| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1321. Amarr Scout - EWar - doesnt make sense. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Why the hell are you still calling scanning EWAR?
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 19:23:00
|
1322. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'd also like to reiterate that HAV's will still need a role to have. Even if they are balanced, they will still only have a single job already done by infantry, and that is shoot at people and other vehicles, mostly HAV's. We need more structures...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 19:22:00
|
1323. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I think we can come up with better values than that. My thought on viable enforcers would be to scale the models down 25% to give them a lower profile and make them harder to hit, and make them the fast ones. 4b. If they...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 19:15:00
|
1324. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: I would like to know why LLAV's and MAV are beeing noted in the spreadsheet. Is this a sign that we are going to get our 3rd ground vehicle category? basically a dropship with wheels on the ground. ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 18:57:00
|
1325. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Let's work both angles. I'll work on resurrecting the chrome stuff you guys run the other angle. Multiple reasonable proposals are always better than all eggs in one basket. So while I may disagree with your approach, don'...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 18:54:00
|
1326. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Random scribbles, just doing this **** in passes. Assume 3 Main slots (Will be increased later, values adjusted accordingly) Assume Passive Armor Reps (Will be changed later, values adjusted accordi...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 18:48:00
|
1327. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Meta lock would be a neat way to keep proto AV from casually rolling new HAV and dropship pilots for their lunch money. I'd rather have tiercide than meta lock, but that's just me.......
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 18:43:00
|
1328. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Buwaro Draemon wrote: shaman oga wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: What were Chromo blasters like exactly, I remember many things, but not that. FYI While you are at it, can you guys fix the glowing effect on gunner se...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 18:41:00
|
1329. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Wasn't the ttk problem for tanks in chrome related to damage mods? Use the 1.0 damage profiles or close to it with chrome hulls. I would go with that, hell yes. Although, I still want a shotty blaster. Hell, looking at...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 07:57:00
|
1330. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Wasn't the ttk problem for tanks in chrome related to damage mods? Use the 1.0 damage profiles or close to it with chrome hulls. Insane railgun damage as well as damage mods. Uprising 1.0 TTK was m...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 07:56:00
|
1331. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I doubt that, he'll probably take our advice about the chromo AV/V balance however It really does sound like he wants tanks to beat the hell out of each other. And as far as Chrome V/AV balanc...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:41:00
|
1332. Changing Caldari and Gallente base EWAR stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
1: Mirroring each other is how they work everywhere, including EVE. 2: Who were you talking to? No. Cal have more good EWAR ships than any race (unless you're neuting, in which Amarr), but not in general, that is silly. 3: @Kirk- Changing the As...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:37:00
|
1333. Amarr should have slightly better sheild delays than gallente - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't remember Amarr ever told to me as being better shield tankers than Gallente. Like ever. I don't think I've ever seen a shield fit Amarr ship in EVE either. Well, until now, anyways
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:22:00
|
1334. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Golden Day wrote: Quote: Neither my mental state nor vacations are affecting this. After the first 20 pages were dragged down into the useless drivel I have come to expect between vehicle and ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:19:00
|
1335. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Golden Day wrote: Quote: Neither my mental state nor vacations are affecting this. After the first 20 pages were dragged down into the useless drivel I have come to expect between vehicle and infantry discussions, I decided to let it simmer ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 04:59:00
|
1336. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Pokey, do you have a skype? I'd very much like some help hammering down my numbers (and ask you a bit about yours) It would be a good idea to make a channel discussing this, live talking is better than this imo.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 04:11:00
|
1337. Ever wanted to change your forum avatar? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I upgrade your territory by doubling it. your welcome.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 00:42:00
|
1338. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Doing things for no purpose other than "this might be cool. Let's surprise everyone" makes no sense in the context of a game who's features are near-ri...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 22:08:00
|
1339. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Doing things for no purpose other than "this might be cool. Let's surprise everyone" makes no sense in the context of a game who's features are near-riot inducing from the word go whenever someone pok...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 21:36:00
|
1340. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: It used to be basically preference, which is best kind of balance in a game. 100% Correct. Although I do remember people gravitating towards the Small Scattered Blaster the most because it did m...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 21:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |