| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3081. red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
In public (High sec) redline tanking results in prescion strike and instant death.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 23:21:00
|
3082. Ok! so let me get this straight. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You see protostomping only occurs because of the kind of matchmaking that we have. Its a connection based matchmaker that pairs younwith people where you will get the best performance. Which is lovely, it works brilliantly, with exception to PC, ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 23:07:00
|
3083. How do we boost team play in Dust????? - in General Discussions [original thread]
We need a better Comms system with a hierarchical structure. Squads need to be able to have open chat, but squad leads also need to be able to PTT either with a commander or terrestial officer. This would increase current squads making them more ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 17:28:00
|
3084. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: That doesn't change the statement. Thats why, change everything about vehicles changes you vehicle respec. It's not their problem you put SP elsewhere. But something to consider, spkr said you co...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 17:23:00
|
3085. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: They're scared to death at the prospect of intelligent, unkillable tanks. The half respec is CCP's way of saying "there you go, yo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 13:26:00
|
3086. What we can agree on - in General Discussions [original thread]
Welcome to diversity my friend. There are over 5,000 people on dust, most on the forums. Someone somewhere will disagree with you, it's the law of averages. Anywho Merry Christmas!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 11:00:00
|
3087. Remove the 15% base damage for all weapons. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
10% but yeah, we don't need it now!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 09:40:00
|
3088. Request AV-Mines - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
dogmanpig wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Galvan Nized wrote: How sad is a weapon when people literally have no idea it exists? "What the hell is that damn beeping?" *BOOM* "Geez what caused that explosion 20m behind me I as drove through?" ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 09:39:00
|
3089. Disable dropsuits/weapons of other factions in FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No, we are mercenaries, we use whatever gear we need to get the job done. We aren't hired because of the gear we wear
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 09:37:00
|
3090. how about an infantry truce in 1.7 :-) - in General Discussions [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: I will fly my old AV dropship Militia Dropship 2 friends with AV grenades fly up to the ceiling fly over tank jump throw 9 Lai Dai Packed in an instant lol lololololol lol Imagine 7 people doing this . . . . . and then...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 09:35:00
|
3091. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Been a lot more responses than I expected. Let's expand the topic, should the heavy laser be AV or AI Why not both? Amen
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 09:10:00
|
3092. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes this really what infantry want, the main problem comes from the fact that we are tackling the issue from an infantry perspective, therin tankers can't see things from our view. Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: >>>What im saying is a t...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 09:08:00
|
3093. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Longer you charge it before unleashing the more damage it does to target, unfortunately you also take feedback damage proportional to charge time, put in a max charge time cap so that you're not guaranteed to fry yourself...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 07:27:00
|
3094. what do you guys think about adding friendly fire into the new soon to be fw? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think for the first few days, no penalties, why? Because it'll be hell on earth, fw, will be worse than 1.4 day one? Give everyone time to stop running infront of each other then add penalties. BUT NO RESTRICTIONS, AWOXING NEEDS TO STILL BE V...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 07:16:00
|
3095. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shokhann Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: If you LOLTank Brigadiers want to be the only viable counter to yourselves, then fine. But you can't be effective at killing infantry then. This isn't World Of Tanks...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 06:58:00
|
3096. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Atiim wrote: If you LOLTank Brigadiers want to be the only viable counter to yourselves, then fine. But you can't be effective at killing infantry then. This isn't World Of Tanks. And we aren't turning this into Tank 5...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 06:28:00
|
3097. Keeping up on 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Good Job plus 1
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 00:33:00
|
3098. ******CCP - Active Scanner Fix ****** - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ok I understand what your thinking, but the idea is the duvolle is a scout catcher, that's what it is meant to do. This doesn't make the scanners unbalanced, the way scanners work is unbalanced. 1) O...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 00:23:00
|
3099. CCP the scanner need to go - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok I understand what your thinking, but removing them isn't the solution, the way scanners work is unbalanced. Not thd premise behind them. 1) Once you scan, you can switch back to your light weapon This is problematic because there is no negati...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.02 00:16:00
|
3100. ******CCP - Active Scanner Fix ****** - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok I understand what your thinking, but the idea is the duvolle is a scout catcher, that's what it is meant to do. This doesn't make the scanners unbalanced, the way scanners work is unbalanced. 1) Once you scan, you can switch back to your ligh...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.01 23:53:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |