| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
7587
   |
Posted - 2014.05.02 11:58:00 -
[361] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:This thread really escalated quickly 
Yeah it's amazing what happens when people continually provide evidence to disprove the anecdotes of the (now proven) mentally challenged Pilot community.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
3792
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:18:00 -
[362] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:
All of these tactics involve the use of human intelligence.
You are asking these peasants for too much.
Then I challenge you to try all of them against me, and I'm willing to bet the entire contents of your wallet that only #3 would have even the slightest possibility of succeeding. Not that #3 is relevant. This is a discussion of Infantry AV.
Son, I could punch your tank to death.
Left handed. |
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
7587
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:23:00 -
[363] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:
Son, I could punch your tank to death.
Left handed.
Then put your money where your mouth is.
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
3792
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:23:00 -
[364] - Quote
It's a bad business venture.
You don't know how much I have, and you never offered anything.
What's in it for me? |
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
7587
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:26:00 -
[365] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:It's a bad business venture.
You don't know how much I have, and you never offered anything.
What's in it for me?
About 60m.
I've been ****-poor since I bought my bro a Templar Code. 
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
3792
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:27:00 -
[366] - Quote
Yeaaaaaa... if all you have is 60 mil I'm not going to wager my own stash which is noticeably bigger. Good hustle on trying to become not broke though.
But I'll keep on a lookout for you so I can give your tin can a kinetic beatdown. |
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property
Dirt Nap Squad.
7587
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:30:00 -
[367] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Yeaaaaaa... if all you have is 60 mil I'm not going to wager my own stash which is noticeably bigger. Good hustle on trying to become not broke though.
But I'll keep on a lookout for you so I can give your tin can a kinetic beatdown.
Well then I guess my assertion stands unopposed.
\o/
Proposed Mobile CRU Changes
-HAND
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution
Dirt Nap Squad.
3792
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 12:31:00 -
[368] - Quote
No, your tank is still going to explode.
You just aren't going to have any hope of receiving a payday. |
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
2743
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 21:00:00 -
[369] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Atiim wrote:True Adamance wrote:Atiim wrote:@Monkey MAC
When disproving the SP argument, it should also be noted that even if the AVer spent less SP (which has been proven false), the SP the AVer spent may only be used if the team has called out a vehicle; as opposed to the Pilot's SP that can be used at any time.
(Albeit to a lesser extent due to maps such as Iron Delta). Well even that is debatable. You can call in AV anytime....but it is worthless. You can call in a tank, but meaningful combat is inside socket or building...........tank is worthless. Isn't that what I just said?  Well that argument has no value if it applies to both sides. Just as subjectives like if, should, and could have no real value either.....
To the contrary, even if 'meaningful' battles takes place inside a socket or a generally unreachable location by tank, you can still have an effective strength, since you can I effect set up a perimeter around said combat to reduce logistical support.
In short if your tank can't be involved directly in the main push it can still be used for high value secondary targets.
AV is only effective when the condition 'vehicle on field == true' as such the AV is by all intensive purposes useless without a target.
A tank can change target to maintain effectiveness, AV cannot.
This therin gives vehicle SP a higher net worth than AV specific SP.
Unless your a Computer Scientist don't tell me how Game Mechanics Work.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
|
Cardio Therapy
Tech Guard
RISE of LEGION
10
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 05:47:00 -
[370] - Quote
Why we always discuss that we need 2-4 mercs with AV weapons to distroy a tank driven by inly 1 person???
Why we don't discuss that a tank to be a danger and to survive should need at least 2 mercs supporting it???
rep tools have higher rep rate on vehicles. Did anyone have ever seen a logi to repair a tank???
why not a commando with RR or lasor to move with the tank in order to snipe and fast kill the AV mercs.
When we speak that we need 2-4 AV to destroy a tank we have to think the oposit - a tank to survive and to be a real danger needs at least 2 merks to support it. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |