Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Moonracer2000
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
374
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:40:00 -
[61] - Quote
This has been discussed to death but I still think it is an interesting discussion, and until we get a solid response from CCP it is an important one.
There is not a simple solution to the problem here. CCP is being pushed into a corner with few options and they are being very quiet.
Facing the risk of legal action might be the "catastrophic" event that causes a full wipe on "commercial release". Unless they did something drastic like start us all off with X million SP and ISK after the reset they would risk losing a LOT of players.
It will be interesting to see how CCP deals with the situation. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1032
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:15:00 -
[62] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point.
Source? And show me another source where it says they would let you keep the Sp alongside the returned booster.
They haven't explained at all how they intend to deal with the Merc Pack, that's the problem.
What they did say over and over again during closed beta is that we could be sure that we would recieve all of our AUR that we purchased back at launch because it's "ridiculous to charge players for items in a beta" and that the Merc Pack should be seen as a "prepurchase for goods players will recieve at launch". This position didn't change until WEEKS after they decided that this would no longer be the case, and they basically back dated the decision to weeks prior... and this isn't even taking into account the fact that such information was never ever "officially" made available, players had to stumble acrossed said information on this trash dump of a forum to find out their real world purchases were no longer being reimbursed.
Anyone who used their Merc Pack or regular AUR purchases between the start of the open beta and weeks later when they made this announcement were basically screwed.
I'm sorry, but I'm not going to search back through hundreds of Dev posts from 9 months to a year ago (are those posts from the older forum, pre wipe, even available anymore?), just to satisfy a naysayer on an internet forum. If you don't believe me that this was there position, then so be it or go find the information yourself, but when a CCP rep or a player that was around back then reads this, I'm sure they will know precisely the conversations I'm referring to because they were more rampant than threads now about the issue are.
Such short memories people seem to have.
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: The only part where this gets messy is with Boosters, and as I've already said, there's a valid argument saying we still technically have those, and the difficulty of reclaiming them means it's reasonable for CCP to reset any Merc Pack content EXCEPT Boosters - and include Boosters purchased with Merc Pack Aurum in that.
The boosters can be substituted for something of equal value though, in this case the SP they got for using the booster in the first place. As long as they keep that, then the agreement would technically be fulfilled right?
I think the idea that the SP is equal value to the booster itself is at least an interesting proposition that I would be willing to entertain, assuming CCP actually bothered to speak up and respond about the issue. It's one thing to discuss the idea with random naysayer #47 on an internet forum, it's another to discuss it with the person who took my money and has yet to speak up on the issue.
Most of the issue here is CCP's lack of response on this, and their apparent about face on the issue. Again, really this is an issue of trust and principle. My $20 Merc Pack itself isn't that big of a deal, but what this situation does (with the way CCP are FAILING to handle it) is makes many of us who bought a Merc Pack much less likely to trust CCP in the future. If I don't get a fair shake on this Merc Pack situation you can gaurantee I won't be buying any more products from CCP in the future. Basically, they have potential future customers hinging on how they deal with this situation. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
682
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: assuming CCP actually bothered to speak up and respond about the issue. 10 years later... nope, gotta wait another 10 years. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1032
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: assuming CCP actually bothered to speak up and respond about the issue. 10 years later... nope, gotta wait another 10 years.
precisely. this discussion has only gotten out of control because people who have spent real world money have been left to speculate endlessly because CCP is either too inept or too chicken **** to just clear the issue up. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:09:00 -
[65] - Quote
Alright... *cracks nucleus* ...amateur hour is over. Time to get down to brass tacks with this subject (this is truly a snafu of the first magnitude).
Let's do some ethics (hope you packed a lunch):
First, it is necessary is for us to CLEARLY define the terminology that was used, and is currently under debate now - in as far as, how it may have -ábeen defined by the consumer, as well as, how CCP may have intended it to be defined, both in light of the actual literal interpretations of said terms.
-áTerms currently under debate:
GÇó Mercenary Pack GÇó Credited in full GÇó Character reset GÇó Commercial release
"...Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset AND for the commercial release."
I am, of course, assuming that the above quote is accurate.
"Mercenary pack" is easy. We all know what it is and what it contains.
"Credited in full", like above, is also VERY clear.
"Character reset", now here is we're we star to run into some problems. What exactly is a character reset (in as far as, both the paying customer and CCP may have defined it).
"Commercial release", and again we run into the same problem as above: what exactly does a "commercial release" Intel?
Let's explore the contested terms.
1. Character reset:
As a consumer, there are two ways to interpret this phrase:
1. Singular: "my character will be reset". This excludes the necessity for the consumer to concern themselves with any other consumer who may have purchased the "Mercenary Pack". In essence, in this interpretation, the consumers purchase occurred in a vacuum.
2. Plural: "all consumers are subject (SUBJECT not entitled) to a reset when it occurs. In this interpretation, the consumer is buying the "Mercenary Pack" with the understanding that the affect, "character reset" insinuates, is as follows: when a character reset occurs, it will affect all consumers.
So, which one is it?
Before we delve any deeper into this, let's take the following scenario under consideration:
During the last character reset (just prior to the open beta launch) if it had been optional, at that time (during that character reset) to opt out of the reset, would this have been desirable to anyone? Speaking from my own perspective, the answer is yes, and I am quite certain that there are many others out there who share sentiment. The reason for this is because I was quite satisfied with what I had, to that point, accomplished with my character. But would this have been fair to the other consumers that were not satisfied? As so many people are so fond of saying, this is a beta, and as such, "a work in progress", an unfinished product subject to change. Now can the consumer be held financial responsible for the purchase of a product that is subject to change? Take the following as an example:
I walk into a grocery store to which it took me two months to drive to (the only grocery store on the planet infact). I take an apple from the shelf, and take it to the teller in order to purchase it. As the teller swipes the apple across the scanner, to ring up the sale, through some act of magic, the apple suddenly turns into an orange. Is it still my responsibility to purchase the orange? The answer is, most emphatically, no.
Now let's say that there are ten people at the teller with me (all purcasing apples) yet mine is the only one that keeps tuning into an orange. Befuddled, I look around in bewilderment and by chance happen to spot a man in a dress shirt and tie waving a wand everytime the teller tries to scan the apple. He is wearing a name tag, it says: "CCP owner/manager". The man notices me noticing him and promptly approaches me, and the following conversation ensues:
CCP: Hello sir. My name is CCP, I'm the owner. What seems to be the problem?
Bob, the unsatisfied customer: Well, quite frankly I'm trying to buy an apply but it keeps turning into an orange.
CCP: Ahh, i see. We have had this problem happen before. I am afraid that you will have to return to you're place of residence, obtaine a notarized afidavid stating that you have returned to your please of residence, and the return to CCP Mart, at which time, we here a CCP Mart garantees that the issue will be resolved.
Bob, the unsatisfied customer: but it took me two months to drive to CCP Mart, what about the time and effort I spent to get here?
CCP: I am quite sorry sir. That is CCP Mart policy.
I'll leave it up to your imagination to figure out what bobs reaction is at that point.
So, as we should all plainly be able to see, an option to opt out of a reset is not an ethical/fair one, because all of those satisfied with the game get to continue on being satisfied with the game while those who are not satisfied, loose an irreplaceable set of commodities: time and effort.
Ok, that takes care of the first contested term. Let's move on to the next:
2. Commercial release:
Legally speaking, this is VERY specific, as well as, VERY binding and for good reason: because it removes consumer responsibility to act responsibly with their purchases until CCP make the consumer aware the the property has been "commercially released"
Regardless of what CCP had intended to mean by "commercial release" is irrelevant. The fact is that the two terms "commercial release" and reset are not connected in any way, no matter how much CCP or any one else, for that mater, wants them to be. By this term, CCP is legally obligated to credit the items in question to any consumer that purchased a Mercenary Pack.
{continued>>> |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:10:00 -
[66] - Quote
The simple fact is that CCP should never have included "commercial if that is not what the were intending to do. it is miss leading in the extreme, and gives those who were mislead by it a valid argument:
I was not responsible with my money because CCP assured me that I did not have to be until the "commercial release".
There is, legally, only three options that CCP can pursue:
1. Reset all player accounts upon-ácommercial release
This is an option that neither the majority of the player base nor CCP themselves want. I can tell you personall that, if my lifetime skill points is reset to zero again, I will no longer be playing this game, and I am sure that there are many others out there who would feel the same, which is the reason why CCP does not desire this option ether.
2. CCP can offer to reset the accounts of any one who wants a Mercenary Pack credit, however, this is entirely unethical toward those who were genuinely mislead by the language of the purchase contract. If this is the path CCP chooses, I will not choose to have my character reset, but neither will I be leaving the game.
3. CCP can take it on the chin like a real man, cut their losses and give out the credits to every one who bought a Mercinary Pack, as to HONOR the original agreement. I would actually consider it a reward to those who helped CCP develop their game in beta. This seems reasonable, and was, in all honesty, what I interpreted this thing to mean when CCP announced that there will be no further "character resets".
And that's my 20 cents worth. Hope this all in some way helped this debacle to get resolved in a desirable fashion that is agreeable to all parties involved. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
443
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:43:00 -
[67] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:
correct, the wording is clear. One for the beta, and another at commercial release. This was verified and assured by CCP reps on a regular basis, and people arguing that this wouldn't be the case were ridiculed by other players and CCP reps.
You know what's even clearer than the wording? The fact that CCP was promising that you would get the merc pack items back in full after the final reset (Commercial Release at the time) so you could try stuff out before that with no worries. You know what isn't clear? CCP promising you that no matter what you were going to get a new merc pack on Commercial Release whether there was a reset or not.
the merc pack IS a fresh set of all items at commercial release. That was the entire point.
The entire point was you would get it all back after the final reset. Whether that final reset was Commercial Release or not the promise was once the game started for real you'd start it with all your Merc Pack goodies. We'll get a non-biased third party to type up a report on this situation and show it a few hundred people and see which side most people take. I thought it was "Buy once, use twice" not "Buy one, use twice unless the the second time happens before Commercial Release is which case it will 'use three times'". By the way, contrary to some nonsense you spouted in another post that is how you explicitly state something. You find me where it says anything about receiving an additional merc pack for free or stop saying you were explicitly promised anything.Source? And show me another source where it says they would let you keep the Sp alongside the returned booster. They haven't explained at all how they intend to deal with the Merc Pack, that's the problem. No, that's not the problem. Thinking you're entitled to a damn thing here is the problem. If you don't like it you can get mad. Write them and angry letter. Write a blog about how unfair it is.
Or you could make a big deal about it, generate some more bad press for the game before it's even released, divide the player base, demand the you get all kinds of stuff you didn't pay for, **** off the new players by demanding even more of an advantage, waste the DEV's time having to deal with this crap. Everybody complains about lack of content now so go ahead and dump a whole bunch of bullshit on their plate right before release because of some sloppy wording.
CCP didn't make you play the BETA. CCP didn't make you buy a Merc Pack. CCP never made you pay a single dime. That was your decision.
You know what CCP did actually make you do? Agree to a document that affirmed you understood that everything in the BETA is subject to change and CCP makes no promises that what they do today won't be undone tomorrow. What they did say over and over again during closed beta is that we could be sure that we would recieve all of our AUR that we purchased back at launch because it's "ridiculous to charge players for items in a beta" and that the Merc Pack should be seen as a "prepurchase for goods players will recieve at launch" Again...ridiculous if you're not going to delete it one day and not give it back after the final reset. And "Launch"? What difference does it make? Was the AUR I spent wasted because it wasn't "Launch"? My SP is getting boosted this week the same as it would after Launch. Anyone who used their Merc Pack or regular AUR purchases between the start of the open beta and weeks later when they made this announcement were basically screwed. http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/74180
Posted Jan. 8. 2 days before reset.Such short memories people seem to have. Yes they do.[quote=Sloth9230] Most of the issue here is CCP's lack of response on this, and their apparent about face on the issue. Again, really this is an issue of trust and principle. My $20 Merc Pack itself isn't that big of a deal, but what this situation does (with the way CCP are FAILING to handle it) is makes many of us who bought a Merc Pack much less likely to trust CCP in the future. If I don't get a fair shake on this Merc Pack situation you can gaurantee I won't be buying any more products from CCP in the future. Basically, they have potential future customers hinging on how they deal with this situation.
Trust and principle? Yea, and the American Civil War was about State's rights. They have said along that plans will change. We signed legal documents stating we knew things would change. Then things changed and now everybody's all pissed off and demanding free stuff. What do you want them say about it? We all knew things would change. That merc pack was guaranteed to survive all the resets. You still have it, right? End of discussion. All this false indignation is because there's a possibility of free stuff due to careless language.
We get pissed when they don't tell us enough about what's going on. Then when they do tell us things, even though we promised that we understood it could all change at any time, we all get so outraged that they've violated out trust. Blow me. They were stupid for bringing real money in to this but we were all stupid for spending it.
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:56:00 -
[68] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Trust and principle? Yea, and the American Civil War was about State's rights. They have said along that plans will change. We signed legal documents stating we knew things would change. Then things changed and now everybody's all pissed off and demanding free stuff. What do you want them say about it? We all knew things would change. That merc pack was guaranteed to survive all the resets. You still have it, right? End of discussion. All this false indignation is because there's a possibility of free stuff due to careless language.-á
We get pissed when they don't tell us enough about what's going on. Then when they do tell us things, even though we promised that we understood it could all change at any time, we all get so outraged that they've violated out trust. Blow me. They were stupid for bringing real money in to this but we were all stupid for spending it.
The "legally documents" that you are referring to have absolutely nothing to do with the contract we entered into when when we bought the Mercenary Pack. CCP is legally obligated to make a credit, to all of those who have purchased a Mercenary Pack, upon release. End of story.
The question is: will they make an ethical choise or an unethical choise. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2214
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 01:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Trust and principle? Yea, and the American Civil War was about State's rights. They have said along that plans will change. We signed legal documents stating we knew things would change. Then things changed and now everybody's all pissed off and demanding free stuff. What do you want them say about it? We all knew things would change. That merc pack was guaranteed to survive all the resets. You still have it, right? End of discussion. All this false indignation is because there's a possibility of free stuff due to careless language.
We get pissed when they don't tell us enough about what's going on. Then when they do tell us things, even though we promised that we understood it could all change at any time, we all get so outraged that they've violated out trust. Blow me. They were stupid for bringing real money in to this but we were all stupid for spending it. That Merc Pack was guaranteed to survive all resets AND Commercial Release, regardless of whether or not Commercial Release is another reset.
And no, we don't all still have the ENTIRE contents of our Merc Packs.
Plenty of us have used some of our HK4M Shotguns, or the Myofibril Stimulants, or Fused Locus Grenades. Some have even managed to - accidentally or with the full knowledge that they would be restored on Commercial Release - delete the Dragonfly or Toxin Blueprints.
Unless CCP credit those back - AS AGREED - they aren't living up to their legal obligations.
For my personal part, this isn't a huge issue, since I so rarely use these items anyway, but for those who do, and those who have deleted Blueprint items, it's important, and it needs to be addressed. |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 02:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
LMFAO
|
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 04:33:00 -
[71] - Quote
I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
686
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 04:45:00 -
[72] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. Here, +2 just for being so long. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:06:00 -
[73] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. Here, +2 just for being so long.
Well at least somebody loves me. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2220
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:I put all that hard work and effort into my post and all I got was one lousy like from you guys. No replies no pats on the back? I feel robbed. I gave 2 likes, 1 on each post.
And it's basically a better-worded version of about half what I've been saying across at least 4 threads on the topic, so I already agreed with you before you said it. |
Leither Yiltron
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
421
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:30:00 -
[75] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:The way I see it is you bought and used a product that benefits you throughout the game. If you purchased skills with SP gained from the booster or Aurum weapons and suits knowing these are limited use items, why should you get a refund? You benefitted from the product as it was intended. Refunding the Merc Pack would essentially give you one for free, right? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Please enlighten me.
It's mostly because there's a faction of players who want the benefit of their Merc Packs for something like the third time in the history of the beta.
The whole idea is that people are greedy, and they'll come up with any reason to justify getting more stuff if they think they can get away with it. |
hermin hermit
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
What is with all the fanboys trying to defend ccp? "Waaaaah ppl are getting a free boster1!!1!"
Why is it unreasonable to expect ccp to honor the terms and conditions set out in the closed beta merc pack? |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 05:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:DS 10 wrote:The way I see it is you bought and used a product that benefits you throughout the game. If you purchased skills with SP gained from the booster or Aurum weapons and suits knowing these are limited use items, why should you get a refund? You benefitted from the product as it was intended. Refunding the Merc Pack would essentially give you one for free, right? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Please enlighten me. It's mostly because there's a faction of players who want the benefit of their Merc Packs for something like the third time in the history of the beta. The whole idea is that people are greedy, and they'll come up with any reason to justify getting more stuff if they think they can get away with it.
Well... that is certainly true... lmao
It does indeed suck that CCP had put that on their Merc Pack so long ago, however... would've people still bought it even if it didn't say that so long ago when the Merc Pack was released... of course, free stuff a long with 40k Aurum.
Sadly people don't care that with the legal binding contract we are all still under until the "Commercial Release", this can and will indeed change, unfortunately it did for the Merc Pack.
You got a free suit, albeit not that great, a free gun, again, not that great, and then you got the 40k Aurum. They made a mistake. Unfortunately, just get over it, in the end, a refund of the Aurum within the Merc Pack received would in my mind also include a reset of the SP. I find it fair that such should happen but... I would be PISSED since I'd be a damn newberry all over again and that for one would mean I would be reluctant to continue playing. AND THIS would include A LOT of people crying ALOUD with the refund, refund, refund. You know those of you who are crying refund would drop this game in a second if your SP was reset and that is exactly what would happen if Aurum was refunded.
So stop complaining, I'd be damn happy that a reset isn't going to happen, I don't want to be at 0 again, hell to the noooooo.
AGAIN I'll reiteration, UNLESS you want your SP reset along with everyone else (who don't want it to reset) to 0 just for a freaking AURUM reset, you're going to decay this game more than it can grow.
Just drop it, I've come to terms, it isn't going to happen, at least this is my opinion, and I'm damn happy with that. |
hermin hermit
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:12:00 -
[78] - Quote
@Tyrin Aur refund does not eqaul skill point reset. Stfu fanboy |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2221
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:27:00 -
[79] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:Sadly people don't understand that with the beta legal binding contract we are all still under the "subject to chante" until the "Commercial Release", this can and will indeed change, unfortunately it did for the Merc Pack. I'm sorry, but the beta terms of use "subject to change" clause doesn't apply to the purchase agreement under which the Merc Pack was bought, which is a totally separate agreement and specifies - WITHOUT any such "unless we decide not to" clause - that there will be a full credit of the contents of the Merc Pack on commercial release.
This argument doesn't apply here. And that fact has already been covered more than once in this thread. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:50:00 -
[80] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tyrin Tonious wrote:Sadly people don't understand that with the beta legal binding contract we are all still under the "subject to chante" until the "Commercial Release", this can and will indeed change, unfortunately it did for the Merc Pack. I'm sorry, but the beta terms of use "subject to change" clause doesn't apply to the purchase agreement under which the Merc Pack was bought, which is a totally separate agreement and specifies - WITHOUT any such "unless we decide not to" clause - that there will be a full credit of the contents of the Merc Pack on commercial release. This argument doesn't apply here. And that fact has already been covered more than once in this thread.
It does when the terms within the beta contract claims rights to all within and if Dev so determine to change something, they can. I understand, it is bad practice to do such a thing with actual hard earned real world dollars are used, but this is the reality of things.
Point me to the Terms of Use of the Open Beta if you think I'm wrong, I will read it over and then apologize if I was in fact wrong.
Until then, in the games current stage, CCP reserves even the right to purchased "Packs".
Difference is, they can't take away the Aurum already provided, nore the items, since they were already provided. A reset though, since it was stated that it would happen with resets, must also imply that with a commercial release, there would be another reset. People just now was another 40k Aurum free.
Went all off the walls when they saw the "no more reset" and got their panties wet while thinking oh... free SP then in a twist when they started thinking about "what if" the Aurum reset was in order with an SP reset... |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2222
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:It does when the terms within the beta contract claims rights to all within and if Dev so determine to change something, they can. I understand, it is bad practice to do such a thing with actual hard earned real world dollars are used, but this is the reality of things.
Point me to the Terms of Use of the Open Beta if you think I'm wrong, I will read it over and then apologize if I was in fact wrong.
Until then, in the games current stage, CCP reserves even the right to purchased "Packs".
Difference is, they can't take away the Aurum already provided, nore the items, since they were already provided. A reset though, since it was stated that it would happen with resets, must also imply that with a commercial release, there would be another reset. People just now was another 40k Aurum free.
Went all off the walls when they saw the "no more reset" and got their panties wet while thinking oh... free SP then in a twist when they started thinking about "what if" the Aurum reset was in order with an SP reset... They can legally change anything that occurs WITHIN the beta.
They CAN'T change an agreement made on purchase of the Merc Pack that exists OUTSIDE of the beta conditions. That isn't subject to the terms of use that are relevant to content within the beta.
They're legally bound, regardless of anything agreed to within the beta's terms of use, to provide the product as agreed when we purchased the Merc Pack. Anything else is legally actionable as false advertising at the very least and could potentially be treated as a fraud case.
The purchase agreement made between CCP and the customers buying the Merc Pack before the change in wording is entirely independent of the beta terms of use, and they're legally required to honour that agreement, which includes the product description as it stood AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE.
EDIT: And in that agreement, it wasn't just stated that we'd get our gear credited back at every reset. It was every reset AND AT COMMERCIAL RELEASE. Not "every reset including commercial release" but "every reset AND commercial release". |
Rusticuls
NECROMONGER'S
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:23:00 -
[82] - Quote
I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
687
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:24:00 -
[83] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote: every reset including commercial release
What the Merc. Pack should have said.
I hope CCPs learned a valuable lesson. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2222
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:42:00 -
[84] - Quote
Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 07:57:00 -
[85] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tyrin Tonious wrote:It does when the terms within the beta contract claims rights to all within and if Dev so determine to change something, they can. I understand, it is bad practice to do such a thing with actual hard earned real world dollars are used, but this is the reality of things.
Point me to the Terms of Use of the Open Beta if you think I'm wrong, I will read it over and then apologize if I was in fact wrong.
Until then, in the games current stage, CCP reserves even the right to purchased "Packs".
Difference is, they can't take away the Aurum already provided, nore the items, since they were already provided. A reset though, since it was stated that it would happen with resets, must also imply that with a commercial release, there would be another reset. People just now was another 40k Aurum free.
Went all off the walls when they saw the "no more reset" and got their panties wet while thinking oh... free SP then in a twist when they started thinking about "what if" the Aurum reset was in order with an SP reset... They can legally change anything that occurs WITHIN the beta. They CAN'T change an agreement made on purchase of the Merc Pack that exists OUTSIDE of the beta conditions. That isn't subject to the terms of use that are relevant to content within the beta. They're legally bound, regardless of anything agreed to within the beta's terms of use, to provide the product as agreed when we purchased the Merc Pack. Anything else is legally actionable as false advertising at the very least and could potentially be treated as a fraud case. The purchase agreement made between CCP and the customers buying the Merc Pack before the change in wording is entirely independent of the beta terms of use, and they're legally required to honour that agreement, which includes the product description as it stood AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE. EDIT: And in that agreement, it wasn't just stated that we'd get our gear credited back at every reset. It was every reset AND AT COMMERCIAL RELEASE. Not "every reset including commercial release" but "every reset AND commercial release".
Oh well, losing case. Doesn't matter what CCP does, or anyone say for that matter. I hope you find what you're searching for. You not feel complete without it. If CCP honors it regardless of standing, great, I feel happy for you all. I don't care either way, I just don't want my SP reset, especially if the reason is because of people who want "their" Aurum
|
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:00:00 -
[86] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: every reset including commercial release
What the Merc. Pack should have said. I hope CCPs learned a valuable lesson.
Yea, probably. People just need to chill and wait to see what happens at "Commercial Release".
I still stand by my beta. But if once purchased, maybe prior purchasing accnts might have a 40k Aurum Credit waiting for you at "Commercial Release".
Who knows, people you're just blowing steam for the moment. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2223
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
Tyrin Tonious wrote:Oh well, losing case. Doesn't matter what CCP does, or anyone say for that matter. I hope you find what you're searching for. You not feel complete without it. If CCP honors it regardless of standing, great, I feel happy for you all. I don't care either way, I just don't want my SP reset, especially if the reason is because of people who want "their" Aurum You've obviously either skipped most of the thread, or only skim-read chunks of it.
I'm openly saying I DON'T want a forced SP reset for all players, and it's clear that neither does CCP, but I'm happy for anyone who demands their Boosters back to be told "you can have it if you opt in for a reset of your SP", and to explain that the booster-enhanced SP they already have is a suitable "equivalent" to the Booster they're entitled to. Any Boosters that were purchased with Merc Pack Aurum from this time period (or from a store which still uses the out-of-date product description) would also come under the same terms. You get back all your other Aurum from the Merc Pack, but lose any AUR-bought items you still have.
That would be fair, and would honour the intent of the agreement made between the players and CCP when we purchased the Merc Pack. |
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:06:00 -
[88] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have.
This wouldn't work because through your prior argument, you're still entitled to your Aurum reimbursement regardless. In this case, you've changed your story in stating that it would be acceptable to accept an equivalent item (which in this case would be multiple items since I haven't seen a single item worth 40k Aur).
Unless as an apology, they provide freebies, then great again for you all. (Even in that case, they might as well give you all the 40k Aur, lmfao) |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:07:00 -
[89] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Rusticuls wrote:I hope CCP has stats on each characters SP totals and how much SP was earned through boosters, that way if they have to do a AUR refund on Merc packs they can just respec each character and take away all 'booster SP'. Or, as people have also explained as an option, they could take the "or an equivalent item" portion and explain that the SP you've already boosted is still on your account, and they aren't required to credit you back something you still have.
I highly doubt that this would hold up in court. As the literature clearly refers to the "Mercenary Pack" and "items" contained there in, and SP does not qualify as either and is most assuredly of "of the same value" when one considers that the consumer could have frivolously used them under the impression the they would be credited back to they account.
"DUST 514 Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514 account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted."
|
Tyrin Tonious
Wraith Shadow Guards
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:11:00 -
[90] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tyrin Tonious wrote:Oh well, losing case. Doesn't matter what CCP does, or anyone say for that matter. I hope you find what you're searching for. You not feel complete without it. If CCP honors it regardless of standing, great, I feel happy for you all. I don't care either way, I just don't want my SP reset, especially if the reason is because of people who want "their" Aurum You've obviously either skipped most of the thread, or only skim-read chunks of it. I'm openly saying I DON'T want a forced SP reset for all players, and it's clear that neither does CCP, but I'm happy for anyone who demands their Boosters back to be told "you can have it if you opt in for a reset of your SP", and to explain that the booster-enhanced SP they already have is a suitable "equivalent" to the Booster they're entitled to. Any Boosters that were purchased with Merc Pack Aurum from this time period (or from a store which still uses the out-of-date product description) would also come under the same terms. You get back all your other Aurum from the Merc Pack, but lose any AUR-bought items you still have. That would be fair, and would honour the intent of the agreement made between the players and CCP when we purchased the Merc Pack.
No, I sadly read through it. Decided to respond towards the end, lol. At this point I've become a troll and am going to stop, more and more am I finding this funnier and funnier. But it's ok, CCP has been good for things and it is what it is.
At launch, if there is an SP reset (along with Aur) sweet for those who want it (I wouldn't unless there was really sweet gear and I absolutely wanted too), or an SP refund, now that is something I'm more interested in.
btw, I am a Merc and Starter owner, so it isn't like I'm blowing steam out of my ass, lmfao. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |