| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
461. [Feedback & Suggestion] EWAR 2 - Remote line-of-sight hacking. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would prefer a Hack Relay. You place it on an Objective terminal, and then can hack the terminal remotely from up to 30m away. The Hack Relay can be destroyed to stop the hack, or the hacker can be killed to stop the hack. It might be worth an e...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 20:09:00
|
462. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Can the Sentinel be given the same band width as an Assault, even though the Sentinel does not have an equipment slot? In Pub matches were no one is drop...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 19:49:00
|
463. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lee corwood wrote: And in general, I disagree with someone's statement on not increasing BW benefits to prototype tiers. I think that would actually encourage more people to run them and boost the economy. We claim its unfair to newer players, ...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 19:43:00
|
464. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doshneil Antaro wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Cross Atu wrote: With respect Fox being stuck playing a suit with bandwidth if you want to have equipment deployed at any given level is exactly the point. With respect Cross, when I made my earli...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 19:08:00
|
465. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
shaman oga wrote: I initially thought that it was a good idea, but now i realize this will create more problems than opportunities. With current design you can't: Place a hive for the ammo and swap to heavy. Attach 3 RE (minimun required to de...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 18:47:00
|
466. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meee One wrote: "REs should have lower BW to accomidate scouts". -No,scouts aren't supposed to be the equipment king,logistics is. -And it should be assaults not scouts doing AV. Medium frame suits don't run fast enough to get in close to T...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 18:30:00
|
467. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Can the Sentinel be given the same band width as an Assault, even though the Sentinel does not have an equipment slot? In Pub matches were no one is dropping Uplinks, I am sometimes forced to switch ...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 18:03:00
|
468. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vrain Matari wrote: P.S. Was thinking about how to explain this. It's actually a 'stack' in computing lingo. Another way to remember how equipment destruction works in Rattati's proposal is FILO: First In, Last Out(i.e. the first piece of equip...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 17:13:00
|
469. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Juno Tristan wrote: Scouts have a lot of advantages at the moment so I would advocate a lower bandwidth than all other suits on the condition a new scoutly uplink is created that has a low bandwidth/spawn count/scan profile/timer to establish f...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 16:58:00
|
470. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Piercing Serenity wrote: I still have five more pages of this thread to get through, but I wanted to reiterate a point that I noticed was getting looked over multiple times. Many people have incorrectly assumed that this proposal will shoe-horn...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 16:44:00
|
471. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kaeru Nayiri wrote: Can we also make equipment hackable in the same update? Please ?? :3 I play Sentinel... if I hack it, it would go "POP". ... unless it was like a hacked vehicle, and still belonged to the person who spawned it, usi...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 16:09:00
|
472. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Booby Tuesdays wrote: I guess I'm still unclear as to how this works. If you are saying it is Dropsuit based, then it's bandwidth per dropsuit? As in, Spawn Amarr logi, spam uplinks, then spawn Cal Logi and spam hives because I have another 24...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 16:08:00
|
473. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: Stuff Well, a few things about that, first the direct method described is stacked rather than objective. In the game under a BW mechanic you would not need to take the time to destroy those deployed items...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 16:02:00
|
474. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
PLAYSTTION wrote: At first i thought this would be bad, read it and its genius. Assaults can carry 1 nano hive and resupply themselves and logis can drop a bunch. But does this stop people from having 6 nano hives on 3 suits and placing 18 down...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 15:55:00
|
475. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Cross Atu wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Can the Sentinel be given the same band width as an Assault, even though the Sentinel does not have an equipment slot? In Pub matches were no one is dropping Uplinks...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 15:37:00
|
476. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Aeon, a lighter suit can use its mobility and radar superiority to achieve the correct geographical or position based advantage required to beat a heavy. The reality is that most people in lighter suits do not. They want...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 15:19:00
|
477. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: With respect Fox being stuck playing a suit with bandwidth if you want to have equipment deployed at any given level is exactly the point. With respect Cross, when I made my earlier posts I was working off the assumption that...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.19 14:34:00
|
478. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No Bandwidth for Sentinels : After thinking about this long and hard I have come to grudgingly accept this. If it reduces the number of casual Sentinels then that would be a good thing. However, in a match where non of the Blueberries are plac...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.18 21:51:00
|
479. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Apothecary Za'ki wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I am against the idea of bandwidth. Not only does it limit what suits I can use, but it hurts Cal and Amarr logos harder since they focus on deployables. Why not just decrease uplink spawn cou...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.18 20:24:00
|
480. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: And that's -exactly- the point. If a player can out-maneuver the heavy he's -supposed to die- and they have no problem with that because we ditched slower turn speeds (justifiably so) a long time ago. A Heavy can whip around j...
- by Fox Gaden - at 2014.11.18 20:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |