| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
341. A Question to the Devs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gelhad Thremyr wrote: A buddy or mine was gold from high sources within AE that its mandatory un their corps but a secret tout others even within... I trust th+¬ source and why do nyan sans always hard tout kill ? I witnessed unexplained l'AG o...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 19:40:00
|
342. Perhaps limit a person to one tank a game. - in General Discussions [original thread]
N1ck Comeau wrote: Skihids wrote: How about balancing by adding rather than subtracting? Add play enhancing counters such as web stasis rather than leave tanks OP but limited to one each. tanks should never be easy to kill. Good pilots wi...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 19:37:00
|
343. [Suggestion] Medium Ground Vehicles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
"Smite" Amarr Mobile Weapons Platform (MWP) Slighly tougher (in EHP) than a LAV. One seat only, with a single large turret. Would be great if large beam laser turrets are introduced at the same time, but would be OK with the current turrets in t...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 11:57:00
|
344. [request] player balance interaction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yep, I like the idea of in-game ratings. +1 Also, how about... Rate your battle On the end-of-battle summary screen players rate the battle (1 to 5 stars) on how much they enjoyed it. This is primarily for CCP's benefit; they can see what batt...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 11:06:00
|
345. Sticky:[GUIDE] New Players Guide to DUST 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fantastic. CCP, can we get a reference to this in game somehow?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 10:46:00
|
346. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqil Aegivan wrote: R F Gyro wrote: All else being equal, HAV vs HAV would be 50/50, surely? Fair enough, I thought I'd join in the indirect point making fun.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:43:00
|
347. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Waaaait a second. So some of you are suggesting that essentially, a tank coming up against two AVers should basically be instagibbed? I would think that a 50/50 in 1v1 is about right, considering that it 's kind of im...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:42:00
|
348. Minimum range on rail turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Haven't thought this through, just chucking it out there... What would happen if rails had a minimum range, below which they won't fire at all. Something like 20 or 30 meters.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:40:00
|
349. Vehicle Recall has no reason to exist anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: ........ That doesn't even make sense. So you can't switch your fits, that's what you're telling me? You don't want vehicles to have the ability to be recalled, yet you're afraid of them being destroyed while being recalled?...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:31:00
|
350. TANKS 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: I edited your text slightly to make it more legible. Thanks, I was all set to ignore this thread. En Driago wrote: I just wanted my voice heard on this subject. Heard by who? Devs have already indicated they are ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:25:00
|
351. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqil Aegivan wrote: R F Gyro wrote: C'mon guys, try answering the question. Please? Can't. You omitted HAV vs HAV. While AV is less effective vs tanks than other tanks the game stays broken. Well, either that or CCP implements additional...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:19:00
|
352. Vehicle Recall has no reason to exist anymore. - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, don't take it away. I like the ability to call in a vehicle, use it while its adding value, then recall it and go back to infantry play. Just lock them so you can't exit within 5 seconds of taking damage or something.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:15:00
|
353. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
T'orq wrote: What I meant about 25/75 is AV wins 25% over infantry and infantry win 75% over AV * or should, depending if AV have a sidearm Yep, I figured that's what you meant.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:10:00
|
354. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: I think head on tanks should be able to kill just about anything. Also it depends on which weapon is used. A railgun tank should beat a dropship, but a blaster tank should lose against a missile dropship. So what shoul...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.18 00:09:00
|
355. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
C'mon guys, try answering the question. Please?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:59:00
|
356. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
P14GU3 wrote: T'orq wrote: 1. 50/50 2. 50/50 3. Dropship 4. 50/50 5. HAV 6. 25/75 So infantry almost always loses? So what do you think it should be then?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:56:00
|
357. Who should win, 1v1? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the following scenarios... 1. Dropship vs HAV 2. Dropship vs AV 3. Dropship vs Infantry 4. HAV vs AV 5. HAV vs Infantry 6. AV vs Infantry Assuming reasonably competent players on both sides. And by "who should win" I mean for the game to fee...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:44:00
|
358. New Amarrians of DUST sound Badass - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't give me gleaming gold. Give me reddy-brown with thick grey stripes. (that's rusty metal with duct tape holding it together, btw)
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:37:00
|
359. What's very very broken with tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Though I was surprised, I remembered you as being in my "not stupid" list I wonder how many pens you wore out making that list for this community.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:34:00
|
360. What's very very broken with tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: R F Gyro wrote: No, its a tank . Its supposed to murder infantry. But it's AV. It's supposed to demolish vehicles. My trolling was clearly a little too subtle, sorry Atiim.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.17 23:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |