Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
steadyhand amarr
Scions of Athra
2097
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
1.7 has proven the last straw for a lot of vets so i would trolling and acknowledg that this has become a big deal breaker of an issue . Most vets agree the game is beyond saving at this point. The bleeding of players has not stopped numbers have not recoverd and the game is now in a deathsprile where only the hardcore holsouts will be left
"i dont care about you or your goals, just show me the dam isk"
winner of EU squad cup
GOGO power rangers
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1940
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:03:00 -
[32] - Quote
Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way.
So idiot players will not adapt is basically what you are saying because its too hard
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
470
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
AV nerf was a bit harsh in some places, more in buffing tanks and nerfing AV before knowing the true balance difference with just one variable changed.
But at least its better then the "Give everyone super aim" with Auto aim patch.. Lost a lot of actually good players to CCP taking the challenge out of aiming and with one patch eliminating the gun game everyone got addicted to in the game-play of DUST.
Sad thing is people want to turn it off but then they are at a disadvantage... So they are stuck turning it back on. |
Anmol Singh
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
541
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way.
never herd of your corp...
Sagaris lover!!!
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
354
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way. So idiot players will not adapt is basically what you are saying because its too hard
The same could be said about pre 1.7 tankers that quit because of AV right? Because those tanks that get cover from infantry where doing pretty well most of the time... |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1940
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:15:00 -
[36] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way. So idiot players will not adapt is basically what you are saying because its too hard The same could be said about pre 1.7 tankers that quit because of AV right? Because those tanks that get cover from infantry where doing pretty well most of the time...
Cover from infantry?
Only if i had all snipers to hit the FG on towers and swarms 350m away which i couldnt see because lolrendering
PC was just as bad, FG on towers and not just for the tanks either
Most of the tankers adapted to each nerf and kept with it, now the 1st change for AV in a long time and they are all walking away from it
|
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
982
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:18:00 -
[37] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:1.7 has proven the last straw for a lot of vets so i would trolling and acknowledg that this has become a big deal breaker of an issue . Most vets agree the game is beyond saving at this point. The bleeding of players has not stopped numbers have not recoverd and the game is now in a deathsprile where only the hardcore holsouts will be left Waiting for FFX HD in March then its time to sell my Black Friday PS3 and get a PS4 and get PS4 games.
Dust 514 loses another player for good then .
Wonder what the Dust 514 player counts will be in May??.......lol!!
Abandon Ship!, Abandon Ship!!
Jumps into escape pod!
Selected destination Planet PS4.
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
354
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:21:00 -
[38] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way. So idiot players will not adapt is basically what you are saying because its too hard The same could be said about pre 1.7 tankers that quit because of AV right? Because those tanks that get cover from infantry where doing pretty well most of the time... Cover from infantry? Only if i had all snipers to hit the FG on towers and swarms 350m away which i couldnt see because lolrendering PC was just as bad, FG on towers and not just for the tanks either Most of the tankers adapted to each nerf and kept with it, now the 1st change for AV in a long time and they are all walking away from it
Why not bring in snipers a good sniper easily can fight of a forge heavy and kill any swarm user that is sitting on a tower. Those on the ground could be dealt with assaults.
AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles. But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage to kill tanks with the weapon that is left (RE's).
|
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
4168
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:1.7 has proven the last straw for a lot of vets so i would trolling and acknowledg that this has become a big deal breaker of an issue . Most vets agree the game is beyond saving at this point. The bleeding of players has not stopped numbers have not recoverd and the game is now in a deathsprile where only the hardcore holsouts will be left it also got quite a few vehicle vets back, so you win some you lose some. however a simple hotfix and some av rebalancing will probably even vehicles out quickly enough. AV players are just massively over reacting, like usual.
Lv 4 forum warrior
Bringer of Bacon
Knight of AMV's
|
Horizen Kenpachi
Kenpachi's Castle
44
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Nazz'Dragg wrote:Burntface man112 wrote:Goodbye my luvers Are you from the west country too? Alright me cocker from cornwall
Hit me with your nerf bat.
|
|
Justicar Karnellia
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
241
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way. Wow Seriously wow You have 15 people in corp that only use AV? This is why we can't have nice things. Just hire 2 or 3 tankers. You could very easily replace that many silly AV with so few tanks. 1 tank could fulfill the job of 15 Avers easily.
And thats the problempeople like Spkr4theDead miss the overall picture and think this is ok.
Yep, I think everyone knows that he doesn't understand this fundamental flaw - yet he keeps posting everywhere.... |
Maciej Szambelan
Made in Poland...
11
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
The game has become all about how to kill a tank.. It might be fun for you guys with 20+ million sp. What should do new players like me? It shouldn't be all about killing tanks. And NO I won't give my isk to anybody!! |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1940
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:44:00 -
[43] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Burntface man112 wrote:15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play because AVs especially Swarms have become a lost in the massive amount of Tanks that litter the field. Goodbye my lovers, this the day AVs lost there way. So idiot players will not adapt is basically what you are saying because its too hard The same could be said about pre 1.7 tankers that quit because of AV right? Because those tanks that get cover from infantry where doing pretty well most of the time... Cover from infantry? Only if i had all snipers to hit the FG on towers and swarms 350m away which i couldnt see because lolrendering PC was just as bad, FG on towers and not just for the tanks either Most of the tankers adapted to each nerf and kept with it, now the 1st change for AV in a long time and they are all walking away from it Why not bring in snipers a good sniper easily can fight of a forge heavy and kill any swarm user that is sitting on a tower. Those on the ground could be dealt with assaults. AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles. But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage to kill tanks with the weapon that is left (RE's).
Whoever said that?
A tank is a hard counter to a tank imo
AV is an option for infantry who do not have a tank around, AV job is to deter the enemy vehicle at least, problem is AV wants to outright kill it because detering the enemy vehicle isnt enough these days
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
354
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:58:00 -
[44] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote: AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles. But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage to kill tanks with the weapon that is left (RE's).
Whoever said that? A tank is a hard counter to a tank imo AV is an option for infantry who do not have a tank around, AV job is to deter the enemy vehicle at least, problem is AV wants to outright kill it because detering the enemy vehicle isnt enough these days
AV Tanks (Rail and Missile to some degree) sure they are a hard cunter as well I have never denied this. But this change the matter that AV Weapons are hard counters to vehicles that why they are called ANTI Vehicle weapons...
SOOO what role do you think should AV weapons have, especially those that can't do any damage to infantry if not killing vehicles? How would you feel when your, tank that you fit especially to bring down other vehicles, that has little to no capability to fight anything else than vehicles would only barely damage said vehicles? |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
695
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
-1 for you missing the expertly timed Christmas movie reference.
(+100 for making the reference, best Christmas movie ever!)
Oh, right. AV was definitely OP, I have to admit it. Now it's UP, but only b/c tanks are too fast and there are too damn many of them. I also think there should be a harsh stacking penalty on the hardeners, any tanker who would dare claim that having the ability to have them going more or less constantly is not ez mode is full of sheit.
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Amarr victor!
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1940
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 13:04:00 -
[46] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote: AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles. But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage to kill tanks with the weapon that is left (RE's).
Whoever said that? A tank is a hard counter to a tank imo AV is an option for infantry who do not have a tank around, AV job is to deter the enemy vehicle at least, problem is AV wants to outright kill it because detering the enemy vehicle isnt enough these days AV Tanks (Rail and Missile to some degree) sure they are a hard cunter as well I have never denied this. But this change the matter that AV Weapons are hard counters to vehicles that why they are called ANTI Vehicle weapons... SOOO what role do you think should AV weapons have, especially those that can't do any damage to infantry if not killing vehicles? How would you feel when your, tank that you fit especially to bring down other vehicles, that has little to no capability to fight anything else than vehicles would only barely damage said vehicles?
Well for one i dont tent to attack tanks when they are shiny and 2 your straight lying now
All the current AV is easily capable of bringing down a vehicle, the problem with AV is the player behind the trigger generally being an idiot
Many AV players have stuck with AV and have brought down a fair few vehicles, if they can do it why cant the rest? |
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
354
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 13:09:00 -
[47] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote: AV is meant to be the hard counter to Vehicles. But even now with our weapons nerfed some tanker still complain that we adapted and manage to kill tanks with the weapon that is left (RE's).
Whoever said that? A tank is a hard counter to a tank imo AV is an option for infantry who do not have a tank around, AV job is to deter the enemy vehicle at least, problem is AV wants to outright kill it because detering the enemy vehicle isnt enough these days AV Tanks (Rail and Missile to some degree) sure they are a hard cunter as well I have never denied this. But this change the matter that AV Weapons are hard counters to vehicles that why they are called ANTI Vehicle weapons... SOOO what role do you think should AV weapons have, especially those that can't do any damage to infantry if not killing vehicles? How would you feel when your, tank that you fit especially to bring down other vehicles, that has little to no capability to fight anything else than vehicles would only barely damage said vehicles? Well for one i dont tent to attack tanks when they are shiny and 2 your straight lying now All the current AV is easily capable of bringing down a vehicle, the problem with AV is the player behind the trigger generally being an idiot Many AV players have stuck with AV and have brought down a fair few vehicles, if they can do it why cant the rest?
To be honest the only tanks I have seen burn where due to other tanks or RE's. Forges seem to do well so far but the forge is not a pure AV weapon it is a hybrid weapon I you want so.
And honestly IF a tanker dies to Swarms he must be terrible or completely ignoring the Swarm user or get hit by multiple AV sources with swarms delivering the final blow.
BTW what makes you think I shoot with swarms at a Tank with hardeners on? I barely use swarms anymore to be honest. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |