| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Why is everyone crying about the redline? - in General Discussions [original thread]
1)it makes sniping a low-no risk to high reward game that is a detriment to the team the sniper is on. 2)it makes redline matches more painful for both sides. 3)it makes AFKing viable to the detriment of active players. I'm not for the strait rem...
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.13 00:13:00
|
162. So the range on large blasters..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
its actually fine, its the accuracy that's the problem in my opinion, and swarm should probobly be given a longer range then it.
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.12 12:04:00
|
163. What do you think of Heavies + LAVs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
outside of city's and points is the land of vehicles so if you go out their with out a vehicle and the world goes all mad max on you, that's on you.
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 03:57:00
|
164. Passive armor tank on tanks is totally OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Cat Merc wrote: You can get on a maddy 560HP/s. Assuming someone firing EVERY SINGLE SECOND NONSTOP, he would have to reload, and ALL the damage he did would go to waste. So basically, this maddy can eat up all the swar...
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 03:44:00
|
165. Dear Soma/Sica scrubs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Stop ruining the good name of those who stayed with tanks from 1.0-.1.7 You are no better than the Duvolle/Gallogi tryhards of 1.7 or the MD/Flaylock/Callogis of 1.4 or callogi/Tars of 1.0; you disgust me. I want you to...
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 01:38:00
|
166. remove wp from unclaimed turrerts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lonegnr wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: its never really been about the wp when dealing with installations, its about the strategic precautions because they don't want to die. Agree with you there, but also agree with OP simply because there...
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 01:19:00
|
167. CCP top ten New Year's resolutions - in General Discussions [original thread]
increasing the size of the dev team specifically the programers.
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 01:12:00
|
168. Swarm range - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have to spend some more time in drop ships, but swarm really do feal useless against ADS.
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 01:10:00
|
169. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: The current level of tank sustainability is, in my opinion, perfectly fine. You can now fit your tank to be a fragile, but powerful glass cannon or a highly defense-oriented mobile fortress ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 00:31:00
|
170. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: hgghyujh wrote: once again we need to remove WP and isk gain from actions taken in the red line. but no one wants to hear it. That would not help. The redline tanks would still stay in the redline for the match u...
- by hgghyujh - at 2014.01.01 00:28:00
|
171. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
oh please if you can't hit infantry with rail guns, you should stop tanking, I can't remember the last time I couldn't kill infantry in 3 shots with a ******* MLT rail.
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 07:06:00
|
172. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thurak1 wrote: hgghyujh wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You don't have any logic. You forced the changes on CCP. CCP answered, and once again, made tanks their own best counter. But that's not fair, because infan...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 06:43:00
|
173. 9 tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Cerberes wrote: Michael Arck wrote: And what am I supposed to be gathering from this? I know one thing for sure, I bet no one attempted to switch to AV anything. ohhh I was in the mcc cause I'm a self centered ******* and I s...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 03:53:00
|
174. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
frankly vehicle balance is the best its been since the E3 build and frankly better, but thats becuase there are no hulls above STD, the big thing that would really make every thing work, would be a return of dumb fire swarm(with an AV nade ignitio...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 03:07:00
|
175. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You don't have any logic. You forced the changes on CCP. CCP answered, and once again, made tanks their own best counter. But that's not fair, because infantry is supposed to do everything, wit...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:58:00
|
176. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Dou...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:43:00
|
177. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Double standards much? Frankly its not my fault if eve...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:30:00
|
178. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
yea I tried to suggest an slight accuracy nerf to large turrets so they are just landing all their on a lav at optimal so they cant just **** infantry, but actually have to work for their infantry kills or use small turrets and passengers(small tu...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 02:21:00
|
179. Am I the only person struggling against Vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
vehicle will tilt the battle in you favor if you field them, but I've been in matches that were being dominated from the get go with tanks, and me and a corp mate drop in some unskilled MLT tanks and turn the fight around, good AV can do the same ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 01:33:00
|
180. Active scanners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: If you are complaining about the duvolle focused, please stop. It's a scout catcher, it is designed to catch scouts. Instead discuss the actual problems with scanners, the unparalleled data given at incredibly long ranges for ...
- by hgghyujh - at 2013.12.31 01:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |