| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2421. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The problem with making the smalls optional back in chrome was even with them mads could field tanks that could weather a storm of fire that is unbelievable, gunnlogis and maddies universally had a 3-4 shot from solid AV lifespan and militia tanks...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.05 07:15:00
|
2422. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: While we are changing vehicles, I hope that you at least consider changes to the large blaster turret. A blaster tank is very effective vs infantry, and fairly effective vs enemy tanks. Because of this, it is easily the go to ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.04 17:17:00
|
2423. [SUGGESTION]New PC Resource. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Bpo manufacturing tool. But would they perform like current BPOs do in public matches? i'M "Eh" on it. But honestly I doubt it. Wanna protostomp? Pays your monies and takes your chances. I'd r...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.04 11:44:00
|
2424. [SUGGESTION]New PC Resource. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bpo manufacturing tool.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.04 04:30:00
|
2425. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I still don't understand what was wrong with Chromosome. We beat the absolute hell out of each other once vehicles were brought into the battle. What was wrong with that? We literally left you all alo...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 20:43:00
|
2426. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Ideally I'd like to not change AV at the same time. I'd keep AV as is and then balance the new HAV stats around it, but go with the Chrome mechanics. Not a good idea at all ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 19:34:00
|
2427. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Ideally I'd like to not change AV at the same time. I'd keep AV as is and then balance the new HAV stats around it, but go with the Chrome mechanics. Not a good idea at all
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 17:34:00
|
2428. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
don't forget revert AV to chrome stats. not including the six missile swarm or 400m lock range
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 17:05:00
|
2429. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Agreed. Too much vehicle balance is predicated on other units that don't exist as well as weapons that don't exist either.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 15:38:00
|
2430. Did you mess up matchmaking?? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This post needs more emotion. I mean clearly we have a statement of problem, but the butthurt isn't really coming through. So. Let's try it again. Once more from the top. OP... GO!
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 12:58:00
|
2431. So I've been working on something... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Heh. I would actually go berserk tearing ass for the chance to name a calsent.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 11:01:00
|
2432. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not having a means to recover from disabling shots would absolutely be idiotic. Let's take the immobile tank as an example. Busted track and complete immobility is just a countdown to annihilation. There would have to be a means of recovery or ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 10:43:00
|
2433. Everyone I have found the right solution !!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dual tanking is the turd that needs flushing Minmatar are crap for efficiency with a dual tank. They are efficient with both, but not at the same time.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 08:52:00
|
2434. Vehicle Specialists!? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tread Loudly 2 wrote: Maximum damage output was buffed as swarms now have much more ammo prior to the update You need to elaborate. Rounds per magazine were not buffed. Only the militia ever had 2 per mag. STD and up have had three since...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 08:49:00
|
2435. How to fix commandos.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Give them one extra high and one extra low. Simply put, give them their scout counterpart layouts. Right now, a prototype commando has less slots than a militia scout suit. Negative sir. Commandos actually require a bit...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 08:44:00
|
2436. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: i think we will always have issues with tanks until you let us defeat them in other ways than killing which currently is the only way to deal with them. what we need is more options like https://forums.dust514.com/default.as...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.03 08:30:00
|
2437. Problem with Amarr Scout HP. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Balance number ratios are not absolutes. They haven't been made a thing. It's just that some players like to crunch numbers. The amarr scout build isn't a cloak assassin build. It's a forward ran...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.02 23:01:00
|
2438. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Yeah, because FPS means no vehicles allowed. Vehicles do need to be redone, skills need to have proper bonuses, they need good PG, CPU and HP values, and turrets need to be proper as well. "Acceptable slot layout" to in...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.02 22:57:00
|
2439. the three things I want most - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Better Control Schemes. 2. Better hit detection 3. Actual matchmaking that ATTEMPTS to separate people out by SP level, then sorts them in with each other by Mu.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.02 18:24:00
|
2440. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: True Adamance wrote: . 1. Problem with all that is that its another overhaul for a new type of tank 2. The reduction of module slots and seperation into specific areas does limit what you fit on to it, possibly all...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.02 18:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |