Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1721. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Breaking is IIRC more than willing to admit he doesn't do much on the vehicle side, but he is more than willing to listen to explanations of why parts of his points are mistaken. It's called learnin' I does it.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 19:53:00
|
1722. [Feedback] Monetization of features - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Talos Vagheitan wrote: That's a lot of words to basically say nothing Learn to read then.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 18:43:00
|
1723. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The UHAV and DHAV skills will need a skill multiplier. x12 seems excessive to me. I'm wildly iffy on x10. I'm also against HAVs costing less overall because they're reall only vulnerable to what, maybe 5 weapons That infantry can carry. Forge,...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 16:56:00
|
1724. Dropship Future design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If that's true then hellz yeah. But I doubt those shells are optimized for DUST. :10bux: says they're optimized for Legion.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 16:16:00
|
1725. [Feedback] Monetization of features - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Slave of MORTE wrote: Gun shy about aurum sales is definitely the reaction I have I'm not sure if to buy the discounted pack, despite it being a damn good deal. Any other day I wo...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 16:12:00
|
1726. [Feedback] Monetization of features - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BAMM HAVOC wrote: This echo's cat merc to an extent, careful dude your going to get banned. But this will hopefully blow your clear away any doubt of what is really going on .... AURUMlords not helping Bamm. if you have constructi...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 16:10:00
|
1727. [Feedback] Monetization of features - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Slave of MORTE wrote: Gun shy about aurum sales is definitely the reaction I have I'm not sure if to buy the discounted pack, despite it being a damn good deal. Any other day I would snatch it up faster than you can say Qu...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 16:05:00
|
1728. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
making them not crap is the first step. shaping the battlefield so they have more utility than "Wp farming engine" or "Warpoint pinata" should be the next step. If we can figure out how to shape the battlefields so that HAVs are necessary and US...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 16:00:00
|
1729. any word on... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: https://twitter.com/CCP_Frame/status/564088206136602624 thank you for that.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 15:57:00
|
1730. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Spkr. You need to quit with the constant "HE DOESNT X" crap. Present your point civilly . You are calling names and making ad hominem attacks when you are in a position to refute the central point or provide counterargum...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 15:39:00
|
1731. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: I'm hoping to be able to record video in 2 weeks or so, to show the state vehicles are in with video evidence, as well as how easy it is to use AV. I'll even use crap tanks to show how strong AV is, while ignoring the experi...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 15:29:00
|
1732. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Your argument over the triple rep madrugar without actually naming it is amusing. Triple/quad repping an armor tank anywhere near a forge gun is suicide. It's only survivable versus swarms. It was ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 15:27:00
|
1733. [Feedback] Monetization of features - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Slave of MORTE wrote: Gun shy about aurum sales is definitely the reaction I have Just continue keeping it civil please.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 15:26:00
|
1734. Daily Strongbox key - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
danie braz wrote: Add keys to loot table. Lets say boxes are 1:10 or 1:5 drop rate. Keys could be 1:25 or 1:50. Keys are in the loot table. While I understand the frustration they should be kept rare IMHO as salvage. Increasing keys EARNED ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 14:35:00
|
1735. [Suggestion] Cleaning up junk, tiercide, and memory usage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Actually I have a suggestion for this. Someone slap mein the biomassed channel in an hour or so please.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 14:31:00
|
1736. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: 8x means less investment of SP than a dropsuit. 10x. Alright So someone that hasn't played in months, and doesn't use vehicles, gets to decide the path vehicles take? And now you want tanks to u...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 14:29:00
|
1737. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Your argument over the triple rep madrugar without actually naming it is amusing. Triple/quad repping an armor tank anywhere near a forge gun is suicide. It's only survivable versus swarms.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 12:49:00
|
1738. [Feedback] Monetization of features - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rattati I appreciate what you are trying to do and why with AUR sales. However, if I may offer a critique, I think a lot of it is clunky, could be implemented more smoothly, less obtrusively and in a way that is both profitable so that you all ca...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 11:11:00
|
1739. LAV - Add slots & PG/CPU, but reduce HP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I have no personal problem with an LAV taking a couple proto forge hits. But the caveat is I believe firmly that this should require the investment of SP and fittings. The free LAV that takes proto AV in the face to deliver an idiot with an HMG...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 10:45:00
|
1740. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
8x means less investment of SP than a dropsuit. 10x.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.07 10:36:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |