| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. Announcement:[Announcement] - CCP Rattati's Big Board of Things - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ratatti just spent some SP in dust community trust V
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.29 21:36:00
|
22. allow the LAV passanger to use its primary weapon! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sweet! Let's do some Swarm Chasing, and Plasma Cannon Lolling! Or even better! Mass Driver Drive bys!
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.28 07:01:00
|
23. Re: HAV name progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
knight guard fury wrote: Minmatar ships have Viking related names And storms. Typhoon, tempest, maelstrom. All of the frigates and most of the cruisers represent blades.
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 22:31:00
|
24. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pagl1u M wrote: Larger corps will still have enough CP (do we really have to use this two letters???) to change their timers, lock districts and sell clones to farm passively. If you make it so it is very hard to earn CPs then smaller Corps w...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 09:28:00
|
25. New heavy weapons? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Timothy Reaper wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: My idea is to create, using existing assets, a heavy plasma cannon (mortar), a heavy laser and a heavy HMG (autocannon) They would be more than capable at taking out vehicles, be proper "H" weapons e...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 08:59:00
|
26. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Also, are you looking at stratagem which might alter the terms of the battlefield. Electronic warfare at the command level if you will, or command bonuses such as: Guerilla warfare stratagem: 5% mobility of all units per level. Sabotage stratage...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 07:44:00
|
27. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reserved and first!
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 07:09:00
|
28. Regarding Redline Camping. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Well thought out, but I don't think it will fix the issue and the con of confusing spawn mechanice is just too high
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 06:52:00
|
29. Feedback on PC timers from the leadership of every corp active in PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not everyone is good at thinking on their feet. Sometimes people need to consider what is written, weigh the pros and cons then give feedback based on that info. I think you guys should pre write your concerns the synchronize a time to post the th...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 04:28:00
|
30. Re: HAV name progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Luther Mandrix wrote: Amarr HAV Names Disciple Standard Missionary Advanced Evangelist Proto Those are better than what i had
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 00:56:00
|
31. Re: HAV name progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I like many of these Thanks ratatti! :D
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 00:22:00
|
32. Re: HAV name progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: 137H4RGIC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Praetor and Arbitrator are currently in use for Amarr content. Editing... standby None of those are in use as far as I can tell. Btw why do you assume the Amarr are Roman?...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.23 00:02:00
|
33. Re: HAV name progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Praetor and Arbitrator are currently in use for Amarr content. Editing... standby
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.22 23:49:00
|
34. Re: HAV name progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I read Ratatti's thread for HAV suggestions and wanted someone to start a thread for names and whatnot. So here goes. I tried to follow the naming schemes set forth by eve online. I didn't quite understand the naming schemes for dust 514. Amarr p...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.22 23:31:00
|
35. NON SQUAD WARBARGE USE - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Single-person squads behave exactly like a solo player in the "team-building" process. So you can't use Warbarge Strikes if you're a solo man in a squad even if you earned the points for it?
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.19 08:17:00
|
36. A reason to eliminate or alter "dead" skills - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I'm in the market for Basic Dropsuit skills and other good ideas, I too think that there are too few unlocks at level 5, and that the level 2 and 4 gaps should have something. even if just half a % or something. Dropsuit C...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2015.01.19 08:16:00
|
37. Request - EOM ISK Efficiency Screen - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: This is something that was asked for during Closed Beta and then shouted down by the KDR monkeys. Please implement it, it is long overdue. They all left for that new CoD game. Don't remEmber what it's called. In light ...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2014.11.20 03:35:00
|
38. Request - EOM ISK Efficiency Screen - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It'll make me feel better about being stomped in a match. "hey man, at least you went stupid positive in isk efficiency..."
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2014.11.19 05:27:00
|
39. Request - EOM ISK Efficiency Screen - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just thinking it'd be cool to know how expensive were the suits that we killed, vs the cost of the suits that we lost.
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2014.11.18 22:16:00
|
40. Please implement mu matchmaking in fw - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Wasn't Q Synching an exploitation? Or one of their "Unintended Game Designs that players meta'd with and is now part of the game...?" Obviously players can't answer this, only CPM and CCP can... Reason for my query is that I had heard that Queue ...
- by 137H4RGIC - at 2014.11.18 07:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |