| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
261. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
frankly vehicle balance is the best its been since the E3 build and frankly better, but thats becuase there are no hulls above STD, the big thing that would really make every thing work, would be a return of dumb fire swarm(with an AV nade ignitio...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 03:07:00
|
262. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You don't have any logic. You forced the changes on CCP. CCP answered, and once again, made tanks their own best counter. But that's not fair, because infantry is supposed to do everything, wit...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:58:00
|
263. [request] allow passengers to shoot from dropship - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like it! It should probably only be allowed while the doors are open and if opening is made controllable at any time by the pilot their would have to be a mobility or tank tradeoff.
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:49:00
|
264. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Dou...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:43:00
|
265. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Double standards much? Frankly its not my fault if eve...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:30:00
|
266. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
yea I tried to suggest an slight accuracy nerf to large turrets so they are just landing all their on a lav at optimal so they cant just **** infantry, but actually have to work for their infantry kills or use small turrets and passengers(small tu...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:21:00
|
267. Am I the only person struggling against Vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
vehicle will tilt the battle in you favor if you field them, but I've been in matches that were being dominated from the get go with tanks, and me and a corp mate drop in some unskilled MLT tanks and turn the fight around, good AV can do the same ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 01:33:00
|
268. Active scanners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: If you are complaining about the duvolle focused, please stop. It's a scout catcher, it is designed to catch scouts. Instead discuss the actual problems with scanners, the unparalleled data given at incredibly long ranges for ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 01:15:00
|
269. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: I think a huge nerf to range would help to solve all of the railgun problems. Maybe 350m at most would still keep it as a viable long range weapon without giving it the ability to control the whole battlefield from one location. ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 01:07:00
|
270. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Whats that redline sniping is OP??? say it isn't so!!!! the elevation isn't the issue tho rails could use a small elevation nerf, its people siting so far back that elevation is a non issue and counter attack is even less of an issue, once again w...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 01:00:00
|
271. In April will we ride M.T.A.C.s in Dust or will we have to do it in another game?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: upto 5 years if its in the 5 year plan.... upto 10 years if not. although i don't think they have any place in dust at all. where do they fit in role wise that is not already covered CQC vehicle killers and city combat ve...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:56:00
|
272. In April will we ride M.T.A.C.s in Dust or will we have to do it in another game?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
jenza aranda wrote: dont hold your breath for MTACs in dust... CLARIFY!!!!! they promised us MTACs, now I don't expect them for...........years???? decades??? but god damn it I want some damn MTACS!!!!
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:55:00
|
273. tankkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I for one welcome my new tank overlords, and enjoy the WP they so freely give, this is what the game should have been this was never an infantry only game.
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:48:00
|
274. Profile Dampeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
BuTtHuRtPEepZ wrote: Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: I have all skills related to hiding/detecting on 5. What pissing me off is that when your victim some how manage to notice you by luck, He knows that you are there, he may not see you on rad...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:46:00
|
275. Request: Mini deployable turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
in replication they had large and small turrets, it was actually really cool and i wish they would bring back the small turrets with the same time.
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:32:00
|
276. [Request] Regarding Plasmacannon - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fremder V1 wrote: Since it can be used against infantry as well as vehicles and installations, i think the Plasmacannon should be less efficient than weapons specialised for a specific role. That seems crucial to not overshadow and thus replace...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:29:00
|
277. I want a STD - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: (Specialised Tank Destroyer) Absolutely awful as AI weapon extremely potent AV. So pretty much the tank of a Lav and the gank better than a tank. 2/1 slot layout Shield variant 450 cpu 1100 pg Both variants would come...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:21:00
|
278. Blind fire for Swarm Launchers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ghermard-ol Dizeriois wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: We did have dumb-fire swarms back in the Replication build. This was in Closed Beta of course. But that got removed because apparently it made it all too easy for a suicide merc to just aim at ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:19:00
|
279. [REQUEST] The assault dropship has to be the last aerial vehicle with... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
nope fighters, less useful for anti personnel but the destroyer of dropships. Whats that ADS you wanna be a douche say hello to my fighter *****!!!
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 00:12:00
|
280. protostomping/new player experience - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
yea battle academy should stay an OPTION until players are making an average WP/match or crossed a certain number of matches above a WP threshold. this would also allow vets to stay in the academy as NPIs.
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.30 12:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |