bring back variety for the Vehicle Users of DUST 514 for some time now. I will be honest and admit that I thought it would be easier. After considerable groundwork, I s...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 03:30:00
|
1352. making tsnkers happy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hynox Xitio wrote: Remove all vehicles. I will end you Hynox. This is your last warning.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 03:29:00
|
1353. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Okay, but adding proto vehicles equals one of two things: either AV balance remains the same and the vehicles receive an irrelevant increase in statistics making the proto not worth having, or proto AV is rebalanced to ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 21:10:00
|
1354. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Djinn SouI wrote: True Adamance wrote: Sure tanks don't currently have a role. This doesn't mean they shouldn't have one. That is also why I asked what tankers believe their role in the battlefield should be. With 0 suggestions or answers...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 21:08:00
|
1355. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Djinn SouI wrote: Quasar Storm wrote: Djinn SouI wrote: All of these responses and I still have not received any answers to my questions... I bolded them for a reason. I am giving you guys a chance to state your case. If this is the best ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 21:03:00
|
1356. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm trying really hard to try to give a **** and explain how you're a ******* idiot, but I just can't.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 05:58:00
|
1357. Vehicle Specialists!? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hynox Xitio wrote: Remove all vehicles. I will end you. You have been warned.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 05:43:00
|
1358. making tsnkers happy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: True Adamance wrote: Harpyja wrote: True Adamance wrote: shaman oga wrote: In 1.6 i was happier. I just need a time machine. I did my best work in 1.6 Because Madrugars were OP and armor reps and shield boosters ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 03:58:00
|
1359. making tsnkers happy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vicious Minotaur wrote: Tankers are an inherently unhappy bunch. You could give them eternal happiness and they'd still act like somebody pooped in their Cheerios. If you knew why we were angry at our vehicles (and idiots like you), you wou...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 03:57:00
|
1360. making tsnkers happy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jacques Cayton II wrote: Add a nuke turret. It fires tsar bombs kills everything within a 22 mile raduis except other tanks. Other tanks take 3 shots to kill. This'll make tankers happy. That would be utter bullshit and would **** me off. **...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 03:53:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |