| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
4801. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Are not the commonly accepted "highly competitive" anti tank fits fully plated up Gunnlogi with multiple damage modules? Or is this the commonly accepted "best tank". All I know is that these are the commonly accepted P...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 21:47:00
|
4802. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
things with splash should never have been rapid fire. That's pretty much the long and short of it. the faster it shoots, the less it should be exploding and doing collateral damage at point of impact. Removing splash wasn't the answer, slowing do...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 21:44:00
|
4803. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I'm thinking if Rattati uses anything resembling my DPS values we're going to need to SEVERELY consider the following due to the damage slowdowns I am proposing: 1: Some splash returned to rails, re...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 21:35:00
|
4804. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm thinking if Rattati uses anything resembling my DPS values we're going to need to SEVERELY consider the following due to the damage slowdowns I am proposing: 1: Some splash returned to rails, representing a hybrid charge with a warhead load r...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 21:29:00
|
4805. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: I haven't dabbled in HAVs much (used to in closed beta when we had the Surya and what not but not since). Just my amateur feedback: Assuming that we're sticking with the whole 'Armor Blaster circles the Gunnlogi' bit, what ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 21:12:00
|
4806. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Update: Changed Nanofiber plates to polycrystalline plates, renamed the third tier of plates Rolled Tungsten. Re-adding nanofiber plates as the ferroscale analogs as soon as my brain is up to kit-bashing them. Unless anyone can think of a reason...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 20:58:00
|
4807. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rattati at least should appreciate the names I put on the minmatar dropships, if he makes the connection to what they are.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 20:08:00
|
4808. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: @ Breaking I occured to me that though we are dropping our fav fits for the current build we ought to go over beast mode fits from your spreadsheet. The same goes for True, pokey, thaddeus and the like. Anybod with proper ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 19:36:00
|
4809. [IDEA] Light and Heavy logistics to replace the current system. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
deezy dabest wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: I don't see how this is a better fix than just buffing the current logistics. Because then we are right back at slayer logis and everyone saying to nerf them. It is an unfortunate cycle that we have...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 17:57:00
|
4810. How would min sentinel be... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Honestly there wouldn't be much difference from what we have now. The minsent we have is nearly identical to the type-II heavy from closed beta. The minsent has it's nasty moments but realistically there's not enough difference in shield or armor ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 17:53:00
|
4811. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: The idea is then to bring out dropships and or enforcers (well in my dreams) that are high speed, low hp blaster tanks (against shields) that have the maneuverability to engage an...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 14:55:00
|
4812. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
LudiKure ninda wrote: Im just gonna leave this link here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KNSdD8PYgY I remember fights like this. That damn Surya. The Sagaris was evil the Surya was ridiculous. those red dots. not a single so...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 11:34:00
|
4813. HMG Balance Proposal - No Direct nerfs. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: Wait - you are saying that AA lowers dispersion? I don't understand. Why do you assert that? Aim assist isn't reticle magnetism, it's bullet magnetism. A higher percentage of your shots will hit the target within your disper...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 11:28:00
|
4814. How would min sentinel be... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kincats or cardiac regulators. the minmatar sentinel can literally be run as a heavier point assault suit with an HMG. You simply CANNOT soak the kind of punishment the other suits can. So don't bother trying.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 11:23:00
|
4815. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: The idea is then to bring out dropships and or enforcers (well in my dreams) that are high speed, low hp blaster tanks (against shields) that have the maneuverability to engage and circle the gunnlogi, or high speed, rapid re...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 11:18:00
|
4816. [ALL CALL] Dropship pilots - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm actually proposing 30% increase to fitting for STD dropships. 15% to militia.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.21 06:15:00
|
4817. [ALL CALL] Dropship pilots - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sir Snugglz wrote: In terms of modules, derpships should not be able to fit 120mm plates or anything considered heavy. While I cannot give exact numbers i hope this actually helps. Pg/cpu should be designed to where ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.20 21:17:00
|
4818. A reason to eliminate or alter "dead" skills - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
won't happen. CCP wants fitting to be tight in certain ways on each suit. Speed tanking past a certain point actually breaks hit detection, for instance.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.20 17:49:00
|
4819. Duna Corp pilot QQ's - in General Discussions [original thread]
I approve of this action and/or conspiracy
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.20 17:27:00
|
4820. A reason to eliminate or alter "dead" skills - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
knight guard fury wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: knight guard fury wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I think the basic frames should benefit from racial bonuses rather than a generic PG/CPU buff Trust me, the minmatar basic frame has the same...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.20 16:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |