| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
861. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: I'm just going to point this section out as I think it sums up what you are trying to say. . . . An excellent analysis by a clearly experienced tanker. Those things should be known well while pla...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.07 17:18:00
|
862. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: If you reduce the large turret effectiveness against infantry then the only job remaining for tanks in PCs is to destroy ADS, and forge does a much better job at that. This so much. Making them purely AV focused is a B...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.07 02:21:00
|
863. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Leeroy Gannarsein wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: So, I might have fallen out of the loop here at some point but are Large Blasters meant to be anti infantry or anti vehicle? I'm just wondering because ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.06 18:50:00
|
864. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: I don't it'd be so stagnant if engaging tanks was a matter of deciding which range you were trying to engage at and then excelling at that range. Making missiles the most versatile, rails the longest range (and best at d...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.06 18:45:00
|
865. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: If I was to make an assertion rails should have the best DPS at range, but i'd make it so that at CQC rails were less effective at tank brawling so that in cqc blasters > missiles > rails in cqc and rails > missile...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.05 20:35:00
|
866. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: At least I tend to mostly get shield flare when using Large Blaster against infantry and generally I get a lot more infantry kills in a game when using Large Rail than Large Blaster, it's true the Large Blaster is easier, ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.05 20:29:00
|
867. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: So, I might have fallen out of the loop here at some point but are Large Blasters meant to be anti infantry or anti vehicle? I'm just wondering because the Large Railgun outperforms the Large Blaster at both roles. Large Ra...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.04 20:51:00
|
868. Sincere question to CCP Rattati about Large Blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: AV You really need to reconsider this.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.04 20:46:00
|
869. Sticky:Hotfix Delta - Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Hi all these are our Turret proposals: Remove all splash damage from Large Rail Turrets from 2m to 0m Remove all splash damage from Small Rail Turrets from 1m to 0m Reduce Small Rail Turret Fire Delay from 0.5 to 0.65, RO...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.04 19:33:00
|
870. What makes the Rail Rilfe OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: Temias Mercurial wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: My problem with it is it can't compete with the Scrambler Rifle or Combat Rifle. Can't compete -_-? With the hip fire it has, as long as your aim is steady, then you...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.09.02 18:47:00
|
871. Help save V vs AV!: Video inside - in General Discussions [original thread]
ratamaq doc wrote: There is a vote going on now in the feedback section by Ratti in a make shift pole post to remove Vehicles from Ambush OMS. This is my plea to save the game mode. Ambush is the only mode where pure V vs AV action can take p...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.30 18:06:00
|
872. Sticky:[Feedback] Ambush vs Ambush OMS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soulja Ghostface wrote: You do realize if they get removed you will have more people shooting at you with proto combat rifles Complains about blaster tank getting 30-0 Dosn't complain about combat rifle going 70-1 Going to point this out b...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.29 19:32:00
|
873. Sticky:[Feedback] Ambush vs Ambush OMS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: A) Ambush without Vehicles and Ambush OMS with Vehicles - This is the current setup You know, this is a pretty complicated issue. A few things nobody seems to mention is how the tank and turret interactions work n...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.28 18:25:00
|
874. Vehicles about to be banished from Ambush forever! - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know, this is a pretty complicated issue. A few things nobody seems to mention is how the tank and turret interactions work now. OMS provides infantry that choose not to AV a powerful outlet to counter tanks or ADS. But another thing to note: ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.28 18:21:00
|
875. Nova Knives are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: minmatar scouts are absolutly insane. this weekend has been an absolute stompfest with games like 52/5 44/6 41/3 43/4 38/4 with the hit detection finally working and that tiny b...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.25 20:16:00
|
876. How infantry want vehicles to be - in General Discussions [original thread]
I really think they should take more consideration for what the vet tankers have to say above all else, when it comes to tank on tank balance. But when considering tank and AV balance, they have to take consideration from both sides. The problem...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.25 20:10:00
|
877. How infantry want vehicles to be - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.25 19:59:00
|
878. Nova Knives are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: minmatar scouts are absolutly insane. this weekend has been an absolute stompfest with games like 52/5 44/6 41/3 43/4 38/4 with the hit detection finally working and that ti...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.25 19:54:00
|
879. Nova Knives are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: minmatar scouts are absolutly insane. this weekend has been an absolute stompfest with games like 52/5 44/6 41/3 43/4 38/4 with the hit detection finally working and that tiny bit of extra range this suit is absolutly de...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.25 19:53:00
|
880. smart deploy is actually Potato - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: It's always been Potato. Maybe CCP Rattati will fix it and it'll become Taco. Hmmm taco
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.08.25 17:53:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |