| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
21. Allow Corps to buy a permanent district for training and friendly... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Beep borp
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.06.05 15:57:00
|
22. Allow Corps to buy a permanent district for training and friendly... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bump?
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.06.05 12:19:00
|
23. Been using the ScR lately. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Vesta Opalus wrote: Talos Vagheitan wrote: Been rocking the Viziam on an ADV Amarr to try and get more familiar with it and the apparent balance issues. I've determined it's slightly ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.06.05 04:37:00
|
24. Allow Corps to buy a permanent district for training and friendly... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Matches. It should cost no isk to attack, have a max clone setting and pay no isk whatsoever. Maybe get to keep salvaged from killed enemies but that's it(and it's a maybe) The purpose would be to allow corps to have friendly battles with each o...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.06.05 03:56:00
|
25. New variety of repair tool - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I reject both your suggestions and point out that triage hives are a thing You can not jab a triage hive into someone's eye.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.05.31 03:07:00
|
26. New variety of repair tool - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I reject them and counter with my own patent pending tool, the self healing nanite injector. Inject into your thigh for a instant 100 armour repair or inject into a friendly for the same 100 armour(flat) Feeling ok? Don't have any friends? Injec...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.05.31 01:37:00
|
27. Rifle normalization. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't understand what what them scribbles and numbers a mean but I support em *Patooie*
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.05.30 21:04:00
|
28. Sticky:[Feedback] eHP and Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: I don't have math, but I do have logic. You're ignoring a huge factor when just balancing speed vs HP in regards to. If the assaults' HP is countered by the lack of speed, and vice versa for the logistics', then th...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.05.27 17:55:00
|
29. Sticky:[Feedback] eHP and Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rise of Logi xD
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.05.27 15:50:00
|
30. HMG Range buff - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alex-ZX wrote: I feel that the hmg Is almost useless right now after several nerfs. And don't get me wrong I know how to use it and get kills with it, the issue is that it overheats on big enemies making it like 1 or 2 kills and overheat. I us...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.05.08 01:53:00
|
31. What if the SL requires you to hold lock on target? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bump
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.17 19:00:00
|
32. What if the SL requires you to hold lock on target? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bump
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.15 13:17:00
|
33. What if the SL requires you to hold lock on target? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Slave of MORTE wrote: If they increased range if SL to at least 250 and brought back the aiming function i wouldn't mind Aim function? Do you mean so in can be used vs infantry?
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.14 21:01:00
|
34. What if the SL requires you to hold lock on target? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bunp
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.13 14:44:00
|
35. What if the SL requires you to hold lock on target? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: You would have to either give a big buff to projectile speed or to damage, since less volleys will be put into the air as they're tracking the vehicle. If that's the case, they would have to add the new lock on version so w...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.12 21:16:00
|
36. What if the SL requires you to hold lock on target? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
At least for dropships. I don't know if it would be a good idea for tanks/LAVs though. It probably need a slight range buff to air vehicles only though, maybe 25 meters. I don't know, I'm far too hung over today. Or at least maybe make a new SL v...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.12 15:45:00
|
37. 2 ideas to discourage dual tanking slightly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: you discourage dual tanking by incentivizing racial fitting meta. But how?
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.04.02 17:25:00
|
38. 2 ideas to discourage dual tanking slightly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bloop
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.03.27 16:30:00
|
39. Making new starter fits available to all players - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I wouldn't mind getting a some new fits to play around with.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.03.27 04:20:00
|
40. 2 ideas to discourage dual tanking slightly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Silver Strike44 wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Silver Strike44 wrote: I dont think its an awful idea, but I have a few questions. When you said scoots, did you mean scouts or what? By those reductions, did you mean a 20 percent reduction to the...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2015.03.25 13:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |