| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
281. Tank Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbh08 wrote: Void Echo wrote: no your not a tank driver, your an infantry player pretending to be a tank driver, tankers post actual facts and statistics, the infantry (you guys) are the ones that posting bullshit based on emotions ahahah...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.24 22:37:00
|
282. Vehicle Users Want CCP Blam! - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Is this another vehicle thread that's being ignored?
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.22 14:53:00
|
283. Vehicle Users Want CCP Blam! - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: We want him too... He's rather Elusive. Elusive isn't the word we should use. The lack of feedback is disgraceful. The entire vehicle community is getting increasingly agitated and frustrated the longer we're ignored....
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.21 04:00:00
|
284. Flaylock vs Dropship - in General Discussions [original thread]
So the Flaylock has enough mass that when it impacts a dropship it sends it tumbling over. The damage isn't enough to be a problem but the fact a pistol can flip a drop ship onto its side with a single shot...not even the massdriver does that.
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.21 03:26:00
|
285. Dropships - in General Discussions [original thread]
once you hit 0hp, caused by enemy fire, you can not recover. If you hit 0 from burning damage I think you can recover. They changed this. Repairing from 0hp used to make armor dropships unkillable. Since you'd kill them and they'd rep back up and...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.21 03:23:00
|
286. Driver Lock needed after removal of free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP has never responded to a vehicle thread no matter how good this idea is.
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.21 02:33:00
|
287. [Request] Dev Response on Vehicles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I've posted numerous times about vehicles, problems and fixes. Infantry players love to troll them since they have no idea what they're talking about. Never a CCP response. Tanks are so easy to kill, expensive and worth 150 points. Once a tank ro...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.21 02:29:00
|
288. The tank nerf... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP, as far as I know, has never responded to any tank posts. My guess is they'll keep making them worse until they take them out of the game. ...seriously demanding some answers here. Didn't they promise more community feedback after FanFest? ...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.21 02:23:00
|
289. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: A big problem is that shield-based options for infantry get a HUGE advantage with their base shield regen stats, but vehicles get nothing. Shield tanks have such pathetic base regen rate that it may as well not exist ...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.19 03:39:00
|
290. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Bigger question: where's Blam!? That should be it's own thread.
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.16 20:38:00
|
291. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldiersaint wrote: @ Kharga......aw man really? hey man if this is the case then i apologize. for some reason i did not realize that the bonus abilities worked like that. No problem, asking questions is how we get answers. [Edit:] Unless i...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.16 20:29:00
|
292. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mary Sedillo wrote: Kharga Lum wrote: Moren DeKaza wrote: Im talking about working with your team and strategically taking out cru's and supply depots. If you want to snipe use a rail and stop complaining about shield tanks not performi...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.11 19:37:00
|
293. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldiersaint wrote: Void Echo wrote: Kharga Lum wrote: Void Echo wrote: no, just no, then you would make all tanks useless if there the same as the enforcers Not the same as the enforces. Just the same as each other. Right now ALL s...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.11 19:25:00
|
294. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Moren DeKaza wrote: Im talking about working with your team and strategically taking out cru's and supply depots. If you want to snipe use a rail and stop complaining about shield tanks not performing to speck. You've had plenty of time to ga...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 23:02:00
|
295. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Moren DeKaza wrote: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX What everyone needs to remember before smearing the current tank builds is that there are 2 more races of vehicles that haven't even been introduced yet and from what i can tell y...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 22:43:00
|
296. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patoman Radiant wrote: A way to fix the imbalance is have a sheild regen is have it many fold higher for HAV's propotional to sheild hp. Making it a real factor in tanking, for a passive regen build, and not a afterthought joke like it is curre...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 22:40:00
|
297. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wako 75 wrote: Are you blind sir it has been this way for a very long time shield beats armor vs infantry and armor beats shield vs each other. I'm not blind, i know it's been this way for a long time. But at what point do you look at someth...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 22:38:00
|
298. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patoman Radiant wrote: If you manage to be good with a sheild tank, it means you are realy good at it because you are using a gimped tank, you have to use tatics I did when using millita tanks vs standard or maraduers like 1. not engaging a ...
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 22:35:00
|
299. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patoman Radiant wrote: Kharga Lum wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol he thinks enforcers are good Well this is exactly my point. No I don't think they're good but I couldn't have described the state of any shield tank more succinctly....
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 22:23:00
|
300. Tank "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol he thinks enforcers are good Well this is exactly my point. No I don't think they're good but I couldn't have described the state of any shield tank more succinctly.
- by Kharga Lum - at 2013.07.10 22:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |