Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
if you want to move around the map in a vehicle you should have to pay for it, or buy an AUR BPO. |
mikegunnz
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sounds like somebody had like a 15-0 match going, before they got run over by an LAV. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
690
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 15:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies
+1 for this! Not QQing about the LAVs though. LOL. Sucks to be on the recieving end of a carmageddon incident especially as a heavy.
|
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 16:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies I approve this message! |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 16:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Being hit by a LAV shouldn't be fatal for anyone as well. Otherwise, yeah, eliminate the starter LAV. Making stuff not cost ISK in a game like this is pretty stupid. |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
205
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 16:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Being hit by a LAV shouldn't be fatal for anyone as well. Otherwise, yeah, eliminate the starter LAV. Making stuff not cost ISK in a game like this is pretty stupid. shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds |
Governor Odius
Doomheim
177
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 16:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
As someone who uses starter suits almost exclusively, I think an argument could be made for restricting those, too. I mean, you don't see Velators fit with their base civilian blaster running around New Eden causing havoc. I get that a starter suit has to exist, but it probably shouldn't be as effective as it is. |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
205
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 16:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies I agree we should have trasnport vehicles in the game , maybe futuristic mortorcycles for solo players? Or maybe like planet side 2 sunders for squads? |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 16:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds
Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear.
And it's not a car crushing a dude, it's a car hitting a supersoldier clone encased in armor that can withstand lasers and missiles and plasma rounds, and all with a forcefield around it. Even one of us getting hit by a car wouldn't necessarily be fatal, and we're regular jackoffs and not video game space men. |
|
Sergeant Wiznowski
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
38
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
No. It's good for match pace and it's fun element. They are made of paper and good for taxi only. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:01:00 -
[12] - Quote
Again this goes back to the issue that there are no "infantry sized objectives" to avoid this situation. Running over the guy crossing the street without looking? Sure, hilarious. Realizing that street is the only place to have gun fights anyway? Suddenly the problem is obvious. |
Nomed Deeps
The Exemplars
91
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:07:00 -
[13] - Quote
In BF3, you can run people down with jeeps and other such vehicles. It's seen as just apart of the game. Therefore, if any change is done here, it should be the accessibilty of LAVs such as making them cost. Afterall, LAVs are easily countered with AV grenades. As for LAVs being only 3 seaters, I have commented that LAVs should be atleast 4 seats so they can fit a full squad but was informed the squad size was not definitely 4 at the time. As squads are still only 4, 4 appears to be the squad max where if that is true, the LAV should fit 4. |
Terram Nenokal
BetaMax.
115
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:16:00 -
[14] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies
Holy crap, this. +1 |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV.
I abuse the hell out of free LAVs. Doesn't mean I think it's good gameplay. |
Lavirac JR
DUST University Ivy League
129
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
Swarm Launchers, they're your friend, use them....
-I love free LAVs and NEVER use them 90+WP |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV.
Could you post this again so I can like it twice? |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear.
Anything that ought to be able to kill something, ought to be able to kill the proto version of it. You lost your isk, deal with it. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:31:00 -
[20] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear. Anything that ought to be able to kill something, ought to be able to kill the proto version of it. You lost your isk, deal with it.
It should take more effort to kill prototype than militia, otherwise what's the point? |
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 17:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tell me again how large turrets or forge guns differentiate between militia & Proto.
Sorry but this thread is LoL funny. About the only thing that needs doing is to NOT give 1 race a better gun for free. Missile > Blaster. That is all. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV.
I'm sorry but free LAV's have always taken away from gameplay. If you want to use a vehicle you should have to pay for it or buy a BPO. It makes absolutely no sense that kids can spam free LAV's when they have to pay for their dropsuits. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
I like free LAVs tbh
+40 WP and the odd kill or 2 to go with it |
Unit-775
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:03:00 -
[24] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies this +1 |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:21:00 -
[25] - Quote
I'm waiting to hear how a free LAV ruins the game, but a 10k ISK LAV doesn't... or an AUR p2w version? The signal radius and audio bugs need work, because it sucks being squashed by a silent vehicle. Lore be damned. V8 sound track would be nice. |
Theos Bell
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
5
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
I agree with:
LAV takes damage too on collision with infantry. LAV like starter dropsuits. You have an initial new character supply, after that they cost, or you buy the BPO for AUR. LAVs fit a whole squad. If not a starter LAV then some LAV transport. Annoying right now to leave one man behind after the first LAV drops. LAVs deal damage on impact, even if it's a lot of dmg. Proto heavies should be able to survive a hit.
|
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation
88
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 20:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
mikegunnz wrote:Sounds like somebody had like a 15-0 match going, before they got run over by an LAV.
+1 jepp jepp
|
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 20:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies
QFT
. . . BBQ |
Thurak Mirunas
BetaMax.
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 20:25:00 -
[29] - Quote
i think as someone mentioned earlier we should just get a personnel carrier instead of the LAV's for the free vehicle, and as CCP say they want many more vehicles we can home APC's are one of them :) tho maybe the free one would not have any/much armour |
Riot Ruckus
Doomheim
56
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 20:30:00 -
[30] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear. Anything that ought to be able to kill something, ought to be able to kill the proto version of it. You lost your isk, deal with it. It should take more effort to kill prototype than militia, otherwise what's the point?
I read effort as money. As a heavy, when my dropsuit cost 100k and can be ran over by a free lav, its infuriating. |
|
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 20:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
Thurak Mirunas wrote:i think as someone mentioned earlier we should just get a personnel carrier instead of the LAV's for the free vehicle, and as CCP say they want many more vehicles we can home APC's are one of them :) tho maybe the free one would not have any/much armour
Not a bad idea. It would give people another vehicle to spec into as well. |
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens
164
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 20:52:00 -
[32] - Quote
I don't know... Making the free LAV an unarmed four seater wouldn't bother me at all. |
Henry FitzEmpress
Reaper Galactic
22
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 21:08:00 -
[33] - Quote
I don't mind the free LAVs either. Killing those is pretty much the only way I get kills nowadays. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 21:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
Wheres the problem? Av grenade properly used and its gone. It simply should stay otherwise bluedot teams will even more sit back in their redline instead of trying to break trough with a LAV. |
Rendiff Jurr
Black Omega Industrial
21
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 21:29:00 -
[35] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies
^^This |
Belzeebub Santana
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
409
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 21:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
As far as free LAVs go, I think in low and null nothing should be free.
Like Nocs point on covered LAVs and 4 seater free ones.
To help combat the constant crushing of poor unsuspecting mercs, the LAVs need noise besides the lights tipping you off. The crushed merc should stay crunched up in the LAVs wheel making the LAV slow until the merc bleeds out. The LAV should have a max damage and we should know what that is, also it should be low enough to kill a militia heavy but have those that are above survive and maybe the impact instead kills LAV. |
Pranekt Tyrvoth
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
177
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
I wouldn't mind if they got rid of the free LAV. Also wouldn't mind if they added impact damage when hitting a person.
Make it so, engage. |
Xavier Hastings
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
243
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:22:00 -
[38] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear. Let me give you analogy.
I got hit by a bus. I die, because I didn't put on a bullet proof vest before work.
You get hit by a bus. You had a bullet proof vest on.
By your logic, you don't die, because you have spent the money on a five grand vest.
*For those of you who don't understand analogies, go back to school let me explain this for you. Me being hit by a bus represents me in my glorious Militia Outfit getting hit by a LAV. The man in the bullet proof vest represents a protoman being hit with a LAV.
And apparently he should not die because Proto Suits are made from the Golden Fleece.
I also find it quite amusing that only the users in Proto complain about free LAVs. I wonder why... |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
AUR BPO for a lav makes sense.....but the free lavs are the least annoying thing on the battlefield. They're easy easy kills. Sure...put 4 people in a lav..lol..will make for some good kill feeds.
Don't change anything CCP |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:40:00 -
[40] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies Like a few others said, this gets my vote. |
|
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Allright lets take a look at this shall we?: dropsuit= empty cola can LAV= weights around 2 tons
2 tons hitting the cola can resulting in a deformation beyond repair. And it doesnt make a difference if it was a no name cola can or a original coca cola can. What you guys demand is that a cola can is aible to not deform at all while getting hit by 2 tons of weight at once. And now we go onto medical aspects. You the guy in the dropsuit are getting lethal injuries because your dropsuit gets deformed. After all inside the dropsuit is still a human who is totally mortal. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:AUR BPO for a lav makes sense.....but the free lavs are the least annoying thing on the battlefield. They're easy easy kills. Sure...put 4 people in a lav..lol..will make for some good kill feeds.
Don't change anything CCP
This. If it isn't broken, don't fix it. Free LAV isn't broken. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 22:59:00 -
[43] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Allright lets take a look at this shall we?: dropsuit= empty cola can LAV= weights around 2 tons
2 tons hitting the cola can resulting in a deformation beyond repair. And it doesnt make a difference if it was a no name cola can or a original coca cola can. What you guys demand is that a cola can is aible to not deform at all while getting hit by 2 tons of weight at once. And now we go onto medical aspects. You the guy in the dropsuit are getting lethal injuries because your dropsuit gets deformed. After all inside the dropsuit is still a human who is totally mortal. What your saying makes sense, only thing is your analogy is inaccurate. We aren't running around wearing tin cans we apparently have state of the art shielding and armor. I would say something that can brush off a couple of super heated plasma rounds can take on a vehicle collision. That being said I also think falling damage needs to be lowered. |
Mister Hunt
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
230
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:29:00 -
[44] - Quote
I love how the Imperfects, who have zero problem whatsoever of sitting there spawn raping people dropping out of their MCC in a dropship, suddenly have a problem with LAVs. Seems pretty hypocritical. Some people use a system that doesn't take SP to kill a bunch of people, and are easily dispatched by starter AV. Other people use a system where only 1 person has to have SP to kill a bunch of people, and are very difficult to kill even with the best gear. Bit of the pot calling the kettle black don't ya think? |
Cecil Wilson
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:54:00 -
[45] - Quote
Tin can is closer to bring correct, but its actually a momentum problem. Just like when you drop out of the MCC, you have to use your inertial dampener. Let us be able to activate our inertial dampener whenever we want, and suddenly the LAV's are hitting near immovable rocks as opposed to sacks of meat in cans.
Just an idea. |
Skihids
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
969
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:59:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:The dark cloud wrote:Allright lets take a look at this shall we?: dropsuit= empty cola can LAV= weights around 2 tons
2 tons hitting the cola can resulting in a deformation beyond repair. And it doesnt make a difference if it was a no name cola can or a original coca cola can. What you guys demand is that a cola can is aible to not deform at all while getting hit by 2 tons of weight at once. And now we go onto medical aspects. You the guy in the dropsuit are getting lethal injuries because your dropsuit gets deformed. After all inside the dropsuit is still a human who is totally mortal. What your saying makes sense, only thing is your analogy is inaccurate. We aren't running around wearing tin cans we apparently have state of the art shielding and armor. I would say something that can brush off a couple of super heated plasma rounds can take on a vehicle collision. That being said I also think falling damage needs to be lowered.
However those tin cans rupture when you toss them off a tall building unless you activate your inertial dampner.
Hitting the ground or having a LAV hit you is all pretty much the same accelleration wise. If one will kill you the other is bound to as well. |
Mister Hunt
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
230
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 00:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
Ya, it was a shoot from the hip response that I have been working on stopping. |
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
462
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 00:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Tell me again how large turrets or forge guns differentiate between militia & Proto.
Sorry but this thread is LoL funny. About the only thing that needs doing is to NOT give 1 race a better gun for free. Missile > Blaster. That is all.
Last Build I ran a blaster fit sagaris and that thing tore up just about any tank I came across. I'm trying out missile turrets this build and haven't really been in any good tank vs tank fights to really judge it. I will say that missile turrets feel abit op against infantry tho. At least with the blaster had to aim my shot a little. The missile is just see the enemy spam that way and kill, and armor tanks get damn near insta poped.
And Give me my railgun splash damage back, leave the radius where its at tho.
Ohhhhhhhhhh and free LAV's keep them or give me an AUR BPO
But If they remove the free LAV's they better remove the free swarm launchers also |
Stinker Butt
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
103
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 00:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies Like a few others said, this gets my vote.
I like the idea, but I'd like to add that passengers can shoot there own weapons out of the window, and no unlimited ammo. |
D3aTH D3alER54
The Southern Legion
130
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 01:01:00 -
[50] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies I approve this message!
You "approve" this message? What do you think you are, some kind of forum mod that can choose which message gets through/approved or not? Gtfo here mate you're pathetic, go back to your basement where you belong. |
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 01:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear. Anything that ought to be able to kill something, ought to be able to kill the proto version of it. You lost your isk, deal with it. It should take more effort to kill prototype than militia, otherwise what's the point?
If you've played the game long enough to get hold of proto gear, shouldn't you have the smarts to keep an eye out for indiscriminate threats? Proto gear isn't a substitute for skills, and even the most skilled players have to die at some point.
These forums are packed with people complaining about every possible way to die, every weakness of this weapon and that dropsuit. This way to die just happens to be annoying, like when you get sniped by a starter setup. A n00b got an easy kill because they found you vulnerable for that split second. That's all it takes. Man up. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 01:55:00 -
[52] - Quote
D3aTH D3alER54 wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies I approve this message! You "approve" this message? What do you think you are, some kind of forum mod that can choose which message gets through/approved or not? Gtfo here mate you're pathetic, go back to your basement where you belong.
I've never seen someone's disdain backfire so efficiently. |
Necrodermis
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
460
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 02:01:00 -
[53] - Quote
i can smell the butthurt
i don't care if morons are wanting to run around in the LAV fine. they have a machinegun unless they pay for it but it's just a coffin flying around the map.
also what's next get rid of the free 4 suits because people are killing you in your precious proto suit?
cry some more |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 02:33:00 -
[54] - Quote
D3aTH D3alER54 wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies I approve this message! You "approve" this message? What do you think you are, some kind of forum mod that can choose which message gets through/approved or not? Gtfo here mate you're pathetic, go back to your basement where you belong. Why are you so mad? |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 02:35:00 -
[55] - Quote
Skihids wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:The dark cloud wrote:Allright lets take a look at this shall we?: dropsuit= empty cola can LAV= weights around 2 tons
2 tons hitting the cola can resulting in a deformation beyond repair. And it doesnt make a difference if it was a no name cola can or a original coca cola can. What you guys demand is that a cola can is aible to not deform at all while getting hit by 2 tons of weight at once. And now we go onto medical aspects. You the guy in the dropsuit are getting lethal injuries because your dropsuit gets deformed. After all inside the dropsuit is still a human who is totally mortal. What your saying makes sense, only thing is your analogy is inaccurate. We aren't running around wearing tin cans we apparently have state of the art shielding and armor. I would say something that can brush off a couple of super heated plasma rounds can take on a vehicle collision. That being said I also think falling damage needs to be lowered. However those tin cans rupture when you toss them off a tall building unless you activate your inertial dampner. Hitting the ground or having a LAV hit you is all pretty much the same accelleration wise. If one will kill you the other is bound to as well. True but I still think heavies should at least take a hit. |
DarkShadowFox
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
238
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 02:38:00 -
[56] - Quote
I think everyone would be so much less frustrated if CCP just raised the amount of money we gained per match again.. -.- |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 02:54:00 -
[57] - Quote
DarkShadowFox wrote:I think everyone would be so much less frustrated if CCP just raised the amount of money we gained per match again.. -.- I actually think the amount we make now is enough. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:01:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ba hahahahahahaaha this has got be the funniest thread yet!
Waaaaaa let's get rid of free lavs cause they take out my proto suit. Hahahahahahahaha.
Seriously though how is my fatty supposed to get around?
The only change we need is some noise so its not so sneaky.
Imagine if suits didn't get crushed and you got booted like a kickball.
|
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:03:00 -
[59] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Ba hahahahahahaaha this has got be the funniest thread yet!
Waaaaaa let's get rid of free lavs cause they take out my proto suit. Hahahahahahahaha.
Seriously though how is my fatty supposed to get around?
The only change we need is some noise so its not so sneaky.
Imagine if suits didn't get crushed and you got booted like a kickball.
I actually don't have a proto suit. BTW i dropped that strike on you earlier on purpose. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
132
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
Make a couple of regular infantry weapons be effective against LAV. I propose that Laser rifles should do high damage to LAV's. This way their low cost and high efficiency is balanced by how easy it is to down them w/o having to use an anti-armor weapon. Also, the laser rifles that are now sub-par compared to ARs would get a reasonable role boost in the game. |
|
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:08:00 -
[61] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Ba hahahahahahaaha this has got be the funniest thread yet!
Waaaaaa let's get rid of free lavs cause they take out my proto suit. Hahahahahahahaha.
Seriously though how is my fatty supposed to get around?
The only change we need is some noise so its not so sneaky.
Imagine if suits didn't get crushed and you got booted like a kickball.
I actually don't have a proto suit. BTW i dropped that strike on you earlier on purpose.
Yes I figured as much.
I was the only one in a big open area there had to be better targets
Believe me running you over is harder than you know. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:09:00 -
[62] - Quote
LAV's shouldn't be free. Militia dropsuits aren't even free. |
Christ0pher Blair
Deep Space Republic
34
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:09:00 -
[63] - Quote
I don't support taking away a free option for a vehicle, mobile transportation (with a really -kitten- turret).
I do support tweaking its functions.
However, you cannot sufficiently and consistently sustain running people over in a paper mache toy car. Therefor there shouldn't be an issue with continuous multiple deaths from being run over. There also shouldn't be a 100% full proof way not to die by getting hit, it puts you in a position of immortality..and that's just as game breaking.*
*I could elaborate on this.. but meh. |
DarkShadowFox
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
238
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:13:00 -
[64] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:DarkShadowFox wrote:I think everyone would be so much less frustrated if CCP just raised the amount of money we gained per match again.. -.- I actually think the amount we make now is enough.
yeah cause you can cheat and just get backed by eve or another corp...
its not enough, I play with no backing no help and I know its not enough. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:20:00 -
[65] - Quote
DarkShadowFox wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:DarkShadowFox wrote:I think everyone would be so much less frustrated if CCP just raised the amount of money we gained per match again.. -.- I actually think the amount we make now is enough. yeah cause you can cheat and just get backed by eve or another corp... its not enough, I play with no backing no help and I know its not enough. So do I. I've never used EVE money and always used my own.
Besides EVE can't transfer money anymore and everyone's wallets have been reset. I find the amount we make right now is enough to reimburse our lost gear and easily make a profit. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:26:00 -
[66] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:DarkShadowFox wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:DarkShadowFox wrote:I think everyone would be so much less frustrated if CCP just raised the amount of money we gained per match again.. -.- I actually think the amount we make now is enough. yeah cause you can cheat and just get backed by eve or another corp... its not enough, I play with no backing no help and I know its not enough. So do I. I've never used EVE money and always used my own. Besides EVE can't transfer money anymore and everyone's wallets have been reset. I find the amount we make right now is enough to reimburse our lost gear and easily make a profit.
Sitting on 5 million ISK right now juss chillen People that are broke obviously don't know what they're doing. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:47:00 -
[67] - Quote
Why are all imperfects so bigheaded? Only because they seperated from betamax they think they are all pro. Honestly i think ROFL house would win against them. Simply due to the fact that they gained by far the most WP so far in the tourny and close behind that is SI. The imperfects even merged with a other corp cause they are too weak to stand a chance on their own. Oh and i know the biggest and fatal flaw of every imperfect: FPS gamer rage. As soon that kicks in they loose controll, insult their own team and then ragequit. This goes espacially for the zitro's. Any kind of explosive or in their opinion cheap death= RAGE. I expect them to not wining the tourny for another reason and that is they are scared to loose their holy "stats". |
Necrodermis
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
460
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:50:00 -
[68] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Why are all imperfects so bigheaded? Only because they seperated from betamax they think they are all pro. Honestly i think ROFL house would win against them. Simply due to the fact that they gained by far the most WP so far in the tourny and close behind that is SI. The imperfects even merged with a other corp cause they are too weak to stand a chance on their own. Oh and i know the biggest and fatal flaw of every imperfect: FPS gamer rage. As soon that kicks in they loose controll, insult their own team and then ragequit. This goes espacially for the zitro's. Any kind of explosive or in their opinion cheap death= RAGE. I expect them to not wining the tourny for another reason and that is they are scared to loose their holy "stats".
welcome to the FPS community.
i'm just waiting to park my dread in space and show them what true firepower is |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 03:55:00 -
[69] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Why are all imperfects so bigheaded? Only because they seperated from betamax they think they are all pro. Honestly i think ROFL house would win against them. Simply due to the fact that they gained by far the most WP so far in the tourny and close behind that is SI. The imperfects even merged with a other corp cause they are too weak to stand a chance on their own. Oh and i know the biggest and fatal flaw of every imperfect: FPS gamer rage. As soon that kicks in they loose controll, insult their own team and then ragequit. This goes espacially for the zitro's. Any kind of explosive or in their opinion cheap death= RAGE. I expect them to not wining the tourny for another reason and that is they are scared to loose their holy "stats". Awww... love the ignorant post
Not to mention you left betamax as well and are pretty "bigheaded" yourself. |
Tyrus Four
128
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 04:35:00 -
[70] - Quote
I agree with getting rid of the free LAV. but thats only cause I really don't have much use for it other than getting from the MCC to a control point.
give us ATVs with no weapons on them, or something of that sort. maybe a Hoverbike.
Never been much to use vehicles, but it'd be nice just to have a personal transport to get around with. in Planetside, there was a ATV. it had no weapons, very, very little armor. But it was useful for getting from battle to battle, and if you wore a Infiltrator suit, the ATV cloaked with you. |
|
D3aTH D3alER54
The Southern Legion
130
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 04:39:00 -
[71] - Quote
Tyrus Four wrote:I agree with getting rid of the free LAV. but thats only cause I really don't have much use for it other than getting from the MCC to a control point.
give us ATVs with no weapons on them, or something of that sort. maybe a Hoverbike.
Never been much to use vehicles, but it'd be nice just to have a personal transport to get around with. in Planetside, there was a ATV. it had no weapons, very, very little armor. But it was useful for getting from battle to battle, and if you wore a Infiltrator suit, the ATV cloaked with you.
I can see people complaining about that too. |
Tyrus Four
128
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 04:43:00 -
[72] - Quote
Necrodermis wrote:
welcome to the FPS community.
i'm just waiting to park my dread in space and show them what true firepower is
Knowing how EVE and the EVE Universe is, I'm quite sure that the MAG fps GUNGAME(tm) contingent is going to be in for a pretty rude awakening once the game is closer to release, and especially when it is live and EVE is fully integrated.
They are big fish in a small Beta pond, at the moment. |
D3aTH D3alER54
The Southern Legion
130
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 05:11:00 -
[73] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:DarkShadowFox wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:DarkShadowFox wrote:I think everyone would be so much less frustrated if CCP just raised the amount of money we gained per match again.. -.- I actually think the amount we make now is enough. yeah cause you can cheat and just get backed by eve or another corp... its not enough, I play with no backing no help and I know its not enough. So do I. I've never used EVE money and always used my own. Besides EVE can't transfer money anymore and everyone's wallets have been reset. I find the amount we make right now is enough to reimburse our lost gear and easily make a profit. Sitting on 5 million ISK right now juss chillen People that are broke obviously don't know what they're doing.
I have to agree with you on that, but that's the whole problem isn't it? Nobody knows what they are doing.. I'm baffled how people can't even get off militia suits, but i guess with guys like you or me how can they? It will be a slaughter fest when this game gets released. |
D3aTH D3alER54
The Southern Legion
130
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 05:17:00 -
[74] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Ba hahahahahahaaha this has got be the funniest thread yet!
Waaaaaa let's get rid of free lavs cause they take out my proto suit. Hahahahahahahaha.
Seriously though how is my fatty supposed to get around?
The only change we need is some noise so its not so sneaky.
Imagine if suits didn't get crushed and you got booted like a kickball.
Yeah that's another bug too, if you switch seats fast enough in a LAV the noise is GONE, totaly stealth =) |
Reimus Klinsman
BetaMax.
319
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 05:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Get rid of free LAVs _or_ allow only one per person per match _or_ Add a bumper on the front so they can't be used to mow down people... effectively making it a vehicle for getting from point a to point b unless you have a gunner. |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 13:09:00 -
[76] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:The dark cloud wrote:Why are all imperfects so bigheaded? Only because they seperated from betamax they think they are all pro. Honestly i think ROFL house would win against them. Simply due to the fact that they gained by far the most WP so far in the tourny and close behind that is SI. The imperfects even merged with a other corp cause they are too weak to stand a chance on their own. Oh and i know the biggest and fatal flaw of every imperfect: FPS gamer rage. As soon that kicks in they loose controll, insult their own team and then ragequit. This goes espacially for the zitro's. Any kind of explosive or in their opinion cheap death= RAGE. I expect them to not wining the tourny for another reason and that is they are scared to loose their holy "stats". Awww... love the ignorant post Not to mention you left betamax as well and are pretty "bigheaded" yourself.
Agreed, how did this become about our Corp? The title states Free LAVs. In your new role as PR is this how you plan to reach out for diplomatic relations to the community? I grouped with you in Betamax, you have alot in common with rage quitters.
On Subject:
Every other vehicle requires you to put SOME SP into them before becoming viable, I don't see why we even have to talk about this CCP. If your going to give free LAVs out, might as well go back to free militia tanks and dropships, that went over real well.
Vehicles 1, LAV 1 should be a minimum requirement to call in an LAV. If you have a BPO for it great, still needs skill reqs. on it. |
Forlorn Destrier
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
914
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 13:14:00 -
[77] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Tony Calif wrote:LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV. I'm sorry but free LAV's have always taken away from gameplay. If you want to use a vehicle you should have to pay for it or buy a BPO. It makes absolutely no sense that kids can spam free LAV's when they have to pay for their dropsuits.
It also doesn't make sense that you can call a tank on a building and shoot into the red zone keeping anything from moving out, but you did that. Hmmm.
Tony is right. Keep the free LAV's. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 13:55:00 -
[78] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:Tony Calif wrote:LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV. I'm sorry but free LAV's have always taken away from gameplay. If you want to use a vehicle you should have to pay for it or buy a BPO. It makes absolutely no sense that kids can spam free LAV's when they have to pay for their dropsuits. It also doesn't make sense that you can call a tank on a building and shoot into the red zone keeping anything from moving out, but you did that. Hmmm. Tony is right. Keep the free LAV's.
Somebody that's butthurt because I denied them a spawn point using a Militia Sica with a blaster on it. Seriously if You can't take out a militia Sica sitting on top of a building begging to get shot down you might as well quit playing the game.
Anyways thats besides the point. Nothing in this game should be "free" unless you buy the BPO using AUR as stated in the OP. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 14:04:00 -
[79] - Quote
Still waiting to hear how they detract from gameplay. All I see so far is " scrubs shouldn't play" and "you should pay AUR for BPO". Not really seeing a reason why.
|
KingBabar
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
442
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 14:46:00 -
[80] - Quote
The only real issue for me is the low radar profile and the low engone sound of the LAVs. If they were more visible on the minimap and made some noise I could actually jump aside before getting rammed in the rear.
We need free LAVs or something similar simply due to the fact that these maps are quite big and without them it will widen the gap between good/experienced players and the idiots/new players.
It's hard enough for anyone new to join this game, I can just imagine the potential player loss we could have if the scrubs had to walk from the back spawn everytime they lost their foreward spawn points. It will also slow the pace down drastically and we really don't want that do we?
I've always used the LAVs solely for transportation, I tried the other day to get some roadkills on the 3-point map and it was way too easy. Make it harder to get roadkills but don't drop the "general mobility" of the game, I see no reason for that.
|
|
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
317
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 15:10:00 -
[81] - Quote
I agree that the vehicles need to make more noise. I know when a tank or dropship are nearby....I can hear them but most of the times the first warning I get that a LAV is near is when my butt is sitting in the radiator. |
Alldin Kan
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
169
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 15:56:00 -
[82] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:if you want to move around the map in a vehicle you should have to pay for it, or buy an AUR BPO.
It's not that bad...
Throw AV grenades and they blow up in 1-2 hits :P |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:08:00 -
[83] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Still waiting to hear how they detract from gameplay. All I see so far is " scrubs shouldn't play" and "you should pay AUR for BPO". Not really seeing a reason why.
They're a low-skill method of killing people which, many times, there's essentially no defence against. When the best way of getting kills with a LAV is ramming people rather than shooting them with the gun in the back, you know there's a major issue with the vehicle.
Chunky Munkey wrote:Anything that ought to be able to kill something, ought to be able to kill the proto version of it. You lost your isk, deal with it.
Yes, because the way this stuff works is that you skill up to prototype, spending 50k on a prototype suit, and are meant to derive no benefit at all from it. Good thinking there, genius. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:11:00 -
[84] - Quote
AV nade, pro sniper, swarm launcher, forge gun, any turret, another LAV. All simple easy counters. Except the sniper. He's gotta be pretty good to pop the driver. The idea there is no defence against them is LoLfunny. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:18:00 -
[85] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:AV nade, pro sniper, swarm launcher, forge gun, any turret, another LAV. All simple easy counters. Except the sniper. He's gotta be pretty good to pop the driver. The idea there is no defence against them is LoLfunny.
Lol, the main issue isn't that they have counters, it's that they over-reaching their purpose. A new, universal jeep would be much better at ensuring people can get to the action. Collision damage would turn roadkill from a free kill into a legitimate tactic. But this all goes back to horrible map design. They are so big you need vehicles to get around, yet there is nowhere vehicles can't reach. |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:24:00 -
[86] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:AV nade, pro sniper, swarm launcher, forge gun, any turret, another LAV. All simple easy counters. Except the sniper. He's gotta be pretty good to pop the driver. The idea there is no defence against them is LoLfunny.
Do you really not understand what I'm saying? I'm kind of surprised that I need to explain this further. You've played this game before, right? You know those times when you're on foot and all of a sudden a LAV comes out of nowhere and is barrelling down on you? In those cases, you're either close enough to cover, lucky enough to be missed by the LAV driver, or you're dead. You can't switch to a sniper rifle and headshot the driver fast enough. You can't throw a grenade before he hits you. You can't spin up a forge gun.
Just so we're clear, nobody is saying it's impossible to kill a LAV, at all, under any circumstances. I don't know where you read that, or if you've just helpfully decided that's what I said, but in either case it isn't accurate. You need to think more about what people are writing before you respond again. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:31:00 -
[87] - Quote
I throw nades at incomming LAVs all the time. They are part of the reason AV nades are on all my fits. I don't see how making them AUR only will change the gameplay except to pin noobs in their spawns. That's what the topic is about.
@noc Over reaching? Not IMHO. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:26:00 -
[88] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:I throw nades at incomming LAVs all the time. They are part of the reason AV nades are on all my fits. I don't see how making them AUR only will change the gameplay except to pin noobs in their spawns. That's what the topic is about.
@noc Over reaching? Not IMHO.
I don't think AV grenades should be a necessity. I don't think they should be AUR only, I think they should keep the militia LAV as paid and replace the BPO with a new vehicle that is either a better troop transport (4 seat jeep) or personal transport (1 seat bike) that you cannot add modules to nor gunned (besides the passengers). The problem isn't ISK prices, it is the lack of SP and risk involved for the ease of killing any infantry. I am against ALL 1HK items, including the current missile turrets. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
690
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:40:00 -
[89] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:if you want to move around the map in a vehicle you should have to pay for it, or buy an AUR BPO.
I disagree. The free LAVs should be around just so that we can run jump over in his proto suits. |
Jarre Jardox
Cool Story But It Needs More EVE
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:47:00 -
[90] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I throw nades at incomming LAVs all the time. They are part of the reason AV nades are on all my fits. I don't see how making them AUR only will change the gameplay except to pin noobs in their spawns. That's what the topic is about.
@noc Over reaching? Not IMHO. I don't think AV grenades should be a necessity. I don't think they should be AUR only, I think they should keep the militia LAV as paid and replace the BPO with a new vehicle that is either a better troop transport (4 seat jeep) or personal transport (1 seat bike) that you cannot add modules to nor gunned (besides the passengers). The problem isn't ISK prices, it is the lack of SP and risk involved for the ease of killing any infantry. I am against ALL 1HK items, including the current missile turrets. In other words nerf snipers, railguns, forge guns, mass drivers, shotguns, impact grenades, remote explosives, missile turrets and lav collisions. All these in the right hands are 1hk so lets just nerf um all cus 1hk is bad. |
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:48:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jarre Jardox wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I throw nades at incomming LAVs all the time. They are part of the reason AV nades are on all my fits. I don't see how making them AUR only will change the gameplay except to pin noobs in their spawns. That's what the topic is about.
@noc Over reaching? Not IMHO. I don't think AV grenades should be a necessity. I don't think they should be AUR only, I think they should keep the militia LAV as paid and replace the BPO with a new vehicle that is either a better troop transport (4 seat jeep) or personal transport (1 seat bike) that you cannot add modules to nor gunned (besides the passengers). The problem isn't ISK prices, it is the lack of SP and risk involved for the ease of killing any infantry. I am against ALL 1HK items, including the current missile turrets. In other words nerf snipers, railguns, forge guns, mass drivers, shotguns, impact grenades, remote explosives, missile turrets and lav collisions. All these in the right hands are 1hk so lets just nerf um all cus 1hk is bad.
Um, yes? That would definitely make for better gameplay. It has to require great skill at the very least for 1HK to be balanced. |
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:50:00 -
[92] - Quote
Alldin Kan wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:if you want to move around the map in a vehicle you should have to pay for it, or buy an AUR BPO. It's not that bad... Throw AV grenades and they blow up in 1-2 hits :P
Yea but not everyone wants to carry around AV grenades. And they shouldn't have to either. |
Jarre Jardox
Cool Story But It Needs More EVE
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 18:09:00 -
[93] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Jarre Jardox wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I throw nades at incomming LAVs all the time. They are part of the reason AV nades are on all my fits. I don't see how making them AUR only will change the gameplay except to pin noobs in their spawns. That's what the topic is about.
@noc Over reaching? Not IMHO. I don't think AV grenades should be a necessity. I don't think they should be AUR only, I think they should keep the militia LAV as paid and replace the BPO with a new vehicle that is either a better troop transport (4 seat jeep) or personal transport (1 seat bike) that you cannot add modules to nor gunned (besides the passengers). The problem isn't ISK prices, it is the lack of SP and risk involved for the ease of killing any infantry. I am against ALL 1HK items, including the current missile turrets. In other words nerf snipers, railguns, forge guns, mass drivers, shotguns, impact grenades, remote explosives, missile turrets and lav collisions. All these in the right hands are 1hk so lets just nerf um all cus 1hk is bad. Um, yes? That would definitely make for better gameplay. It has to require great skill at the very least for 1HK to be balanced. If you nerf these weapons then wat is the point of having them in game? For example if a forge gun doesn't have massive dmg it can't kill a tank and as a side effect is 1hk, so if u nerf it its a pointless weapon might as well remove it. All these weapons have a purpose (and a counter) and if u nerf them it takes away their purpose so just remove them instead so all we have are assault rifles, laser rifles, scrambler pistols and smgs. Oh wait recent threads have pointed out tht laser rifles assault rifles and scrambler are all op so we might as well remove them as well. Only smgs ppl thts all you get. Flavorless 514 |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 18:15:00 -
[94] - Quote
Jarre Jardox wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Jarre Jardox wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I throw nades at incomming LAVs all the time. They are part of the reason AV nades are on all my fits. I don't see how making them AUR only will change the gameplay except to pin noobs in their spawns. That's what the topic is about.
@noc Over reaching? Not IMHO. I don't think AV grenades should be a necessity. I don't think they should be AUR only, I think they should keep the militia LAV as paid and replace the BPO with a new vehicle that is either a better troop transport (4 seat jeep) or personal transport (1 seat bike) that you cannot add modules to nor gunned (besides the passengers). The problem isn't ISK prices, it is the lack of SP and risk involved for the ease of killing any infantry. I am against ALL 1HK items, including the current missile turrets. In other words nerf snipers, railguns, forge guns, mass drivers, shotguns, impact grenades, remote explosives, missile turrets and lav collisions. All these in the right hands are 1hk so lets just nerf um all cus 1hk is bad. Um, yes? That would definitely make for better gameplay. It has to require great skill at the very least for 1HK to be balanced. If you nerf these weapons then wat is the point of having them in game? For example if a forge gun doesn't have massive dmg it can't kill a tank and as a side effect is 1hk, so if u nerf it its a pointless weapon might as well remove it. All these weapons have a purpose (and a counter) and if u nerf them it takes away their purpose so just remove them instead so all we have are assault rifles, laser rifles, scrambler pistols and smgs. Oh wait recent threads have pointed out tht laser rifles assault rifles and scrambler are all op so we might as well remove them as well. Only smgs ppl thts all you get. Flavorless 514
You have a flawed idea of feedback. I am saying up the skill and/or risk criteria for OHKs. Never did I say remove all the weapons from the game. |
ugg reset
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
234
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 18:20:00 -
[95] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear. And it's not a car crushing a dude, it's a car hitting a supersoldier clone encased in armor that can withstand lasers and missiles and plasma rounds, and all with a forcefield around it. Even one of us getting hit by a car wouldn't necessarily be fatal, and we're regular jackoffs and not video game space men.
Yes, yes it should.
Alldin Kan wrote: if you want to move around the map in a vehicle you should have to pay for it, or buy an AUR BPO.
It's not that bad...
Throw AV grenades and they blow up in 1-2 hits :P
Yea but not everyone wants to carry around AV grenades. And they shouldn't have to either.
why not? they work really well. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 18:23:00 -
[96] - Quote
Rename this thread sQQuelch |
Jarre Jardox
Cool Story But It Needs More EVE
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 18:34:00 -
[97] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Jarre Jardox wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Jarre Jardox wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:]
I don't think AV grenades should be a necessity. I don't think they should be AUR only, I think they should keep the militia LAV as paid and replace the BPO with a new vehicle that is either a better troop transport (4 seat jeep) or personal transport (1 seat bike) that you cannot add modules to nor gunned (besides the passengers). The problem isn't ISK prices, it is the lack of SP and risk involved for the ease of killing any infantry. I am against ALL 1HK items, including the current missile turrets. In other words nerf snipers, railguns, forge guns, mass drivers, shotguns, impact grenades, remote explosives, missile turrets and lav collisions. All these in the right hands are 1hk so lets just nerf um all cus 1hk is bad. Um, yes? That would definitely make for better gameplay. It has to require great skill at the very least for 1HK to be balanced. If you nerf these weapons then wat is the point of having them in game? For example if a forge gun doesn't have massive dmg it can't kill a tank and as a side effect is 1hk, so if u nerf it its a pointless weapon might as well remove it. All these weapons have a purpose (and a counter) and if u nerf them it takes away their purpose so just remove them instead so all we have are assault rifles, laser rifles, scrambler pistols and smgs. Oh wait recent threads have pointed out tht laser rifles assault rifles and scrambler are all op so we might as well remove them as well. Only smgs ppl thts all you get. Flavorless 514 You have a flawed idea of feedback. I am saying up the skill and/or risk criteria for OHKs. Never did I say remove all the weapons from the game. i know you didnt say remove the weapons, im not saying you did. im saying that if you nerf everything that is 1hk then you remove the purpose of the weapon and if the weapon has no purpose why is it in the game? Lavs are trash as it is because they are hard to control and the gunner has no protection, you want to remove the one thing skilled lav drivers have to be and effective weapon, collisions. they are not light transport vehicles, they are light attack vehicles. I dont have a problem with making the free vehicle something else like a 4 person jeep or a single man bike, but if you remove 1hk collisions then the lav becomes a pointless vehicle. |
Forlorn Destrier
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
914
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:02:00 -
[98] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:Tony Calif wrote:LoL Scrubs. Get AV or gtfo. Keep the free LAV. I'm sorry but free LAV's have always taken away from gameplay. If you want to use a vehicle you should have to pay for it or buy a BPO. It makes absolutely no sense that kids can spam free LAV's when they have to pay for their dropsuits. It also doesn't make sense that you can call a tank on a building and shoot into the red zone keeping anything from moving out, but you did that. Hmmm. Tony is right. Keep the free LAV's. Somebody that's butthurt because I denied them a spawn point using a Militia Sica with a blaster on it. Seriously if You can't take out a militia Sica sitting on top of a building begging to get shot down you might as well quit playing the game. Anyways thats besides the point. Nothing in this game should be "free" unless you buy the BPO using AUR as stated in the OP.
Nope, not at all - I was on your team when you did it. I'm just pointing out that there are things that are illogical in the game that you took advantage of, in the case of the tank on a building you were taking advantage of a known bug that caused problems with spawn points so you could wrap up 50-60 kills in a match - kind of an exploit of the game, don't you think?
You didn't complain when it was on your side, and now that it is pointed out that something that is not a bug is ruining your day, this is when you complain. You didn't report the bug to CCP then, so you don't have the right to complain now when there is a legitimate tactic in game that you don't like. |
Forlorn Destrier
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
914
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:03:00 -
[99] - Quote
Super Cargo wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:if you want to move around the map in a vehicle you should have to pay for it, or buy an AUR BPO. It's not that bad... Throw AV grenades and they blow up in 1-2 hits :P Yea but not everyone wants to carry around AV grenades. And they shouldn't have to either.
You're right - that's why you join matches in squads to complement each other's skills and play styles. This is squad based warfare, or supposed to be anyway.
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:12:00 -
[100] - Quote
Jarre Jardox wrote: i know you didnt say remove the weapons, im not saying you did. im saying that if you nerf everything that is 1hk then you remove the purpose of the weapon and if the weapon has no purpose why is it in the game? Lavs are trash as it is because they are hard to control and the gunner has no protection, you want to remove the one thing skilled lav drivers have to be and effective weapon, collisions. they are not light transport vehicles, they are light attack vehicles. I dont have a problem with making the free vehicle something else like a 4 person jeep or a single man bike, but if you remove 1hk collisions then the lav becomes a pointless vehicle.
Your idea of balance is garbage. It takes no skill to run people over, and if you think that is the only thing LAV's are good for, you are simple wrong. LAV's are brutal as AP vehicles right now. Hell, you can even give tanks a run for their money. If you NEED one hit kill weapons in a game to get kills, you are bad. Rocket tag is fun for quick comedy, not serious competition or long term fun. |
|
Jarre Jardox
Cool Story But It Needs More EVE
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 20:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Jarre Jardox wrote: i know you didnt say remove the weapons, im not saying you did. im saying that if you nerf everything that is 1hk then you remove the purpose of the weapon and if the weapon has no purpose why is it in the game? Lavs are trash as it is because they are hard to control and the gunner has no protection, you want to remove the one thing skilled lav drivers have to be and effective weapon, collisions. they are not light transport vehicles, they are light attack vehicles. I dont have a problem with making the free vehicle something else like a 4 person jeep or a single man bike, but if you remove 1hk collisions then the lav becomes a pointless vehicle.
Your idea of balance is garbage. It takes no skill to run people over, and if you think that is the only thing LAV's are good for, you are simple wrong. LAV's are brutal as AP vehicles right now. Hell, you can even give tanks a run for their money. If you NEED one hit kill weapons in a game to get kills, you are bad. Rocket tag is fun for quick comedy, not serious competition or long term fun. actually MY idea of balance is "a" counters "b" which counters "c" which counters "a", each item has its own niche and style of play and is the counter to something else. for the most part i see a lot of this in game. but nerfing "b" because it 1hk throws of this balance: "a" counter "b" and "c" counters "a" but there is no counter to "c" because "b" was nerfed.
free throwaway lavs dont require skill to drive, not because they are op but because of the mentality u have driving them, if you lose it who cares it was free no big you only lost the isk of your dropsuit, so drive with reckless abandon. as a player that has an alt specced only into lav and lav support skills i can assure u driving a non free lav u dont have the same mentality. Not losing your lav becomes very important because it costs as much as a fully proto dropsuit. you dont stop for anything really because with all the av nades and forge guns running around stopping or even just dramatically slowing down can cost you 150k isk, so you start thinking about things like is that guy by that building alone or does he have budies around the corner, if i engage him will that tiny hill make me do a 180, where is that forge gunner i saw 10 seconds ago, are there swarms behind me, was that a locus grenade he just cooked or an av grenade. its not as easy as you make it out to be. and come on the gunner on an lav is a joke. the only thing its good for really is harassing tanks since anyone can shoot you off easier than dominating a game in a dropship. my gunners get an average of 3 kills before getting shot off. if you work with your gunner to get in good overwatch positions they get sniped out not to mention that if you let your gunner shoot while your driving around you draw way to much attention to yourself and ppl start hunting you down like your a tank. so yes u need to be able to run ppl over to be an effective weapon otherwise wats the point? |
Ghost-33
ShootBreakStab
108
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 21:12:00 -
[102] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Nstomper wrote:shouldnt be fatal? It's a car crushing a dude at fast speeds Who cares? Moving forward and steering a bit in a free vehicle should not be able to drop someone in proto gear. And it's not a car crushing a dude, it's a car hitting a supersoldier clone encased in armor that can withstand lasers and missiles and plasma rounds, and all with a forcefield around it. Even one of us getting hit by a car wouldn't necessarily be fatal, and we're regular jackoffs and not video game space men.
lolwut?!
|
Valentine Crendre
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 21:27:00 -
[103] - Quote
As someone who has speced into LAVs and Dropships before, the free milita LAVs are definitely too much and they are being spammed.
Again, this is coming from a LAV guy... I should love free LAVs, if anybody.
No, I'm not a guy running around in proto suits losing ISK because I get roadkilled - I use militia crap because I spend all my ISK on vehicle crap.
And no, I don't get frustrated with peoples free LAVs killing my good LAVs. Hell, I can create a mid-range LAV (not even top-tier) with small blasters that can beat a free LAV with a missile launcher in a 1 v 1 scenario providing I have a competent gunner and quality blasters equipped, of course... besides, the top-tier LAVs (Logistics LAVS) have something like a 50% damage reduction? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that is... silly. Why even have a turret gun on them? It should be a giant remote control repair gun or some crazy loggy-type sh!t.
On a side note: The missile turret > blaster turret business still needs tweaking. The only reason why I can pull off a Blaster LAV beating a Militia Missile LAV is if I run PROTO BLASTERS WITH DAMAGE MODS... And that's just not kosher... or cheap. And though this is an entirely different point, it plays a part and I will get to that...
ANY LAV, militia or not, should NOT be free nor should they have a p2w BPO. I think the only things that should have BPO are the things that are already available in BPOs like some of the basic militia gear and the basic crummy dropsuit (which you don't need BPO for cuz it's already free, I think). So far, this seems to be working fine for the state that this beta is currently in.
Any one who can decently play this game can make money, with time and patience, and begin to progress in the game with those simple basic things. How many of us have done so already...?
The militia LAVs should be an item you need to purchase and stock if you want to use it. If people want more seating capacity in the ground vehicles, then it's time for CCP to implement, at least, a militia APC (and the pilot suit already, sh!t...)
There is no free militia dropships and tanks (anymore)... there should be no free LAVs. They can be just as deadly if used properly (or just spammed... sigh).
Back to my previous point. Once LAVs are no longer free, the small turret classes need balancing, without a doubt. I assume/hope that the reason blasters are so... terribly useless... is because they didn't want a ton of spammed LAVS on the field with killer blasters.
Once LAVs are pay for, the small blasters (and maybe the small rail, haven't had many opportunities to try it but it seems nerfed in AV situations) need a proper buff to offer distinct advantages and disadvantages compared to the missile launcher and the other turrets that we will eventually see.
It's a shame that small proto blasters WITH the top damage mod AND all the hybrid turret skills maxed... do comparable damage to a Duvolle infantry rifle... At base damage... not even equipped with the gun skills that an infantry player would undoubtedly have... just sitting there in the market. Shameful... I would expect vehicle mounted turrets to be, at least moderately, more damaging than infantry small arms assault rifles.
However CCP, before you consider any one of our various gripes, complaints, and moans...
PLEASE FIX THE LAG ISSUE FFS.
Sometimes I can't even shoot someone in front of me! Or I warp off a ledge AND I'm facing in the opposite direction... wtf is up with that? I won't even touch Skirmish anymore. Are PSN North American servers really this atrocious? |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
285
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 22:35:00 -
[104] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Yes, because the way this stuff works is that you skill up to prototype, spending 50k on a prototype suit, and are meant to derive no benefit at all from it. Good thinking there, genius.
"Derive no benefit"? Do you not shoot anyone in between becoming an expensive red stain on the floor? |
Richard Blackburn
Blackburn Odyssey
55
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 22:38:00 -
[105] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:The free lav should be 4 seats, no gun, no modules. The paid lavs should have freaking roofs. Any roadkill should do equal damage back, potentially leading to awesome stand your ground moments with heavies Im Barrack Obama and i approve this message. |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 23:50:00 -
[106] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:"Derive no benefit"? Do you not shoot anyone in between becoming an expensive red stain on the floor?
What does that have to do with whether LAVs should be able to one-hit-kill anyone regardless of the gear they're wearing? |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |