Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
439
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1027
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what?
We haven't hit commercial release yet. The Merc Pack is to be credited to the account at commercial release. I know you know this at this point, I've quoted the Merc Pack itself in response to you. At this point it must be assumed you are simply trolling. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:41:00 -
[33] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED to, but haven't YET received everything we WILL BE entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? We haven't hit commercial release yet. The Merc Pack is to be credited to the account at commercial release. I know you know this at this point, I've quoted the Merc Pack itself in response to you. At this point it must be assumed you are simply trolling. Trolling...do huh? When you bought the merc pack the items and their quantities were listed out for you before you agreed to the purchase. That is how many of each item you will receive, so what are you talking about? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2179
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED (past tense) to, but haven't YET (future tense) received everything we WILL BE (future tense) entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? Added in explanations of how you're missing the point in parentheses. I hope that helps.
The product description on the Merc Pack that was on the PS Store at the time many of us purchased them included events that haven't happened yet. We haven't received those parts of what we purchased yet because the event on which they depend has yet to occur.
And as long as that clause was in the description of the product provided by the store at which the Merc Pack was purchased, it's a legally binding part of the purchase agreement, and is independent of the terms of use that CCP have the right to alter as set out when a player first starts up the beta. |
Severus Smith
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
206
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Severus Smith wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Give those who want the option to get back their AUR and BPCs. In exchange they get reset as promised for the Commercial Release. Sounds fair to me. Purchasers can petition to get their Merc Pack items / AUR refunded, and CCP will refund them after resetting their characters. It fulfills the contract. Anything more is just people being greedy. There you go Baal, that work for you? No, absolutely not. That's disgusting. Why are you people so deadset on the people who bought a Merc Pack receiving the items they purchased? Why would the people who actually paid CCP real world money for those items need to have their progress in the game reset in order to recieve them? How does that make ANY sense whatsoever? Are you just jealous that you didn't buy a Merc Pack when they were still such an awesome deal? If that's the case, just go buy one from Game Stop, the deal is still going on there with that particular Merc Pack. Otherwise stop being so spiteful and let us get the items we bought without trying to figure out a way to screw your opponents out of their purchase. I've bought roughly 10 Merc packs. So no, I'm not jealous. I'm just annoyed when people like you are greedy and try to take advantage of others due to "fine print".
You, me, and everyone else purchased a Merc pack during Closed Beta to get access to the Boosters, AURUM, and other goodies. We were told in the "fine print" that these would be refunded to us after resets and upon "Commercial release". This print was written when CCP intended to reset us at Commercial release. They changed their plans and thus their stance on Merc Pack refunds.
So sure, you're right. According to the "fine print" you are entitled to a refund of your Boosters, AURUM, and items upon Commercial release. Though since the Merc Pack you bought has already been applied to your current character you would effectively be using it twice thus violating the original intent of the sale. So, to correct this double dipping the only logical course of action is for CCP to exercise the "fine print" in their EULA and reset your and other protesting player's characters, thus removing the items you have already applied to your character, before refunding your Merc pack so they keep in line with their original intent at the time of sale.
You can act all disgusted and that you're being screwed over all you want. But the only way that your request is fair is if it is honored in the original context in which it was offered; that Merc Pack purchasers would receive a refund of their items after each and every reset. Anything beyond that is pure greed on your part.
Hopeful CCP Announcement wrote:We will gladly refund any Merc packs purchased by players before XX/XX/XXXX. However, we will be resetting those player's characters before applying the refund. This is to ensure that players who applied the Merc Pack to their characters before XX/XX/XXXX do not benefit from the items and AURUM twice. If you would like your Merc Pack refunded please contact CCP Customer Support at [email protected].
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3279
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:08:00 -
[36] - Quote
Well according to some people's reading apparently my own purchasing one merc pack entitles me to ownership of 4 merc packs.
The reality is you only PURCHASED ONE merc pack per PURCHASE, you are not going to magically get a second merc pack on the same purchase, it is still the same merc pack before a total item reset.
So you bought one and still got ONE. Not two not three not infinity or indefininite but One Merc Pack.
No where in the language of that purchase agreement does it say a 'second' instead its more referral to that singular item purchase still.
Lawsuit all you want but you're not going to get far. Because you bought that one thing and you have have been given that one thing and the sale advertisement does not indicate a second (nor third nor fourth nor fifth or so on) one free of charge but rather ccp has every right NOT to give you a second one but do so anyways because they are generous.
This is not buy one get one free, this is buy one and retain one.
Any attempts to pluralize the contract requires a second purchase.
Commercial Release or not, you only have that one pack, even if they do reset, its still that one pack. |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
120
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
So the gist of it is players who bought the Merc Pack want to basically "double dip" because of fine print that talks about something that hasn't happened yet (commercial release). Why is everyone up in arms about it now? For all we know, the Merc Packs will be reissued at commercial release and all this arguing will be for naught.
Just so everyone knows, I couldn't care less about what happens. I got my $20 worth, so I'm happy. As long as it's reissued if there's a reset, I'm good. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3279
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
Either way the only way to fulfill the agreement would require RESETTING the game.
Which is considered the far greater evil of the two. |
DS 10
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
120
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Either way the only way to fulfill the agreement would require RESETTING the game.
Which is considered the far greater evil of the two.
Yeah. They'd lose me and probably hundreds of other dedicated players. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
Everyone who purchased the Merc Pack under those terms - as set out when in the pre-purchase agreement - is legally entitled to receive everything they purchased.
Which I pointed out in the other thread were listed by quantity at the time of purchase. So you got everything you were supposed to. GOT everything we WERE SUPPOSED (past tense) to, but haven't YET (future tense) received everything we WILL BE (future tense) entitled to under the terms agreed upon purchase. What? You didn't get your items? Should have contacted Sony about that before now. Were they just missing or did the download fail or what? Added in explanations of how you're missing the point in parentheses. I hope that helps. The product description on the Merc Pack that was on the PS Store at the time many of us purchased them included events that haven't happened yet. We haven't received those parts of what we purchased yet because the event on which they depend has yet to occur. And as long as that clause was in the description of the product provided by the store at which the Merc Pack was purchased, it's a legally binding part of the purchase agreement, and is independent of the terms of use that CCP have the right to alter as set out when a player first starts up the beta.
I'm afraid you are missing what I'm saying. This isn't my opinion or how I think it should be, this is the law. When you bought the merc pack it said, for example, 30 Day Booster x 1. That is not what you were receiving at that time, that was what you agreed to purchase period.
I'm not exaggerating when I say there is no wiggle room at all in that. That is as legally binding as anything can possibly be. So you have received exactly what you agreed to purchase. So you're trying to tell me that you looked at the list of contents and saw 30-Day Booster x 1 and thought you were going to get 2? And no implied product clause modifies jack. Those numbers are what you agree to purchase.
I'm serious about this, if you fail to understand this one single point I was assume you lack the mental capacity for productive dialogue and ignore your future posts. Those quantities of items are all you are entitled to receive unless explicitly stated somewhere that additional items will be delivered at a future date. By explicit I don't mean clear, I mean things like "At such date for such payment amount this certain quantity will be delivered". I don't see that anywhere.
And like I said before, "credited to your account" means to replace that which was lost. It is a term with a fixed meaning. You must first give something to someone else before you can receive "credit" for it. A credit can not increase the quantity of anything. A credit is merely a representation of something else. In fact, in a legal sense if you are credited something and yet you currently posses that item, therefor increasing what you posses from 1 to 2 of the whatever, you are required by law to return the credit immediately and will be held liable in court if you spend it. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2183
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:I'm afraid you are missing what I'm saying. This isn't my opinion or how I think it should be, this is the law. When you bought the merc pack it said, for example, 30 Day Booster x 1. That is not what you were receiving at that time, that was what you agreed to purchase period.
I'm not exaggerating when I say there is no wiggle room at all in that. That is as legally binding as anything can possibly be. So you have received exactly what you agreed to purchase. So you're trying to tell me that you looked at the list of contents and saw 30-Day Booster x 1 and thought you were going to get 2? And no implied product clause modifies jack. Those numbers are what you agree to purchase.
I'm serious about this, if you fail to understand this one single point I was assume you lack the mental capacity for productive dialogue and ignore your future posts. Those quantities of items are all you are entitled to receive unless explicitly stated somewhere that additional items will be delivered at a future date. By explicit I don't mean clear, I mean things like "At such date for such payment amount this certain quantity will be delivered". I don't see that anywhere.
And like I said before, "credited to your account" means to replace that which was lost. It is a term with a fixed meaning. You must first give something to someone else before you can receive "credit" for it. A credit can not increase the quantity of anything. A credit is merely a representation of something else. In fact, in a legal sense if you are credited something and yet you currently posses that item, therefor increasing what you posses from 1 to 2 of the whatever, you are required by law to return the credit immediately and will be held liable in court if you spend it. I'm afraid YOU'RE missing what I'M saying, and definitely NOT the other way around.
Yes, they stated clearly the exact content the Merc Pack came with.
But they ALSO stated clearly the terms under which those items are given. Those terms as described are just as legally binding as the listing of the Merc Pack's content. Included in those terms was the line (possibly paraphrased - I don't have the exact wording in front of me) "at every character reset AND on commercial release". That wording clearly defines commercial release as not only being (potentially) distinct from a character reset, but ALSO as being - whether it's a reset or not - a point at which all Merc Pack gear is "credited in full".
That being said, I agree with you for the most part on what you want to have happen.
In essence, since anyone who's used their Merc Pack Booster still has the SP it provided, they arguably still have the Booster itself. It's a grey area, imo, and leaves some room for argument. I don't think the Booster should be given back unless the player is willing to have a character reset along with it.
The same thing applies with Aurum purchases using the Merc Pack's provided Aurum. If you bought Boosters, you still have the Booster, therefore you still have the benefit provided by that Aurum's use. If you want that Aurum back, it's reasonable to see your character reset in order to do that.
Any BPO Merc Pack items that were assigned to a character then deleted when the character was terminated should be credited back into the player's account to be assigned to a new character. Any BPC items that came with the Merc Pack should be credited back to the player up to the number included in the Merc Pack (or however many copies of the Merc Pack that player purchased). Any Aurum spent by the player on something OTHER than a Booster should be credited back to the player, and the AUR items the player purchased should be returned to the store (unless destroyed).
If you want to use the Boosters you already used, go ahead. But you have to give up the SP that you earned with them.
To me, that's a fair solution. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
What about the part that you can't be "credited in full" for something you currently posses? You know the part about none of the words on that page equal "get an additional one at no cost"?
EDIT:I'm sorry, I have to ask. Seriously. Real talk. When you bought the merc pack months and months ago you knew you were going to get two of them for the price of one? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1027
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 23:00:00 -
[43] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:What about the part that you can't be "credited in full" for something you currently posses? You know the part about none of the words on that page equal "get an additional one at no cost"?
EDIT:I'm sorry, I have to ask. Seriously. Real talk. When you bought the merc pack months and months ago you knew you were going to get two of them for the price of one?
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2185
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 23:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:What about the part that you can't be "credited in full" for something you currently posses? You know the part about none of the words on that page equal "get an additional one at no cost"?
EDIT:I'm sorry, I have to ask. Seriously. Real talk. When you bought the merc pack months and months ago you knew you were going to get two of them for the price of one? So you're not reading what I'm saying?
No, we don't get to keep the originally-issued Merc Pack gear (or what's left of it) AND get a new Merc Pack on top of that when the game goes live.
But yes, we ARE entitled to have all the Merc Pack content credited in full, as specified at the time of purchase.
If I still have my Dragonfly suit, I don't get 2. I either keep the one I already have, or I get it reset, losing the existing one in exchange for a new one (which would allow me to assign it to another character if I've changed my mind about which of my alts I want to use it with). If I terminated a character and deleted my Dragonfly, I should be issued a new one.
If I still have all 50 of my HK4Ms, I don't now have 100, I either keep them on the character they're assigned to, or get them reset as with the Dragonfly. If I have 20 of them left, I get them reset back to 50. I don't have 70.
The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3283
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:31:00 -
[45] - Quote
Show me where exactly are you getting TWO mercenary packs. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
661
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:36:00 -
[46] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point.
Source? And show me another source where it says they would let you keep the Sp alongside the returned booster. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
663
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:38:00 -
[47] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote: The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that.
The boosters can be substituted for something of equal value though, in this case the SP they got for using the booster in the first place. As long as they keep that, then the agreement would technically be fulfilled right? |
King Kobrah
SyNergy Gaming
122
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
There's no interpretation to be had here. The letter and the law is very clear cut here. We will be getting our merc packs refunded on commercial release as the terms of the contract stated when we made the purchase.
This is not rocket science kids. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
663
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:There's no interpretation to be had here. The letter and the law is very clear cut here. We will be getting our merc packs refunded on commercial release as the terms of the contract stated when we made the purchase.
This is not rocket science kids. Okay, just know that playing things by the letter can comeback to bite you in the ass. Like CCP cutting your Sp, they never said they wouldn't do that.
And last I checked, we do take the spirit of laws/agreements into account. For instance, almost every single amendment to the US constitution. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2190
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:48:00 -
[50] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that.
The boosters can be substituted for something of equal value though, in this case the SP they got for using the booster in the first place. As long as they keep that, then the agreement would technically be fulfilled right? Actually, any item can be substituted for "an equivalent" item" on release or any reset. And yes, the SP is a reasonable equivalent. Well spotted! +1
I still think it's reasonable for people to expect their HK4Ms, etc. to be topped back up though. And for someone (even though it was stupid if they did) who deleted a character with the Toxin and/or Dragonfly to get those Blueprint items back. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3285
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:51:00 -
[51] - Quote
Basically the wording does not allow for you to obtain a second from one purchase. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1821
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Um, guys.
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=653179#post653179
Altina wrote: EDIT: I asked Sony about this and the unofficial word from some random customer service rep (after she "researched" it for me) was that if CCP releases the game they will have to refund AUR since that what was explicitly stated.
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
442
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
Seems like the forums ate my post. Other people have already raised all my points but I just want to apologize to Garrett. Too many threads got blurry and I didn't realize you were the one saying to reimburse it all back to the original value only, my bad. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2193
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 01:02:00 -
[54] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Seems like the forums ate my post. Other people have already raised all my points but I just want to apologize to Garrett. Too many threads got blurry and I didn't realize you were the one saying to reimburse it all back to the original value only, my bad. No worries. With all the threads about this, it's a bit of a confusing mess to try and follow.
I've agreed with a lot of what you're saying, and I get that some of what I said wasn't as clear as it should have been.
Also, thank you for spelling my name right. Most people forget the second "t" |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
134
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 18:54:00 -
[55] - Quote
I am 300% with Baal. CCP sold a product/service under certain conditions. They must deliver. The fact that some unforeseen events took place such as that the official release being pushed back or the fact that they decided later on not to reset SP for everyone at release does not change the initial agreement. The should not have the power to unilateraly change commercial agreements after they already have received the payment.
And it does not matter that some ppl think that it may be fair not give out the merc pack twice - there is an agreement and the players who paid for the Merc pack are entitled to the windfall of the unforeseen circumstances. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
134
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 19:17:00 -
[56] - Quote
"Credited in full" upon release to me means - yes, the second of each: the AUR, booster and the other stuff.
I don't see how CCP can give you the uplinks and militia SG as part of this 'credited in full' but not the booster.
People who say that the extra SP that ppl carry around instead of the booster is an equivalent of the booster, therefore there should not be another booster given, would then have to extend their logic and accept that all those other consummable items are in fact still 'with the player' because they were used to play matches and resulted in accrued SP. And if so, nothing should be 'credited in full' upon release. The agreement, on the other hand, stipulates that the merc pack will be 'credited in full'
To people who say that Merc pack never promised 'the same thing being given tiwce' are wrong because I got my full merc pack already 3 times this beta with each reset. And the agreement clearly states that official release will be treated as a reset as far as Merc pack is concerned; so yes, the full pack much be given another time. So 4 total packs, in my case, with 2 of them having a lasting benefit. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2204
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 19:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:"Credited in full" upon release to me means - yes, the second of each: the AUR, booster and the other stuff.
I don't see how CCP can give you the uplinks and militia SG as part of this 'credited in full' but not the booster.
People who say that the extra SP that ppl carry around instead of the booster is an equivalent of the booster, therefore there should not be another booster given, would then have to extend their logic and accept that all those other consummable items are in fact still 'with the player' because they were used to play matches and resulted in accrued SP. And if so, nothing should be 'credited in full' upon release. The agreement, on the other hand, stipulates that the merc pack will be 'credited in full'
To people who say that Merc pack never promised 'the same thing being given tiwce' are wrong because I got my full merc pack already 3 times this beta with each reset. And the agreement clearly states that official release will be treated as a reset as far as Merc pack is concerned; so yes, the full pack much be given another time. So 4 total packs, in my case, with 2 of them having a lasting benefit. It can be argued that CCP only promised the items OR AN EQUIVALENT when crediting you in full.
So we MUST get something that's at least an approximation of the Dragonfly Scout, but maybe they will change it to be a Caldari small frame suit instead. And we MUST get 50 HK4M Shotguns, or something with equivalent capabilities. And we MUST get the 30-day Booster.... OR SOMETHING EQUIVALENT.
Something equivalent to a 30 day booster like, for example, 30 days worth of boosted SP that we already have, so they don't need to re-credit that because we already have it.
Crediting the Merc Pack in full on release means they have to replace anything that's gone, NOT that they have to give us more on top of what we still have left over.
If you used the Booster, you still have the SP which is an appropriate equivalent to a Booster, so you're not actually losing something by not getting it credited back.
If your HK4M Shotguns all got blown up, you DON'T still have them, AND you don't still have any equivalent to them. If you accidentally deleted your Dragonfly suit or Toxin with a character they were assigned to, then you DON'T still have those items or an equivalent of them |
Zlocha
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 20:10:00 -
[58] - Quote
Guys dont be too greedy. U ll just bring the full reset of everything, SP, Assets, AUR on yourselves. It will hurt more surely than the merc pack refund which was refunded when the game went open beta. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 20:39:00 -
[59] - Quote
i cant wait for CCP to pull the "Welcome to New eden" on these packs player already used,Their probably not going to do anything seeing as their dancing around the subject |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2205
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 20:53:00 -
[60] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:i cant wait for CCP to pull the "Welcome to New eden" on these packs player already used,Their probably not going to do anything seeing as their dancing around the subject Considering there's solid ground for a legal case to be brought against them if they do nothing, I'm pretty sure they're working on a solution.
But at the same time, considering the "or an equivalent" part of the equation, there's still solid ground for them to refuse refunds of Boosters, including AUR Boosters (citing the argument that you still have the result of - and therefore the value of - the Booster purchased). |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |