| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2001. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. Missile turret is made for high alpha and the SL in uprising could hit 3k per volley from 6missiles 2. If the missile turret did any less then why pick that over the rail? the problem with the missile turret is th...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 17:43:00
|
2002. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Right now dodging swarms is more a matter of circumstance than intent
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 17:34:00
|
2003. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DDx77 wrote: As a tank hater I would not be against this but I would like either increased ammo supply or further reduced efficiency of the vehicles main blaster An increase in the distance you can get a lock might also balance lower dps ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 17:05:00
|
2004. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breach is not a viable AV weapon by itself. Heavy mods weren't rebuffed solely because of the HMG. Rattati mentioned that once. I should have clarified and said single shot alpha for rails. The burst DPS of the missile turret is beyond excessiv...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 17:01:00
|
2005. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Despite having ~400 more DPS, the engagement range is literally half of what the Forge Gun is. Given how CCP's weapon philosophy is [Range <-> DPS] this is balanced. It's not really working though. And it's alpha vs. dps. ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 16:26:00
|
2006. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is why I don't consider his input useful. He automatically assumes sinister motives regardless of evidence to the contrary. On that magical note I'm blocking his posts. If he makes a point worth looking at someone pipe up an I'll add it to t...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 15:50:00
|
2007. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Your way means vehicles can kill infantry but not the reverse. This is not balance. Nor is it fun. I am not wrong because infantry and AV exist together in a combined arms shooter. Your assertion only works if there are no infantry to be casua...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 15:20:00
|
2008. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shamarskii Simon wrote: The PLC's charge time + reload speed determines the ROF, 0.375 is the charge time at proto ( 0.5 x (1-25%) = 0.375) Check my sig. I have all the PLC numbers loaded.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 15:01:00
|
2009. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: ^I'm not an avid PLC user I just squad with the guy who came in 3rd for PLC kills during officer event. I don't think having 'dps' similar to or potentially even higher than an AFG would be 'broken' due to the skill requi...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 15:00:00
|
2010. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As far as the PLC goes: How badly will it break if we buff it via reload/charge rather than damage? I got the PLC numbers close to AFG efficiency in my other proposal. Will this break it? My gut says no due to the AFG also being direct fire s...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 14:30:00
|
2011. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thank you. Like I said. This is an information gathering thread not a complaint thread. READ. If your input has been covered already In another post repeating it over and over will not help.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 14:16:00
|
2012. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer grow up and quit trying to derail ythreads. You saying this thread is useless Isn't useful feedback. Rattati said to go ahead and pull the AV data together which I am doing. I really have zero interest in your opinion on the matter. If y...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 14:11:00
|
2013. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyzad4 wrote: I can't really add too much numbers wise, but one thing I would like to see is some tweaks to movement penalties correlated to added magnification on FG. BFG, high damage with terrible charge and you're locked in place so much hig...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 13:42:00
|
2014. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Lazer your input is neither wanted or needed unless you have something useful to add. Stop trying to push me out of the process. I'm not going anywhere. 1. You always sort out vehicles and there...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 13:41:00
|
2015. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer your input is neither wanted or needed unless you have something useful to add. Stop trying to push me out of the process. I'm not going anywhere.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 12:48:00
|
2016. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
shaman oga wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I like my spreadsheet but you literally cannot use the HAVS without also sharply boosting AV capacity. The AV values there were from when in chrome a solid AV gunner could put those listed HAVs, includi...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 12:46:00
|
2017. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Let me clarify something: This thread is DIRECTLY related to Rattati's bring back the HAVs initiative. It is not a gripe thread. It is not a general complaint thread. It is not in relation to anything but the HAV thread. A statement that "sw...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 12:12:00
|
2018. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I disagree on the range of swarms. I believe it's a rate of fire problem. They would be easier to balance around average flight time to target with the time it takes to travel the full 200m being the refire delay time. This would allow the longe...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 11:20:00
|
2019. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like my spreadsheet but you literally cannot use the HAVS without also sharply boosting AV capacity. The AV values there were from when in chrome a solid AV gunner could put those listed HAVs, including marauders, in check. The turret remote re...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 10:59:00
|
2020. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This thread is intended to be a living document for review of AV weapons. Both Infantry AV and heavy and small turrets can be discussed here. It is intended to discuss where AV is overperforming and where it is failing. This is a discussion of ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 10:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |