| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
281. Lone Wolfs Stand Up - in General Discussions [original thread]
Solo. I don't have time to wait 10 mins after every match for an ******* to restock their supplies.
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.19 04:24:00
|
282. Sniper rifles need buff... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sniping in this game is as easy as it gets How about snipers get a damage buff when their bullets have a travel time and bullet drop.
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.19 04:14:00
|
283. So Ccp - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chibi Andy wrote: still wondering if the heavies will get more weapons for both anti-infantry and anti-armor. for example, the minmatar has the HMG for infantry but will they have another weapon for vehicles? same goes for each racial heavies...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 15:12:00
|
284. a tank change for ccp to considder - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Yes it can be done, in one single scenario. One that requires tanks to not equip a single plate or extender and the FG user to have max lvl prof and ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 15:01:00
|
285. a tank change for ccp to considder - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Yes it can be done, in one single scenario. One that requires tanks to not equip a single plate or extender and the FG user to have max lvl prof and 2 complex damage mods, and then ONLY on the weak...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 14:39:00
|
286. a tank change for ccp to considder - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Whut? So if i fit up to kill infantry i still only get 25 WP even tho i fitted it up to kill infantry and made myself...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 14:17:00
|
287. a tank change for ccp to considder - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Whut? So if i fit up to kill infantry i still only get 25 WP even tho i fitted it up to kill infantry and made myself weaker to vehicles? makes no sense Effort, i ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 13:25:00
|
288. Something wrong with orbitals - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yet take cover inside a null cannon and you'll survive every time. Classic CCP.
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 13:19:00
|
289. Whats FG range? - in General Discussions [original thread]
300
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.18 13:16:00
|
290. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: But if there is no passive ISK from the districts why would you lock them? If you are looking at 5 mil a lock but a match pays out 16 to 32 mil or more per mock battle then you could easily manage ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 21:34:00
|
291. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maximus Stryker wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Django Quik wrote: Can we please try to keep this discussion on topic - that is: Would you play PC if there were no passive isk? This is not about "what can be done to save PC1.0". This is not "wh...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 19:00:00
|
292. CCP drops into red, losing $21m in FY 2013 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Agrios Endendros wrote: P14GU3 wrote: Not sure if it works the same for CCP, but when most companies say they take a "loss," its not that they really lost any money. See companies project to make so much money for the year, say 50 million ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 18:54:00
|
293. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: Can we please try to keep this discussion on topic - that is: Would you play PC if there were no passive isk? This is not about "what can be done to save PC1.0". This is not "what should be done for PC2.0". This is not "wha...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 18:45:00
|
294. Delete Italian from in-game client - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nitrobeacon wrote: Sounds good, I played Japanese games without translation or clue to wth is going on b4. Got the hang of the game - Front Mission 5 - you likely have not heard of it. Yea, cause they never had English versions of Front Miss...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 14:09:00
|
295. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deluxe Edition wrote: If we remove passive isk from the game and increase clone biomass payouts from winning matches organizations such as DNS would be incentivized to just attack ourselves for profit. It would not only encourage district locki...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 03:41:00
|
296. proto swarms or proto forge? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Bethhy wrote: Forges have a bonus to shield damage. This is a year long myth that needs to be stamped out. Call in an LAV, grab a militia forge, and observe your 90% damage efficiency versus shields. The Forge is a...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.15 01:06:00
|
297. Why Does everyone hate on CCP... - in General Discussions [original thread]
saxonmish wrote: ...Dont you realise this is a free game? Yea theres bugs and glitches but maybe if eveyone stopped complaining about what is 'OP' or what is 'UP' and just play the game, Just leave them to it. It'll get Sorted. But all in all...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.14 23:25:00
|
298. swarm verses incubus an python - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apparently at some point in time CCP gave drop ships an innate resistance against swarms. Then completely forgot about it it seems. I believe judge has made video footage of this issue.
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.14 23:22:00
|
299. Driveby HMG sentinels - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: "It's a legitimate tactic" --Heavies since forever It's true though. Drive-by HMG is essentially zero risk all reward. Nah. We've more been saying "it's one of the two only tactics we have". I'll admit if I see a lon...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.14 21:22:00
|
300. I miss 1.6 HAV.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Harpyja wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: LittleCuteBunny wrote: The only thing I don't miss from 1.6 is shield tanks being quite UP against an armor tank But in return Shield tanks were very strong...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.14 20:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |