Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zatara Rought
Fatal Absolution
2662
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 06:31:00 -
[31] - Quote
kiarbanor wrote:Arkena, I appreciate you trying to make an argument for your team member, and I assume friend. I will not go point by point because I'm on an iPad, and I'm just not going to type that much.
I have nothing against Zatara or Spero. I've talked to both of them briefly, and they aren't horrible people. However, you never answered my question. How is Zatara going to represent the community when he's made the decisions he's made?
You don't have to give me a history lesson; I've been part of numerous conversations where Zatara spoke. You know, "top secret" stuff. I know what Zatara was trying to do. I heard his intentions over chat. However, his actions--believe or not--speak volumes. He and Spero both speak and support adjustments to PC; yet, their actions contradict that by being in the biggest blue donut Dust has ever seen. Not just that, but being part of a blue donut that wants to wipe the entire player base from the map. To me, that is stopping the majority from enjoying a game mode. How can you even begin to argue that?
The only people that argue and defend what DNS has done to the game are those in DNS. Everyone else sees it for what it is. This isn't the War Room, though; so, we don't need to get in those arguments.
All I'm asking is how the player base can trust Zatara to represent them. From being on comms and listening to him speak, then watching his actions as he disregarded loyalty for the almighty ISK, I'm struggling to see how he can even be considered a legit option.
I'm having a hard time distinguishing decisions made by the player compared to future decisions of a person in direct conversations with CCP.
It saddens me that my candidacy is being tested not on the merits of my knowledge/experience in game, my desire to improve it, my ability to accomplish goals, play devil's advocate with any idea (including my own), ability to disagree amiably, or a wealth of other pertinent traits I personally find important...but rather on whether I can put the game above my corp/alliance.
When have I personally ever put DNS above the community?
I find assertions that I came to DNS for isk misguided. Where have I ever related that?
I haven't taken a paycheck from PC profits during my entire tenure in FA, except for ringing.
I did not come to DNS to make isk. Simple as that.
Really, it seems your concern boils down to "I'm concerned that Zatara would try to sway PC to his alliance's/corp's advantage."
Would you like testimony from people who have known me a long time in game? Maybe character witnesses from real life?
What proof would suffice?
I supported a nerf to cal logi's (and indeed respecced out of the FOTM callogi at the time into the then UP gal logi), supported a nerf to gal logi's when armor tanking got buffed and they became OP, I supported nerfs to TAC's despite teammates using them, nerfs to nades despite loving them, nerfs to scanners despite using them, and many more nerfs that affected me or my team at the time.
About the only thing I regrettably didn't argue the change for (initially) was the melee glitch..which i promptly apologized for.
I supported hardener tank nerfs despite boasting arguably the strongest tank core in the game.
This is a pattern of putting the game above my ambitions in game.
Being in DNS for the last month does not demean my ability to put the needs of this game above all else.
I see absolutely no tension in the ideas that you can immensely desire changes to PC to help change the current stymied landscape...while still fighting a game mode aptly called "Planetary Conquest."
Do I want changes that will hopefully negatively impact DNS's chances of finishing their goal for 100%? Absolutely.
No one has asked me if I support DNS taking 100% of PC.
No one has asked if I agree with DNSBlack.
All that's being offered thus far is assertions fabricated out of whole cloth.
Anyone that knows me, or wants to know me...outside of PC battles and the strain they can be on my immediate patience (looks at Jaysyn's comments) knows or will discover someone who loves dust and would like to bring the experience and other relevant skills accumulated to the table for the betterment of the community.
off to bed. o7
CEO of FA
B3RT>PFBHz>TP>IMP>FA
Follow me on twitter Skype Zatara.Rought
|
Zatara Rought
Fatal Absolution
2662
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 06:35:00 -
[32] - Quote
Another great question is...of all the corps that locked before the hotfix...who DIDN'T support changes to fix PC locking?
Does the same logic not apply then to all the candidates that owned a corp in PC at that time?
Are they all to be found wanting because while supporting changes to PC locking...they still locked?
I support changes to fix PC...and yet the blue donut isn't glitching or exploiting mechanics like isk duplication in the process.
CEO of FA
B3RT>PFBHz>TP>IMP>FA
Follow me on twitter Skype Zatara.Rought
|
Stiddlefaxq
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
65
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 07:23:00 -
[33] - Quote
Zatara knows how to play the game and has demonstrated this for almost a year now at the game's highest level of competition. As a member and as a CEO.
The way he has run his corp shows that he clearly cares for the new player experience. Zatara is the clear first choice if you care about having a competitive game.
Our relation has been a bit rocky at times since he left Teamplayers and started his own corp. This is more my fault than his, I got a bit peeved when he tried to undercut us on those districts :D. But when I played along side him nearly every night for over three months, he demonstrated an ability to adapt and analyze that is infrequent in online game play. The only complaint I had, was maybe sometimes he had a bit TOO much to say, but it was always goal oriented and usually quite appropriate. He has undoubtedly taught this style to the many newer players in his corp that he, seeing potential, has recruited.
As a logi, he pioneered the role and was a huge part of why we maintained compound dominance as we did those days. If having a working, competitive game is something you want to see, and want to elect someone that can relate those issues, and further the conversation with the community on them, then Zatara is your candidate. |
Deep Shallowness
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
11
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 07:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
It's really simple Zatara :
You are being judged on your current and past actions. DNS'a actions do not make the game better for the community. Placing excessive ISK in the hands of a few allows them influence over others (see proto in pubs). Letting a few have access to a game mode and denying it others through a mechanic you know full well was not intended is fine for a player, but NOT for a CPM.
You are in DNS. I does not matter one bit if you never play a single match in PC. Your corps assets, such as ISK and people and being used by DNS. Even if they do nothing their action to not engage DNS, is still an action in DNS's favor.
Being part of a group always implies explicit support of their actions. You cannot be in the Ku Klux Klan and expect people to trust it is only because they happen to own the best library in town and you would like to use it. If you are no benefit to DNS and it is no benefit to you then leave.
No CPM member should take part in an activity that hurts the people they are supposed to represent, so I do not trust you to represent me.
You just said you support changes to PC. Well how about you actually show us that? Right now. Pull out of DNS and stop supporting PC as it is now. Actions not words. |
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
4501
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 07:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
This, is this really real?
This is not the election for California new joke mayor or which Wrestler Minnesota is going to vote in next (+1 to those who figure out why I mention these two states in zatara's defense)
It's a video game election, and you're saying because of his tags, and selective track record, you will judge him?
This is why I have no faith in this community. The only people showing intelligence proves how little they actually have. You're letting the EvE Metasphere dictate how you approach Dust. It's a different Metasphere completely. We're in a tiny region where a corp can only do so much on it's own when it's vastly out numbered by equal skill. But to make a corp to even reach that skill is a feat on it's own, and proof zatara has dedication to this game. A proof that FAR OUT WEIGHTS THE OTHER CANDIDATES. Besides maybe the Dust Uni one.
What does it matter if he's in DNS? The situation he was in to make him join is not comparable to any EvE standards to set a precedence to snipe him over it. No one in EvE gets backed into the corner and forced to leave the game and go play pubs with terrible players all day. Do you guys understand how mind numbing it is playing pubs for competitive players? He kept content for his guys the best way he could, and you can ask nothing more from someone whose leading you.
How you can stand running for CPM, Zatara, I will never know. You're a saint. It will take some time before people see past your tags and into your heart, but when they do, you'll see votes flying in.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Critical-Impact
3651
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 07:57:00 -
[36] - Quote
ugh
Sir Hadah for CPM
|
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
952
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 08:33:00 -
[37] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:This, is this really real?
This is not the election for California new joke mayor or which Wrestler Minnesota is going to vote in next (+1 to those who figure out why I mention these two states in zatara's defense)
It's a video game election, and you're saying because of his tags, and selective track record, you will judge him?
This is why I have no faith in this community. The only people showing intelligence proves how little they actually have. You're letting the EvE Metasphere dictate how you approach Dust. It's a different Metasphere completely. We're in a tiny region where a corp can only do so much on it's own when it's vastly out numbered by equal skill. But to make a corp to even reach that skill is a feat on it's own, and proof zatara has dedication to this game. A proof that FAR OUT WEIGHTS THE OTHER CANDIDATES. Besides maybe the Dust Uni one.
What does it matter if he's in DNS? The situation he was in to make him join is not comparable to any EvE standards to set a precedence to snipe him over it. No one in EvE gets backed into the corner and forced to leave the game and go play pubs with terrible players all day. Do you guys understand how mind numbing it is playing pubs for competitive players? He kept content for his guys the best way he could, and you can ask nothing more from someone whose leading you.
How you can stand running for CPM, Zatara, I will never know. You're a saint. It will take some time before people see past your tags and into your heart, but when they do, you'll see votes flying in.
SoTa,
I speak for no one but myself on this - tags matter far less than the individual and on that you are 100% correct. That also doesn't mean that folks should totally ignore that based on their points of view.
I don't think anyone can doubt Zatara's individual skill and understanding of Dust. As you pointed out rightly so, FA accomplished more than the majority of Dust corps every have. Again, there are many other factors in play other than that and simple alliance tags.
Anyway...my current opinions aren't actually based on anything he may or may not have done with DNS. I've said more than once on the forums that the decision to join with Spero (pre-DNS) was a purely internal FA matter and that was for them to deal with. I do think publicly letting folks know where they stand on the things that DNS Black, head of the DNS Alliance, openly and often touted and what their individual actions actions might be in response is probably a good thing for any candidate to do based on the community reaction.
Lastly, in reference to the comment about potentially being forced to go down to the minors so to speak in EVE...that happens in that game as well. Lots of folks that used to be in NulSec aren't anymore because of that very thing. The problem in Dust is that there are simply less viable options in this regard than Eve.
"Endless money forms the sinews of War." - Cicero
Skype: jaysyn.larrisen
Twitter: @JaysynLarrisen
|
Archer Yorcot
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
31
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 12:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
Deep Shallowness wrote:It's really simple Zatara :
You are being judged on your current and past actions. DNS'a actions do not make the game better for the community. Placing excessive ISK in the hands of a few allows them influence over others (see proto in pubs). Letting a few have access to a game mode and denying it others through a mechanic you know full well was not intended is fine for a player, but NOT for a CPM.
You are in DNS. I does not matter one bit if you never play a single match in PC. Your corps assets, such as ISK and people and being used by DNS. Even if they do nothing their action to not engage DNS, is still an action in DNS's favor.
Being part of a group always implies explicit support of their actions. You cannot be in the Ku Klux Klan and expect people to trust it is only because they happen to own the best library in town and you would like to use it. If you are no benefit to DNS and it is no benefit to you then leave.
No CPM member should take part in an activity that hurts the people they are supposed to represent, so I do not trust you to represent me.
You just said you support changes to PC. Well how about you actually show us that? Right now. Pull out of DNS and stop supporting PC as it is now. Actions not words.
Well said. People are judging Zatara by his actions, and his actions have left his credibility in ruins. Same with Sparo.
Look how their actions have helped devastate the NPE and wall off an entire game mode by virtue of exploiting a design oversight. Using free ISK to proto stomp 24/7 has driven hordes of new players away from the game.
He has willfully and deliberately chosen to ally with DNSBlack, a man whose vision for Dust is predicated on monopolizing Molden Heath. In doing so, he has provided resources, leadership, and support to further this agenda.
How is that a positive development for the community? Why wouldn't voters judge him negatively for doing that?
I don't think anyone here disputes Zatara's passion for the game, but his credibility is shot.
Vote for someone else.
This forum signature is OP.
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2724
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 13:21:00 -
[39] - Quote
Will you campaign for a nade buff?
How to Leave PC
|
kiarbanor
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
409
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 14:34:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ah, since Zatara has now joined the conversation, I will now address him directly. Nothing against you, Arkena. And Sota, IGÇÖll respond to you in the War Room because I do not want to sidetrack ZataraGÇÖs campaign thread.
So, Zatara, letGÇÖs have a cordial, intelligent conversation about my points and yours. I will go directly off your response, point by point.
First, it shouldnGÇÖt surprise you that your candidacy will be judged by those you associate with. It shouldnGÇÖt surprise anyone. This is the way the world works. You might not agree with itGÇöI certainly donGÇÖtGÇöbut itGÇÖs the simple truth. The majority will see Fatal Absolution and DNS next to your name, and they will immediately have preconceived ideas on who you are and what youGÇÖre about. If you want to enter the political realmsGÇöeven in a video gameGÇöyou have to understand that.
As for when have you put DNS ahead of the community? Well, letGÇÖs see. I guess every second that youGÇÖre part of DNS and doing what youGÇÖre doing in PC, youGÇÖre putting DNS ahead of the community. The majorityGÇöthis is how I will reference the 98% of the communityGÇödo not agree with anything DNS stands for or is trying to accomplish. All you have to do is spend 5 seconds in the forums to realize that. So, by continuing to align yourself with DNS and its objectives, you are alienating the majority, which you now hope to represent.
I will apologize for the isk comment; it was intended to get a response more than what I truly believe. My belief is that FA was put against the ropes and held over the cliff. You made the best judgment call for your people, in order to guarantee their survival. Some will say this is honorable. My belief is that itGÇÖs weakness. But this still isnGÇÖt the issue.
IGÇÖm going to skip down to this before I get to my main point, though. You said, GÇ£No one has asked me if I support DNS taking 100% of PC.GÇ¥ Zatara, no one needs to ask you that question. You are living your own answer. By remaining part of DNS and watching as the majority are turned away from one of the game modes, when you have the power to do something, your actions are your answer. You might not agree with taking over 100% of PC, but your GÇ£silence of actionsGÇ¥ speaks for you.
Now I can get to my main point. I was trying to give you a forum in which to answer and convince the community that you deserve their vote, not hide behind a thought process of GÇ£my in-game actions shouldnGÇÖt dictate how people perceive me.GÇ¥ I have nothing against you, but you are na+»ve to think that will happen. Our actions, and the actions of those we associate with, dictate our overall perception. If FA proto stomps in pub matchesGÇöeven if youGÇÖre not thereGÇöit will have a negative impact on you.
The reason I wonGÇÖt vote for you is pretty simple: I was in a chat room when you were discussing our next steps (TsoGÇÖs next steps) after the fix to locking. Right out of your mouth came, GÇ£The last thing I want is to be part of another blue donut,GÇ¥ and, GÇ£we do not want to take over all the districts or kick anyone out of PC. 60 districts, between everyone in our alliance, are the most we want.GÇ¥ Do you remember saying this? I do. Others do. Then, when the pressure was put on, what did you do? You joined the blue donut (justify it all you want) and are currently attempting to kick every single person out of PC except DNS. Because of this, you are a liar. You canGÇÖt be trusted.
So, please tell me again how youGÇÖre going to represent the entire community and earn back trust?
|
|
Moorian Flav
224
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 14:38:00 -
[41] - Quote
Quote:Stop judging people based on their alliance and start judging them based on who they are. I think seeing the alliance a player is in and how they got into their alliance speaks a lot toward their character (who they are).
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
I'm also known as "The ANTI-Propaganda Machine".
|
Ridire Greine
383
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 14:45:00 -
[42] - Quote
Moorian Flav wrote:I think seeing the alliance a player is in and how they got into their alliance speaks a lot toward their character (who they are).
The decision to join the alliance was a decision made by the whole corp, not just Zatara. We had a corp meeting and Zatara gave us the info, from there the group as a whole made a decision to move. Zatara just gave us the details, we made the decision.
You can't blame Zatara for listening to his players and following through on their decision, in fact, is that not a good trait to have in a CPM Candidate?
"Jolly cooperation"
Knight Solaire
CEO. Farmer. Pubstomper. For those that can't figure it out. - Knight Soiaire
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2173
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 15:13:00 -
[43] - Quote
Some questions and concerns about Zatara may be valid, others, I don't think are so valid. I haven't decided who I'm voting for yet (other then myself, of course), but I urge people not to rush to conclusions. I don't feel being in the dominant landholding alliance is necessarily a capital crime for a CPM candidate. While exploits have been a problem for a pretty large percentage of the PC playerbase, largely speaking, the fault is CCP's failure to create a good game mode, and failure to police those individuals exploiting the system.
If the game is in such a way that allows one to take 100% of it, that's not the player's fault for doing it. Does everyone here expect CPM members to pull their punches in-game? Planetary Conquest is part of the game, and by it's very definition, you're kinda supposed to try and kick people out of it.
I mean, I'm big on PFC, so you know, sometimes I can be a big carebear about getting people into PC and having fun. But it's hard to blame someone for playing the game well.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Archer Yorcot
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
33
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 15:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Some questions and concerns about Zatara may be valid, others, I don't think are so valid. I haven't decided who I'm voting for yet (other then myself, of course), but I urge people not to rush to conclusions. I don't feel being in the dominant landholding alliance is necessarily a capital crime for a CPM candidate. While exploits have been a problem for a pretty large percentage of the PC playerbase, largely speaking, the fault is CCP's failure to create a good game mode, and failure to police those individuals exploiting the system.
If the game is in such a way that allows one to take 100% of it, that's not the player's fault for doing it. Does everyone here expect CPM members to pull their punches in-game? Planetary Conquest is part of the game, and by it's very definition, you're kinda supposed to try and kick people out of it.
I mean, I'm big on PFC, so you know, sometimes I can be a big carebear about getting people into PC and having fun. But it's hard to blame someone for playing the game well.
No one is blaming Zatara for playing the game "well."
But his assertion that his in-game conduct should have no bearing on his candidacy is fundamentally absurd.
His in game conduct is directly responsible for alienating new players, indulging in game breaking exploits, and enabling an alliance which detrimental to the game's development.
This forum signature is OP.
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
2175
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 15:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Archer, I went a bit more into my thoughts on my own thread in this board, where kiarbanor asked me some additional questions. Rather than retype or restate, do you mind if I direct you towards that post?
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2095857#post2095857
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Archer Yorcot
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
34
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 16:31:00 -
[46] - Quote
+1 for an articulate and rational response Soraya. Thank you.
However, Zatara's actions, his leadership, and his associations have directly and negatively impacted Dust's current state of play and its future in the New Eden universe.
These are not the actions of someone who is merely roleplaying within the parameters of the Molden Heath sandbox. These are the actions of someone who has made the Dust experience worse for the community as whole, and then insists that we should turn a blind eye when it comes time to vote.
Zatara may be a fantastic CEO who can assure his corporation's survival and prosperity. That's fine. He may be a passionate and dedicated player. That's great, no problem there.
But I see nothing in his conduct to convince me that he will put the needs of the community above his personal ambitions, his corporation's holdings, or the political expediency of his alliance.
I vote no.
This forum signature is OP.
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2725
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 16:32:00 -
[47] - Quote
Archer Yorcot wrote:+1 for an articulate and rational response Soraya. Thank you. However, Zatara's actions, his leadership, and his associations have directly and negatively impacted Dust's current state of play and its future in the New Eden universe. These are not the actions of someone who is merely roleplaying within the parameters of the Molden Heath sandbox. These are the actions of someone who has made the Dust experience worse for the community as whole, and then insists that we should turn a blind eye when it comes time to vote. Zatara may be a fantastic CEO who can assure his corporation's survival and prosperity. That's fine. He may be a passionate and dedicated player. That's great, no problem there. But I see nothing in his conduct to convince me that he will put the needs of the community above his personal ambitions, his corporation's holdings, or the political expediency of his alliance. I vote no. A legally bound and signed contract might.
How to Leave PC
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3536
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 18:09:00 -
[48] - Quote
I think Zatara would bring an interesting element to the CPM. He's played the game at it's highest levels and succeeded. He was a FC for Team Players in the most impressive run of PC seen to date. He started a corp and quickly turned it into one of the most feared corps in Dust 514.
I've spent quite a bit of time talking to Zatara and I believe he is genuinely interested in the long term success of this game. I don't see Zatara using the CPM as a platform for benefiting his corporation or his allies.
Zatara is an excellent candidate and I'll have him at or near the top of my ballot.
Level 3 Forum Warrior
|
kiarbanor
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
411
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 18:46:00 -
[49] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:I think Zatara would bring an interesting element to the CPM. He's played the game at it's highest levels and succeeded. He was a FC for Team Players in the most impressive run of PC seen to date. He started a corp and quickly turned it into one of the most feared corps in Dust 514.
I've spent quite a bit of time talking to Zatara and I believe he is genuinely interested in the long term success of this game. I don't see Zatara using the CPM as a platform for benefiting his corporation or his allies.
Zatara is an excellent candidate and I'll have him at or near the top of my ballot.
I respect your opinion on this, Thor. And it means a lot that you're able to have this perspective after the conversations I know we both heard.
+1 |
waters104
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 21:14:00 -
[50] - Quote
Put it this way, " dont judge a book from its front cover" at least take intitave and open it lolz |
|
waters104
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 21:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
Great guy he gives everyone chances ^^ i learn some stuff from him ^^ good teacher
Shoot for the stars.....not the ground, i have dreams do you?
|
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
4558
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 23:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
Archer Yorcot wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Some questions and concerns about Zatara may be valid, others, I don't think are so valid. I haven't decided who I'm voting for yet (other then myself, of course), but I urge people not to rush to conclusions. I don't feel being in the dominant landholding alliance is necessarily a capital crime for a CPM candidate. While exploits have been a problem for a pretty large percentage of the PC playerbase, largely speaking, the fault is CCP's failure to create a good game mode, and failure to police those individuals exploiting the system.
If the game is in such a way that allows one to take 100% of it, that's not the player's fault for doing it. Does everyone here expect CPM members to pull their punches in-game? Planetary Conquest is part of the game, and by it's very definition, you're kinda supposed to try and kick people out of it.
I mean, I'm big on PFC, so you know, sometimes I can be a big carebear about getting people into PC and having fun. But it's hard to blame someone for playing the game well. No one is blaming Zatara for playing the game "well." But his assertion that his in-game conduct should have no bearing on his candidacy is fundamentally absurd. His in game conduct is directly responsible for alienating new players, indulging in game breaking exploits, and enabling an alliance which detrimental to the game's development. You hold one point that is true, and can't back it up in regards to Zatara. And that is that you can judge him on choices he's made, however, you're ignoring how he runs his corporation. Are you saying, that by allowing his guys to make the decision to what they've done, that Zatara should take the fall as a person?
In this regard, him giving his guys the option of what path they will be fighting on, was the choice that we wish CCP would give us. This man, has shown that he will listen to you, help you improve your ideas, and then implement them. FA is the proof guys, no one else in this entire game has the commitment to do what he did and make the choices he has. He heard his men out, and made the best moves for them. Even district locking was so that he could keep enough clones so he wouldn't be forced to clone pack - everyone is getting very frustrated with Clone Packs, and many corps have completely burnt out using them - so he did what the cool thing was to do back then, because he had to for his guys.
As a corp leader, Dust is not his concern, but as CPM, it would be, you would see a whole new side of him reaching out to the NPE. This would be a positive move that would help grow the trust between community and CPM. I doubt there are few who take this game as seriously as Zatara. But more then that, he would be a person to break down walls this community has set in itself, such as vet vs casual.
He would also help fix the transparency issue between CPM and Community - not the leakage of NDA, but how well the communication link works. IE. you can expect CPM to reply as best they can to all concerns
Zatara, offers a lot as CPM. To both the community and game mechanics. I implore those judging him on selective track records - ask yourselves - "If I had a competitive team loyal to me, looking up to me to make the right decisions, what would I do for them?" Then ask if it's alright to judge him based on what he thought was right.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
kiarbanor
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
414
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 00:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Archer Yorcot wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Some questions and concerns about Zatara may be valid, others, I don't think are so valid. I haven't decided who I'm voting for yet (other then myself, of course), but I urge people not to rush to conclusions. I don't feel being in the dominant landholding alliance is necessarily a capital crime for a CPM candidate. While exploits have been a problem for a pretty large percentage of the PC playerbase, largely speaking, the fault is CCP's failure to create a good game mode, and failure to police those individuals exploiting the system.
If the game is in such a way that allows one to take 100% of it, that's not the player's fault for doing it. Does everyone here expect CPM members to pull their punches in-game? Planetary Conquest is part of the game, and by it's very definition, you're kinda supposed to try and kick people out of it.
I mean, I'm big on PFC, so you know, sometimes I can be a big carebear about getting people into PC and having fun. But it's hard to blame someone for playing the game well. No one is blaming Zatara for playing the game "well." But his assertion that his in-game conduct should have no bearing on his candidacy is fundamentally absurd. His in game conduct is directly responsible for alienating new players, indulging in game breaking exploits, and enabling an alliance which detrimental to the game's development. You hold one point that is true, and can't back it up in regards to Zatara. And that is that you can judge him on choices he's made, however, you're ignoring how he runs his corporation. Are you saying, that by allowing his guys to make the decision to what they've done, that Zatara should take the fall as a person? In this regard, him giving his guys the option of what path they will be fighting on, was the choice that we wish CCP would give us. This man, has shown that he will listen to you, help you improve your ideas, and then implement them. FA is the proof guys, no one else in this entire game has the commitment to do what he did and make the choices he has. He heard his men out, and made the best moves for them. Even district locking was so that he could keep enough clones so he wouldn't be forced to clone pack - everyone is getting very frustrated with Clone Packs, and many corps have completely burnt out using them - so he did what the cool thing was to do back then, because he had to for his guys. As a corp leader, Dust is not his concern, but as CPM, it would be, you would see a whole new side of him reaching out to the NPE. This would be a positive move that would help grow the trust between community and CPM. I doubt there are few who take this game as seriously as Zatara. But more then that, he would be a person to break down walls this community has set in itself, such as vet vs casual. He would also help fix the transparency issue between CPM and Community - not the leakage of NDA, but how well the communication link works. IE. you can expect CPM to reply as best they can to all concerns Zatara, offers a lot as CPM. To both the community and game mechanics. I implore those judging him on selective track records - ask yourselves - "If I had a competitive team loyal to me, looking up to me to make the right decisions, what would I do for them?" Then ask if it's alright to judge him based on what he thought was right.
So, your argument is that since he did whatever possible for his corporation--no matter the outcome to the rest of the community--he should be commended? And this is because he let his corp members voice their concerns and ultimately make the call?
You believe this translates to him listening to the community and making the best decisions for all of us?
I'm trying to simplify this; so, please correct me if I simplified it too much. |
waters104
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 00:06:00 -
[54] - Quote
Lolz did you ever go under his command? Lolz
Shoot for the stars.....not the ground, i have dreams do you?
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
3720
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 01:04:00 -
[55] - Quote
It's no great secret that I hate the majority of you... people.... on principle alone, so I'll just say this.
Zatara is attempting to throw you guys a bone. I know how he thinks and he really does want improvement for the game at large, not just for his own personal sandbox. He wants large scale fights where Tso's can throw their legions upon legions of fodder at their enemies and have "gud fights". He likes the idea of territories being split and chaotic. The blue donut isn't his decision, but he's backing it because reasons.
If you vote for someone like him, you will get experienced and educated representation that falls in line with what you guys want. If you vote for someone like me, I really will just completely screw you over because I legitimately do not think any of you deserve to breathe the same air as me.
Understand the difference between someone who is trying to help you, and someone who actually does want to hurt you. I'll tell you right now, the flag they carry doesn't tell you that difference. |
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution
7181
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 01:34:00 -
[56] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:If you vote for someone like me, I really will just completely screw you over because I legitimately do not think any of you deserve to breathe the same air as me. Oh Himiko. |
SoTa PoP
Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad.
4579
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 03:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
kiarbanor wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Archer Yorcot wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Some questions and concerns about Zatara may be valid, others, I don't think are so valid. I haven't decided who I'm voting for yet (other then myself, of course), but I urge people not to rush to conclusions. I don't feel being in the dominant landholding alliance is necessarily a capital crime for a CPM candidate. While exploits have been a problem for a pretty large percentage of the PC playerbase, largely speaking, the fault is CCP's failure to create a good game mode, and failure to police those individuals exploiting the system.
If the game is in such a way that allows one to take 100% of it, that's not the player's fault for doing it. Does everyone here expect CPM members to pull their punches in-game? Planetary Conquest is part of the game, and by it's very definition, you're kinda supposed to try and kick people out of it.
I mean, I'm big on PFC, so you know, sometimes I can be a big carebear about getting people into PC and having fun. But it's hard to blame someone for playing the game well. No one is blaming Zatara for playing the game "well." But his assertion that his in-game conduct should have no bearing on his candidacy is fundamentally absurd. His in game conduct is directly responsible for alienating new players, indulging in game breaking exploits, and enabling an alliance which detrimental to the game's development. You hold one point that is true, and can't back it up in regards to Zatara. And that is that you can judge him on choices he's made, however, you're ignoring how he runs his corporation. Are you saying, that by allowing his guys to make the decision to what they've done, that Zatara should take the fall as a person? In this regard, him giving his guys the option of what path they will be fighting on, was the choice that we wish CCP would give us. This man, has shown that he will listen to you, help you improve your ideas, and then implement them. FA is the proof guys, no one else in this entire game has the commitment to do what he did and make the choices he has. He heard his men out, and made the best moves for them. Even district locking was so that he could keep enough clones so he wouldn't be forced to clone pack - everyone is getting very frustrated with Clone Packs, and many corps have completely burnt out using them - so he did what the cool thing was to do back then, because he had to for his guys. As a corp leader, Dust is not his concern, but as CPM, it would be, you would see a whole new side of him reaching out to the NPE. This would be a positive move that would help grow the trust between community and CPM. I doubt there are few who take this game as seriously as Zatara. But more then that, he would be a person to break down walls this community has set in itself, such as vet vs casual. He would also help fix the transparency issue between CPM and Community - not the leakage of NDA, but how well the communication link works. IE. you can expect CPM to reply as best they can to all concerns Zatara, offers a lot as CPM. To both the community and game mechanics. I implore those judging him on selective track records - ask yourselves - "If I had a competitive team loyal to me, looking up to me to make the right decisions, what would I do for them?" Then ask if it's alright to judge him based on what he thought was right. So, your argument is that since he did whatever possible for his corporation--no matter the outcome to the rest of the community--he should be commended? And this is because he let his corp members voice their concerns and ultimately make the call? You believe this translates to him listening to the community and making the best decisions for all of us? I'm trying to simplify this; so, please correct me if I simplified it too much. Yes, i am, because it's that simple. He did what he could to help his guys.
What would he do to help this game? Think about the commitment he's shown to what his goals are - now he's saying he wants to be an effective CPM - his track record shows when he sets out to do something he accomplishes it. I can't see how someone who looks after people could be negative on CPM. If you can find a single FA to honestly speak bad of what he's done with FA I'd be surprised.
i trust in his commitment. He's shown it to me first hand. And I hope you will all give him a chance to prove himself.
I'm sure after Fanfest Zatara will really start to show his stuff. For now, I hope I help bring light to his better traits and his situation.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ I watch anime for the plot
|
Tallen Ellecon
1832
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 05:30:00 -
[58] - Quote
I guess in the end I don't care about what Zatara wants to do, or what he says he'll do, I care about what he will do. His actions may make him a good leader to those he follows, shown by the vast amount of support. I'm not looking for a leader in a CPM, I'm looking for a representative who truly the games survival and community first. Some people can't overlook certain harmful actions, even if they were done with good intentions.
Supporter of tiericide, EVE interaction, and a proper NPE SoonGäó514
"No blue tags make Tallen go crazy.
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
12869
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 06:18:00 -
[59] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:Some people can't overlook certain harmful actions, even if they were done with good intentions.
What actions, specifically, are 'harmful'?
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Oh, forums
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1620
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:26:00 -
[60] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:It's no great secret that I hate the majority of you... people.... on principle alone, so I'll just say this.
Zatara is attempting to throw you guys a bone. I know how he thinks and he really does want improvement for the game at large, not just for his own personal sandbox. He wants large scale fights where Tso's can throw their legions upon legions of fodder at their enemies and have "gud fights". He likes the idea of territories being split and chaotic. The blue donut isn't his decision, but he's backing it because reasons.
If you vote for someone like him, you will get experienced and educated representation that falls in line with what you guys want. If you vote for someone like me, I really will just completely screw you over because I legitimately do not think any of you deserve to breathe the same air as me.
Understand the difference between someone who is trying to help you, and someone who actually does want to hurt you. I'll tell you right now, the flag they carry doesn't tell you that difference.
I have nothing against you or Zatara... had a lot of good games... But when you say stuff like "Zatara is attempting to throw you guys bone" You sound as cocky as he is in game.... If you are asking for votes, learn to be humble first... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |