| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
841. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Texs Red wrote: DootDoot wrote: When a tank is out running a LAV.... A tank is to fast... As far as anything else its fine. Have you ever seen a modern tank? Those things are wicked fast. Everybody seems to think tanks should be the lumbe...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 14:57:00
|
842. Remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
DTOracle wrote: BUGSBUNNY LOONEY wrote: Do not use remote explosives on enemy tanks because it will kick you from FW once you get back to The Merc quarters it says you were kicked from battle because of friendly fire I took out 2 tanks...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 13:56:00
|
843. Solution to your problems CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
amen
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 13:40:00
|
844. what are swarms supposed to do? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Swarms = AV weapon AV = Anti vehicle I still see players kill vehicles with swarms Why cant you do the same? Easy watch a tank shooting at another tank till the tank you want to shoot is nearly down and deliver ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 13:24:00
|
845. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles . But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage t...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 13:09:00
|
846. CCP this is what i am talking about - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Senator Snipe wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKQhiD7UK-E This basically shows whats going on right now. And for all the people that disagree with me. Can **** themselves because this is just bullshit OP you...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 13:00:00
|
847. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles . But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage to kill tanks with the weapon that is left (RE's). ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 12:58:00
|
848. what are swarms supposed to do? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Seymor Krelborn wrote: they cant hit infantry, they cant even hit a neutral turret. all they can do is lock on vehicles and shoot them. so why do so many think swarms aren't meant to be the main anti vehicle wea...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 12:29:00
|
849. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Burntface man112 wrote: 15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corpo...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 12:21:00
|
850. AV still too strong - in General Discussions [original thread]
Your Absolut End wrote: Yeah why does the swarms even do damage? They should fire firework rockets exploding and sparkling all over your tank to celebrate your awesomeness, they should do exactly 1hp damage from the plastic tip of the rocket ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 12:11:00
|
851. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Burntface man112 wrote: 15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 12:05:00
|
852. 8 tanks in a battle fields.. one full squad of proto Avers... No tank died...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Atiim wrote: Patrick57 wrote: Maybe you should consider teamwork. I know you AVers are new to this, but trust me, you'll get the hang of it Soon(TM). Your one to talk. Tankers can't refuse to comprehend the defini...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 12:03:00
|
853. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: A simple question. I've heard the argument that a sica costs 57k isk and your proto suit costs 200k+, which isn't fair. Didn't tankers say the same thing when tanks were upwar...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 11:56:00
|
854. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: I never said, nor will I say, that it is balanced. It is just so funny to see AV players trying to use the same logic they discounted pre-1.7. We could argue about tthat endlessly as this is basicly truth for both si...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 10:59:00
|
855. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: RydogV wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more t...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 10:54:00
|
856. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: A simple question. I've heard the argument that a sica costs 57k isk and your proto suit costs 200k+, which isn't fair. Didn't tankers say the same thing when tanks were upwards of a million isk, and yall said that wasn...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 08:53:00
|
857. So i set out as AV infantry today - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: i have collected the burning husks of the following tanks 3 Railgun Gunnlogis 2 railgun Sicas 1 blaster Sica 6 blaster Somas 1 rail Soma 1 Blaster Madrugar thats 14 tanks in as many games my fit? i just added AV ganades...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 08:45:00
|
858. It has begun - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Wut? Wouldn't the RR's spool-up time make turbo functions useless on it? Yes, unless Assault. Still shouldn't matter for autos though, only semis with large RPM limits like the old Tac Rifles. E...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 08:41:00
|
859. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the pas...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.16 08:39:00
|
860. Tank Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Drifter MAGGOT wrote: How would you feel about tanks being changed to a two man team....meaning a driver and a gunner? IMO it would help out non tank users. If one side brings in 3 tanks that would mean 6 players aren't battling over objectives...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2013.12.15 12:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |