| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2261. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: one question? can there be a new control scheme added for vehicles? specifically modeled after battlefield with a left shoulders brake/reverse and a right r2 acceleration button? considering one of the tank destroyers wou...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.14 07:07:00
|
2262. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer fo cused's proposal DOUBLES MARAUDER EHP FROM CHROMOSOME LEVELS. What is so hard to comprehend about this?
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.14 06:11:00
|
2263. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: the HP bonus to the Sagaris compounded would almost double it's EHP from chrome levels Laser strike = Rattati's own words. That's not a justifica...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.14 05:19:00
|
2264. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
alright: the following items need to be addressed for my proposal to work. Dropships: too squishy. am going to do a combination of fitting buffs and resistances Surya: Inordinately higher EHP than the sagaris. a bit more is fine, but not by THAT...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.14 04:46:00
|
2265. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: the HP bonus to the Sagaris compounded would almost double it's EHP from chrome levels Laser strike = Rattati's own words. That's not a justification for making them overpowered against everyt...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.14 04:38:00
|
2266. Buff contact grenades - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
People cried when nades were effective. Because newbies could kill vets with them. Apparently it was utterly unfair to die from nades.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.14 04:30:00
|
2267. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: What if you had 3 flavors? Resistance Amps - 15% Passive, Always On, Zero Downtime Active Hardener - 25% Active, Moderate Duration, Long Downtime Flux Active Harder - 40%, Active, Short Duration, Long Downtime This I like...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 22:44:00
|
2268. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
found the chrome AV nade values. Guess what's going into my proposal...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 22:34:00
|
2269. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Link Updated my base stats, as well as some module stats (particularly Armor Plates) Expanded Slots to 7 each, and fitting to allow for the slots to be filled (as ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 22:33:00
|
2270. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Link Updated my base stats, as well as some module stats (particularly Armor Plates) Expanded Slots to 7 each, and fitting to allow for the slots to be filled (as well as shown where my proposed skills would effect ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 22:27:00
|
2271. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: honestly? COmbining mods isn't hilariously awesome, mostly because :programming: cooking things up that behave similar? maybe. If you are referring to my post I don't mean in terms of one Harden...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 22:21:00
|
2272. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
honestly? COmbining mods isn't hilariously awesome, mostly because :programming: cooking things up that behave similar? maybe.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 22:02:00
|
2273. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m7G9wnM6gcnNM6oP6mw5oYgHQZF6XYelYh0PTgk72iM/pubhtml 1. Chrome with altered numbers, not finished either Your marauder resistances are set both too high and should apply only to a...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 21:21:00
|
2274. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin', what about making some vehicle scale "EWAR" (as they call it dust side) with different levels of detection, sensor radii and profiles... Yeah... Say we can implement the scaled down model ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 20:19:00
|
2275. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I want to know if it's possible to scale down models. Enforcer with no secondary turrets, 25% reduced in size and much much faster than a marauder makes for a much more interesting glass cannon concept IMHO. Lower profile + faster = harder to hit.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 19:20:00
|
2276. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: Sorry, havent been on the thread lately. So what your saying is, you pretty much agree? You tell me. Work in progress. Of particular note that I'm looking for input on: Dropshi...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 18:43:00
|
2277. Vehicle recall time (too much) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pumping up wrote: Okay, make it shorter but only if at full health and it's not under attack (has received no damage for X seconds). that would be acceptable. But vehicle drivers traditionally wait until I have dumped 4 forge gun rounds into...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 18:38:00
|
2278. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Sorry, havent been on the thread lately. So what your saying is, you pretty much agree? You tell me. Work in progress. Of particular note that I'm looking for input on: Dropships: Eternal victims in chrome, I wish input...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 17:17:00
|
2279. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Most of what you are proposing is covered under my "revive chrome vehicle balance" proposal. The idea here is that the HAVs are fit-centric rather than hull centric. It doesn't matter if you runa maddy or a marauder. Without proper fittings you'...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 16:33:00
|
2280. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I made it cost less than a standard small turret. In exchange for having a potential of two small gunners plus three point defense/hack point assaulting infantry. The net benefit far outweighs ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.13 16:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |