| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2681. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
DS 10 wrote: hooc order wrote: ladwar wrote: hooc order wrote: "Get up high up where the LAVs can't get you" Says the guy standing in the middle of the road between the objective and the enemy spawn. Your voice says the LAVs need a n...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 03:01:00
|
2682. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
Matakage wrote: ladwar wrote: I think your wrong. I think I know what CCP is thinking. AV good vs HAV/dropships which are good vs LAVs. HAVs/DS are meant to rain in control over the LAVs and AV is meant to destroy HAVs/DS, not LAVs. good old...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 02:18:00
|
2683. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
hooc order wrote: "Get up high up where the LAVs can't get you" Says the guy standing in the middle of the road between the objective and the enemy spawn. Your voice says the LAVs need a nerf yet the very video you are talking over shows they...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 02:05:00
|
2684. armor tank > shield tank everytime!... come on ccp,, you fixed what wasn'... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
we need proto HAVs.. don't see them coming out to be to actually better then the standard ones with is the wrong way for CCP to it.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:53:00
|
2685. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
ever seen a map with HAVs on one team and there other full of LAVs? I haven't
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:43:00
|
2686. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
great.. till its on a console go away and adds nothing to thread.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:19:00
|
2687. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
5tgbnm wrote: Here is my fix, I actually made a vid explaining in detail the counter to the murdur taxi. http://youtu.be/9md61EpQ9sw?t=6m20s I will not play PS2 on laptop. so go away with your locking of post.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:17:00
|
2688. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
there is a counter, its just not being used because it doesn't have balance with its counter leaving LAVs wide open to do as they please. and AV nades are effect on HAVs, I dare you to prove me wrong.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:16:00
|
2689. murder taxi - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe843CakeMan wrote: Ludvig Enraga wrote: stlcarlos989 wrote: Lol all you murder taxi drivers are just putting yourselves closer and closer to getting the LAV mechanics changed. Look at the dropships in closed beta, when was the last t...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:12:00
|
2690. The solution for the "Murder Taxi" problem is simple: Think about its ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
balance HAVs so that more HAVs come back to that role and all of your LAVs will fade away back into balance.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:08:00
|
2691. The LAV Debacle and Possible Solutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think your wrong. I think I know what CCP is thinking. AV good vs HAV/dropships which are good vs LAVs. HAVs/DS are meant to rain in control over the LAVs and AV is meant to destroy HAVs/DS, not LAVs. good old rock/paper/scissors. with the lose ...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 01:05:00
|
2692. DUST 514 customer support team work for deceive customer - in General Discussions [original thread]
hm... so the mighty ground wins and that's normal mechanic in the game. seems fair now if only infantry had this problem too, then it would be fair.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.10 00:47:00
|
2693. CCP on vacation - in General Discussions [original thread]
hooc order wrote: XXfootnoteXX wrote: hooc order wrote: DarkMaximos wrote: This should interesting in the next weeks. *CCP employees come back to work on Monday 2 weeks from now. "So how many players did we lose?" "2000" ... *c...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 23:56:00
|
2694. How to easily make pub matches more competitive - in General Discussions [original thread]
this idea wouldn't change a thing
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 23:49:00
|
2695. two manned fighter - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I dunno maybe a 16 man heavy attack bomber with atleast 12 turrets 4 of which being large turrets sounds like a good idea for me, becuase who need to be on the ground anyways.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 21:01:00
|
2696. Sooo... When's the next 'major' update CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: omega 015 wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The Dust Team is multi faceted what one team does the other team is not an expert on. So those responsible for physics controls and balance are not responsible for orchestrati...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 19:32:00
|
2697. GM Stealing - in General Discussions [original thread]
hooc order wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: A GM took 20 mill from my personal wallet sent it to my corporation wallet then to a director in my corp who I know has CCP ties. I petitioned gonna go check it now hopefully they both get banned. They...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 19:21:00
|
2698. The truthss of lavs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
reason why there are more Charybdis is the lack of caldari HAVs...its not worth being outclassed completely and totally less usefull by another type of HAV.
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 10:43:00
|
2699. tanks and AV will never be balanced - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: I cannot beleive you are forcing me to defend IWS. The comment is being taken out of context. He was posting a hypothetical option, loosely stated at that. If the CPM had an official or grouped position on AV/Vehicle bala...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 08:56:00
|
2700. Stop forming 1-2 person squads you idiots. - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol p r o strikes again...
- by ladwar - at 2013.06.09 07:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |