| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
481. CCP Remnant confirms scouts will lose a sidearm but gain an equipment - in General Discussions [original thread]
You really should post the full thing as you are going to create an uproar Minjas are not getting a second equipment slot and are keeping their side arm unless more changes. edit: CCP Remnant wrote: Well, the thinking was to give the secon...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 15:13:00
|
482. Scouting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Proto is a jump but its not a miracle worker if your having trouble with militia or standard, if you are having trouble now, it is rather risky to just jump to proto and expect that to fix any problems. Needless to say domination is not a very sc...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 14:59:00
|
483. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
OZAROW wrote: Also our low slots need our red/greens an have no room for hack mods. This also poses a HUGE CONCERN WITH PROFILE. How can we be fast ninjas with a 40.5 db after maxing complex damp? THIS MEANS ONE COMPLEX PD GIVES YOU 30 db an ...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 14:28:00
|
484. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll adapt to anything at this point, the challenge is fun at any rate, so it looks like I might have to hang up my duel sidearm fits then, this pretty much nullifies any pistol usage due to low ammo (which is why you needed two), the smg and the ...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 14:13:00
|
485. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also since I didn't make it clear, especially with my inquiries, I can live with that bonus until future changes.
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 08:30:00
|
486. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
double post
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 08:01:00
|
487. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Asha Starwind wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: Actually I just thought of a utility of a precision raiser, (while small, its something I guess), pending on how strong it is, it would allow you to bring in a team of mediums up undetected agains...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 08:00:00
|
488. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually I just thought of a utility of a precision raiser, (while small, its something I guess), pending on how strong it is, it would allow you to bring in a team of mediums up undetected against passive scanning scouts.
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 07:49:00
|
489. To all scouts out there unsatisfied with the new bonuses... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Remnant wrote: So here's a question... would you like a Caldari Scout skill that actually increased the precision of anyone caught within the passive radius even if there was NO UI FEEDBACK telling you the adjusted scan precision/profile ...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.13 07:37:00
|
490. Commando Registry // Scouts only think they got it bad - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: We both suck. Also: You guys only have 2 pages. 2 down, 300+ to go Agree that we both suck, but right there is why we suck...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 23:35:00
|
491. Regarding scouts. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can entertain the thought, I've seen games that work like this at any rate (mechwarrior anyone?) I am assuming you are talking about squad vision only, So if scouts were the "active scanners" themselves would they receive the +25 for ally kill...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 23:07:00
|
492. CPM: Petition to CCP Regarding Cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeeJay One wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: Essentially all I am asking is that scouts no longer have a role/racial to the cloak, should cloaks be of limited utility Remember the slayer logi? You know, we still have them, even though logi ...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 20:32:00
|
493. CPM: Petition to CCP Regarding Cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
To reiterate for the anti cloak group, I never expected to shoot while cloaked, that was a shocked to me as well, but when your role and racial are literally tied to one equipment piece, it dam well better have defensive and offensive utility. No...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 18:08:00
|
494. Commando Registry // Scouts only think they got it bad - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: We both suck. Also: You guys only have 2 pages. 2 down, 300+ to go Agree that we both suck, but right there is why we suck more. At least the scouts have a following, Comma...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 10:14:00
|
495. scan precision modules - in General Discussions [original thread]
BLACKSTAR AND TSUBAKI wrote: so ive been away for awhile (not by choice mind you) and now that im back im wondering the communitys view on Scan Precison modules know after they did the new mapping it made them close to obsolete. so are they wor...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 06:03:00
|
496. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I gotta say, I'm getting burned out in Cal FW, I'm just jumping through the hoops at this point, only doing somewhere between 900-1500 wp per match, which is subpar from what is needed. Getting to level 6 is a pain
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.12 05:06:00
|
497. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Matticus Monk wrote: @ Shotty - I don't think I want to go on strike for two reasons: 1.) It robs CCP of data. As nervous as I am about them mis-interpreting data, I'm more nervous about them making decisions without it. I don't really...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.10 19:50:00
|
498. Assault Dropships and Ramming - in General Discussions [original thread]
ForgeGun Blap Blap wrote: Where is the realism crowd? I thought this makes sense that a large heavy armored vehicle might take less collision damage then a light weight framed ship protected by an explosion resistant energy shield. Actuall...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.10 18:14:00
|
499. Should the Combat Rifle and Rail Rifle get a hipfire accuracy reduction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would just lower the damage of the other 3, the ar should out dps in its optimal, and the rifles need to be toned downed anyways.
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.10 17:36:00
|
500. Summary of cloak debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
The summary of the cloak debate is this, Non Scouts: make the cloak of limited utility Scouts: Don't tie my racial and role bonus to cloaks then
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2014.01.10 17:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |