| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
621. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Jadd Hatchen wrote: Stop this... Stop saying that scouts main role in life is to be anti-vehicle... it takes taht role away from the heavies and the assaults and the logis who are supposed to be doing this stuff. Second no...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 20:53:00
|
622. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Bluntly this needs to happen. Equipment substitutions and lemming rushes via uplink replace real tactics and a need for thought in DUST. People claim tthat this limits tactical options but the current meta is you spam or y...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 20:45:00
|
623. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
korrah silain wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: korrah silain wrote: Mad Syringe wrote: Cross Atu wrote: Za'ki no system which binds its limits to the player rather than the active deployed dropsuit will be adequate in that no player bo...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 20:26:00
|
624. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
korrah silain wrote: Mad Syringe wrote: Cross Atu wrote: Za'ki no system which binds its limits to the player rather than the active deployed dropsuit will be adequate in that no player bound system will address 'dumbfire self logi' (...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 19:48:00
|
625. Gallente Logistics Role - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: I agree. although my only problem and question is. do you want me to be rewared/point ***** for using 4 creodron flux active scanners on my gk.o logi? personally I woulodnt mind like +5wp or even...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 19:29:00
|
626. Gallente Logistics Role - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: The Caldari Logistics' reward is crap though. You can resupply the entire team and only receive 160 WP, but I can repair only 1 person and get 2-500 WP. The super hive bubbles are siiiick tho, I love my CalLogi just for being a...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 19:27:00
|
627. Gallente Logistics Role - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: Unless you're in a squad, you will receive no points for scans, but help out the entire team regardless. Information is key to victory, but the Gallente Logistics simply isn't rewarded for his/her efforts. The Minmatar Logist...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 19:24:00
|
628. [Feedback] Equipment Signature Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Proximity Explosives: 0db Given how they already have an alarm which sounds before you get within their radius they shouldn't be visible on the TACNET. +1! lol
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 19:14:00
|
629. Sticky:[Feedback] HP Modules and Strafe Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You guys need to be fast, deservedly so. But not THAT fast, gamebreakingly so.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:57:00
|
630. Sticky:[Feedback] HP Modules and Strafe Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: Personally I don't like the idea of shields reducing movement, it doesn't seem to make sense. I agree they should have a penalty to reduce the effectiveness of shield stack...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:55:00
|
631. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So, have we hit the point in here where base range on mediums and heavies gets significantly buffed yet? Anybody who has actually run ewar knows prec without range is almost worthless and seeing a guy who moves @ 8m/s in the last 10 m for a second...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:33:00
|
632. [Idea] Fitting folders CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Signed, +1 Folders and expansion of available slots is waaaaaaaay overdue, I think I've liked these idea threads a 100x now.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:27:00
|
633. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: with the changes, seeing as the amount of prox mines dropped is limited could we perhaps have them magnetized in teh same way as AV nades with say a 5 or 10m seek range? it'd make them so much more usefull and mixed with...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:25:00
|
634. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: John Psi wrote: It's very simple - the equipment running from any suit should not live longer this suit. Suit die or refitted - equipment DOWN. So the...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:21:00
|
635. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lee corwood wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: So I guess once the gal logis have dropped their deployables they'll be swapping out for their quad scanner suit? scanner plus injector and rep tool with a back up nanohive in a pinch, but likely...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:19:00
|
636. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: lee corwood wrote: ONLY if that different suit has lower BW than the previous, at which point it would 'poof' the EQ that is OVER the new suits BW in the queue order it was laid. There is nothing to stop multiple playe...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:18:00
|
637. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: No system is perfect, everyone will have to make some kind of sacrifice in order to limit EQ spam. This way, IMO, impacts everyone except logi's far more than it does logi's. This topic has been the central poin...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 17:49:00
|
638. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Apothecary Za'ki wrote: most all logi cannot fit a mostly proto tank AND proto equipment and proto weapon.. Why do you need all three? Better question may be Why Don't We Deserve The Ability to Use All Three?
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 17:38:00
|
639. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
smh I really don't want to lend support to the lunatic fringe...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 16:34:00
|
640. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Syeven Reed wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Syeven Reed wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Because Cross' logi revamps are compatible with BW changes and BW can be adjusted up or down to allow logis greater play and flexibility without indirectly...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 16:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |