| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
641. Completely unfair to tankers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
To unlock Damage Control Units (A vehicle only module) I need Dropsuit armor upgrade, Dropsuit upgrades, Dropsuit core upgrades, dropsuit upgrades level 2, and dropsuit engineering. To unlock Shield Extenders (for vehicles) I need Dropsuit upgrad...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.05.06 21:05:00
|
642. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll say it one final time and maybe you people will see. After my small corp defends our 1 or 2 areas we control in PC, the best way to make money is it afk. There should be some freaking outlet for making ISK based on performance. I want to ea...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 21:35:00
|
643. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: That's complete BS. The correct order is 1. using proto without dying, and or being reaaly good with less expenive gear 2. doing relativly well in free gear 3. Proto gear without dying more than once, unless you're a heavy 4....
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 06:28:00
|
644. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqua-Regia wrote: poor as* try hard trying to be good at making isk. just go afk on the mcc LOL. This gentlemen. This is EXACTLY my friggin point.
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 06:22:00
|
645. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: In the game mode designed for new players to make tiny chunks of ISK to get some basic gear, I see absolutely no problem with this scenario. Sure, it can be used by the uber-lazy to afk farm trivial amounts of ISK, but the alt...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 06:18:00
|
646. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deluxe Edition wrote: no you don't make anywhere near as much... you get a max of around 150k isk on a very very long skirmish where I continuously use 'raven' type-1 assaults, with an 'exile' and a 'toxin' with all blue print milita modules ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 06:08:00
|
647. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: Not at all. Make ISK by using cheap gear to minimize the amount of money lose if you die. Win by using expensive gear to maximize your chances for victory. The gambling only comes in when you want to earn more ISK than you...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 05:46:00
|
648. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Sure, if you want to make 150,000 ISK, you can afk in high sec instant battles. You're playing for a tiny contract that is there so new players can make a little scratch to buy a couple of skill books before venturing forth in...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 05:42:00
|
649. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Reread the OP, this isn't the argument. The OP is arguing that dying more shouldn't COST more. No, he's arguing that his rewards should be proportionate to the effort/score/WP he put into it. I'm not certain on his exact ...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 05:25:00
|
650. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: You brought that tank to WIN, to SP farm, and/or maybe patch up your KDR, not to gain ISK. Exactly. I brought my best fit to WIN. To earn hardcore WP. I didn't die in it. I did fantastic. If I wanted to make MONEY I sh...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 05:07:00
|
651. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Again, this is basing all calculations off of pubstomping in high sec instant battles. If instant battles are where players who have access to proto gear are hanging out, this game is ****** before it gets started and your AFK...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 05:05:00
|
652. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: William HBonney wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: I don't know EXACTLY how well you're doing and how many times you're dying but I certainly agree rewards HEAVILY favor doing poorly in cheap suits. In my tank I can go 20-0 (i...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 04:58:00
|
653. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't know EXACTLY how well you're doing and how many times you're dying but I certainly agree rewards HEAVILY favor doing poorly in cheap suits. In my tank I can go 20-0 (in skirmish) with upwards of 1900 points and make 250k. In my Sever logi...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.28 04:36:00
|
654. Question for CCP about KB/M "unlimitations" - in General Discussions [original thread]
I personally feel the controllers should be buffed to match kb/m as far as tanks are concerned. If you drive backwards you can get full throttle while turning effect on the controller. Make it so we can do it while driving forwards too.
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.26 05:15:00
|
655. To people complaining about tanks being OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Darqwonders wrote: But what's the incentive to doing this? You're better off picking a sniper rifle and doing the same thing against enemies. You'll net yourself more points that way. In a team game t...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.25 01:05:00
|
656. To people complaining about tanks being OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darqwonders wrote: But what's the incentive to doing this? You're better off picking a sniper rifle and doing the same thing against enemies. You'll net yourself more points that way. In a team game that rewards the most for killing, there's a...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.25 00:08:00
|
657. To people complaining about tanks being OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Welp, congratulations on giving the finger to those four tanks and educating people on AV. One day people will stop whining, and one day tanks will be buffed. Also, tanks should be banned from ambush. ***** silly. Just throwing that out there.
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.24 21:45:00
|
658. To people complaining about tanks being OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
So, would you concede that you don't have very much SP invested in Anti-Vehicle specifically?
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.24 21:42:00
|
659. To people complaining about tanks being OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
CBR7 is the basic one I think?
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.24 21:36:00
|
660. To people complaining about tanks being OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Weaponry maxed out is something most infantry have just to be infantry. Proto assault also has nothing to do with you AV level or capability. The only thing you have specifically into "AV" is Swarm Launcher Op, which is only a couple hundred thou...
- by Eurydice Itzhak - at 2013.04.24 21:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |