| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
LOL reload speed bonus.
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2015.01.14 15:33:00
|
2. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. I hope thats for the standard HAVs we have 2. All modules from chrome should be brough back, active armor reppers and nerf passive, constant passive shield regen needs to come back along with ...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.18 16:08:00
|
3. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: While the discussion is great, I think we way be getting a little carried away with deeper level ideas. Perhaps we should refocus on a couple core issues that need to be hammered out first. 1. Consi...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.18 16:03:00
|
4. A Comparison of Armor and Shield HAV Regeneration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: x3 rep maddy stands under ads fire and chuckles. Shields cant do that :( 350hp/s vs 164hp/s. Pretty clear who can get more regen using modules. Also armor reps without delay. Quit picking on shi...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.17 00:16:00
|
5. A Comparison of Armor and Shield HAV Regeneration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
x3 rep maddy stands under ads fire and chuckles. Shields cant do that :( 350hp/s vs 164hp/s. Pretty clear who can get more regen using modules. Also armor reps without delay. Quit picking on shields bro. After 28 seconds shield tanks lose thei...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.16 20:26:00
|
6. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: True Adamance wrote: CommanderBolt wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^there are problems with fitting small turrets. 1) they take away from fitting more tank 2) small turrets have always been kind of glitchy 3) people a...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.16 16:09:00
|
7. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Again, what role should HAV's fill on the battlefield? If it's just slaughtering infantry, we will never reach a point where both vehicle pilots and infantry are satisfied. if tanks cant sh*t on infantry then why have them i...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.16 16:04:00
|
8. Vehicle entrance/exit delay - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lol nu nu nu. I need my min mando + rail tank so I can kill anything even though im a skill less pilot 99% of what Derrith says is utter stupidity. But this post is that rare 1% where the sh*t he says actually makes sense.
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.10 22:50:00
|
9. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Hmm well consider this STD Heavy Armor Rep: 80HP/s ADV Heavy Armor Rep: 90HP/s PRO Heavy Armor Rep: 110HP/s so even at 85 shield regen per second that's very close to a built-in ADV Heavy Armor rep, and still allows that ...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.10 22:38:00
|
10. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: As I've said before, simply adding PG and CPU to the Madrugar wont do much to help it. They will still need to fit 1 Repper, 1 Plate, and 1 Hardener. Even if all of those are maxed to proto, the eHP simply wont stack up agai...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.10 18:16:00
|
11. Large Blaster Turret Proposition - Re-designation of Role - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Bump. Please God let Rattati actually read a Vehicles thread for once. lol Rattati butchers all vehicles. But who cares, pilots are but a tiny minority. interesting proposal though. I like
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.12.07 12:01:00
|
12. return logistic dropships - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What if the logi DS had no bonuses, just a built in mobile cru? .....and a cool paint job ofcorse if you don't need to use a slot for mobile cru, then that means you have more flexibility. Want more HP? No problem. Want a bit more mobility? Aft...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.11.04 09:34:00
|
13. On actually balancing ADS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lol funk in FA
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.09.14 00:38:00
|
14. Sticky:Hotfix Delta - Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: SponkSponkSponk wrote: I don't really see the need for losing the splash on the large blaster turret, but I'll deal with it. Large Blasters are back to their shenanigans after Charlie reverted Bravo LB nerf, it's too OP...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.09.04 16:32:00
|
15. Sticky:[Feedback] Ambush vs Ambush OMS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
there are only 3 modes never limit peoples options. Vehicle specialists should be able to do their thing in every game mode.
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.08.31 06:34:00
|
16. Sticky:Hotfix Charlie - Swarm Launchers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lol buff ADS as tanks fade to black (-.-)y--
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.07.28 07:23:00
|
17. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Until CCP gives a definitive statement about what the purpose of large blaster turrets are, I feel like I can't assert that LBT's need less dispersion (whether through a skill or some other way). I s...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.07.04 18:31:00
|
18. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
manboar thunder fist wrote: I still go 30+ with a neutron blaster madrugar and kill several gunnlogi and other madrugar in the process. These less skilled tankers just want an instakill OP weapon. Well guess what, the time of being a 1 man deat...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.07.02 16:27:00
|
19. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Blasters both small and large are terrible. I'm not even a full time tanker and I know this. AV has made quite a come back infantry wise so tanks are not as ridiculous killing machines as they used to be. My Min commando...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.07.01 18:01:00
|
20. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SteelDark Knight wrote: In the past there was a role that REQUIRED gunners to be effective. It was the DropShip pre-ADS and it was horrible. The ultimate goal of any DS pilot was to go 0/0. For many, many months this issue was bitterly complain...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 19:44:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |