Near as I can figure one guy got blown up one time to many so made a butt hurt thread, others told him he was tripping, and then the rest of the tankers were awoken from their slumber to QQ up a storm thats been going on for a few days

Av grenades provide equal capabilities of all level of swarms.
Seriously... 1 grenade v 6 missiles? swarms still lose?

ok.. swarm launcher across the map fired vs AV grenades at throwing distance... which user is at a greater risk?

the bigger the risk... the bigger the reward

I would agree with you if there were separate skill trees for each type of grenade, but being able to specc into all 3 grenade types at once with only one skill to get your maximum effectiveness with all 3 grenades isn't very fair when you have to specc into 5 skills to get maximum effectiveness with an AV weapon.

I feel that if they made it so there was at least 1 skill per grenade type it would be a little fairer, also I believe that giving grenades less damage and a skill that increases their damage output would even things out nicely. That way you actually have to put in work to make those grenades worth while.

I agree that AV nades are fine, I just think that they should require a bit of work, just like every other piece of high end gear, to be as effective as they are.

14 pages of crutch defending on why he should be able to solo tanks without any skill

Perhaps you need to find your own crutch with the 5,000 pc battles that was brought upon you yesterday...

Quit sticking up for bad tank tactics... smh

Yes because i will be such a force in PC battles

My basic tank and modules going against proto AV

Are you really so biased to claim that it should take more than one person to kill one person? It should take one AVer with STD to take out one Std tank. I'm not even saying in one shot or anything like that, I mean maybe all of one's ammo load to solo a tank. That's called balance. Reduce the prices of tanks if you have to, but until it requires more than one person to operate a tank, it should not take more than one person to blow it up. Stop trying to create a crutch for yourself.

you are wrong, a moron, and every idea you have is fundamentally flawed

Yeesh. The very title of the thread is the giveaway that there's a massive imbalance.

"Why my AV Grenades Dominate Tanks."

dom-+i-+nant
/-êd+ñm+Ön+Önt/
Adjective
Most important, powerful, or influential: "they are now in an even more dominant position in the market".
Noun
A dominant thing, in particular.
Synonyms
predominant - ruling - prevailing - commanding

Well, there's no one here who'll disagree with that definition. It's a good video, Hitman. You say bad tactics on the part of the driver is how you kill 60-70% of your tanks. Makes sense. The issue is that the tactics you use aren't a big departure for how you kill the remaining 30-40% of your targets. There are no good or bad drivers when two or three grenades are all it ever takes, no matter the fit.

So is your defense of vehicles in an as you put it, Infantry Dominated Game, it normally takes me 3-4 suits to blow up a vehicle if I am able to, while I probably lose another 4-5 dealing with the infantry between me and the vehicle, those enemies have no respect for a AV vs tank battle....didn't I read a while ago that all you tankers want to go toe to toe with each other, how is it that I need a tanker of my own to see that type of action on a regular basis, why because that is another myth perpetuated by your kind of poster saying that is the way it should be.

No comments about the rest of my post just an attack on my stated opinion, no comment about the infinite ammo, the ability to jump into and drive off said tank/ vehicle or in the case of the LAV's push it upgright after a crash that would normally total the vehicle with full health, I must not be using the lock-on right on the swarm launcher otherwise why are so many dropship pilots racing for the redline and the flight ceiling where my rockets seem to just disappear. Again no comments about where your teams logi's where with their repping of the tank. (it sounds a lot funnier if you picture stewie saying when his voice gets higher and faster)

You are the ones that keep mentioning COD, haven't touched one in years and I always preferred the classic. Nope I am Resistance, Grand Theft, MAG, Arm Core, yeah I played some COD but mainly for the single player and co-op aspects as I like to play with my friends.

So what is your alt, as I am seeing so many people here afraid to actually use their names, hrrmm I have been using this one at all times

the pattern is too obvious. tank drivers are just whining because they cant solo whole squads with their toy because they use their tanks as bulldozer instead of using it properly. tank is several times as fast as a dropsuit and they have range advantage but all the whiny tank drivers usually sit on top of the enemy squad and are not moving at all thinking they should not die. afterwards they cry because 10 AV grenades get tossed at them, who would guess that would happen, right?

also why should a tank be able to solo anything? as long as a tank does not require several people to be used properly a single AV guy should have atleast a decent chance of keeping a tank at bay and not allow him to move around freely which is currently the case.

this is not rocket science but simple common sense, as soon as you need more than one guy to keep a tank at bay it turns into a game where the team with more tanks win. if one tank requires atleast 2 players to have a single tank under control it would mean that the team with more tanks have numbers advantage in firepower on the ground because they need less dedicated AV and less AV on the team means more firepower on the frontline. this would sooner or later result in everyone sitting in tanks. if you want that go play world of tanks. disagreeing with this equals insulting your own intelligence, so please go on and amuse me.

and it is a fact that properly fit and driven tanks cannot be soloed by AV grenades and swarms. forge guns sitting on rooftop is a different story though.