| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
301. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesta Opalus wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: consider the min scouts moves at a base 7+ meters per second sprint speed, he's in and killed you or in and out of range before your squad even knows he's there. Sounds good. Bu...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.22 16:06:00
|
302. Rebalance ADS skills to not force turret choice - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mountain Doody wrote: I think swarms are OP vs ADS because as judge rhadamanthus explained is trivial for swarms to engage DS but nearly impossible for ADS to fight back. I feel for dropship pilots; their craft are expensive and fragile. T...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.22 13:00:00
|
303. Another topic on Novas - For this beautiful weapon to cheer us a lit... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: If you refuse to fit damps then your going to get scanned. An Assault or Logi running 1 precision enhancer will scan any MinScout, even one running straight damps.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.22 03:08:00
|
304. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: To Tesfa, it's zero precision mods on a medium to pick up a single dampened min scout, two precision if the scout fills all lows with dampeners. Incorrect! Profile & Precision values are rounded to the nearest whole d...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 23:43:00
|
305. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: At the end of the day, EWAR is in an ok place at the moment. Scouts don't get scanned and aren't OP. It would be a shame to mess it up. Must disagree here. I run damps on my sc...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 23:36:00
|
306. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: consider the min scouts moves at a base 7+ meters per second sprint speed, he's in and killed you or in and out of range before your squad even knows he's there. Sounds good. But we must be missing something as MN Scout kil...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 23:09:00
|
307. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: At the end of the day, EWAR is in an ok place at the moment. Scouts don't get scanned and aren't OP. It would be a shame to mess it up. Must disagree here. I run damps on my scout loadouts. I get scanned often by passives...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 23:00:00
|
308. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just to keep the record straight, Scouts weren't king until 1.8. So much has changed since then; too many things to name.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 22:27:00
|
309. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Vesta Opalus wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: In response, and basically re iterating my support for squad shared passive scans: Whether by original intent when coding the game years ago or not I have yet to hear an argument tha...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 22:01:00
|
310. Blaster turrets - My thoughts and possible changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Completely agree with assessments made in paragraph one. Don't know if the proposed solution would work but it is definitely neat. +1
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 19:19:00
|
311. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zaria Min Deir wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: 7. Zaria Min Deir said so. Always a good reason to do something. But I said what now? Ah, yes, something about shared passive scans, and how I personally would be happy to be rid of them. They...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 15:20:00
|
312. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: * Shared Squad Sight: fine as is. Many are of the opinion that if we could disable shared squad sight, we should. I'm curious; why is it that you feel otherwise? because it's ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 13:05:00
|
313. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zaria Min Deir wrote: Or for the highslots, precisicion enhancers can be, and are, used to great effectiveness, but I still would be quite surprised to find them in the top 10. Agreed on all points. Though I would point out (in response to a...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.21 12:30:00
|
314. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: * Shared Squad Sight: fine as is. Many are of the opinion that if we could disable shared squad sight, we should. Why is it that you feel otherwise? Don't plan to argue with you; simply curious.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 22:06:00
|
315. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
zzZaXxx wrote: *Gallente LAG Facility Good catch!
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 20:06:00
|
316. [Feedback] OP / UP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
After reading Devadander's post , added Strongboxes to "Wonky" section. 2015.05.07 - 1919 2015.06.12 - 2281 2015.07.17 - 2650 Currently have somewhere between 2600 and 2700 myself, and (as you can see above) this number appears to growing...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 15:18:00
|
317. Strongboxes and dailys - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Agreed. Needs polish. +1
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 15:03:00
|
318. Separate KDR stats - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Looks good!
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 10:27:00
|
319. pub payouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 10:26:00
|
320. Acquisition Event. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Anomaly Event II!
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.07.20 02:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |