Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
108
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
The way I see it is you bought and used a product that benefits you throughout the game. If you purchased skills with SP gained from the booster or Aurum weapons and suits knowing these are limited use items, why should you get a refund? You benefitted from the product as it was intended. Refunding the Merc Pack would essentially give you one for free, right? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Please enlighten me. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1020
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's not a "refund" DS.
Quote: ...Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset AND for the commercial release
*emphasis added
That IS the Merc Pack. Whether you think that's an awesome deal or not can be discussed, but it's pretty clear language man. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3274
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Its a misreading of the terms of sale.
Terms goes something like this after boiled down very heavily.
You pay us this much You get these items
Note: If Reset Then Reissue, No other refunds |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
309
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP included in the small print, when buying the merc pack in closed beta, that you'd get aurum back for each SP reset and before commercial release. As the game hasn't been commercially released yet, they want their Aurum back. But that would mean being able to buy SP boosters, and that means gaining two sets of SP boosters for basically the price of one.
CCP have categorically ruled out any SP reset, barring something dramatic. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1020
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Its a misreading of the terms of sale.
Terms goes something like this after boiled down very heavily.
You pay us this much You get these items
Note: If Reset Then Reissue, No other refunds
no, it says very clearly that at commercial release you get all the items credited to your account again. It's quoted above, simple language, nothing about requiring resets or refunds. You are the one "misreading" in this particular case.
Heck, the ones they sell at Gamestop STILL say this. |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
108
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:It's not a "refund" DS. Quote: ...Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset AND for the commercial release
*emphasis added
That IS the Merc Pack. Whether you think that's an awesome deal or not can be discussed, but it's pretty clear language man. If it "doesn't make sense" to you, take it up with CCP, they wrote it not me, but don't get upset at me for wanting to receive what I paid for.
Why are people asking for it now? There have been no solid official announcements of commercial release. Just speculation and a dev(?) that unofficial lot said it. Is that why there's such a backlash over it? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1020
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
Laheon wrote:CCP included in the small print, when buying the merc pack in closed beta, that you'd get aurum back for each SP reset and before commercial release. As the game hasn't been commercially released yet, they want their Aurum back. But that would mean being able to buy SP boosters, and that means gaining two sets of SP boosters for basically the price of one.
CCP have categorically ruled out any SP reset, barring something dramatic.
it's not "the small print" it's the main selling point of the Merc pack, and was hocked by CCP as such. Nor does it say anything about a "refund" or the commercial release having a "reset" in fact, it specifically delineates between aSP resets and commercial release, implying that they are very separate things. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1020
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's not a "refund" DS. Quote: ...Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset AND for the commercial release
*emphasis added
That IS the Merc Pack. Whether you think that's an awesome deal or not can be discussed, but it's pretty clear language man. If it "doesn't make sense" to you, take it up with CCP, they wrote it not me, but don't get upset at me for wanting to receive what I paid for. Why are people asking for it now? There have been no solid official announcements of commercial release. Just speculation and a dev(?) that unofficial lot said it. Is that why there's such a backlash over it?
someone asks every few weeks since early January, CCP keeps telling us that "no, we are not yet at official release" but that they will "get back to us" on how exactly the Merc Pack will work. Every time it comes up people who didn't buy it freak out over it and start arguing that the people who bought the Merc Pack shouldn't get the offer because it's too good of a deal, and an argument erupts. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3274
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Its a misreading of the terms of sale.
Terms goes something like this after boiled down very heavily.
You pay us this much You get these items
Note: If Reset Then Reissue, No other refunds no, it says very clearly that at commercial release you get all the items credited to your account again. It's quoted above, simple language, nothing about requiring resets or refunds. You are the one "misreading" in this particular case. Heck, the ones they sell at Gamestop STILL say this.
Well I just clear cut all the fancy words out. This is all what is left afterwards.
Secondly Notices are not legal binding. |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
108
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Laheon wrote:CCP included in the small print, when buying the merc pack in closed beta, that you'd get aurum back for each SP reset and before commercial release. As the game hasn't been commercially released yet, they want their Aurum back. But that would mean being able to buy SP boosters, and that means gaining two sets of SP boosters for basically the price of one.
CCP have categorically ruled out any SP reset, barring something dramatic. it's not "the small print" it's the main selling point of the Merc pack, and was hocked by CCP as such. Nor does it say anything about a "refund" or the commercial release having a "reset" in fact, it specifically delineates between aSP resets and commercial release, implying that they are very separate things.
Do you think it's possible that CCP just reissues everyone that has purchased a Merc Pack? I don't see how they'd differentiate between those who bought packs with the fine print and without. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1818
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
INB4LOCK
Seriously people. There are already a bunch of threads on this. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
655
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
They're greedy. CCP honored the spirit of the agreement with the last reset, now people are trying to for them to honor the litteral meaning because they realize it would be in their best interest.
So why did CCP decide no more SP resets? I would imagine that they felt they needed to give people a reason to play. It's kind of hard to do a stress test if no one is playing.
Edit: Baal, don't even bother replying to me, we've gone in circles 100 times already. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1020
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Its a misreading of the terms of sale.
Terms goes something like this after boiled down very heavily.
You pay us this much You get these items
Note: If Reset Then Reissue, No other refunds no, it says very clearly that at commercial release you get all the items credited to your account again. It's quoted above, simple language, nothing about requiring resets or refunds. You are the one "misreading" in this particular case. Heck, the ones they sell at Gamestop STILL say this. Well I just clear cut all the fancy words out. This is all what is left afterwards. Secondly Notices are not legal binding.
Quote: ...Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account... for the commercial release
*emphasis added
it's not particularly "fancy".
Maybe a "notice" isn't legally binding, but as far as I'm concerned it is ETHICALLY binding. The Merc Pack was sold to us in Closed Beta as a way to prepurchase a bunch of stuff that we would receive at launch, and that anything that happened with it in Beta was irrelevant. It was never announced that this was changing, ever. CCP still haven't made a statement on this topic. They've said "no more SP resets" but that really has no bearing on the Merc Pack and the term therein. |
Nomed Deeps
The Exemplars
108
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
I've bought at least two merc packs that I have used in game. As they were used and there is no reset, there is no reason I would want a refund for them. Those that want a refund are just trying to take advantage of what was typed because CCP was initially planning on another reset at full release. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1818
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:INB4LOCK
Seriously people. There are already a bunch of threads on this.
bump |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1818
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=66280&find=unread
Already being discussed. |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
I think when CCP set out with the Merc Packs, they initially planned to clear SP and return AUR used in purchases EVERY single time they reset, and the initial plan was to do this on commercial release.
THANKFULLY, CCP decided NO MORE SP resets, but now people are wanted the best of both worlds - keeping the SP and getting back all AUR used and they feel entitled. It's really selfish if you ask me.
CCP should present the choice: FULL reset on commercial release (SP and AUR included), or stay the course. That way people can't call them on this small SNAFU. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1818
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:05:00 -
[18] - Quote
BursegSardaukar wrote:CCP should present the choice: FULL reset on commercial release (SP and AUR included), or stay the course. That way people can't call them on this small SNAFU.
There is just one problem with that idea.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63890&find=unread |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
109
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=66280&find=unread
Already being discussed.
That's an attempt to fix it. I didn't understand the problem in the first place. Calm down, forum police. Go rub one out or something. You seem tense. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1023
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:23:00 -
[20] - Quote
Really, this all comes down to CCO's penchant for making promises first and asking questions later. They seem to have zero PR or customer relation skills.
They want to have their official release early without calling it a release, so as to avoid getting reviewed and being held to a "commercial release" standard, but they expect the players to treat the game as a finished product when it is convenient for CCP for us to do so.
This isn't a situation in which the two sides involved are players who bought a merc pack and players who didn't, this is a situation between a multimillion dollar gaming company and the paying customers who can't get that company to clearly explain what we are getting with the money we paid.
I bought the merc pack under a specific set of conditions with clear wording and an assurance by CCP representatives that the items most certainly would never be "used up" on the beta. They went to great lengths to assure us that we would get all of those items back at commercial release when people argued on the forums that it was a bad idea to sell things for real world currency in a beta.
Now they've decided to rework all of that, and guess what, all of this stuff we are buying in the beta is being used up and won't be refunded at commercial release.
CCP wants to have their cake and eat it too, and they seem to hope that we all have the short memories and attention spans on the stereotypical console FPS player. So many seem to have forgotten these discussions, or simply weren't around for then in the first place, but I assure you that this discussion goes back the part of a year, and CCP seem to have done a complete 180.
Likely because of this history, they are now afraid to respond to questions about this issue. |
|
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:34:00 -
[21] - Quote
From my perspective as a long time closed beta player and also someone that has purchased multiple mercpackcs etc-
The reason I think the AUR reset SHOULD occur is that CCP hasn't taken any of the AUR items and your real life money seriously.
At the moment CCP has a product on the market that consists of $20 for what is effectively a 1 month subscription.
It was originally designed as a "starter" pack but is the only 1 month subscription available.
Is this seriously an fpsmmo worth $20 a month to anyone?
What mmo does anyone play (excepting your multiple alts on EVE) that costs $20 a month? None that I'm aware of or think is relevant to the discussion.
CCP has basically been very very lazy in not addressing this issue or the other issues arising out of what is completely bizarre AUR pricing for guns/dropsuits, only 7 day expensive passive boosters etc etc etc
I don't like lazy and I think they haven't provided the value that I expect for my money.
I was fine with them being lazy about "beta" AUR that was being reset but now we sort of slid into this bad middle ground where they are still "beta" on the pricing and merc packs available but somehow this is now a final version of your character.
tldr; CCP should reset all the AUR when they get serious about what the monthly pricing is supposed to be (it's seriously dumb now)
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3274
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:44:00 -
[22] - Quote
I think the players looking for a second FREE merc pack are far more greedier. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1023
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:47:00 -
[23] - Quote
Exactly Tel, it's a "beta" when it's convenient for them, and "everything is permanent" when THAT is more convenient. They don't seem to understand that they are dicking around with real people's real money, and if they make a promise about what they intend to give us for the money we pay, they need to STICK TO IT.
Not 6 months ago all the CCP reps were talking about how ridiculous it would be to charge IRL money for items that are in a beta, when a beta is obviously a product in flux. Heck, back then the word was that ALL AUR purchased items would be removed and all AUR would be returned to ALL players at comercial release since the items quality and prices fluctuate so much as they balance the game. Now, we still see these huge fluctuations of price and quality, but our real world money is there's to keep anyway, and they won't even comment on the items that we were promised in the merc pack but now are starting to question whether we will ever see them at all.
They never address how they intend to handle this issue, even though there are hundreds of players who worked their IRL jobs to make money to spend on this make-pretend game waiting to hear about what that money we spent will be getting us.
It's absurd and frankly, a bit insulting. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1024
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:50:00 -
[24] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I think the players looking for a second FREE merc pack are far more greedier.
It's not free, it's half of the package we purchased. It's not up for debate, the wording was very clear. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2176
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 20:56:00 -
[25] - Quote
Nobody's asking for a "refund" except when they're assuming CCP won't live up to what they offered those who purchased the Merc Pack under the old (still present in Gamestop) product description.
And for Iron Wolf, a "notice" may not be legally binding everywhere in the world, but an official product description on the Playstation Store IS legally binding.
The terms under which many Merc Packs were purchased specifically define that the contents of the Merc Pack will be "credited in full" to the account on Commercial Release.
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
CCP, likewise, are entitled to reset ONLY those people who choose to ask for this reset of their Merc Packs, since that won't be a full reset, and since the legal issues surrounding Merc Packs can be seen as a significant enough hurdle to allow a reset.
They're also entitled to, as a courtesy to those supportive players who don't want our progress to be wiped, be generous enough to let us pass on the Merc Pack reset, or to give us a good middle ground where they reset everything EXCEPT the boosters, so you get any OTHER Aurum purchases refunded, but if you earned bonus SP beyond your normal cap, then you don't get a refund of the Aurum you spent to do so - but you also don't lose the SP you would otherwise now be entitled to earn twice without legitimately paying for it. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
438
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
362
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:07:00 -
[27] - Quote
SP resetting only the subset of your customers that have paid IRL money for your product seems so profoundly stupid I'm having trouble processing who would seriously suggest it... |
Severus Smith
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
205
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Give those who want the option to get back their AUR and BPCs. In exchange they get reset as promised for the Commercial Release. Sounds fair to me. Purchasers can petition to get their Merc Pack items / AUR refunded, and CCP will refund them after resetting their characters. It fulfills the contract. Anything more is just people being greedy.
There you go Baal, that work for you? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2178
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1024
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:27:00 -
[30] - Quote
Severus Smith wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Give those who want the option to get back their AUR and BPCs. In exchange they get reset as promised for the Commercial Release. Sounds fair to me. Purchasers can petition to get their Merc Pack items / AUR refunded, and CCP will refund them after resetting their characters. It fulfills the contract. Anything more is just people being greedy. There you go Baal, that work for you?
No, absolutely not. That's disgusting. Why are you people so deadset on the people who bought a Merc Pack receiving the items they purchased? Why would the people who actually paid CCP real world money for those items need to have their progress in the game reset in order to recieve them? How does that make ANY sense whatsoever? Are you just jealous that you didn't buy a Merc Pack when they were still such an awesome deal? If that's the case, just go buy one from Game Stop, the deal is still going on there with that particular Merc Pack. Otherwise stop being so spiteful and let us get the items we bought without trying to figure out a way to screw your opponents out of their purchase. |
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
439
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1027
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what?
We haven't hit commercial release yet. The Merc Pack is to be credited to the account at commercial release. I know you know this at this point, I've quoted the Merc Pack itself in response to you. At this point it must be assumed you are simply trolling. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:41:00 -
[33] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? We haven't hit commercial release yet. The Merc Pack is to be credited to the account at commercial release. I know you know this at this point, I've quoted the Merc Pack itself in response to you. At this point it must be assumed you are simply trolling. Trolling...do huh? When you bought the merc pack the items and their quantities were listed out for you before you agreed to the purchase. That is how many of each item you will receive, so what are you talking about? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2179
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED (past tense) to, but haven't YET (future tense) received everything we WILL BE (future tense) entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? Added in explanations of how you're missing the point in parentheses. I hope that helps.
The product description on the Merc Pack that was on the PS Store at the time many of us purchased them included events that haven't happened yet. We haven't received those parts of what we purchased yet because the event on which they depend has yet to occur.
And as long as that clause was in the description of the product provided by the store at which the Merc Pack was purchased, it's a legally binding part of the purchase agreement, and is independent of the terms of use that CCP have the right to alter as set out when a player first starts up the beta. |
Severus Smith
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
206
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Severus Smith wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Give those who want the option to get back their AUR and BPCs. In exchange they get reset as promised for the Commercial Release. Sounds fair to me. Purchasers can petition to get their Merc Pack items / AUR refunded, and CCP will refund them after resetting their characters. It fulfills the contract. Anything more is just people being greedy. There you go Baal, that work for you? No, absolutely not. That's disgusting. Why are you people so deadset on the people who bought a Merc Pack receiving the items they purchased? Why would the people who actually paid CCP real world money for those items need to have their progress in the game reset in order to recieve them? How does that make ANY sense whatsoever? Are you just jealous that you didn't buy a Merc Pack when they were still such an awesome deal? If that's the case, just go buy one from Game Stop, the deal is still going on there with that particular Merc Pack. Otherwise stop being so spiteful and let us get the items we bought without trying to figure out a way to screw your opponents out of their purchase. I've bought roughly 10 Merc packs. So no, I'm not jealous. I'm just annoyed when people like you are greedy and try to take advantage of others due to "fine print".
You, me, and everyone else purchased a Merc pack during Closed Beta to get access to the Boosters, AURUM, and other goodies. We were told in the "fine print" that these would be refunded to us after resets and upon "Commercial release". This print was written when CCP intended to reset us at Commercial release. They changed their plans and thus their stance on Merc Pack refunds.
So sure, you're right. According to the "fine print" you are entitled to a refund of your Boosters, AURUM, and items upon Commercial release. Though since the Merc Pack you bought has already been applied to your current character you would effectively be using it twice thus violating the original intent of the sale. So, to correct this double dipping the only logical course of action is for CCP to exercise the "fine print" in their EULA and reset your and other protesting player's characters, thus removing the items you have already applied to your character, before refunding your Merc pack so they keep in line with their original intent at the time of sale.
You can act all disgusted and that you're being screwed over all you want. But the only way that your request is fair is if it is honored in the original context in which it was offered; that Merc Pack purchasers would receive a refund of their items after each and every reset. Anything beyond that is pure greed on your part.
Hopeful CCP Announcement wrote:We will gladly refund any Merc packs purchased by players before XX/XX/XXXX. However, we will be resetting those player's characters before applying the refund. This is to ensure that players who applied the Merc Pack to their characters before XX/XX/XXXX do not benefit from the items and AURUM twice. If you would like your Merc Pack refunded please contact CCP Customer Support at [email protected].
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3279
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:08:00 -
[36] - Quote
Well according to some people's reading apparently my own purchasing one merc pack entitles me to ownership of 4 merc packs.
The reality is you only PURCHASED ONE merc pack per PURCHASE, you are not going to magically get a second merc pack on the same purchase, it is still the same merc pack before a total item reset.
So you bought one and still got ONE. Not two not three not infinity or indefininite but One Merc Pack.
No where in the language of that purchase agreement does it say a 'second' instead its more referral to that singular item purchase still.
Lawsuit all you want but you're not going to get far. Because you bought that one thing and you have have been given that one thing and the sale advertisement does not indicate a second (nor third nor fourth nor fifth or so on) one free of charge but rather ccp has every right NOT to give you a second one but do so anyways because they are generous.
This is not buy one get one free, this is buy one and retain one.
Any attempts to pluralize the contract requires a second purchase.
Commercial Release or not, you only have that one pack, even if they do reset, its still that one pack. |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
120
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
So the gist of it is players who bought the Merc Pack want to basically "double dip" because of fine print that talks about something that hasn't happened yet (commercial release). Why is everyone up in arms about it now? For all we know, the Merc Packs will be reissued at commercial release and all this arguing will be for naught.
Just so everyone knows, I couldn't care less about what happens. I got my $20 worth, so I'm happy. As long as it's reissued if there's a reset, I'm good. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3279
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
Either way the only way to fulfill the agreement would require RESETTING the game.
Which is considered the far greater evil of the two. |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
120
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Either way the only way to fulfill the agreement would require RESETTING the game.
Which is considered the far greater evil of the two.
Yeah. They'd lose me and probably hundreds of other dedicated players. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED (past tense) to, but haven't YET (future tense) received everything we WILL BE (future tense) entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? Added in explanations of how you're missing the point in parentheses. I hope that helps. The product description on the Merc Pack that was on the PS Store at the time many of us purchased them included events that haven't happened yet. We haven't received those parts of what we purchased yet because the event on which they depend has yet to occur. And as long as that clause was in the description of the product provided by the store at which the Merc Pack was purchased, it's a legally binding part of the purchase agreement, and is independent of the terms of use that CCP have the right to alter as set out when a player first starts up the beta.
I'm afraid you are missing what I'm saying. This isn't my opinion or how I think it should be, this is the law. When you bought the merc pack it said, for example, 30 Day Booster x 1. That is not what you were receiving at that time, that was what you agreed to purchase period.
I'm not exaggerating when I say there is no wiggle room at all in that. That is as legally binding as anything can possibly be. So you have received exactly what you agreed to purchase. So you're trying to tell me that you looked at the list of contents and saw 30-Day Booster x 1 and thought you were going to get 2? And no implied product clause modifies jack. Those numbers are what you agree to purchase.
I'm serious about this, if you fail to understand this one single point I was assume you lack the mental capacity for productive dialogue and ignore your future posts. Those quantities of items are all you are entitled to receive unless explicitly stated somewhere that additional items will be delivered at a future date. By explicit I don't mean clear, I mean things like "At such date for such payment amount this certain quantity will be delivered". I don't see that anywhere.
And like I said before, "credited to your account" means to replace that which was lost. It is a term with a fixed meaning. You must first give something to someone else before you can receive "credit" for it. A credit can not increase the quantity of anything. A credit is merely a representation of something else. In fact, in a legal sense if you are credited something and yet you currently posses that item, therefor increasing what you posses from 1 to 2 of the whatever, you are required by law to return the credit immediately and will be held liable in court if you spend it. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2183
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:I'm afraid you are missing what I'm saying. This isn't my opinion or how I think it should be, this is the law. When you bought the merc pack it said, for example, 30 Day Booster x 1. That is not what you were receiving at that time, that was what you agreed to purchase period.
I'm not exaggerating when I say there is no wiggle room at all in that. That is as legally binding as anything can possibly be. So you have received exactly what you agreed to purchase. So you're trying to tell me that you looked at the list of contents and saw 30-Day Booster x 1 and thought you were going to get 2? And no implied product clause modifies jack. Those numbers are what you agree to purchase.
I'm serious about this, if you fail to understand this one single point I was assume you lack the mental capacity for productive dialogue and ignore your future posts. Those quantities of items are all you are entitled to receive unless explicitly stated somewhere that additional items will be delivered at a future date. By explicit I don't mean clear, I mean things like "At such date for such payment amount this certain quantity will be delivered". I don't see that anywhere.
And like I said before, "credited to your account" means to replace that which was lost. It is a term with a fixed meaning. You must first give something to someone else before you can receive "credit" for it. A credit can not increase the quantity of anything. A credit is merely a representation of something else. In fact, in a legal sense if you are credited something and yet you currently posses that item, therefor increasing what you posses from 1 to 2 of the whatever, you are required by law to return the credit immediately and will be held liable in court if you spend it. I'm afraid YOU'RE missing what I'M saying, and definitely NOT the other way around.
Yes, they stated clearly the exact content the Merc Pack came with.
But they ALSO stated clearly the terms under which those items are given. Those terms as described are just as legally binding as the listing of the Merc Pack's content. Included in those terms was the line (possibly paraphrased - I don't have the exact wording in front of me) "at every character reset AND on commercial release". That wording clearly defines commercial release as not only being (potentially) distinct from a character reset, but ALSO as being - whether it's a reset or not - a point at which all Merc Pack gear is "credited in full".
That being said, I agree with you for the most part on what you want to have happen.
In essence, since anyone who's used their Merc Pack Booster still has the SP it provided, they arguably still have the Booster itself. It's a grey area, imo, and leaves some room for argument. I don't think the Booster should be given back unless the player is willing to have a character reset along with it.
The same thing applies with Aurum purchases using the Merc Pack's provided Aurum. If you bought Boosters, you still have the Booster, therefore you still have the benefit provided by that Aurum's use. If you want that Aurum back, it's reasonable to see your character reset in order to do that.
Any BPO Merc Pack items that were assigned to a character then deleted when the character was terminated should be credited back into the player's account to be assigned to a new character. Any BPC items that came with the Merc Pack should be credited back to the player up to the number included in the Merc Pack (or however many copies of the Merc Pack that player purchased). Any Aurum spent by the player on something OTHER than a Booster should be credited back to the player, and the AUR items the player purchased should be returned to the store (unless destroyed).
If you want to use the Boosters you already used, go ahead. But you have to give up the SP that you earned with them.
To me, that's a fair solution. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
What about the part that you can't be "credited in full" for something you currently posses? You know the part about none of the words on that page equal "get an additional one at no cost"?
EDIT:I'm sorry, I have to ask. Seriously. Real talk. When you bought the merc pack months and months ago you knew you were going to get two of them for the price of one? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1027
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 23:00:00 -
[43] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:What about the part that you can't be "credited in full" for something you currently posses? You know the part about none of the words on that page equal "get an additional one at no cost"?
EDIT:I'm sorry, I have to ask. Seriously. Real talk. When you bought the merc pack months and months ago you knew you were going to get two of them for the price of one?
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2185
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 23:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:What about the part that you can't be "credited in full" for something you currently posses? You know the part about none of the words on that page equal "get an additional one at no cost"?
EDIT:I'm sorry, I have to ask. Seriously. Real talk. When you bought the merc pack months and months ago you knew you were going to get two of them for the price of one? So you're not reading what I'm saying?
No, we don't get to keep the originally-issued Merc Pack gear (or what's left of it) AND get a new Merc Pack on top of that when the game goes live.
But yes, we ARE entitled to have all the Merc Pack content credited in full, as specified at the time of purchase.
If I still have my Dragonfly suit, I don't get 2. I either keep the one I already have, or I get it reset, losing the existing one in exchange for a new one (which would allow me to assign it to another character if I've changed my mind about which of my alts I want to use it with). If I terminated a character and deleted my Dragonfly, I should be issued a new one.
If I still have all 50 of my HK4Ms, I don't now have 100, I either keep them on the character they're assigned to, or get them reset as with the Dragonfly. If I have 20 of them left, I get them reset back to 50. I don't have 70.
The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3283
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:31:00 -
[45] - Quote
Show me where exactly are you getting TWO mercenary packs. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
661
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:36:00 -
[46] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point.
Source? And show me another source where it says they would let you keep the Sp alongside the returned booster. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
663
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:38:00 -
[47] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote: The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that.
The boosters can be substituted for something of equal value though, in this case the SP they got for using the booster in the first place. As long as they keep that, then the agreement would technically be fulfilled right? |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
122
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
There's no interpretation to be had here. The letter and the law is very clear cut here. We will be getting our merc packs refunded on commercial release as the terms of the contract stated when we made the purchase.
This is not rocket science kids. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
663
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:There's no interpretation to be had here. The letter and the law is very clear cut here. We will be getting our merc packs refunded on commercial release as the terms of the contract stated when we made the purchase.
This is not rocket science kids. Okay, just know that playing things by the letter can comeback to bite you in the ass. Like CCP cutting your Sp, they never said they wouldn't do that.
And last I checked, we do take the spirit of laws/agreements into account. For instance, almost every single amendment to the US constitution. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2190
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:48:00 -
[50] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that.
The boosters can be substituted for something of equal value though, in this case the SP they got for using the booster in the first place. As long as they keep that, then the agreement would technically be fulfilled right? Actually, any item can be substituted for "an equivalent" item" on release or any reset. And yes, the SP is a reasonable equivalent. Well spotted! +1
I still think it's reasonable for people to expect their HK4Ms, etc. to be topped back up though. And for someone (even though it was stupid if they did) who deleted a character with the Toxin and/or Dragonfly to get those Blueprint items back. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3285
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:51:00 -
[51] - Quote
Basically the wording does not allow for you to obtain a second from one purchase. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1821
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Um, guys.
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=653179#post653179
Altina wrote: EDIT: I asked Sony about this and the unofficial word from some random customer service rep (after she "researched" it for me) was that if CCP releases the game they will have to refund AUR since that what was explicitly stated.
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
442
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
Seems like the forums ate my post. Other people have already raised all my points but I just want to apologize to Garrett. Too many threads got blurry and I didn't realize you were the one saying to reimburse it all back to the original value only, my bad. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2193
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 01:02:00 -
[54] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Seems like the forums ate my post. Other people have already raised all my points but I just want to apologize to Garrett. Too many threads got blurry and I didn't realize you were the one saying to reimburse it all back to the original value only, my bad. No worries. With all the threads about this, it's a bit of a confusing mess to try and follow.
I've agreed with a lot of what you're saying, and I get that some of what I said wasn't as clear as it should have been.
Also, thank you for spelling my name right. Most people forget the second "t" |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
134
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 18:54:00 -
[55] - Quote
I am 300% with Baal. CCP sold a product/service under certain conditions. They must deliver. The fact that some unforeseen events took place such as that the official release being pushed back or the fact that they decided later on not to reset SP for everyone at release does not change the initial agreement. The should not have the power to unilateraly change commercial agreements after they already have received the payment.
And it does not matter that some ppl think that it may be fair not give out the merc pack twice - there is an agreement and the players who paid for the Merc pack are entitled to the windfall of the unforeseen circumstances. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
134
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 19:17:00 -
[56] - Quote
"Credited in full" upon release to me means - yes, the second of each: the AUR, booster and the other stuff.
I don't see how CCP can give you the uplinks and militia SG as part of this 'credited in full' but not the booster.
People who say that the extra SP that ppl carry around instead of the booster is an equivalent of the booster, therefore there should not be another booster given, would then have to extend their logic and accept that all those other consummable items are in fact still 'with the player' because they were used to play matches and resulted in accrued SP. And if so, nothing should be 'credited in full' upon release. The agreement, on the other hand, stipulates that the merc pack will be 'credited in full'
To people who say that Merc pack never promised 'the same thing being given tiwce' are wrong because I got my full merc pack already 3 times this beta with each reset. And the agreement clearly states that official release will be treated as a reset as far as Merc pack is concerned; so yes, the full pack much be given another time. So 4 total packs, in my case, with 2 of them having a lasting benefit. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2204
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 19:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:"Credited in full" upon release to me means - yes, the second of each: the AUR, booster and the other stuff.
I don't see how CCP can give you the uplinks and militia SG as part of this 'credited in full' but not the booster.
People who say that the extra SP that ppl carry around instead of the booster is an equivalent of the booster, therefore there should not be another booster given, would then have to extend their logic and accept that all those other consummable items are in fact still 'with the player' because they were used to play matches and resulted in accrued SP. And if so, nothing should be 'credited in full' upon release. The agreement, on the other hand, stipulates that the merc pack will be 'credited in full'
To people who say that Merc pack never promised 'the same thing being given tiwce' are wrong because I got my full merc pack already 3 times this beta with each reset. And the agreement clearly states that official release will be treated as a reset as far as Merc pack is concerned; so yes, the full pack much be given another time. So 4 total packs, in my case, with 2 of them having a lasting benefit. It can be argued that CCP only promised the items OR AN EQUIVALENT when crediting you in full.
So we MUST get something that's at least an approximation of the Dragonfly Scout, but maybe they will change it to be a Caldari small frame suit instead. And we MUST get 50 HK4M Shotguns, or something with equivalent capabilities. And we MUST get the 30-day Booster.... OR SOMETHING EQUIVALENT.
Something equivalent to a 30 day booster like, for example, 30 days worth of boosted SP that we already have, so they don't need to re-credit that because we already have it.
Crediting the Merc Pack in full on release means they have to replace anything that's gone, NOT that they have to give us more on top of what we still have left over.
If you used the Booster, you still have the SP which is an appropriate equivalent to a Booster, so you're not actually losing something by not getting it credited back.
If your HK4M Shotguns all got blown up, you DON'T still have them, AND you don't still have any equivalent to them. If you accidentally deleted your Dragonfly suit or Toxin with a character they were assigned to, then you DON'T still have those items or an equivalent of them |
Zlocha
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 20:10:00 -
[58] - Quote
Guys dont be too greedy. U ll just bring the full reset of everything, SP, Assets, AUR on yourselves. It will hurt more surely than the merc pack refund which was refunded when the game went open beta. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 20:39:00 -
[59] - Quote
i cant wait for CCP to pull the "Welcome to New eden" on these packs player already used,Their probably not going to do anything seeing as their dancing around the subject |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2205
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 20:53:00 -
[60] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:i cant wait for CCP to pull the "Welcome to New eden" on these packs player already used,Their probably not going to do anything seeing as their dancing around the subject Considering there's solid ground for a legal case to be brought against them if they do nothing, I'm pretty sure they're working on a solution.
But at the same time, considering the "or an equivalent" part of the equation, there's still solid ground for them to refuse refunds of Boosters, including AUR Boosters (citing the argument that you still have the result of - and therefore the value of - the Booster purchased). |
|
Moonracer2000
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
374
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:40:00 -
[61] - Quote
This has been discussed to death but I still think it is an interesting discussion, and until we get a solid response from CCP it is an important one.
There is not a simple solution to the problem here. CCP is being pushed into a corner with few options and they are being very quiet.
Facing the risk of legal action might be the "catastrophic" event that causes a full wipe on "commercial release". Unless they did something drastic like start us all off with X million SP and ISK after the reset they would risk losing a LOT of players.
It will be interesting to see how CCP deals with the situation. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1032
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:15:00 -
[62] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point.
Source? And show me another source where it says they would let you keep the Sp alongside the returned booster.
They haven't explained at all how they intend to deal with the Merc Pack, that's the problem.
What they did say over and over again during closed beta is that we could be sure that we would recieve all of our AUR that we purchased back at launch because it's "ridiculous to charge players for items in a beta" and that the Merc Pack should be seen as a "prepurchase for goods players will recieve at launch". This position didn't change until WEEKS after they decided that this would no longer be the case, and they basically back dated the decision to weeks prior... and this isn't even taking into account the fact that such information was never ever "officially" made available, players had to stumble acrossed said information on this trash dump of a forum to find out their real world purchases were no longer being reimbursed.
Anyone who used their Merc Pack or regular AUR purchases between the start of the open beta and weeks later when they made this announcement were basically screwed.
I'm sorry, but I'm not going to search back through hundreds of Dev posts from 9 months to a year ago (are those posts from the older forum, pre wipe, even available anymore?), just to satisfy a naysayer on an internet forum. If you don't believe me that this was there position, then so be it or go find the information yourself, but when a CCP rep or a player that was around back then reads this, I'm sure they will know precisely the conversations I'm referring to because they were more rampant than threads now about the issue are.
Such short memories people seem to have.
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that.
The boosters can be substituted for something of equal value though, in this case the SP they got for using the booster in the first place. As long as they keep that, then the agreement would technically be fulfilled right?
I think the idea that the SP is equal value to the booster itself is at least an interesting proposition that I would be willing to entertain, assuming CCP actually bothered to speak up and respond about the issue. It's one thing to discuss the idea with random naysayer #47 on an internet forum, it's another to discuss it with the person who took my money and has yet to speak up on the issue.
Most of the issue here is CCP's lack of response on this, and their apparent about face on the issue. Again, really this is an issue of trust and principle. My $20 Merc Pack itself isn't that big of a deal, but what this situation does (with the way CCP are FAILING to handle it) is makes many of us who bought a Merc Pack much less likely to trust CCP in the future. If I don't get a fair shake on this Merc Pack situation you can gaurantee I won't be buying any more products from CCP in the future. Basically, they have potential future customers hinging on how they deal with this situation. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
682
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: assuming CCP actually bothered to speak up and respond about the issue. 10 years later... nope, gotta wait another 10 years. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1032
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: assuming CCP actually bothered to speak up and respond about the issue. 10 years later... nope, gotta wait another 10 years.
precisely. this discussion has only gotten out of control because people who have spent real world money have been left to speculate endlessly because CCP is either too inept or too chicken **** to just clear the issue up. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:09:00 -
[65] - Quote
Alright... *cracks nucleus* ...amateur hour is over. Time to get down to brass tacks with this subject (this is truly a snafu of the first magnitude).
Let's do some ethics (hope you packed a lunch):
First, it is necessary is for us to CLEARLY define the terminology that was used, and is currently under debate now - in as far as, how it may have -ábeen defined by the consumer, as well as, how CCP may have intended it to be defined, both in light of the actual literal interpretations of said terms.
-áTerms currently under debate:
GÇó Mercenary Pack GÇó Credited in full GÇó Character reset GÇó Commercial release
"...Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset AND for the commercial release."
I am, of course, assuming that the above quote is accurate.
"Mercenary pack" is easy. We all know what it is and what it contains.
"Credited in full", like above, is also VERY clear.
"Character reset", now here is we're we star to run into some problems. What exactly is a character reset (in as far as, both the paying customer and CCP may have defined it).
"Commercial release", and again we run into the same problem as above: what exactly does a "commercial release" Intel?
Let's explore the contested terms.
1. Character reset:
As a consumer, there are two ways to interpret this phrase:
1. Singular: "my character will be reset". This excludes the necessity for the consumer to concern themselves with any other consumer who may have purchased the "Mercenary Pack". In essence, in this interpretation, the consumers purchase occurred in a vacuum.
2. Plural: "all consumers are subject (SUBJECT not entitled) to a reset when it occurs. In this interpretation, the consumer is buying the "Mercenary Pack" with the understanding that the affect, "character reset" insinuates, is as follows: when a character reset occurs, it will affect all consumers.
So, which one is it?
Before we delve any deeper into this, let's take the following scenario under consideration:
During the last character reset (just prior to the open beta launch) if it had been optional, at that time (during that character reset) to opt out of the reset, would this have been desirable to anyone? Speaking from my own perspective, the answer is yes, and I am quite certain that there are many others out there who share sentiment. The reason for this is because I was quite satisfied with what I had, to that point, accomplished with my character. But would this have been fair to the other consumers that were not satisfied? As so many people are so fond of saying, this is a beta, and as such, "a work in progress", an unfinished product subject to change. Now can the consumer be held financial responsible for the purchase of a product that is subject to change? Take the following as an example:
I walk into a grocery store to which it took me two months to drive to (the only grocery store on the planet infact). I take an apple from the shelf, and take it to the teller in order to purchase it. As the teller swipes the apple across the scanner, to ring up the sale, through some act of magic, the apple suddenly turns into an orange. Is it still my responsibility to purchase the orange? The answer is, most emphatically, no.
Now let's say that there are ten people at the teller with me (all purcasing apples) yet mine is the only one that keeps tuning into an orange. Befuddled, I look around in bewilderment and by chance happen to spot a man in a dress shirt and tie waving a wand everytime the teller tries to scan the apple. He is wearing a name tag, it says: "CCP owner/manager". The man notices me noticing him and promptly approaches me, and the following conversation ensues:
CCP: Hello sir. My name is CCP, I'm the owner. What seems to be the problem?
Bob, the unsatisfied customer: Well, quite frankly I'm trying to buy an apply but it keeps turning into an orange.
CCP: Ahh, i see. We have had this problem happen before. I am afraid that you will have to return to you're place of residence, obtaine a notarized afidavid stating that you have returned to your please of residence, and the return to CCP Mart, at which time, we here a CCP Mart garantees that the issue will be resolved.
Bob, the unsatisfied customer: but it took me two months to drive to CCP Mart, what about the time and effort I spent to get here?
CCP: I am quite sorry sir. That is CCP Mart policy.
I'll leave it up to your imagination to figure out what bobs reaction is at that point.
So, as we should all plainly be able to see, an option to opt out of a reset is not an ethical/fair one, because all of those satisfied with the game get to continue on being satisfied with the game while those who are not satisfied, loose an irreplaceable set of commodities: time and effort.
Ok, that takes care of the first contested term. Let's move on to the next:
2. Commercial release:
Legally speaking, this is VERY specific, as well as, VERY binding and for good reason: because it removes consumer responsibility to act responsibly with their purchases until CCP make the consumer aware the the property has been "commercially released"
Regardless of what CCP had intended to mean by "commercial release" is irrelevant. The fact is that the two terms "commercial release" and reset are not connected in any way, no matter how much CCP or any one else, for that mater, wants them to be. By this term, CCP is legally obligated to credit the items in question to any consumer that purchased a Mercenary Pack.
{continued>>> |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:10:00 -
[66] - Quote
The simple fact is that CCP should never have included "commercial if that is not what the were intending to do. it is miss leading in the extreme, and gives those who were mislead by it a valid argument:
I was not responsible with my money because CCP assured me that I did not have to be until the "commercial release".
There is, legally, only three options that CCP can pursue:
1. Reset all player accounts upon-ácommercial release
This is an option that neither the majority of the player base nor CCP themselves want. I can tell you personall that, if my lifetime skill points is reset to zero again, I will no longer be playing this game, and I am sure that there are many others out there who would feel the same, which is the reason why CCP does not desire this option ether.
2. CCP can offer to reset the accounts of any one who wants a Mercenary Pack credit, however, this is entirely unethical toward those who were genuinely mislead by the language of the purchase contract. If this is the path CCP chooses, I will not choose to have my character reset, but neither will I be leaving the game.
3. CCP can take it on the chin like a real man, cut their losses and give out the credits to every one who bought a Mercinary Pack, as to HONOR the original agreement. I would actually consider it a reward to those who helped CCP develop their game in beta. This seems reasonable, and was, in all honesty, what I interpreted this thing to mean when CCP announced that there will be no further "character resets".
And that's my 20 cents worth. Hope this all in some way helped this debacle to get resolved in a desirable fashion that is agreeable to all parties involved. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
443
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:43:00 -
[67] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
You know what's even clearer than the wording? The fact that CCP was promising that you would get the merc pack items back in full after the final reset (Commercial Release at the time) so you could try stuff out before that with no worries. You know what isn't clear? CCP promising you that no matter what you were going to get a new merc pack on Commercial Release whether there was a reset or not.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point.
The entire point was you would get it all back after the final reset. Whether that final reset was Commercial Release or not the promise was once the game started for real you'd start it with all your Merc Pack goodies. We'll get a non-biased third party to type up a report on this situation and show it a few hundred people and see which side most people take. I thought it was "Buy once, use twice" not "Buy one, use twice unless the the second time happens before Commercial Release is which case it will 'use three times'". By the way, contrary to some nonsense you spouted in another post that is how you explicitly state something. You find me where it says anything about receiving an additional merc pack for free or stop saying you were explicitly promised anything.Source? And show me another source where it says they would let you keep the Sp alongside the returned booster. They haven't explained at all how they intend to deal with the Merc Pack, that's the problem. No, that's not the problem. Thinking you're entitled to a damn thing here is the problem. If you don't like it you can get mad. Write them and angry letter. Write a blog about how unfair it is.
Or you could make a big deal about it, generate some more bad press for the game before it's even released, divide the player base, demand the you get all kinds of stuff you didn't pay for, **** off the new players by demanding even more of an advantage, waste the DEV's time having to deal with this crap. Everybody complains about lack of content now so go ahead and dump a whole bunch of bullshit on their plate right before release because of some sloppy wording.
CCP didn't make you play the BETA. CCP didn't make you buy a Merc Pack. CCP never made you pay a single dime. That was your decision.
You know what CCP did actually make you do? Agree to a document that affirmed you understood that everything in the BETA is subject to change and CCP makes no promises that what they do today won't be undone tomorrow. What they did say over and over again during closed beta is that we could be sure that we would recieve all of our AUR that we purchased back at launch because it's "ridiculous to charge players for items in a beta" and that the Merc Pack should be seen as a "prepurchase for goods players will recieve at launch" Again...ridiculous if you're not going to delete it one day and not give it back after the final reset. And "Launch"? What difference does it make? Was the AUR I spent wasted because it wasn't "Launch"? My SP is getting boosted this week the same as it would after Launch. Anyone who used their Merc Pack or regular AUR purchases between the start of the open beta and weeks later when they made this announcement were basically screwed. http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/74180
Posted Jan. 8. 2 days before reset.Such short memories people seem to have. Yes they do.[quote=Sloth9230] Most of the issue here is CCP's lack of response on this, and their apparent about face on the issue. Again, really this is an issue of trust and principle. My $20 Merc Pack itself isn't that big of a deal, but what this situation does (with the way CCP are FAILING to handle it) is makes many of us who bought a Merc Pack much less likely to trust CCP in the future. If I don't get a fair shake on this Merc Pack situation you can gaurantee I won't be buying any more products from CCP in the future. Basically, they have potential future customers hinging on how they deal with this situation.
Trust and principle? Yea, and the American Civil War was about State's rights. They have said along that plans will change. We signed legal documents stating we knew things would change. Then things changed and now everybody's all pissed off and demanding free stuff. What do you want them say about it? We all knew things would change. That merc pack was guaranteed to survive all the resets. You still have it, right? End of discussion. All this false indignation is because there's a possibility of free stuff due to careless language.
We get pissed when they don't tell us enough about what's going on. Then when they do tell us things, even though we promised that we understood it could all change at any time, we all get so outraged that they've violated out trust. Blow me. They were stupid for bringing real money in to this but we were all stupid for spending it.
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:56:00 -
[68] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Trust and principle? Yea, and the American Civil War was about State's rights. They have said along that plans will change. We signed legal documents stating we knew things would change. Then things changed and now everybody's all pissed off and demanding free stuff. What do you want them say about it? We all knew things would change. That merc pack was guaranteed to survive all the resets. You still have it, right? End of discussion. All this false indignation is because there's a possibility of free stuff due to careless language.-á
We get pissed when they don't tell us enough about what's going on. Then when they do tell us things, even though we promised that we understood it could all change at any time, we all get so outraged that they've violated out trust. Blow me. They were stupid for bringing real money in to this but we were all stupid for spending it.
The "legally documents" that you are referring to have absolutely nothing to do with the contract we entered into when when we bought the Mercenary Pack. CCP is legally obligated to make a credit, to all of those who have purchased a Mercenary Pack, upon release. End of story.
The question is: will they make an ethical choise or an unethical choise. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2214
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Trust and principle? Yea, and the American Civil War was about State's rights. They have said along that plans will change. We signed legal documents stating we knew things would change. Then things changed and now everybody's all pissed off and demanding free stuff. What do you want them say about it? We all knew things would change. That merc pack was guaranteed to survive all the resets. You still have it, right? End of discussion. All this false indignation is because there's a possibility of free stuff due to careless language.
We get pissed when they don't tell us enough about what's going on. Then when they do tell us things, even though we promised that we understood it could all change at any time, we all get so outraged that they've violated out trust. Blow me. They were stupid for bringing real money in to this but we were all stupid for spending it. That Merc Pack was guaranteed to survive all resets AND Commercial Release, regardless of whether or not Commercial Release is another reset.
And no, we don't all still have the ENTIRE contents of our Merc Packs.
Plenty of us have used some of our HK4M Shotguns, or the Myofibril Stimulants, or Fused Locus Grenades. Some have even managed to - accidentally or with the full knowledge that they would be restored on Commercial Release - delete the Dragonfly or Toxin Blueprints.
Unless CCP credit those back - AS AGREED - they aren't living up to their legal obligations.
For my personal part, this isn't a huge issue, since I so rarely use these items anyway, but for those who do, and those who have deleted Blueprint items, it's important, and it needs to be addressed. |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 02:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
LMFAO
|
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 04:33:00 -
[71] - Quote
I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
686
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 04:45:00 -
[72] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. Here, +2 just for being so long. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:06:00 -
[73] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. Here, +2 just for being so long.
Well at least somebody loves me. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2220
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. I gave 2 likes, 1 on each post.
And it's basically a better-worded version of about half what I've been saying across at least 4 threads on the topic, so I already agreed with you before you said it. |
Leither Yiltron
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
421
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:30:00 -
[75] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:The way I see it is you bought and used a product that benefits you throughout the game. If you purchased skills with SP gained from the booster or Aurum weapons and suits knowing these are limited use items, why should you get a refund? You benefitted from the product as it was intended. Refunding the Merc Pack would essentially give you one for free, right? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Please enlighten me.
It's mostly because there's a faction of players who want the benefit of their Merc Packs for something like the third time in the history of the beta.
The whole idea is that people are greedy, and they'll come up with any reason to justify getting more stuff if they think they can get away with it. |
hermin hermit
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
What is with all the fanboys trying to defend ccp? "Waaaaah ppl are getting a free boster1!!1!"
Why is it unreasonable to expect ccp to honor the terms and conditions set out in the closed beta merc pack? |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:DS 10 wrote:The way I see it is you bought and used a product that benefits you throughout the game. If you purchased skills with SP gained from the booster or Aurum weapons and suits knowing these are limited use items, why should you get a refund? You benefitted from the product as it was intended. Refunding the Merc Pack would essentially give you one for free, right? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Please enlighten me. It's mostly because there's a faction of players who want the benefit of their Merc Packs for something like the third time in the history of the beta. The whole idea is that people are greedy, and they'll come up with any reason to justify getting more stuff if they think they can get away with it.
Well... that is certainly true... lmao
It does indeed suck that CCP had put that on their Merc Pack so long ago, however... would've people still bought it even if it didn't say that so long ago when the Merc Pack was released... of course, free stuff a long with 40k Aurum.
Sadly people don't care that with the legal binding contract we are all still under until the "Commercial Release", this can and will indeed change, unfortunately it did for the Merc Pack.
You got a free suit, albeit not that great, a free gun, again, not that great, and then you got the 40k Aurum. They made a mistake. Unfortunately, just get over it, in the end, a refund of the Aurum within the Merc Pack received would in my mind also include a reset of the SP. I find it fair that such should happen but... I would be PISSED since I'd be a damn newberry all over again and that for one would mean I would be reluctant to continue playing. AND THIS would include A LOT of people crying ALOUD with the refund, refund, refund. You know those of you who are crying refund would drop this game in a second if your SP was reset and that is exactly what would happen if Aurum was refunded.
So stop complaining, I'd be damn happy that a reset isn't going to happen, I don't want to be at 0 again, hell to the noooooo.
AGAIN I'll reiteration, UNLESS you want your SP reset along with everyone else (who don't want it to reset) to 0 just for a freaking AURUM reset, you're going to decay this game more than it can grow.
Just drop it, I've come to terms, it isn't going to happen, at least this is my opinion, and I'm damn happy with that. |
hermin hermit
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:12:00 -
[78] - Quote
@Tyrin Aur refund does not eqaul skill point reset. Stfu fanboy |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2221
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:27:00 -
[79] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:Sadly people don't understand that with the beta legal binding contract we are all still under the "subject to chante" until the "Commercial Release", this can and will indeed change, unfortunately it did for the Merc Pack. I'm sorry, but the beta terms of use "subject to change" clause doesn't apply to the purchase agreement under which the Merc Pack was bought, which is a totally separate agreement and specifies - WITHOUT any such "unless we decide not to" clause - that there will be a full credit of the contents of the Merc Pack on commercial release.
This argument doesn't apply here. And that fact has already been covered more than once in this thread. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:50:00 -
[80] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tyrin Tonious wrote:Sadly people don't understand that with the beta legal binding contract we are all still under the "subject to chante" until the "Commercial Release", this can and will indeed change, unfortunately it did for the Merc Pack. I'm sorry, but the beta terms of use "subject to change" clause doesn't apply to the purchase agreement under which the Merc Pack was bought, which is a totally separate agreement and specifies - WITHOUT any such "unless we decide not to" clause - that there will be a full credit of the contents of the Merc Pack on commercial release. This argument doesn't apply here. And that fact has already been covered more than once in this thread.
It does when the terms within the beta contract claims rights to all within and if Dev so determine to change something, they can. I understand, it is bad practice to do such a thing with actual hard earned real world dollars are used, but this is the reality of things.
Point me to the Terms of Use of the Open Beta if you think I'm wrong, I will read it over and then apologize if I was in fact wrong.
Until then, in the games current stage, CCP reserves even the right to purchased "Packs".
Difference is, they can't take away the Aurum already provided, nore the items, since they were already provided. A reset though, since it was stated that it would happen with resets, must also imply that with a commercial release, there would be another reset. People just now was another 40k Aurum free.
Went all off the walls when they saw the "no more reset" and got their panties wet while thinking oh... free SP then in a twist when they started thinking about "what if" the Aurum reset was in order with an SP reset... |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2222
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:It does when the terms within the beta contract claims rights to all within and if Dev so determine to change something, they can. I understand, it is bad practice to do such a thing with actual hard earned real world dollars are used, but this is the reality of things.
Point me to the Terms of Use of the Open Beta if you think I'm wrong, I will read it over and then apologize if I was in fact wrong.
Until then, in the games current stage, CCP reserves even the right to purchased "Packs".
Difference is, they can't take away the Aurum already provided, nore the items, since they were already provided. A reset though, since it was stated that it would happen with resets, must also imply that with a commercial release, there would be another reset. People just now was another 40k Aurum free.
Went all off the walls when they saw the "no more reset" and got their panties wet while thinking oh... free SP then in a twist when they started thinking about "what if" the Aurum reset was in order with an SP reset... They can legally change anything that occurs WITHIN the beta.
They CAN'T change an agreement made on purchase of the Merc Pack that exists OUTSIDE of the beta conditions. That isn't subject to the terms of use that are relevant to content within the beta.
They're legally bound, regardless of anything agreed to within the beta's terms of use, to provide the product as agreed when we purchased the Merc Pack. Anything else is legally actionable as false advertising at the very least and could potentially be treated as a fraud case.
The purchase agreement made between CCP and the customers buying the Merc Pack before the change in wording is entirely independent of the beta terms of use, and they're legally required to honour that agreement, which includes the product description as it stood AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE.
EDIT: And in that agreement, it wasn't just stated that we'd get our gear credited back at every reset. It was every reset AND AT COMMERCIAL RELEASE. Not "every reset including commercial release" but "every reset AND commercial release". |
Rusticuls
NECROMONGER'S
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:23:00 -
[82] - Quote
I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
687
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:24:00 -
[83] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote: every reset including commercial release
What the Merc. Pack should have said.
I hope CCPs learned a valuable lesson. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2222
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:42:00 -
[84] - Quote
Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:57:00 -
[85] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tyrin Tonious wrote:It does when the terms within the beta contract claims rights to all within and if Dev so determine to change something, they can. I understand, it is bad practice to do such a thing with actual hard earned real world dollars are used, but this is the reality of things.
Point me to the Terms of Use of the Open Beta if you think I'm wrong, I will read it over and then apologize if I was in fact wrong.
Until then, in the games current stage, CCP reserves even the right to purchased "Packs".
Difference is, they can't take away the Aurum already provided, nore the items, since they were already provided. A reset though, since it was stated that it would happen with resets, must also imply that with a commercial release, there would be another reset. People just now was another 40k Aurum free.
Went all off the walls when they saw the "no more reset" and got their panties wet while thinking oh... free SP then in a twist when they started thinking about "what if" the Aurum reset was in order with an SP reset... They can legally change anything that occurs WITHIN the beta. They CAN'T change an agreement made on purchase of the Merc Pack that exists OUTSIDE of the beta conditions. That isn't subject to the terms of use that are relevant to content within the beta. They're legally bound, regardless of anything agreed to within the beta's terms of use, to provide the product as agreed when we purchased the Merc Pack. Anything else is legally actionable as false advertising at the very least and could potentially be treated as a fraud case. The purchase agreement made between CCP and the customers buying the Merc Pack before the change in wording is entirely independent of the beta terms of use, and they're legally required to honour that agreement, which includes the product description as it stood AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE. EDIT: And in that agreement, it wasn't just stated that we'd get our gear credited back at every reset. It was every reset AND AT COMMERCIAL RELEASE. Not "every reset including commercial release" but "every reset AND commercial release".
Oh well, losing case. Doesn't matter what CCP does, or anyone say for that matter. I hope you find what you're searching for. You not feel complete without it. If CCP honors it regardless of standing, great, I feel happy for you all. I don't care either way, I just don't want my SP reset, especially if the reason is because of people who want "their" Aurum
|
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:00:00 -
[86] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: every reset including commercial release
What the Merc. Pack should have said. I hope CCPs learned a valuable lesson.
Yea, probably. People just need to chill and wait to see what happens at "Commercial Release".
I still stand by my beta. But if once purchased, maybe prior purchasing accnts might have a 40k Aurum Credit waiting for you at "Commercial Release".
Who knows, people you're just blowing steam for the moment. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2223
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:Oh well, losing case. Doesn't matter what CCP does, or anyone say for that matter. I hope you find what you're searching for. You not feel complete without it. If CCP honors it regardless of standing, great, I feel happy for you all. I don't care either way, I just don't want my SP reset, especially if the reason is because of people who want "their" Aurum You've obviously either skipped most of the thread, or only skim-read chunks of it.
I'm openly saying I DON'T want a forced SP reset for all players, and it's clear that neither does CCP, but I'm happy for anyone who demands their Boosters back to be told "you can have it if you opt in for a reset of your SP", and to explain that the booster-enhanced SP they already have is a suitable "equivalent" to the Booster they're entitled to. Any Boosters that were purchased with Merc Pack Aurum from this time period (or from a store which still uses the out-of-date product description) would also come under the same terms. You get back all your other Aurum from the Merc Pack, but lose any AUR-bought items you still have.
That would be fair, and would honour the intent of the agreement made between the players and CCP when we purchased the Merc Pack. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:06:00 -
[88] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have.
This wouldn't work because through your prior argument, you're still entitled to your Aurum reimbursement regardless. In this case, you've changed your story in stating that it would be acceptable to accept an equivalent item (which in this case would be multiple items since I haven't seen a single item worth 40k Aur).
Unless as an apology, they provide freebies, then great again for you all. (Even in that case, they might as well give you all the 40k Aur, lmfao) |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:07:00 -
[89] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have.
I highly doubt that this would hold up in court. As the literature clearly refers to the "Mercenary Pack" and "items" contained there in, and SP does not qualify as either and is most assuredly of "of the same value" when one considers that the consumer could have frivolously used them under the impression the they would be credited back to they account.
"DUST 514 Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted."
|
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:11:00 -
[90] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tyrin Tonious wrote:Oh well, losing case. Doesn't matter what CCP does, or anyone say for that matter. I hope you find what you're searching for. You not feel complete without it. If CCP honors it regardless of standing, great, I feel happy for you all. I don't care either way, I just don't want my SP reset, especially if the reason is because of people who want "their" Aurum You've obviously either skipped most of the thread, or only skim-read chunks of it. I'm openly saying I DON'T want a forced SP reset for all players, and it's clear that neither does CCP, but I'm happy for anyone who demands their Boosters back to be told "you can have it if you opt in for a reset of your SP", and to explain that the booster-enhanced SP they already have is a suitable "equivalent" to the Booster they're entitled to. Any Boosters that were purchased with Merc Pack Aurum from this time period (or from a store which still uses the out-of-date product description) would also come under the same terms. You get back all your other Aurum from the Merc Pack, but lose any AUR-bought items you still have. That would be fair, and would honour the intent of the agreement made between the players and CCP when we purchased the Merc Pack.
No, I sadly read through it. Decided to respond towards the end, lol. At this point I've become a troll and am going to stop, more and more am I finding this funnier and funnier. But it's ok, CCP has been good for things and it is what it is.
At launch, if there is an SP reset (along with Aur) sweet for those who want it (I wouldn't unless there was really sweet gear and I absolutely wanted too), or an SP refund, now that is something I'm more interested in.
btw, I am a Merc and Starter owner, so it isn't like I'm blowing steam out of my ass, lmfao. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2223
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:14:00 -
[91] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have. I highly doubt that this would hold up in court. As the literature clearly refers to the "Mercenary Pack" and "items" contained there in, and SP does not qualify as either and is most assuredly not "of the same value" when one considers that the consumer could have frivolously used them under the impression the they would be credited back to they account. "DUST 514 Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted." Thanks for someone finally providing the exact wording of that part here. I don't have it on hand myself.
And for something whose only purpose and use is to increase your earned SP, then it logically follows that the already-boosted SP is equivalent to an item which ends up as no more than that extra SP you still have from using it. It's also fair, given the lack of definitive statements to the contrary, for CCP to offer a new 30-day Booster, but only if you opt in for a full SP reset to get it. They've said they don't intend to reset player SP except in a "catastrophe", which this Merc Pack issue has the potential to become. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:22:00 -
[92] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:[quote=Garrett Blacknova][quote=Rusticuls] I highly doubt that this would hold up in court. As the literature clearly refers to the "Mercenary Pack" and "items" contained there in, and SP does not qualify as either and is most assuredly not "of the same value"when one considers that the consumer could have frivolously used them under the impression the they would be credited back to their account.
"DUST 514 Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset and for the commercial release.CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted."
There's your answer Garret, yes, I can see how it can be confusing though. But as I read this, I look at it as for every character reset and commercial release (another reset). However, through this, it is telling me that if there is ever a reset, that it will be refunded, the final reset being the Commercial Release.
Yes, maybe it could have been worded differently, but still... |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
689
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:29:00 -
[93] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote: only if you opt in for a full SP reset to get it. They've said they don't intend to reset player SP except in a "catastrophe", which this Merc Pack issue has the potential to become.
I see no reason for a complete reset. CCP just said they wouldn't put people back at the SP level of a starting character, so SP cuts are fair game. 380,800 is the amount of boosted SP you can gain if you hit the cap for 4 weeks (I'd say is 28 days is close enough to 30).
So really I think players should be allowed to choose either of these options
1. Get back booster back, lose 380,800 SP (basically 2 weeks worth of fully capped SP) 2. Don't get booster back, keep SP as is.
Either would fulfill the agreement.
Edit: and give everyone a free 3-day booster just to get them to shut up lol |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2223
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:33:00 -
[94] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:I highly doubt that this would hold up in court. As the literature clearly refers to the "Mercenary Pack" and "items" contained there in, and SP does not qualify as either and is most assuredly not "of the same value"when one considers that the consumer could have frivolously used them under the impression the they would be credited back to their account.
"DUST 514 Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset and for the commercial release.CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted." There's your answer Garret, yes, I can see how it can be confusing though. But as I read this, I look at it as for every character reset and commercial release (another reset). However, through this, it is telling me that if there is ever a reset, that it will be refunded, the final reset being the Commercial Release. Yes, maybe it could have been worded differently, but still... It specifically says "after each character reset AND commercial release".
Like I said earlier, it SHOULD have been "including commercial release" so that the reset of Merc Pack content is only dependent on a reset, and if one isn't happening on commercial release, that condition is negated. Because of the wording chosen, it means that the Merc Pack contents must be credited back - OR an appropriate equivalent provided - on commercial release, whether that commercial release includes a character reset or not.
EDIT: Also, Garrett. Double "t". Please? |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
119
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:35:00 -
[95] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have. I highly doubt that this would hold up in court. As the literature clearly refers to the "Mercenary Pack" and "items" contained there in, and SP does not qualify as either and is most assuredly not "of the same value" when one considers that the consumer could have frivolously used them under the impression the they would be credited back to they account. "DUST 514 Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted." And for something whose only purpose and use is to increase your earned SP, then it logically follows that the already-boosted SP is equivalent to an item which ends up as no more than that extra SP you still have from using it. It's also fair, given the lack of definitive statements to the contrary, for CCP to offer a new 30-day Booster, but only if you opt in for a full SP reset to get it. They've said they don't intend to reset player SP except in a "catastrophe", which this Merc Pack issue has the potential to become.
As I said, the issue her is the potential frivolous use of the items under the impression that the items would be credited back. The consumer may have been expecting to keep them as collector items, or may have been planing to sell them on the open market, at an enormous increase in value equivalent in ISK, which would mean that the potential SP gained from the the items in the Merc Pack could in fact have been much greater, and this includes the auram as well. It could just as easily been frivolously spent. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
119
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:50:00 -
[96] - Quote
The only way for CCP to move forward with this mater and get what they "may" have intended to obtain is to offer an option to opt out of a reset, with the condition that anyone who opts out sign a waver releasing them from the terms and conditions of the Mercenary Pack. But as I have said before this is highly unethical. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2223
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:58:00 -
[97] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:The only way for CCP to move forward with this mater and get what they "may" have intended to obtain is to offer an option to opt out of a reset, with the condition that anyone who opts out sign a waver releasing them from the terms and conditions of the Mercenary Pack. But as I have said before this is highly unethical. Unless you consider the possibilities of resetting SP fully or partially, or a reset of everything except Boosters, with maybe the option of an "opt out" where you just keep what you currently have if you're fine with that current state of your Merc Pack content. |
VOUYER
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 10:37:00 -
[98] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: only if you opt in for a full SP reset to get it. They've said they don't intend to reset player SP except in a "catastrophe", which this Merc Pack issue has the potential to become.
I see no reason for a complete reset. CCP just said they wouldn't put people back at the SP level of a starting character, so SP cuts are fair game. 380,800 is the amount of boosted SP you can gain if you hit the cap for 4 weeks (I'd say is 28 days is close enough to 30). So really I think players should be allowed to choose either of these options 1. Get back booster back, lose 380,800 SP (basically 2 weeks worth of fully capped SP) 2. Don't get booster back, keep SP as is. Either would fulfill the agreement. Edit: and give everyone a free 3-day booster just to get them to shut up lol
Would you care to explain why player's should lose sp to have the booster refunded as it didn't say anywhere in the merc pack description to receive your booster back upon commercial release you must give up sp. I am only referring to CB pack's before the wording was changed |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
689
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 16:43:00 -
[99] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote: As I said, the issue here is the potential frivolous use of the items under the impression that the items would be credited back. The consumer may have been expecting to keep them as collector items, or may have been planing to sell them on the open market, at an enormous increase in value equivalent in ISK, which would mean that the potential SP gained from the the items in the Merc Pack could in fact have been much greater, and this includes the auram as well, it could just as easily have been frivolously spent.
Someone who didn't use it because they intend to sell it would still have it, there is no need to re-credit it to them. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
689
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 17:00:00 -
[100] - Quote
VOUYER wrote: Would you care to explain why player's should lose sp to have the booster refunded as it didn't say anywhere in the merc pack description to receive your booster back upon commercial release you must give up sp. I am only referring to CB pack's before the wording was changed
It's true that it doesn't say players must give up a portion of SP, but nowhere on the merc pack does it say that CCP can't take a portion of your SP; therefore, it's perfectly acceptable.
380.8 might be a bit too much for those who didn't try to maximize SP gains (however unlikely that might be), but if CCP doesn't have an exact way of knowing how much boosted SP someone gained, then I think 308,800 would be a reasonable enough amount. Keep in mind that that number doesn't include any SP that might have been after hitting a weekly cap. If someone feels they would lose more SP then they had actually gained, then they can always choose option 2. If someone feels they can make up for what they lose by grinding, then they can choose option 1. Honestly though, I doubt anyone who used the booster didn't try to maximize SP gains, so I see very few people choosing option 1. |
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
443
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 18:36:00 -
[101] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: every reset.
What the Merc. Pack should have said. I hope CCPs learned a valuable lesson. Fixed that for you.
That's all I had for you in particular, the rest is for everyone else.
CCP screwed up with the wording on that thing. But back when you bought it you didn't think it meant you were going to get 2 of them. And everybody knew things were subject to change. And you should understand that all CCP has really been saying all along is anything you bought before a character reset would still be there afterwards.
So can we just drop all this "I'm outraged!" and "I am merely asking for what I originally purchased!" bullcrap? You got what you paid for, we all did. And CCP hasn't broken any promises about the Merc Pack. So just stop, you're making yourselves look stupid.
"CCP changed their mind on the final reset being when the game went to the Commercial Release stage. I knew they might change their mind about anything and I agreed to that when I entered the BETA. Unfortunately for them they got sloppy with some wording and now I'm entitled to free stuff. I don't care if you think it's right or wrong, it's not my fault they weren't more careful with the contract language. I feel I'm within my rights to demand this and I'm going to stand by that."
If you start saying that it won't matter if I agree or disagree because at least you're being honest. Stop trying to make CCP the villain in all this. And stop thinking anyone who disagrees with you "is just defending CCP!". I'm looking at this objectively.
Whether the final reset is at launch or before you still got your Merc Pack items after it. And you were informed that is would be the final reset before it happened. So just say you want free stuff because they screwed up. Can't argue with that so the debate moves on to speculation about whether or not you should actually be entitled to receive another Merc Pack.
And as a side note the merc pack itself did say that all AUR would be refunded at commercial release. That statement was all alone whereas this other stuff directly followed language that referred to resets. Because of that I would say if nothing else CCP should be obligated to refund the AUR from the Merc Packs that players have spent so far. It will be bad for the game and community but that statement is hard to argue with, mainly because it was all by itself. |
VOUYER
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 18:59:00 -
[102] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:VOUYER wrote: Would you care to explain why player's should lose sp to have the booster refunded as it didn't say anywhere in the merc pack description to receive your booster back upon commercial release you must give up sp. I am only referring to CB pack's before the wording was changed
It's true that it doesn't say players must give up a portion of SP, but nowhere on the merc pack does it say that CCP can't take a portion of your SP; therefore, it's perfectly acceptable. 380.8 might be a bit too much for those who didn't try to maximize SP gains (however unlikely that might be), but if CCP doesn't have an exact way of knowing how much boosted SP someone gained, then I think 308,800 would be a reasonable enough amount. Keep in mind that that number doesn't include any SP that might have been after hitting a weekly cap. If someone feels they would lose more SP then they had actually gained, then they can always choose option 2. If someone feels they can make up for what they lose by grinding, then they can choose option 1. Honestly though, I doubt anyone who used the booster didn't try to maximize SP gains, so I see very few people choosing option 1.
Thanks for the response but it still didn't answer my question as to why player's should lose sp |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
690
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 19:19:00 -
[103] - Quote
VOUYER wrote: Thanks for the response but it still didn't answer my question as to why player's should lose sp
Okay, but if they get the booster back then why should they be allowed to keep the SP from having used the booster in the first place? I'm just saying they should only get to keep the SP that they would have normally had, the unboosted Sp. |
VOUYER
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 22:51:00 -
[104] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:VOUYER wrote: Thanks for the response but it still didn't answer my question as to why player's should lose sp
Okay, but if they get the booster back then why should they be allowed to keep the SP from having used the booster in the first place? I'm just saying they should only get to keep the SP that they would have normally had, the unboosted Sp.
Why shouldn't they be able to keep it your just basically dodging the question I asked which is your reason you think they should lose the sp.
Honestly why do you care if they get to keep the sp earned with the booster unless your compelling reason is you don't want them to get something your not. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2246
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:16:00 -
[105] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:And CCP hasn't broken any promises about the Merc Pack. +1 to you (I've been doing that on a lot of your posts on this topic), but this part needs looking at.
CCP hasn't broken any promises about the Merc Pack.
But - and it's a big "but" - there's plenty of reason to believe they WILL break promises that are made about the Merc Pack.
Many people with the Pack have spammed the use of gear included in the pack under the understanding that it'll be reset on commercial release. Those people are entitled, legally, to a reset of their Merc Pack as promised. Some people may have basically thrown away their Booster by using it and only really taking advantage for the first week, and thought it was fine because they'll get it reset on commercial release. Those people are also entitled to a reset of their Merc Pack as promised. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
696
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:48:00 -
[106] - Quote
VOUYER wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:VOUYER wrote: Thanks for the response but it still didn't answer my question as to why player's should lose sp
Okay, but if they get the booster back then why should they be allowed to keep the SP from having used the booster in the first place? I'm just saying they should only get to keep the SP that they would have normally had, the unboosted Sp. Why shouldn't they be able to keep it your just basically dodging the question I asked which is your reason you think they should lose the sp. Honestly why do you care if they get to keep the sp earned with the booster unless your compelling reason is you don't want them to get something your not. I don't think they deserve to keep something they didn't pay for or that wasn't willingly gifted to them. If they get the booster back then they didn't pay for the boosted SP they received earlier.
I don't care if someone has more Sp than me, lots of people do. I care if people are trying take advantage of a technicality, which will effect me, in order to gain something more than they deserve. It won't effect me you say? H'mm what do you think they're going to do with that extra SP? They're going to use it to have an advantage over other players, that includes me.
Now then, why do you think they should be allowed to keep it? |
snipper doo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 01:56:00 -
[107] - Quote
Bump |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
264
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 01:58:00 -
[108] - Quote
VOUYER wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:VOUYER wrote: Thanks for the response but it still didn't answer my question as to why player's should lose sp
Okay, but if they get the booster back then why should they be allowed to keep the SP from having used the booster in the first place? I'm just saying they should only get to keep the SP that they would have normally had, the unboosted Sp. Why shouldn't they be able to keep it your just basically dodging the question I asked which is your reason you think they should lose the sp. Honestly why do you care if they get to keep the sp earned with the booster unless your compelling reason is you don't want them to get something your not.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |