Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 |
781. Tacnet Directional Arrow - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: The directional arrow is needed for Scouts who are trying to be Scouts (as opposed to Brick Tanked Scouts trying to be Logi or Assault) , because they need to know when the other guy is looking the other way so they can sneak ...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.20 18:47:00
|
782. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: It would be interesting if scouts had to rely on scans from logis in the same way heavies rely on logi reps. It might be impractical though due to the level or teamwork required. It's easier to be a logi, see a sentinal and ...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.20 17:40:00
|
783. CQC QQ neuters RR at Long Range - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't use the rail rifle, but this does makes me sad to hear.
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.20 17:00:00
|
784. Tacnet Directional Arrow - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would like to start a discussion about the tacnet directional arrow. It seems many people want it removed. I would like people to state why they think it should be removed and what doing so will hope to achieve. I've heard the buzzword "prefire...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.20 16:29:00
|
785. Sticky:[Feedback] HP Modules and Strafe Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Francois Sanchez wrote: Adding penalty to shield extenders and not to ferroscale plates isn't right as ferroscale give you more HP than equal tier exenders (that btw use much more CPU PG) Moreover that penalty to shield extenders doesn' t make ...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.20 16:24:00
|
786. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Honestly, just removing cloaks would help balance so much. I honestly don't think so. And I don't want that to happen. The BEST part about cloaking is that it allows their use...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.19 20:25:00
|
787. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: *facepalm* Wow, your total lack of insight just boggles the mind. A quote from an old TV show comes to mind: "My god you are so dumb it makes me tired" I am an Amarr logi. Please explain to me how your proposal helps ...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.19 17:36:00
|
788. [IDEA] Remote Explosive Balance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Remember I am not proposing a nerf to damage, just in how it is applied. If you can throw more remotes, at proxy strength, the damage dealt will be the same. The difference is it takes longer to set the trap, or drop the REs onto unsuspecting squa...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.19 17:28:00
|
789. [IDEA] Remote Explosive Balance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
sir RAVEN WING wrote: Alternate solution: Placer must walk to wall or surface (within 2m) and wait 0.2s to place Remote explosive. To counter the time to place the detonation delay is cut in half. Thoughts? This ruins it's use as AV, you c...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.19 17:23:00
|
790. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I can hear the Caldari Sentinel unified cries of terror all the way here in Offugen.
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.18 23:35:00
|
791. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Can we also make equipment hackable in the same update? Please ?? :3
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.18 23:27:00
|
792. Needle Changes Will Hurt the Game. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Please add the text: PUSH X TO CALL FOR HELP / LEFT-CLICK TO CALL FOR HELP right under clone termination timer. This solves the newberry issue nicely and actually matches many other FPS games in mechanics to help the player realize they...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.18 23:12:00
|
793. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Haerr wrote: Scan Table - New_EWAR - this is the full table Scan Table - New_EWAR_Slim - this is a slimmed down version that removes a lot of less interesting things and only cares about complex dampeners Provided you use google docs an...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.18 22:32:00
|
794. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't understand why you continue to believe bandwidth will nerf logis. It's going to nerf everyone else's use of equipment EXCEPT for logis and it's going to make logis KING of equipment FINALLY. Add to that they are also going to adjust and ...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.18 21:46:00
|
795. The problem you have with small blasters (and other turrets for ADS) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Whatever is done with the small blaster needs to be checked carefully. It has to become decent enough to slap onto an Incubus without being totally stupid on a LAV. Balance the Small Blaster to be very effective anti infantry on Tanks and LAVS, t...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.18 20:56:00
|
796. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Crazy idea: 1. Dampeners reduce your scan range. 2. Range amps reduce your precision. 3. Precision enhancers increase your Profile . eWAR solved for ever. fixed for better rock paper scissors
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.17 21:01:00
|
797. Fixing the ADSs [WARNING: Number Intensive] - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Kaeru Nayiri wrote: There are details about the assault dropship that have been bothering me more lately than before. I am going with the assumption that the Incubus was intended to have more staying power in an engage...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.17 20:35:00
|
798. Fixing the ADSs [WARNING: Number Intensive] - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There are details about the assault dropship that have been bothering me more lately than before. I am going with the assumption that the Incubus was intended to have more staying power in an engagement and that the Python was intended to have mo...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.17 20:18:00
|
799. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I am very glad to see this idea come to fruition, good work CCP and most of all Rattati. I know you probably want to bring down scan ranges across the board and see this as an opportunity to at least dumb down everyone's current max scan range by...
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.17 18:18:00
|
800. Home Station for Merc clones - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Love this ! Another good opportunity to make standing count.
- by Kaeru Nayiri - at 2014.11.14 19:55:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |