Now its a accuracy problem.

You know, quiet as its kept, the truth no one is talking about is player skill involved. The truth no one is talking about is that the CR really trumps. But the common merc doesn't know that.

The running theme? "I don't adapt my playstyle, the game must adapt to me. How could a person actually be good with a RR trump with CQC? That's utterly impossible! I demand a nerf!"

So close quarters combat is trump with lasers, assault MDs and...sniper rifles...compared to the RR? Am I understanding you correctly because honestly that doesn't make sense to me.

The gallente at is better when fired in bursts, like an actual assault rifle, you cannot cry for a Nerf to a weapon because people want to pray and spray. That said the RR does have disadvantages, the charge time, slow rate of fire, and magazine size. I do see where you are coming from, especially since you are gallente. This weapon was designed to kill armor tanks, much like the scrambler is designed to kill my shield tanked caldari suit. You know what I do when I see a good scrambler rifle user? I run, because I am out matched, as I cannot fight that awesome alpha of a gun designed to kill me.

I don't see the range as an issue, it has the same optimal as the scrambler rife, 78m it's effective is a bit longer, I believe 102m. At about 150m I'm doing about 20% damage, I won't be able to break shields at that damage before I burn through my whole clip. The assault rail is meant for medium to short range, its a variant, but a good gal at user will still beat me cqc.

I don't care if you Nerf the RR, I don't use it because its op, I use it because its caldari.
I would like to know how you intend to reduce the dps tho, as I would preferably like to keep it useful.
Personally I think all assault rifles should loose 10% damage to encourage specialty weapons.

It's too accurate.
Due to it's low fire rate (meaning you know when the bullets will fly out of the barrel) and EXTREME hip fire accuracy, it can apply full DPS at any time.

An AR, while accurate, is not as accurate, and unless the target is sitting still or moving RIGHT at you, you will never apply full DPS.
Even while aiming down sights, due to it's fire rate if the target is moving you usually can't apply full DPS.


So you have a weapon with the same DPS as the AR, higher range, higher accuracy, better damage application...

RR DPS must be reduced, it's too accurate, has too much range and has too good of a damage application to have this much DPS.

It's too accurate.
Due to it's low fire rate (meaning you know when the bullets will fly out of the barrel) and EXTREME hip fire accuracy, it can apply full DPS at any time.

An AR, while accurate, is not as accurate, and unless the target is sitting still or moving RIGHT at you, you will never apply full DPS.
Even while aiming down sights, due to it's fire rate if the target is moving you usually can't apply full DPS.


So you have a weapon with the same DPS as the AR, higher range, higher accuracy, better damage application...

RR DPS must be reduced, it's too accurate, has too much range and has too good of a damage application to have this much DPS.

Show me on the doll where the rr touched you and if it's so op why is the cr used more in pc

Show me on the doll where the rr touched you and if it's so op why is the cr used more in pc

I'm saying that the RR isn't bad in CQC. It's possible to win in CQC with the proper skill, even against specialized CQC weapons like the HMGs, while it's next to impossible for these weapons to win in CQC against weapons like AR and forget CQC weapons like the HMG, regardless of skill level.

Because the CR is OP too? "X isn't broken because Y exists" is terrible logic.

The ONLY problem with the RR is it is too effective in cqc and it kills fast from 0 meters to 100m. No other weapon can do that. I have no problem with a RR killing me from 50 - 100 meters, that's it's turf. But a RR should not be able to beat my CR or AR at 5 meters. And it happens a lot.

Reducing hip fire accuracy will reduce cqc effectiveness of the RR without harming its long range abilities. Reducing damage or rof will harm both cqc and long range and that shouldn't happen. Reducing its cqc abilities will be good enough.

But consider the implication...it's spot on.

The ONLY problem with the RR is it is too effective in cqc and it kills fast from 0 meters to 100m. No other weapon can do that. I have no problem with a RR killing me from 50 - 100 meters, that's it's turf. But a RR should not be able to beat my CR or AR at 5 meters. And it happens a lot.

Reducing hip fire accuracy will reduce cqc effectiveness of the RR without harming its long range abilities. Reducing damage or rof will harm both cqc and long range and that shouldn't happen. Reducing its cqc abilities will be good enough.

Rail rifle is fine, but it's going to be over nerfed and then everyones gonna switch to combat rifles and nerf that too.

And thus the cycle continues...shame, really.

Generally 100 % bullshit.

Try to fire RR while strafe, when your opponent is on the move.

How many same topics you will start over and over?

True, but he rr is the "racial equivalent" of the breach ar from pre 1.7. So logically, it should be high damage (as most breach weapons are) and slower ROF with a better hip spread (as most breach weapons are)....

The CR is probably the worst weapon to use in PC once framerate drops it's DPS drops with it. Unless you mean the ACR the CR is not the weapon to go with if you are in PC. Although the best explainable reason for using the CR in PC is its higher DPS output and ease of use. Even though the SCR has a higher damage output it is harder to use, if the SCR didn't kill itself with overheat that would be the go to gun.

I have and you sir are stupid

Both need a nerf actually...

It's too accurate.
Due to it's low fire rate (meaning you know when the bullets will fly out of the barrel) and EXTREME hip fire accuracy, it can apply full DPS at any time.

An AR, while accurate, is not as accurate, and unless the target is sitting still or moving RIGHT at you, you will never apply full DPS.
Even while aiming down sights, due to it's fire rate if the target is moving you usually can't apply full DPS.


So you have a weapon with the same DPS as the AR, higher range, higher accuracy, better damage application...

RR DPS must be reduced, it's too accurate, has too much range and has too good of a damage application to have this much DPS.

really not, you play with a gallente with dmg mod live with it, now you have a counter stop whinning you appear to never played an MMO

So...
What stops me from putting on an RR and making those damage mods even better?

You appear to have no logic.