| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1881. Bask in the glory that is Mass Driver Spam - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wowski wrote: Goodbye Flaylock, hello massdriver. MD is a primary weapon, Flaylock is a sidearm so I'd say that's okay. Ofc I'm monitoring the power of MD with great interest...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 23:27:00
|
1882. CCP whats with the render distance? - in General Discussions [original thread]
...And invisible swarm missiles bug caused by short render distance... Only thing you can do then is to abuse the near-instant vehicle recall function. =PPP
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 23:19:00
|
1883. So, the active scanner... - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: first LAV's will push infantry to the side if hit with front bumper wich makes no sense and now this? WP for doing nothing? who is the person approving what to change and what not? because most decisions are plain *...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 23:15:00
|
1884. So, the active scanner... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Protected Void wrote: Also, in the spirit of reducing clutter: Fix the bug that keeps enemy nanohives and uplinks visible across the whole map. It gets so crowded on both the spawn-in map and the minimap/radar that it's really hard to see wha...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 22:59:00
|
1885. So, the active scanner... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Wolfman wrote: This seems like a good opportunity to tell you about some of the scanning related things weGÇÖre currently testing internally. What are we testing? Shared vision for squads disabled.
Team member chevrons only vis...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 21:57:00
|
1886. So, the active scanner... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes shared vision for squads and teams is disabled in our current internal build. Personally I've found it makes the game more exciting. So that would mean that anyone trying to be team commander on map is even mor...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 21:21:00
|
1887. New Laser Rifle Scope, coming soon - in General Discussions [original thread]
Looks nice! And futuristic enough for a lazor... =)
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 16:52:00
|
1888. 10 months since a simple feature was promised: abandoned by CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Old discussions on the forums ended on the opinion "sprint reloading is bad". On that basis it was the right thing to do not to add it. BTW, it still is a bad idea. Reason found on old threads.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.30 16:14:00
|
1889. Reason for respecs you can not argue against! - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Yes, once it gets to that point. But its not...so we still have the same argument being thrown back and forth. One side - "It helps the game by letting people choose what they want to have fun with" Othe...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.28 12:23:00
|
1890. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why isn't this nonsense in the war room as it's supposed to?
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.27 02:17:00
|
1891. Tournament rewards are simply not good enough. - in General Discussions [original thread]
King Kobrah wrote: . . . Oh yeah, it also says in the rules if you're caught teabagging anyone, you'll be disqualified? LOL, welcome to new eden, rite gias? Yeah, I thought teabagging as the same as this
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.27 01:59:00
|
1892. How tanky/powerful would a proto-tank have to be anyway? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Proto tanks should not be superior in all counts, especially on both kill power and survivability at the same time. CCPs has hinted that their intention is indeed to make proto tanks specialized in having superior capability on one thing and weak...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.25 10:41:00
|
1893. smexy gorillarape goes 377/1 with 18,890 WP. I smell boosting!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
This form of boosting/farming got momentum during the Mordu's trial event. For some reason some people felt they couldn't get their 100 kills - or decided to go triple and get rewards for alts as well. I can confirm that the pictures and scores ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.25 10:18:00
|
1894. smexy gorillarape goes 377/1 with 18,890 WP. I smell boosting!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote: Im guessing this is why we cant get rid of the SP cap, so lame. ^ THIS
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.25 09:54:00
|
1895. CPM: "If 1.4 doesn't go over well, CCP is in a tough spot" - CPM AMA - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: CCP's already in a tough spot. 1.4 might be CCP's last leg. The bell lap of the race. I honestly HOPE there's new content in 1.4 and not just fixes. People are grateful for the minor fixes, but the lack of content ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.25 01:56:00
|
1896. 1.3 patch notes are up - in General Discussions [original thread]
<3 the new montly update system. It gives Dust 514 a chance to live.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.24 09:28:00
|
1897. What exactly is wrong with "Flavors of the Month"? - in General Discussions [original thread]
What's wrong: - Everyone is running identical gear. There's no diversity on the battlefield - Anyone not abusing FOTM is hopelessly outgunned - even harder for younger players - Makes a game dull. Imagine some oldschool shooter with one basic rifle.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.22 11:02:00
|
1898. Sleek grenades - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sleek nades are rarely used and there's a reason for it. (Fluxes may be an exception) For things like nades (especially AV) damage is something that can't be sacrificed. SUGGESTION: Let Sleek Grenades have comparable damage to other nades. Make ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.22 10:59:00
|
1899. FW: I pretend it matters. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Queen of Uranus wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: We agree, we want FW to more visible, unique from instant battle and more rewarding for those invested in it. The answer to why it isn't like that now is we just havn't gotten to it yet. FoxFour ha...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.22 10:45:00
|
1900. FW: I pretend it matters. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBlade82 wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: We agree, we want FW to more visible, unique from instant battle and more rewarding for those invested in it. The answer to why it isn't like that now is we just havn't gotten to it yet. FoxFour has a ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2013.07.22 10:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |