Also, Grenades will be factored into the Fitting bonus for Assaults, currently Light Weapons and Sidearms only.

Please, when theorycrafting, whether to prove the Sentinels are now broken or still OP, or the vice versa for Assault, provide links to protofits. We will not be able to keep up testing them.

Much appreciated

Also, Grenades will be factored into the Fitting bonus for Assaults, currently Light Weapons and Sidearms only.

Erm... that would require protofits to be updated with new slot layout and capacity changes. Or am I missing something?

I believe your comparison of capacity is flawed.
1 PG != 1 CPU

A better comparison would be:
1 PG = 5 CPU

Not for everything...
For Caldari yes, 5CPU = 1PG
But for Gallente, 1CPU = 1PG I think

But, at the end, we al see Caldari hasn't enought CPU

I have made a spreadsheet with an alternative proposal: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15rwmh5VU4pOlPxQ-uZO0tdu4lJZvIcpENxXbqYnwewY/edit?usp=sharing


The Amarr Assault never really lacked CPU/PG, I think it's in an excellent place when it comes to CPU/PG and it doesn't need a buff.
Instead I believe the rest of the assaults should have the same Capacity as the Amarr Assault.

From left to right, CPU increases while PG decreases
Amarr --> Gallente --> Minmatar --> Caldari

I have made a spreadsheet with an alternative proposal: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15rwmh5VU4pOlPxQ-uZO0tdu4lJZvIcpENxXbqYnwewY/edit?usp=sharing


The Amarr Assault never really lacked CPU/PG, I think it's in an excellent place when it comes to CPU/PG and it doesn't need a buff.
Instead I believe the rest of the assaults should have the same Capacity as the Amarr Assault.

From left to right, CPU increases while PG decreases
Amarr --> Gallente --> Minmatar --> Caldari

You're forgetting that the ScR has massive PG costs and the LR has massive CPU costs. Amarr weapons cost the most amount of fititng (or 'capacity') so fitting those reduces our overall 'capacity' per slot so in the end, if you keep all the suits the same as you have, the Amarr will have the least amount of freedom for fits.

Amarr need more CPU and PG than the other suits to be able to use their weapons. It's not balanced if say, we have to downgrade some of our mods in order to fit our weapon while other suits don't need to.

Amarr ships in EVE also have high fitting resources:
Abaddon (Amarr) - 21000 PG, 560 CPU
Rokh (Caldari) - 15000 PG, 780 CPU
Maelstrom (Minmatar) - 21000 PG, 640 CPU
Hyperion (Gallente) - 16000 PG, 600 CPU

Now, EVE did a much better job at balancing fitting resources among weapons, shield modules, and armor modules. Shield modules are CPU heavy while armor modules are PG heavy. That's why Caldari has the most CPU and least PG. Also, energy (laser) and projectile weaponry are the most PG intensive of the weapons, which is why Amarr and Minmatar have high PG values. While Amarr and Gallente purely armor tank, Minmatar can do a little bit of both shield and armor, so they have higher CPU than Amarr and Gallente. Hybrid weapons and missile launchers are the least resource intensive of the weapons, which is why Caldari and Gallente have fairly low PG. Keep in mind that this is extremely generalized.

Now transfer this over to Dust. Amarr weapons have the highest resource usage, so there's a start as to why they should have more resources. However, shield and armor modules have very little difference in fitting requirements (which is a flaw in game design), so those don't offer any reasons to buff CPU or PG on any suit. Really, the only important factor tjhat remains here is weapon resource draw, and Amarr weapons have the highest. Therefore, the differences in suit PG/CPU can really mostly only be based on their racial weapons, and Amarr gets the most (because ScR is PG heavy and LR is CPU heavy).

Agree with the above. Min Sentinel does not need any kind of nerf, ESPECIALLY not a PG reduction. The basic suit will be pretty much unfittable in any reasonable way. If anything, it needs a buff, though not necessarily to its current resources. They're ok where they are.

The Min Scout PG buff needs another 1-2, as well, unless KCs and Knives are going to have their PG "slashed."

That's why you get highest PG.
SCR's draw higher PG, but not really higher CPU.

Are you blind? I mentioned that laser rifles have highest CPU requirements. My advanced LR has almost as much CPU draw as a proto combat rifle (74 vs 78 iirc).

You're forgetting that the ScR has massive PG costs and the LR has massive CPU costs. Amarr weapons cost the most amount of fititng (or 'capacity') so fitting those reduces our overall 'capacity' per slot so in the end, if you keep all the suits the same as you have, the Amarr will have the least amount of freedom for fits.

Amarr need more CPU and PG than the other suits to be able to use their weapons. It's not balanced if say, we have to downgrade some of our mods in order to fit our weapon while other suits don't need to.

Amarr ships in EVE also have high fitting resources:
Abaddon (Amarr) - 21000 PG, 560 CPU
Rokh (Caldari) - 15000 PG, 780 CPU
Maelstrom (Minmatar) - 21000 PG, 640 CPU
Hyperion (Gallente) - 16000 PG, 600 CPU

Now, EVE did a much better job at balancing fitting resources among weapons, shield modules, and armor modules. Shield modules are CPU heavy while armor modules are PG heavy. That's why Caldari has the most CPU and least PG. Also, energy (laser) and projectile weaponry are the most PG intensive of the weapons, which is why Amarr and Minmatar have high PG values. While Amarr and Gallente purely armor tank, Minmatar can do a little bit of both shield and armor, so they have higher CPU than Amarr and Gallente. Hybrid weapons and missile launchers are the least resource intensive of the weapons, which is why Caldari and Gallente have fairly low PG. Keep in mind that this is extremely generalized.

Now transfer this over to Dust. Amarr weapons have the highest resource usage, so there's a start as to why they should have more resources. However, shield and armor modules have very little difference in fitting requirements (which is a flaw in game design), so those don't offer any reasons to buff CPU or PG on any suit. Really, the only important factor tjhat remains here is weapon resource draw, and Amarr weapons have the highest. Therefore, the differences in suit PG/CPU can really mostly only be based on their racial weapons, and Amarr gets the most (because ScR is PG heavy and LR is CPU heavy).

Amarr Equipment too - the Uplinks are resource intensive as well.

I have made a spreadsheet with an alternative proposal: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15rwmh5VU4pOlPxQ-uZO0tdu4lJZvIcpENxXbqYnwewY/edit?usp=sharing


The Amarr Assault never really lacked CPU/PG, I think it's in an excellent place when it comes to CPU/PG and it doesn't need a buff.
Instead I believe the rest of the assaults should have the same Capacity as the Amarr Assault.

From left to right, CPU increases while PG decreases
Amarr --> Gallente --> Minmatar --> Caldari

Well it does kinda make more sense for both fitting styles and balance reasons.

And the cal assault cpu is much better.

haha true.

I have made a spreadsheet with an alternative proposal: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15rwmh5VU4pOlPxQ-uZO0tdu4lJZvIcpENxXbqYnwewY/edit?usp=sharing


The Amarr Assault never really lacked CPU/PG, I think it's in an excellent place when it comes to CPU/PG and it doesn't need a buff.
Instead I believe the rest of the assaults should have the same Capacity as the Amarr Assault.

From left to right, CPU increases while PG decreases
Amarr --> Gallente --> Minmatar --> Caldari

Amarr ships in EVE also have high fitting resources:
Abaddon (Amarr) - 21000 PG, 560 CPU
Rokh (Caldari) - 15000 PG, 780 CPU
Maelstrom (Minmatar) - 21000 PG, 640 CPU
Hyperion (Gallente) - 16000 PG, 600 CPU