| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Doc DDD wrote: I made some fits with all skills maxed in proto fits that still goes over either cpu or pg, not sure if the 10% per level has been added to electrical and engineering yet, but dropping those at all would m...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.19 17:11:00
|
162. Minmatar Assault Discussion And Is Stamina Gain A Bit Overboard - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ROMULUS H3X wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: Atiim wrote: The greatest advantage it receives when compared to the other Assaults is 2.5x, as the Caldari and Gallente both recover stamina at 20/s while the Matari recovers stamina at 50/s. Giv...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.19 09:22:00
|
163. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
On a different note, i've noticed Armor reps have been nerfed a small amount to make up for native tank armor regen. However Armor dropships aren't getting this native regen yet, so it losing those reps is a negative side effect. Less so on the I...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.19 05:45:00
|
164. Minmatar Assault Discussion And Is Stamina Gain A Bit Overboard - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesta Opalus wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: I heard it is faster than the AM Scout with roughly twice the native HP. If that is true, then something is wrong with one or both of these suits. Amarr scout moves at 5.25/7.35, Min Assault moves ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.19 05:28:00
|
165. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: After conversing with a few folks I think the 10% per level fitting for engineering and electronics on the upgrades is far too generous, 1% Why do you think 1% is enough an 10% too much? Please show your work, very lit...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.19 05:13:00
|
166. Minmatar Assault Discussion And Is Stamina Gain A Bit Overboard - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesta Opalus wrote: I've been using the Minmatar assault alot lately and its pretty fun. Given that we are seeing minmatar assaults everywhere these days, does anyone think this suit is overpowered? My experience is that its fun to run in pub...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.18 20:47:00
|
167. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Sooo...does that mean you're buffing AV to handle tanks, effectively killing dropships, or leaving AV as is, effectively killing AV vs tanks? How about a comprimise? Introduce the new tanks, see how they perform vs AV an...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.18 14:43:00
|
168. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Oh I found out you can't interrupt shield boosters. they only get one pulse for the listed amount. if you take damage, it just eats part (or all) of that benefit entirely. so i...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.18 12:44:00
|
169. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Oh I found out you can't interrupt shield boosters. they only get one pulse for the listed amount. if you take damage, it just eats part (or all) of that benefit entirely. so instead of 5 pulses that result in say 1950 HP...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.18 12:30:00
|
170. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Doc DDD wrote: Thank you for the Eve lesson, but it really shows how different the games operate. Short of both games having 'shields and armor' we should really work on making what we have now fair ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.18 10:29:00
|
171. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Few things: 1) Can you bring up the profile on these tanks? Little weird that (base) Commandos can't pick up a tank on their passive scans. 2) What are ISK prices looking like f...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.18 09:40:00
|
172. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I am saying needs to be more in a thoughtful manner instead of screwing one entire race's of HAVs out of elevation. IE shift them to turrets so we can ideally balance them there. However this may not deem possible as ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 23:26:00
|
173. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Elevation on all HAVs needs to go. Needs to move to the turret base instead. Blasters should have the widest range until other rapid firing weapons make it in that are more suitable for AA work. Missiles and rails shou...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 21:53:00
|
174. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Please take into account my comments of PG and CPU mods. They will cost heftily in the opposite direction. Has it already been implemented? If so i couldn't tell, as soon as i ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 14:31:00
|
175. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
...And if i picked the Proto assualt will you say *i diddn't say ASSAULT FORGE GUN* Here is the regular proto Kalikiota Forge. 1862.66 PRF 5 Charge time 3 seconds. First hit shields gone, 622.66 armor damage Second hit 3 seconds later, Armor f...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 12:41:00
|
176. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: True Adamance wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: http://www.protofits.com/fittings/shared/136/11751 I don't like the trend this is going. Tanks seem to be trending toward repair fitti...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 11:38:00
|
177. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: True Adamance wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: http://www.protofits.com/fittings/shared/136/11751 I don't like the trend this is going. Tanks seem to be trending toward repair fitting where they need to be buffer fit. When ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 11:10:00
|
178. Large Railgun turrets need dispersion - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would ask, since the first shot, usually the kiler sniper blow, has zero dispersion how would adding it help infantry dodge rail turrets? the build up charge and zero splash gives infantry plenty of time to move. It would help against spammin s...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 10:49:00
|
179. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Please take into account my comments of PG and CPU mods. They will cost heftily in the opposite direction. Has it already been implemented? If so i couldn't tell, as soon as i got proto fits to work again i have made a ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 10:39:00
|
180. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: True Adamance wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: great work. I like limiting active harderners A preliminary concern is that the CV.0 now has limited fitting options compared to the GV.0 . As in the frist ...
- by Tesfa Alem - at 2015.02.17 10:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |