I know..... I have been tanking for a very long time......

And I have in my mind a role for HAV since we currently don't have one. And it is what I has stated. However I think that an HAV pilot should be able to switch between control of a Large turret for AV fire, and a Light Turret for anti infantry fire (( basically finding reasons for HAV pilots to fill up turret slots and stop fitting HAV for pure tank)).

As in the tanker switches seats, or the tanker loses control of his main gun to fire a side gun while still driving the tank?

I still go 30+ with a neutron blaster madrugar and kill several gunnlogi and other madrugar in the process. These less skilled tankers just want an instakill OP weapon. Well guess what, the time of being a 1 man death machine is over. Learn 2 gunners. With my madrugar with missiles and 2 particle accelerators we get over 10,000 wp between us and kill around 60 ppl per match.

That name doesn't sound familiar at all either.

Learn your place on the food chain

Lmao have you ever even PCed bro?

D3lta blitzkrieg was a squad cup tourney winner

And has been kicking ass since Chrome days

But Shadow has like 4 alts he Switches between

He is also I.H. CEO

He hasn't played PC on shadow in a while because of recent tank changes

But he, as lead tank, is the one that won us those 30/40 districts we now own and through his training has made the few 0.H./ I.H. tankers some of the best in the game

Learn your place on the food chain

I still go 30+ with a neutron blaster madrugar and kill several gunnlogi and other madrugar in the process. These less skilled tankers just want an instakill OP weapon. Well guess what, the time of being a 1 man death machine is over. Learn 2 gunners. With my madrugar with missiles and 2 particle accelerators we get over 10,000 wp between us and kill around 60 ppl per match.

Lmao have you ever even PCed bro?

Until CCP gives a definitive statement about what the purpose of large blaster turrets are, I feel like I can't assert that LBT's need less dispersion (whether through a skill or some other way). I spoke with a couple other tanks and they agreed with your sentiment that a scout can outstrafe blasters. But like I said, if blasters are supposed to be ineffective against infantry, then thats significant. However I do believe blasters need to be anti infantry effective. I think personally tanks need to have a purpose beyond destroying the the extremely effective anti infantry ADS and killing enemy tanks/lav's.

I for one would not be opposed to tanks getting a major buff to DPS in exchange for them losing out on their ability to traverse the battlefield quickly.

I for one do not know why rails need splash damage, at all. I have been VERY frustrated at times hacking a point only to be hit 4 times by spalsh damage that only required the ral to hit the point lazily. Min/maxing they don't do enough DPS IMO. And the range nerf was 2 strong, I hear tanks seriously concerned about the viability of rail tanking as opposed to forging, mobility being the only advantage. I personally view rails to be snipers of sorts.

I've spoken with tank pilots they would prefer tanks required more skill required of them in order to obtain a greater advantage over easier to use fits. Specifically I spoke with a few that preferred when tankers were required to be responsible for a lot of diverse modules as opposed to hitting all the damage mods or hardeners and then recalling when they ran out.

Learn your place on the food chain

Can you please FFS leave your asinine pride in the WR, or at least out of the ******* feedback section?

What a douchebag comment.

He wasn't trying to be offensive or insulting.

You gone dun it now Zatara.

Defending the Publics and the FWers from PCers....... wins the vote (actually already prepared to vote for you)

What?! Really?? YAY! <3

And thank you!

*bows*

I feel like this got buried. I do not pretend to be a tanker, but I would like some feedback. <3

Less SP & ISK investment.

Tanks r useless and have no rule #truth.