| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
281. 2-3 weeks till 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Skirmish 1.0 Enough said. Except that was broken too (but still fun and a much better gamemode than what we have now). Oh and why did CCP remove it then? And can you name something else, still in the game, that wasn't bro...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.23 08:07:00
|
282. If Rail Rifles aren't nerfed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Caldari Commando. 500 Shields 3 damage mods. +10% to Rail Rifle damage. +15% from proficiency. Say hi to the FOTM. Well, we already know the RR is being nerfed (lower damage is confirmed, but there might be more too). Th...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.22 14:37:00
|
283. Weak fights - in General Discussions [original thread]
Redline and roof camping is terrible, but what do you expect when you profit more doing these things where you're at little risk instead of trying to actually win the match on the ground? Sure, you might lose the match, but the difference in payo...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.21 21:21:00
|
284. Gal assualt vs Gal scout 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Personally I think they've done just a little too much for Scouts, so that there will be no role for Assaults. I intend to post a thread with Scout vs Assault comparisons once we have final stats on Assaults, but at the moment it's not looking to...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.21 21:09:00
|
285. What happens when your profile signature is 0? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It can't.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.20 19:58:00
|
286. Shield tanks passive shield rep - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Psychotic Shooter wrote: 100% wrong even with your math if you play the game the only weapon that can stop the regen with 1 hardener is a fg So are you saying that the threshold isn't 102 damage? Because anything doing more than 102 damage d...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.20 13:05:00
|
287. while on irc..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: I really wish IRC wasn't used. It isn't like CCP doesn't have their own forums or Youtube channel. Almost as bad as Riot using Reddit for everything. This wasn't from any devs though, but from Hans (CPM). But yes, CCP ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.20 12:24:00
|
288. Shield tanks passive shield rep - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: So hardened shields are able to recharge while being damaged by anti-armor weapons, but stop recharging when damaged by anti-shield weapons. Where's the problem? Forge Gun is anti-armor weapon fyi. The problem is that Swarms h...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.20 11:56:00
|
289. Solution to Hardener stacking issue (CPM feedback requested) - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: as after a minute of being king they would also be vulnerable. Except that they aren't. Three Shield Hardeners will keep a Gunnlogi hardened at all times. Even just two would only give a 15 second window after 60 ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.20 08:47:00
|
290. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ronan Elsword wrote: They just made this thread so they no where to look when making arguments for and against a respec. Also the forums were being spammed by repsec, hiding other threads in the midst. They aren't commenting in order to keep ho...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.19 09:50:00
|
291. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: 17 pages, and this is so far a player monologue. Can you have a discussion with us CCP? Or are you busy doing other more important things? CCP doesn't want to talk with their community. They didn't two years ago and t...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.19 09:09:00
|
292. Pc-Fix confirmed for 1.8? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just asked Saberwing about PC/FW fixes in 1.8 and he said they are bringing Nullarbor over to Shanghai to see what they can do about PC district locking issues. However, it sounded like there might not be something in 1.8 (depending on what they ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.19 08:55:00
|
293. Swarms vs Tanks. Video - in General Discussions [original thread]
As the others said the video doesn't really say much. Swarms need either more lock-on range or more damage. More lock-on range preferably. I'm thinking like 250 meters. The other problem with Swarms is the 50% damage increase from Standard to Pr...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.19 07:58:00
|
294. Solution to Hardener stacking issue (CPM feedback requested) - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Limit vehicles to a single hardener.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.18 08:15:00
|
295. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'll copy paste a few posts of mine from some of the other threads. Bendtner92 wrote: I skilled into something and now you're changing it to something entirely else. How is not giving a respec even an option? I don't get it, my choice can only...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.17 18:47:00
|
296. 1.8 Respec plz - in General Discussions [original thread]
COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: People who can't use a ******* search function don't deserve a respec. Spamming threads is the only way to get CCP to listen (as proven in the past). Therefore we need MOAR RESPEC THREADS!
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.17 15:47:00
|
297. 1.8 respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
I skilled into something and now you're changing it to something entirely else. How is not giving a respec even an option? I don't get it, my choice can only have consequences if I fully knew what I skilled into. Infantry respec for 1.8 or get out.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.17 15:41:00
|
298. If there is no respec.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why wouldn't I? Why would I want to use something that I didn't choose to skill into? I would only have my easymode tanks and even that gets boring at some point.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.17 15:34:00
|
299. 1.8 SP respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Confirming that Hans told us to spam more respec threads, since as proved in the past the only way to get CCP to listen is to cause a massive uproar in the forums. Without a respec I only have my easymode tanks to use as I certainly don't want to...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.17 15:13:00
|
300. What does infantry want for vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Henchmen21 wrote: But also remove the window of vulnerability that CCP promised. When i use 3 a FG will always go through 1 hardener, so i put a second one on that leaves me with 1 left if the danger isnt dealt...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.02.16 17:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |