|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
2985
   |
Posted - 2014.02.02 03:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now its a accuracy problem.
You know, quiet as its kept, the truth no one is talking about is player skill involved. The truth no one is talking about is that the CR really trumps. But the common merc doesn't know that.
The running theme? "I don't adapt my playstyle, the game must adapt to me. How could a person actually be good with a RR trump with CQC? That's utterly impossible! I demand a nerf!"
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
2985
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 03:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Now its a accuracy problem.
You know, quiet as its kept, the truth no one is talking about is player skill involved. The truth no one is talking about is that the CR really trumps. But the common merc doesn't know that.
The running theme? "I don't adapt my playstyle, the game must adapt to me. How could a person actually be good with a RR trump with CQC? That's utterly impossible! I demand a nerf!" Implying that it's hard to win in CQC with the RR compared to Lasers, Assault MDs, and Sniper Rifles.
So close quarters combat is trump with lasers, assault MDs and...sniper rifles...compared to the RR? Am I understanding you correctly because honestly that doesn't make sense to me.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
2994
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 05:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:
I'm saying that the RR isn't bad in CQC. It's possible to win in CQC with the proper skill, even against specialized CQC weapons like the HMGs, while it's next to impossible for these weapons to win in CQC against weapons like AR and forget CQC weapons like the HMG, regardless of skill level.
Thanks for clarification. System rebooted.
Jacques Cayton II wrote:
if it's so op why is the cr used more in pc
*morpheus voice*
yessssss!
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
2994
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 05:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Jacques Cayton II wrote:Cat Merc wrote:It's too accurate.
Due to it's low fire rate (meaning you know when the bullets will fly out of the barrel) and EXTREME hip fire accuracy, it can apply full DPS at any time.
An AR, while accurate, is not as accurate, and unless the target is sitting still or moving RIGHT at you, you will never apply full DPS.
Even while aiming down sights, due to it's fire rate if the target is moving you usually can't apply full DPS.
So you have a weapon with the same DPS as the AR, higher range, higher accuracy, better damage application...
RR DPS must be reduced, it's too accurate, has too much range and has too good of a damage application to have this much DPS. Show me on the doll where the rr touched you and if it's so op why is the cr used more in pc Because the CR is OP too? "X isn't broken because Y exists" is terrible logic.
But consider the implication...it's spot on.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3006
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 09:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:Rail rifle is fine, but it's going to be over nerfed and then everyones gonna switch to combat rifles and nerf that too.
And thus the cycle continues...shame, really.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
|
|
| |
|