Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Poplo Furuya
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
482
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:23:00 -
[61] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:To add context to that quote in the OP
The reson CCP will be in a tough spot, is because 1.4 is far from 1.3 in terms of what it will bring. 1.3 is what anyone would call 'minor fixes'. 1.4 on the other hand...
From what was pitched to us, 1.4 will be making pretty massive changes to major aspects of core gameplay. It might be a point release, but it is not going to be minor by any definition. We're still waiting for the word from the bigwigs at the time of this posts as to what exactly we can divule from the 1.4 plan we recieved today... But rest assured - When you hear it, you're going to share our cautious optimism that this is the first step in a serious, deep dive towards making dust not suck at it's core level.
If this update somehow fails, that is why CCP will be in trouble. I'm not saying that all of these features will be perfect, because we don't know the nitty-gritty yet and have no way to playtest it. However, at least in telling us what they changed and how they changed it... We're pretty much unanimous in our optimism for 1.4 being a massive step forward, and the first real proof that this new, high speed development strategies and leadership structure is paying off.
Oh, and sorry for interrupting your PC banter with srsbsns. Carry on, Gents! My main concern if it's a vehicle balance pass is that it might go off on the wrong foot. In which direction I couldn't say.
Neither Skirmish or Ambush provide a context where HAVs or Dropships flourish, where they possess a strong symbiotic relationship with infantry and a definitive role. These game modes do not integrate vehicles into the game. That is probably the most major issue holding the vehicle game back, scratch that, the entire game. Lack of focus, no central strategic objective to operate around.
Don't suppose I could request that you might forward a question to the people in CCP if you get the chance?
Namely, "do you think the current Skirmish actually works as a game mode?".
Would be interested in their thoughts on that. |
Killar-12
Intrepidus XI EoN.
320
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
I've thought about PC, us being mercs and such, but why was there PC in the first place, we are mercenaries why didn't CCP offer us a way to work for EVE players instead, we aren't land owners we are mercenaries. |
Eno Raef
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
47
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 23:31:00 -
[63] - Quote
I hope they make Faction Warfare relevant with 1.4. This would be an awesome mode for Skirmish 1.0 or similar game mode with one team defending and the other attacking and not this we're all attackers nonsense like skirmish 2.0 offers. The very first map Dust had with Skirmish 1.0 is still my favorite.
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3090
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:12:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Now PC is dead. False, like it or not, you're in a farmville alliance, nobody cares about the big alliances because they're full of mongs. The action is with the indie corps, don't like it? Do what SI seem to be doing, sell your districts to the smaller corps and let them flourish for a bit, when they're stronger come back and start a war, but seriously these big 15 corp alliances will do nobody any favours in the long run. Speaking from a viewpoint outside all the Corp bullshit.
lol Seraphim Iirrelevant
I find it really funny coming from the very corp that attack Dust University the first week of PC. Take your hypocritical bullshit elsewhere.
At least EoN didn't go out of its way to attack smaller corps to try and get more land. At least EoN has given / sold districts to smaller corps BEFORE you ever thought about doing it.
Now you're selling districts acting like you're doing the community a favor. EoN been doing this a lot longer than you have sir. Get off your wannabe high horse. Fact is your alliance was the most arrogant out there, and for what? Pressing X on as many districts as possible?
No wonder so many people blued up against you. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
292
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
I am tired of ppl asking for glitter. I don't want more guns or cars or even custom pain suits. I want a reason to want to keep playing - in a persistent world where actions are supposed to have consequences, I want a setting where what I do makes some difference. This was the grand promis of Dust. Look at what actually is happening. PC is dead. FW literally is meaningless to me. Killboards are are a joke, basically it's a proxy for who's the best cal logi farmer. And the game offers nothing else. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Auxiliaries
2134
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:32:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Now PC is dead. False, like it or not, you're in a farmville alliance, nobody cares about the big alliances because they're full of mongs. The action is with the indie corps, don't like it? Do what SI seem to be doing, sell your districts to the smaller corps and let them flourish for a bit, when they're stronger come back and start a war, but seriously these big 15 corp alliances will do nobody any favours in the long run. Speaking from a viewpoint outside all the Corp bullshit. lol Seraphim Iirrelevant I find it really funny coming from the very corp that attack Dust University the first week of PC. Take your hypocritical bullshit elsewhere. At least EoN didn't go out of its way to attack smaller corps to try and get more land. At least EoN has given / sold districts to smaller corps BEFORE you ever thought about doing it. Now you're selling districts acting like you're doing the community a favor. EoN been doing this a lot longer than you have sir. Get off your wannabe high horse. Fact is your alliance was the most arrogant out there, and for what? Pressing X on as many districts as possible? No wonder so many people blued up against you.
Lance m8, I usually find you amusing but I'm beginning to find you becoming more and more like a ******* mongoloid. All of our corps are nonfactors, who the **** cares if we hold some territory? You guys keep preaching "Hypocrite" and I sit here wondering how? Do I look like a director to you? Do you think I really care how much land my corp held or what they did to achieve it? I wanted to fight somewhat decent players, I found them, I got my ass handed too me as well as dishing out some severe damage. Unlike you Infantry scrubs, Tankers are good willed people, and aren't bothered by petty scrubs squabbles.
On DUST Uni, it was a tactical approach, you can bullshit me as much as you want, but you really think SI was the only one who was going to attack them? No, let them stay there and eventually they would've been taken by any number of corps, I can see that and I'm not even decent at strategy. iirc DUST Uni were being reallocated. In the beginning it was all out, everyone was pumped and this was going to be the start of epic battles, it wasn't.
*shrugs* I don't care who "started" doing it, I'm talking to you from a neutral standpoint, Corp bullshit should be in the war room, if you can't separate the game from discussing and making improvements it's sad.
I don't sit on a high horse, I just tell you what's going on, the indie corp leaders very happy that they're about to get into PC because they now have a district of their own, the enthusiasm that I lost about a month into it and maybe that we should be doing more of it, because right now you're the farmers of DUST, our alliance may be arrogant, it's hilarious to watch you guys get hyped up about it, and when you get hyped up, everybody wants to fight, it's great.
TL;DR give up Lance, forget the corp **** in GD, instead focus on what we can take out of this. Indie corps are having a lot more fun the these big ass alliances, I'm not a director, I'm a tanker who enjoys good fights, don't blame me for leadership decisions (You know, I was quite disappointed with the CRONOS alliance, I would've enjoyed fighting EU corps, Americans are bad in general ;) ) |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3927
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:33:00 -
[67] - Quote
Lightning xVx wrote:Baracka Flocka Flame wrote:Lightning xVx wrote:How does ANYONE think this game will prosper if its the same CORPs in the SAME alliances. There is NO reason to play what-so-ever. Where are the Merc's / Pirates groups? Where have all the districts gone? PC is dead because people who decide to be under the same TIT wont man up and do their own things. This game is about being A MERC, not a damn corporation. I don't see why people blame Corps / Alliances, im not just saying this cause im in one but we played the game we were given, there are no merc options, oh we can transfer money to each other? Cool so i can pay people to take land for me, which alliances do they take land so why pay someone? People need to stop looking at the players/corps/alliances as ruining this game and more at CCP for lack of content, lack of merc options and most of all driving players away with a game still in beta. This is not the players fault. This honestly is both the players and CCP's fault. Keep staying under the same alliance only to find out that you will all get bored one day because you have no purpose to fight or anything for that matter to contend on. Think about it.
1. EoN wasnt built for Molden Heath, neither was ROFL or any other of the big boy alliances. What happens in MH is of no concern, we were built with longterm goals in mind.
2. It is NOT the players fault that DUST is subpar atm and is LOSING players
3. Main problems with DUST is the subpar quality of the game and how it PUSHES new players away with a HORRIBLE grind. You need about 8M SP for PC and with a weekly cap in place there is NOT gonna be any new corps coming into the game
4. Ppl are gonna leave, regardless of if u put a magical cap on anything. Game is not fun atm, PS4 coming out as well with BETTER games to play. Also reason there is lack of competition atm is because the losers pull out PC/or got CCP'd early on by **** servers (mostly losers pullin out)
DUST will go into hibernation this holiday because its terrible for new players and vets will be moving to PS4 and with DUST incapable of attracting new players CCP is in a bad spot. DUST needs to be re-launched on PS4 within a year or 2. |
Mike Poole
Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State
361
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:38:00 -
[68] - Quote
If CCP is really planning major changes to core game play mechanics they're screwed before they even start. They can't even manage small changes to non core mechanics without screwing over large chunks of the playerbase. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3091
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:46:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Lance m8, I usually find you amusing but I'm beginning to find you becoming more and more like a ******* mongoloid. All of our corps are nonfactors, who the **** cares if we hold some territory? You guys keep preaching "Hypocrite" and I sit here wondering how? Do I look like a director to you? Do you think I really care how much land my corp held or what they did to achieve it? I wanted to fight somewhat decent players, I found them, I got my ass handed too me as well as dishing out some severe damage. Unlike you Infantry scrubs, Tankers are good willed people, and aren't bothered by petty scrubs squabbles.
On DUST Uni, it was a tactical approach, you can bullshit me as much as you want, but you really think SI was the only one who was going to attack them? No, let them stay there and eventually they would've been taken by any number of corps, I can see that and I'm not even decent at strategy. iirc DUST Uni were being reallocated. In the beginning it was all out, everyone was pumped and this was going to be the start of epic battles, it wasn't.
*shrugs* I don't care who "started" doing it, I'm talking to you from a neutral standpoint, Corp bullshit should be in the war room, if you can't separate the game from discussing and making improvements it's sad.
I don't sit on a high horse, I just tell you what's going on, the indie corp leaders very happy that they're about to get into PC because they now have a district of their own, the enthusiasm that I lost about a month into it and maybe that we should be doing more of it, because right now you're the farmers of DUST, our alliance may be arrogant, it's hilarious to watch you guys get hyped up about it, and when you get hyped up, everybody wants to fight, it's great.
TL;DR give up Lance, forget the corp **** in GD, instead focus on what we can take out of this. Indie corps are having a lot more fun the these big ass alliances, I'm not a director, I'm a tanker who enjoys good fights, don't blame me for leadership decisions (You know, I was quite disappointed with the CRONOS alliance, I would've enjoyed fighting EU corps, Americans are bad in general ;) )
My problem is you keep throwing jabs at EoN and saying we're the bad guys. "You ruined PC, and you're chasing away indie corps"
Basically is what you're inferring.
I'm no director either. I call it how i see it. Attacking DUST uni was a **** move. You know it, and I know it. Don't sugar coat it by saying "it was a tactical move". EoN gave Dust Uni a district or 2 in the end.
I laugh when you, of ALL PEOPLE IN PC, call us the farmers. Bro, you've been doing that from day 1 of PC. We've fought 2 wars to get where we're at.
You're blaming us for the very thing you did...irony at its finest.
Bottom line is, EoN is not stopping anyone from getting into PC. As you've seen Cubs has done allot of work on the front. Or you can choose to ignore the facts and point fingers.
Not our fault players left cuz the game got boring which led to less competition, which led to PC being how it is now. Point your fingers at CCP. |
DoomLead
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
140
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:47:00 -
[70] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:I am tired of ppl asking for glitter. I don't want more guns or cars or even custom pain suits. I want a reason to want to keep playing - in a persistent world where actions are supposed to have consequences, I want a setting where what I do makes some difference. This was the grand promis of Dust. Look at what actually is happening. PC is dead. FW literally is meaningless to me. Killboards are are a joke, basically it's a proxy for who's the best cal logi farmer. And the game offers nothing else. Most relevant post
|
|
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Auxiliaries
2135
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:47:00 -
[71] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Lance m8, I usually find you amusing but I'm beginning to find you becoming more and more like a ******* mongoloid. All of our corps are nonfactors, who the **** cares if we hold some territory? You guys keep preaching "Hypocrite" and I sit here wondering how? Do I look like a director to you? Do you think I really care how much land my corp held or what they did to achieve it? I wanted to fight somewhat decent players, I found them, I got my ass handed too me as well as dishing out some severe damage. Unlike you Infantry scrubs, Tankers are good willed people, and aren't bothered by petty scrubs squabbles.
On DUST Uni, it was a tactical approach, you can bullshit me as much as you want, but you really think SI was the only one who was going to attack them? No, let them stay there and eventually they would've been taken by any number of corps, I can see that and I'm not even decent at strategy. iirc DUST Uni were being reallocated. In the beginning it was all out, everyone was pumped and this was going to be the start of epic battles, it wasn't.
*shrugs* I don't care who "started" doing it, I'm talking to you from a neutral standpoint, Corp bullshit should be in the war room, if you can't separate the game from discussing and making improvements it's sad.
I don't sit on a high horse, I just tell you what's going on, the indie corp leaders very happy that they're about to get into PC because they now have a district of their own, the enthusiasm that I lost about a month into it and maybe that we should be doing more of it, because right now you're the farmers of DUST, our alliance may be arrogant, it's hilarious to watch you guys get hyped up about it, and when you get hyped up, everybody wants to fight, it's great.
TL;DR give up Lance, forget the corp **** in GD, instead focus on what we can take out of this. Indie corps are having a lot more fun the these big ass alliances, I'm not a director, I'm a tanker who enjoys good fights, don't blame me for leadership decisions (You know, I was quite disappointed with the CRONOS alliance, I would've enjoyed fighting EU corps, Americans are bad in general ;) ) My problem is you keep throwing jabs at EoN and saying we're the bad guys. "You ruined PC, and you're chasing away indie corps" Basically is what you're inferring. I'm no director either. I call it how i see it. Attacking DUST uni was a **** move. You know it, and I know it. Don't sugar coat it by saying "it was a tactical move". EoN gave Dust Uni a district or 2 in the end. I laugh when you, of ALL PEOPLE IN PC, call us the farmers. Bro, you've been doing that from day 1 of PC. We've fought 2 wars to get where we're at. You're blaming us for the very thing you did...irony at its finest. Bottom line is, EoN is not stopping anyone from getting into PC. As you've seen Cubs has done allot of work on the front. Or you can choose to ignore the facts and point fingers. Not our fault players left cuz the game got boring which led to less competition, which led to PC being how it is now. Point your fingers at CCP.
But seriously bro, get back to the wheat fields.
|
Cat Merc
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3553
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:52:00 -
[72] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Cat Merc wrote:I would prefer if the current content works well and is balanced before they add more stuff and complicate stuff. Let 1.4/1.5 be fixes, after that add content. too late... GTA 5, then PS4 is out by then. I don't know how adding a map, a new gun, a new suit, is a major deal to add. They can fix a million things but won't add something new? lol? Well, when they try to do it quickly stuff like the flaylock happens. Do you really want another flaylock? |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3091
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:53:00 -
[73] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Lance m8, I usually find you amusing but I'm beginning to find you becoming more and more like a ******* mongoloid. All of our corps are nonfactors, who the **** cares if we hold some territory? You guys keep preaching "Hypocrite" and I sit here wondering how? Do I look like a director to you? Do you think I really care how much land my corp held or what they did to achieve it? I wanted to fight somewhat decent players, I found them, I got my ass handed too me as well as dishing out some severe damage. Unlike you Infantry scrubs, Tankers are good willed people, and aren't bothered by petty scrubs squabbles.
On DUST Uni, it was a tactical approach, you can bullshit me as much as you want, but you really think SI was the only one who was going to attack them? No, let them stay there and eventually they would've been taken by any number of corps, I can see that and I'm not even decent at strategy. iirc DUST Uni were being reallocated. In the beginning it was all out, everyone was pumped and this was going to be the start of epic battles, it wasn't.
*shrugs* I don't care who "started" doing it, I'm talking to you from a neutral standpoint, Corp bullshit should be in the war room, if you can't separate the game from discussing and making improvements it's sad.
I don't sit on a high horse, I just tell you what's going on, the indie corp leaders very happy that they're about to get into PC because they now have a district of their own, the enthusiasm that I lost about a month into it and maybe that we should be doing more of it, because right now you're the farmers of DUST, our alliance may be arrogant, it's hilarious to watch you guys get hyped up about it, and when you get hyped up, everybody wants to fight, it's great.
TL;DR give up Lance, forget the corp **** in GD, instead focus on what we can take out of this. Indie corps are having a lot more fun the these big ass alliances, I'm not a director, I'm a tanker who enjoys good fights, don't blame me for leadership decisions (You know, I was quite disappointed with the CRONOS alliance, I would've enjoyed fighting EU corps, Americans are bad in general ;) ) My problem is you keep throwing jabs at EoN and saying we're the bad guys. "You ruined PC, and you're chasing away indie corps" Basically is what you're inferring. I'm no director either. I call it how i see it. Attacking DUST uni was a **** move. You know it, and I know it. Don't sugar coat it by saying "it was a tactical move". EoN gave Dust Uni a district or 2 in the end. I laugh when you, of ALL PEOPLE IN PC, call us the farmers. Bro, you've been doing that from day 1 of PC. We've fought 2 wars to get where we're at. You're blaming us for the very thing you did...irony at its finest. Bottom line is, EoN is not stopping anyone from getting into PC. As you've seen Cubs has done allot of work on the front. Or you can choose to ignore the facts and point fingers. Not our fault players left cuz the game got boring which led to less competition, which led to PC being how it is now. Point your fingers at CCP. But seriously bro, get back to the wheat fields.
resumes to troll a discussion when he has nothing relevant left to say
|
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
393
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:53:00 -
[74] - Quote
Adding content will be quickly ate up by those who want it. They will play hard for several days, quickly tiring themselves out. While I do understand the need for great content, its the "drug addict" type players who constantly want their fix that worries me. It's all or nothing with the community. There's no breaks-just all Dust or nothing.
I would like to see the core mechanics continually to be fine tuned. There's still much work in that department. Then I want to see more of the EVE/Dust connection happening. I would like to see that fully realized.
I can go for the PVE but I'm doing okay just playing with friends and having some good time.
Maybe CCP should allow players to have create their own games within matchmaking. That might hold off the hungry content players who seem to never be satisfied. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3091
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:57:00 -
[75] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Cat Merc wrote:I would prefer if the current content works well and is balanced before they add more stuff and complicate stuff. Let 1.4/1.5 be fixes, after that add content. too late... GTA 5, then PS4 is out by then. I don't know how adding a map, a new gun, a new suit, is a major deal to add. They can fix a million things but won't add something new? lol? Well, when they try to do it quickly stuff like the flaylock happens. Do you really want another flaylock?
as i told IWS, CCP has good ideas, but their common sense seems to be the problem. The bonus for some suits, the way some weapons work, the poor balance between shield and armor...
The Flaylock was OP since i first saw it. A couple people made threads about it, then what? They got told to HTFU and got trolled. In the end the FLP was OP after all huh... funny.
At least it didn't take them 2-3 months to nerf it when it finally became a stale joke. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Auxiliaries
2139
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 00:57:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Lance m8, I usually find you amusing but I'm beginning to find you becoming more and more like a ******* mongoloid. All of our corps are nonfactors, who the **** cares if we hold some territory? You guys keep preaching "Hypocrite" and I sit here wondering how? Do I look like a director to you? Do you think I really care how much land my corp held or what they did to achieve it? I wanted to fight somewhat decent players, I found them, I got my ass handed too me as well as dishing out some severe damage. Unlike you Infantry scrubs, Tankers are good willed people, and aren't bothered by petty scrubs squabbles.
On DUST Uni, it was a tactical approach, you can bullshit me as much as you want, but you really think SI was the only one who was going to attack them? No, let them stay there and eventually they would've been taken by any number of corps, I can see that and I'm not even decent at strategy. iirc DUST Uni were being reallocated. In the beginning it was all out, everyone was pumped and this was going to be the start of epic battles, it wasn't.
*shrugs* I don't care who "started" doing it, I'm talking to you from a neutral standpoint, Corp bullshit should be in the war room, if you can't separate the game from discussing and making improvements it's sad.
I don't sit on a high horse, I just tell you what's going on, the indie corp leaders very happy that they're about to get into PC because they now have a district of their own, the enthusiasm that I lost about a month into it and maybe that we should be doing more of it, because right now you're the farmers of DUST, our alliance may be arrogant, it's hilarious to watch you guys get hyped up about it, and when you get hyped up, everybody wants to fight, it's great.
TL;DR give up Lance, forget the corp **** in GD, instead focus on what we can take out of this. Indie corps are having a lot more fun the these big ass alliances, I'm not a director, I'm a tanker who enjoys good fights, don't blame me for leadership decisions (You know, I was quite disappointed with the CRONOS alliance, I would've enjoyed fighting EU corps, Americans are bad in general ;) ) My problem is you keep throwing jabs at EoN and saying we're the bad guys. "You ruined PC, and you're chasing away indie corps" Basically is what you're inferring. I'm no director either. I call it how i see it. Attacking DUST uni was a **** move. You know it, and I know it. Don't sugar coat it by saying "it was a tactical move". EoN gave Dust Uni a district or 2 in the end. I laugh when you, of ALL PEOPLE IN PC, call us the farmers. Bro, you've been doing that from day 1 of PC. We've fought 2 wars to get where we're at. You're blaming us for the very thing you did...irony at its finest. Bottom line is, EoN is not stopping anyone from getting into PC. As you've seen Cubs has done allot of work on the front. Or you can choose to ignore the facts and point fingers. Not our fault players left cuz the game got boring which led to less competition, which led to PC being how it is now. Point your fingers at CCP. But seriously bro, get back to the wheat fields. resumes to troll a discussion when he has nothing relevant left to say
Am sorry, I was going to type relevant things, but, I just don't want to type so much any more, is 2am.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens League of Infamy
275
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 01:54:00 -
[77] - Quote
I wonder how many here complaining about the slow trickle of new content are the same people who have been playing the same old repetitive CoD/Battlefield games for years. |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
604
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 01:56:00 -
[78] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:CCP's already in a tough spot.
1.4 might be CCP's last leg. The bell lap of the race.
I honestly HOPE there's new content in 1.4 and not just fixes. People are grateful for the minor fixes, but the lack of content and the lack of reason to play other than grinding SP is chasing people away.
Look I have all the stuff I need for my role and then some, so SP grinding means nothing anymore. I'm a competitive gamer and came here for PC and corp matches. Now PC is dead.
I have no new heavy suit to skill into, I have no new pistol I want to try. I have no new map to play on. I have no new game mode to tryout. I have no reason to play FW.
These are problems that existed for far too long.
Now this isn't just about a "doom and gloom" post. There were some decent points made by the CPM. I'm sure IWS will post all the Q&A.
But this quote is what grabbed my attention cuz if the CPM knows this, then CCP knows this. So I hope they realize adding new content will go a long way in keeping some players playing DUST.
Oh but the FIXES are the thing that's really giving hope for Dust. It doens't help to add more content onto broken base (unfixed unbalanced current game).
The fast update rate makes finally balancing and fixing attempts possible. |
Rogatien Merc
Red Star. EoN.
500
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 06:19:00 -
[79] - Quote
Lightning xVx wrote:Baracka Flocka Flame wrote:Lightning xVx wrote:How does ANYONE think this game will prosper if its the same CORPs in the SAME alliances. There is NO reason to play what-so-ever. Where are the Merc's / Pirates groups? Where have all the districts gone? PC is dead because people who decide to be under the same TIT wont man up and do their own things. This game is about being A MERC, not a damn corporation. I don't see why people blame Corps / Alliances, im not just saying this cause im in one but we played the game we were given, there are no merc options, oh we can transfer money to each other? Cool so i can pay people to take land for me, which alliances do they take land so why pay someone? People need to stop looking at the players/corps/alliances as ruining this game and more at CCP for lack of content, lack of merc options and most of all driving players away with a game still in beta. This is not the players fault. This honestly is both the players and CCP's fault. Keep staying under the same alliance only to find out that you will all get bored one day because you have no purpose to fight or anything for that matter to contend on. Think about it. No... it's CCP's fault. **** mechanics allow overwhelming and permanent domination and should be fixed. The view that 'everybody is in the same alliance' is quite misinformed. "Everybody" just happens to be the cover term for "That one alliance that kicked the other alliances ass" ... and those other alliances are still out there, licking their wounds. Not our fault they left PC. They quit. CCP needs to give them a reason to not quit. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3470
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 06:48:00 -
[80] - Quote
If skirmish 1.0 ever comes back, then I will be the happiest man alive. |
|
ReGnYuM
TeamPlayers EoN.
577
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 08:05:00 -
[81] - Quote
I love when PC beef gets dragged into random threads
Boyz. this is what a FPS forum is all about |
meri jin
Goonfeet Top Men.
203
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 08:06:00 -
[82] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:To add context to that quote in the OP
The reson CCP will be in a tough spot, is because 1.4 is far from 1.3 in terms of what it will bring. 1.3 is what anyone would call 'minor fixes'. 1.4 on the other hand...
From what was pitched to us, 1.4 will be making pretty massive changes to major aspects of core gameplay. It might be a point release, but it is not going to be minor by any definition. We're still waiting for the word from the bigwigs at the time of this posts as to what exactly we can divule from the 1.4 plan we recieved today... But rest assured - When you hear it, you're going to share our cautious optimism that this is the first step in a serious, deep dive towards making dust not suck at it's core level.
If this update somehow fails, that is why CCP will be in trouble. I'm not saying that all of these features will be perfect, because we don't know the nitty-gritty yet and have no way to playtest it. However, at least in telling us what they changed and how they changed it... We're pretty much unanimous in our optimism for 1.4 being a massive step forward, and the first real proof that this new, high speed development strategies and leadership structure is paying off.
Oh, and sorry for interrupting your PC banter with srsbsns. Carry on, Gents!
It's the waiting that kills me. |
Raz Warsaw
Capital Acquisitions LLC
11
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 08:41:00 -
[83] - Quote
The problem isn't the people working on DUST development, the problem is the lack of people working on it.
Current generation FPS's have TEAMS of people working on them, between 300+ where as DUST has about 30-50.
CCP does not have the man power to roll stuff out quick enough to keep an ADD FPS community, well, they do, but if eve devs were moved to work on dust, the eve community would have a nerd rage the likes of which we have never seen.
Eve players WANT this game to fail, they want it bad. This would return CCPs complete focus back to EVE
|
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
37
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 09:22:00 -
[84] - Quote
CCP is giving content little by little , they need to have a job.
If they hand out everything now , they wont have a job in Dust514 department.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
747
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 11:26:00 -
[85] - Quote
1.5 is the vehicle patch
Wolfman is the vehicle dev now
2months to make or break |
Shion Typhon
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
197
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 11:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
Go through this post and its replies, then go through just page 1 of General and page 1 of Feedback.
Then come to the realisation that there isn't going to be sufficient fixes and content for another 10-15 patches .... at least.
Just don't get your hopes up for some miracle rebirth over the next 1-3 patches. It just can't be done no matter how much you beg CCP. You are really honestly looking at 18 months to turn this ship around. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1642
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 11:50:00 -
[87] - Quote
Lightning xVx wrote:How does ANYONE think this game will prosper if its the same CORPs in the SAME alliances. There is NO reason to play what-so-ever. Where are the Merc's / Pirates groups? Where have all the districts gone? PC is dead because people who decide to be under the same TIT wont man up and do their own things. This game is about being A MERC, not a damn corporation. This game will die to due; No Competition, No Purpose in fighting and Nothing new added/ fixed. There should be a cap on how many corps can be in alliances 3-5 (depending on size). Bottom Line.
We are supposed to be mercs for Eve corps... |
CrotchGrab 360
187. League of Infamy
152
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 11:53:00 -
[88] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Lightning xVx wrote:QQ about EoN ruining PC Listen, if people didn't get bored, and left DUST / PC there would still be more corps playing which = more competition. I don't get your point about how alliances destroyed PC You're blaming us, for getting ready for a mechanic that CCP has in place??? Seriously??!!
really I think the problem lies in the fact that there aren't that many people playing this game.
the mechanic is set up for large-scale battles between large corporations. the ones at the top run things, they have competition and either get pushed out or dig themselves further in.
the problem is that there is no competition, no point in blaming anybody willing to compete.
if I was at the bottom of a mountain and 10 people were sat around a camp-fire QQ'ing saying im up the mountain I would just say "come at me bro". |
Brock Samson12
Planetary Response Organization
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 12:56:00 -
[89] - Quote
Quote: Its a load of **** that a lot of the balancing updates are being integrated into the client updates. A lot of things can be done in hotfixes server side especially values like weapon range, dmg, modules, base values on suits etc that we already have.
AImiing and hit detection may require client code fixes but the other stuff can be rolled out ahead of time. Look at the changes made to PC they were introduced ahead of 1.3. This is just CCP using every bit of deadlines and slowing down the process as a result.
There is quite a bit that can be done server side or at least that what they led people at FF to believe.
i was just saying regardless of how they release patches and hotfixes, they also need to put out at least a small update with some content. But monthly content updates would be nice even small ones.
|
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
573
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 13:13:00 -
[90] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:1.5 is the vehicle patch
Wolfman is the vehicle dev now
2months to make or break
Nope, that is going to take too long for me.
I was already concerned that not getting the vehicle balance pass done before GTA 5 would be bad because it would prevent a deeper playerbase from providing feedback.
Pushing it back another month isn't going to help, especially when it looks like 1.4 won't have suits, maps, or game modes. So unless they are pulling some sort of magic rabbit out of their asses, I don't see anything being done to reverse the dropping player count.
So the vehicle balance pass won't be any good because the vet tankers will leave after a little bit longer of magic swarms, and other AV that we can't see, and then the noob tankers with less than 5 million SP will still be complaining about getting instapopped by AV grenades, because the AR toting infantry will not leave a game wherein they can feel omnipotent any time armor shows up. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |