DUST Search - Stop complaining about Aim Assist

Panther Alpha wrote:

Bethhy wrote:

Bones McGavins wrote:

i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that.

Im not saying lack of AA dust wasnt fun in its own tiny, niche way. But that game was dying, it was impossible to get most people to give it a chance because they couldnt hit people.
.

You are making stuff up now to sound correct. There wasn't one video or review or even mention that a player has made that said they aren't gonna play DUST because they can't "HIT" or Aim at anything.. that was one of the reasons people logged on everyday... to get "better" at aiming....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWpFIAkvC0

That is why people stop playing DUST since Uprising launch it all comes down to the terrible NPE.

When someone isn't aiming well and knows it's them... The last thing they blame is "The lack of Aim Assist on this console game" That idea and concept is hilarious... They work on improving their aim and it adds to the game play.

Is like playing football with a ball that Auto-aims to the goal all the time..Anyone that can hit the ball will become a Professional football player. Consoles is making Kids lazy..nothing wrong with some mental exercise to keep you brain muscles in top shape.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 655	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:08:00 - [31] - Quote Surt gods end wrote: Luna Angelo wrote: Speed tanking is negated with AA. Take it out and we'll see the return of Scouts that can actually survive if they are seen. I use AA because it's there. I don't need it, my gun game is good enough without it. There was a really good FPS on PS2, Black. No AA AT ALL and it was the best game on PS2, with few exceptions. AA is not required in FPS's, it's just that COD fans got so used to it that they suck without it. I play all sorts of games, adventure, action, action-adventure, RPG's and yes, even FPS's. AA was not in FPS's and were not a staple of them until COD introduced it. Take it out and this game will be what it was supposed to be. And one last thing: To those who say that it makes it fair to the slightly lesser skilled players, CCP has stated "PvP is inherently unbalanced". I love Black too, but if I remember it wasn't a multiplayer game. Only SP. So we can't say how it would have been without AA. KZ on the other hand I think it's a awesome game. and has no AA. Used Black because I knew the game, and yet, my point still stands. You still need to aim, regardless of whether it's SP or MP. And I forgot one thing: Everyone gets upset at: Brick tanking, Dual tanking, etc. Removing AA will cut back, without eliminating, these, as more people will Speed tank again. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 449	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:21:00 - [32] - Quote i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that. Scouts should be ewar and flanking, not "dance in front of you". You may have a fondness for those things, but they are BAD gameplay. Im not saying lack of AA dust wasnt fun in its own tiny, niche way. But that game was dying, it was impossible to get most people to give it a chance because they couldnt hit people. Hell, even I pretty much adjusted to never fighting anyone who knew I was there because theyd just dodge me while someone else got a better angle and killed me or them. I was decent at playing the game this way, but it was silly. If you insist on AA removal. Cool, we can all be elitist kings of our tiny little castle that nobody cares about because most people think the game is a terrible joke.
Bethhy Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 1081	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:25:00 - [33] - Quote Bones McGavins wrote: i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that. Scouts should be ewar and flanking, not "dance in front of you". You mean Cal Logi? not scout... unless chromosome? then definitely not... with chromosomes good aiming and hit detection.. he had to use a lot of LoS tricks and flanking... speed tanking isn't viable in a competitive aspect of DUST... ANYTHING can be made viable with situational awareness in a Public match... Sheesh look at the Plasma cannon in Pub's .... Can get scores higher then most people come to the forums bragging about... But take it to a PC or que synced FW? pfft.
Panther Alpha DarkWingsss 1191	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:33:00 - [34] - Quote Bethhy wrote: Bones McGavins wrote: i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that. Scouts should be ewar and flanking, not "dance in front of you". You mean Cal Logi? not scout... unless chromosome? then definitely not... with chromosomes good aiming and hit detection.. he had to use a lot of LoS tricks and flanking... speed tanking isn't viable in a competitive aspect of DUST... ANYTHING can be made viable with situational awareness in a Public match... Sheesh look at the Plasma cannon in Pub's .... Can get scores higher then most people come to the forums bragging about... But take it to a PC or que synced FW? pfft. Speed hacking to beat the aimbot ....now we only need a wallhack to beat the Speed hack and .. ohh wait....
Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 450	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:36:00 - [35] - Quote I think they were scouts before they were cal logi. I think cal logi only became the speed tanker FOTM at uprising? But yeah, im probably referring to uprising, cal logi speed tanking. Shotgunning in open fields, surrounded by reds. Running through groups of reds dropping RE. And if you think this is just in pubs, go watch some early PC vids. Youll see Team Player ringers versus Negative Feedback (so some of the best players in the game) and speed tankers just run through without getting touched. So, its not just "oh you people suck at aiming" stupid stuff that was laughable to most FPS players was happening at the highest levels.
Bethhy Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 1082	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:37:00 - [36] - Quote Bones McGavins wrote: i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that. Im not saying lack of AA dust wasnt fun in its own tiny, niche way. But that game was dying, it was impossible to get most people to give it a chance because they couldnt hit people. . You are making stuff up now to sound correct. There wasn't one video or review or even mention that a player has made that said they aren't gonna play DUST because they can't "HIT" or Aim at anything.. that was one of the reasons people logged on everyday... to get "better" at aiming.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWpFIAkvC0 That is why people stop playing DUST since Uprising launch it all comes down to the terrible NPE. When someone isn't aiming well and knows it's them... The last thing they blame is "The lack of Aim Assist on this console game" That idea and concept is hilarious... They work on improving their aim and it adds to the game play.
Fizzer94 L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 1920	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:42:00 - [37] - Quote OP, Dust was just fine before AA was introduced. You were just used to having AA, so not having it was foreign to you, and the game probably felt 'unresponsive' or 'clunky' to you. I had the same issue. You just have to learn how to not rely on aim assist, you will end up being a far better player if you do. Yours Truly, Reginald Fizzer94 Delafontaine III, Esquire MAG ~ Seryi Volk Executive Response
Syeven Reed RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS 293	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:50:00 - [38] - Quote Atiim wrote: If you need Aim Assist then please STFU and Get Good. [/thread] Don't you tank? Gÿé Syeven 514
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 659	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:51:00 - [39] - Quote You know, I like how everyone except the OP is saying that AA can go or be dialed back, and he is the ONLY one defending it. I use it, yes, but I wish I didn't have to use it to be competitive. Dust before AA was much more fun. It gave people an excuse to TRY to shoot at the proto people. And speed tanking MEANS not that you run AWAY quickly, it means that you can get under their gun and then circle around them so fast that they don't stand a chance, but if they see you, you die. High HP and Speed Tanking are not compatible, hence why the Matari have the lowest HP, to encourage speed tanking. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Panther Alpha DarkWingsss 1191	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:51:00 - [40] - Quote Bethhy wrote: Bones McGavins wrote: i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that. Im not saying lack of AA dust wasnt fun in its own tiny, niche way. But that game was dying, it was impossible to get most people to give it a chance because they couldnt hit people. . You are making stuff up now to sound correct. There wasn't one video or review or even mention that a player has made that said they aren't gonna play DUST because they can't "HIT" or Aim at anything.. that was one of the reasons people logged on everyday... to get "better" at aiming.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWpFIAkvC0 That is why people stop playing DUST since Uprising launch it all comes down to the terrible NPE. When someone isn't aiming well and knows it's them... The last thing they blame is "The lack of Aim Assist on this console game" That idea and concept is hilarious... They work on improving their aim and it adds to the game play. Is like playing football with a ball that Auto-aims to the goal all the time..Anyone that can hit the ball will become a Professional football player. Consoles is making Kids lazy..nothing wrong with some mental exercise to keep you brain muscles in top shape.

Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 661	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:56:00 - [41] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Bethhy wrote: Bones McGavins wrote: i currently speed "tank". i cant stand in front of guys and make them miss, but i can use the environment to keep them from having stable LOS and make them miss and get good flanks. The scouts of old were silly. You had folks like annie oakley running out in the open into a squad and just shotgunning everyone without dying. Thats dumb. That is a bad game that allows that. Im not saying lack of AA dust wasnt fun in its own tiny, niche way. But that game was dying, it was impossible to get most people to give it a chance because they couldnt hit people. . You are making stuff up now to sound correct. There wasn't one video or review or even mention that a player has made that said they aren't gonna play DUST because they can't "HIT" or Aim at anything.. that was one of the reasons people logged on everyday... to get "better" at aiming.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWpFIAkvC0 That is why people stop playing DUST since Uprising launch it all comes down to the terrible NPE. When someone isn't aiming well and knows it's them... The last thing they blame is "The lack of Aim Assist on this console game" That idea and concept is hilarious... They work on improving their aim and it adds to the game play. Is like playing football with a ball that Auto-aims to the goal all the time..Anyone that can hit the ball will become a Professional football player. Consoles is making Kids lazy..nothing wrong with some mental exercise to keep you brain muscles in top shape. If you're American, like myself, he means soccer, I'm almost 100% sure of it. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Henchmen21 Planet Express LLC 514	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:59:00 - [42] - Quote Marlin Kirby wrote: If you need AA to aim, you must have no coordination on your thumbs. Just because every console FPS has it doesn't mean news one should have it too. MAG didn't have a real aim-assist and it was great. Dumbasses couldn't shoot for their life and skilled players actually did good. In fact, if I had a PS4, I probably buy the new Killzone because of the lack of AA. Hows mag doing these days? Henchmen21: Infantry Gotyougood Ufkr: Vehicles
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 10595	Posted - 2014.02.05 16:59:00 - [43] - Quote If you're actually a skilled player, then you're still going to stomp an unskilled player using AA. This is just DUST, where people want to shove their opponent so far into the dirt that it actually forces an uninstall and sets their ps3 on fire. No on in this game wants a challenge. Videos / Fiction Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 451	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:01:00 - [44] - Quote Yes, im the only one posting, but notice the folks liking the OP? So its not exactly an unshared viewpoint. I adapted to lack of AA. I was fine. My k/d hasnt changed much since AA. A meh game is 2 for me and better games go double digits. I run by myself or with a buddy so we are typically on the ass end of proto stompings and still hold our own. Not amazing, but definitely solid. This was how it was prior to AA and how it is post AA. I run speed/stealth adv min assault and adv gallante scout. I aimed fine in chromosome, I aimed fine in uprising. I mean, no, I didnt, but compared to most players, I was ok. It was still a joke compared to most FPS games. Im not defending AA because I need it. Im defending it because the gameplay was a disaster before it. I was fine in that disasterous gameplay, cause I like the ideas DUST has. But dust (in a gameplay, not in balance) is in a much better place for me to show a buddy and have him enjoy himself now than it was prior to AA. Look at the uprising control complaints. Those ALL died when AA came in. Now people blame AA for other things and dumbing down the game, but nobody is complaining that the hit detection or controls blow.
Akdhar Saif Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative 216	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:03:00 - [45] - Quote The AA in games like COD are alot stronger than in Dust. Don't know what people are complaining about.
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 661	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:05:00 - [46] - Quote It's still a cheap way to make the tryhards feel better. I love this game, have for a year now, but AA is making it boring. If you want to know, I actually do better WITH AA than I did without it, but I still enjoyed it more when it wasn't here. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 451	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:06:00 - [47] - Quote Quote: If you're actually a skilled player, then you're still going to stomp an unskilled player using AA. This. AA doesnt magiclaly make a bad player kill a good one. It makes it so people arent emptying enitre clips at eachother standing in the open. Prior to AA my gallante scout could run into a group and murder everyone untouched. Prior to AA it was a legit tactic to not fire until the other player reloaded and then take them out uncontested while they reloaded. Prior to AA it was a legit tactic to just cook a nade 1on1 while dancing and then whip it at their feet. prior to AA it was a legit tactic to run through a blob of reds and drop RE. This has very little to do with me "gettin gud" as I was the one doing these things, not being the victim of them. It was just obvious that nobody could kill you (nobody, not even good players) with regular gun play in the time it took you to do these other "aim free" tactics.
Bethhy Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 1084	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:08:00 - [48] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: If you're actually a skilled player, then you're still going to stomp an unskilled player using AA. This is just DUST, where people want to shove their opponent so far into the dirt that it actually forces an uninstall and sets their ps3 on fire. No on in this game wants a challenge. If you think this is about unskilled players using AA.... lawls.... Let's just say your premise is right and every post in this thread is about unskilled FPS players killing all of us tooo much!!!(LAWLS) What would you think highly skilled players would do with such a tool? You would of been better trying to make the point you have tried to make relevant since 1.4 "remove AA when you remove M/KB" And then you talk about a challenge and how a computer program tracking people is better then someone physically using a peripheral. Your just full of self contradiction Fiend.
Sgt Buttscratch 1444	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:09:00 - [49] - Quote you can still drop REs, BPO scout suit MLT kitkat/PD, RE's. No-one ever notices me until I have placed 3 remotes in their little clumps, I suicide or get killed, then watch the screen as Kill+50 and equipment destroyed +5 rollllllllllllls down my screen I stick my weiner in two buns and and then give it the gas Sour cream from my spleen into Levi jeans
Panther Alpha DarkWingsss 1191	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:10:00 - [50] - Quote Bones McGavins wrote: Quote: If you're actually a skilled player, then you're still going to stomp an unskilled player using AA. This. AA doesnt magiclaly make a bad player kill a good one. It makes it so people arent emptying enitre clips at eachother standing in the open. Prior to AA my gallante scout could run into a group and murder everyone untouched. Prior to AA it was a legit tactic to not fire until the other player reloaded and then take them out uncontested while they reloaded. Prior to AA it was a legit tactic to just cook a nade 1on1 while dancing and then whip it at their feet. prior to AA it was a legit tactic to run through a blob of reds and drop RE. This has very little to do with me "gettin gud" as I was the one doing these things, not being the victim of them. It was just obvious that nobody could kill you (nobody, not even good players) with regular gun play in the time it took you to do these other "aim free" tactics. NO.. seriously no.. What AA does is that i can kill as much people as before when watching TV at the same time ..Before my PS3 broke i watched the full series of Stargate SG-1 as i was playing... No way i could do that in CS... CCP is making a game for lazy people.

Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 453	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:12:00 - [51] - Quote To opponents of AA, I honestly want you to go watch youtube videos of NF versus STB(team player ringers) and watch how ****** it is. These are the best players in the game, with the best gun game, and runnng through the enemy dropping RE is something that works. Note, im not saying they flanked and got them from behind undetected, they run straight at them, and through them, speed tanking the gunfire. Do you honestly think that was good gameplay? Please defend how even in the top levels, such a suicidal move could be successful? I get it, there is a wider gap between skilled and unskilled players without AA. But honestly, i think the bigger problem people have is... back when AA wasnt around, TTK was a ton higher. So the gap between proto and adv, or adv and std gear was a lot more meaningful. AA reduces tier advantage, and folks dont like that.
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 662	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:13:00 - [52] - Quote Bethhy and I don't usually agree, the fact that we do now is amusing. AA cheapens this game more so than, say, COD, where you get killed instantly. I hate COD for that reason. I play this because I actually stand a chance of living for ten seconds. I do better WITH AA than without it, but I did well enough without it to be feared and sent hate mail for using Shotty Scout (AKA "Easy Mode" though how it was that, IDK.) The fact is, I STOPPED being a Shotty Scout when Uprising dropped because it was nearly useless to be it because of the AA. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 453	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:15:00 - [53] - Quote Quote: No way i could do that in CS... CCP is making a game for lazy people. CS? PC gamer? Doesnt understand console FPS...noted. Everything I said was true. Your counter point had nothing to do with what I said. You ignored all the stupid things I could accomplish with AA off. And then brought up a PC shooter...from 20 years ago? Quote: you can still drop REs, BPO scout suit MLT kitkat/PD, RE's. No-one ever notices me until I have placed 3 remotes in their little clumps, I suicide or get killed, then watch the screen as Kill+50 and equipment destroyed +5 rollllllllllllls down my screen Yes, because you snuck up on them. The key here is "no-one ever notices me". Back before AA it didnt matter if they noticed you or not. You could run at them, by them, and drop REs on them, all while they shot at you.
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 662	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:16:00 - [54] - Quote Bones McGavins wrote: To opponents of AA, I honestly want you to go watch youtube videos of NF versus STB(team player ringers) and watch how ****** it is. These are the best players in the game, with the best gun game, and runnng through the enemy dropping RE is something that works. Note, im not saying they flanked and got them from behind undetected, they run straight at them, and through them, speed tanking the gunfire. Do you honestly think that was good gameplay? Please defend how even in the top levels, such a suicidal move could be successful? I get it, there is a wider gap between skilled and unskilled players without AA. But honestly, i think the bigger problem people have is... back when AA wasnt around, TTK was a ton higher. So the gap between proto and adv, or adv and std gear was a lot more meaningful. AA reduces tier advantage, and folks dont like that. "Folks don't like their crutch being removed" is basically your argument? Seriously? I use STD gear, did in Chromosome, and I LOVED killing Proto people with it. Proto heavies were particularly fun, as they sent me fan mail after EVERY kill. And I find it rich that someone defending AA is using THAT argument. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Bones McGavins TacoCat Industries 454	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:19:00 - [55] - Quote Its true though. It was a LOT harder for std gear to kill proto before AA. The TTK was a ton higher, so the extra ehp or dps or reps from proto gear had a much bigger role. Not saying thats the only reason people want AA off. But when people refer to how "great" it was before... I cant help but think that may be a cause.
Panther Alpha DarkWingsss 1193	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:22:00 - [56] - Quote Bones McGavins wrote: Quote: No way i could do that in CS... CCP is making a game for lazy people. CS? PC gamer? Doesnt understand console FPS...noted. Everything I said was true. Your counter point had nothing to do with what I said. You ignored all the stupid things I could accomplish with AA off. And then brought up a PC shooter...from 20 years ago? Quote: you can still drop REs, BPO scout suit MLT kitkat/PD, RE's. No-one ever notices me until I have placed 3 remotes in their little clumps, I suicide or get killed, then watch the screen as Kill+50 and equipment destroyed +5 rollllllllllllls down my screen Yes, because you snuck up on them. The key here is "no-one ever notices me". Back before AA it didnt matter if they noticed you or not. You could run at them, by them, and drop REs on them, all while they shot at you. And i don't think you understand gaming .. console or pc. What is the point of having a Controller if the game itself is doing half of the job for you ? You may just play an interactive movie where you just have to choice A or B, probably don't even need a controller for that.. just a couple of buttons in a stick.
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 662	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:23:00 - [57] - Quote Bones McGavins wrote: Its true though. It was a LOT harder for std gear to kill proto before AA. The TTK was a ton higher, so the extra ehp or dps or reps from proto gear had a much bigger role. Not saying thats the only reason people want AA off. But when people refer to how "great" it was before... I cant help but think that may be a cause. But it's PROTO. It SUPPOSED to be better, to go with the COST. High risk, high reward. Now it's better running STD gear than Proto for the cost efficiency (not that that's a bad thing, mind you) but in Chrome, when Proto meant something, how many Protos did you actually see? And no, I would still NOT use proto, as I think it's a coward's tactic. I use ADV or lesser ONLY. And kill the Protos who try too hard. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Marlin Kirby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 315	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:25:00 - [58] - Quote Henchmen21 wrote: Marlin Kirby wrote: If you need AA to shootersyou must have no coordination on your thumbs. Just because every console FPS has it doesn't mean news one should have it too. MAG didn't have a real aim-assist and it was great. Dumbasses couldn't shoot for their life and skilled players actually did good. In fact, if I had a PS4, I probably buy the new Killzone because of the lack of AA. Hows mag doing these days? As dead as a dead horse. I guess that's what happens to games that have a terrible ad campaign while being sandwiched between the releases of MW2 and BC2. Not to mention the false information reviewers gave and some poor decisions made in post-production by Zipper. None of which involved AA. Not that SONY wanted to cut all existing relations with the now nonexistent Zipper. SOCOM4 and SOCOM Con were shutdown on the same day. The not Logic Bomb! -->We need better comms!<--
Luna Angelo We Who Walk Alone 662	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:25:00 - [59] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Bones McGavins wrote: Quote: No way i could do that in CS... CCP is making a game for lazy people. CS? PC gamer? Doesnt understand console FPS...noted. Everything I said was true. Your counter point had nothing to do with what I said. You ignored all the stupid things I could accomplish with AA off. And then brought up a PC shooter...from 20 years ago? Quote: you can still drop REs, BPO scout suit MLT kitkat/PD, RE's. No-one ever notices me until I have placed 3 remotes in their little clumps, I suicide or get killed, then watch the screen as Kill+50 and equipment destroyed +5 rollllllllllllls down my screen Yes, because you snuck up on them. The key here is "no-one ever notices me". Back before AA it didnt matter if they noticed you or not. You could run at them, by them, and drop REs on them, all while they shot at you. And i don't think you understand gaming .. console or pc. What is the point of having a Controller if the game itself is doing half of the job for you ? You may just play an interactive movie where you just have to choice A or B, probably don't even need a controller for that.. just a couple of buttons in a stick. If you want a game where it does nearly everything for you, play Beyond: Two Souls. As much as I love that game, it holds your hand. This game is all about diversity, and yet, 1/4 of the tanking styles is useless. I don't need luck, I have ammo. Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. CEO of We Who Walk Alone
Dexter307 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar 844	Posted - 2014.02.05 17:26:00 - [60] - Quote Marlin Kirby wrote: If you need AA to aim, you must have no coordination on your thumbs. Just because every console FPS has it doesn't mean news one should have it too. MAG didn't have a real aim-assist and it was great. Dumbasses couldn't shoot for their life and skilled players actually did good. In fact, if I had a PS4, I probably buy the new Killzone because of the lack of AA. So you want EVEN MORE noobs to leave?



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page