How bout make attacks a que system?

Example:

Corps A, B, and C are in molden heath

Corp A has a district online. Corp B attack district, Corp C can also attack District of corp A but its battle on that district is put on hold after the battle with Corp B. lets say 2 day between attacks.

Only 1 corp can have 1 battle que.

This way no corp can have a perma lock on districts.

Suggestions would be better placed in a thread that's created to stop district locking instead of a thread trying to get more corps into pc.

I appreciate your optimism, but I just don't see that big of an idea happening. All you're doing is perpetuating the main issues in this game. Even if the big corps only merc, they will be the only ones playing this game. For the majority, that is all that happens now. AE will be hired to play Fatal Absolution again, and again, and again. You have to think of a better way to get everyone involved and competing.

Plus, we need a way more people learn how to compete so they can go off and actually play PC.

Honestly I think you're short minded to assume something like this couldn't happen. AE is at the point of attacking their own allies for good fights, and taking out their frustration on forum threads that go no where... who's to say we aren't willing to do something?

Right now its its a little impossible for this to happen considering if someone were to deviate from the rules and decide to lock their districts indefinitely, no one could enforce the rules on them.

Once district locking is fixed, I predict renegade will go for the full 100% for the f**k of it, then open up MH again with some sort of game plan involved until CCP implements better mechanics to make 1 alliance dominating completely near impossible/not worth it.

Ima make a thread to present my ideas on fixing district locking and my ideas on this very matter we are discussing after the fact. Productive train of thought ftw

i know the ******* way to balance pc , it clear that 16 vs 16 is extreme hard mode to high number count corp wit 95% useless low ,high sp player VS a small corp elite wit 100 % useful pro player shitload of sp , i have the solution to this problem since the ps3 hardware is weakshit 128 vs 128 is out of question, 1 merc should be only able to fight 2 pc per 24 hour wat do it
mean is tha if during the 24 hour 18 of 61 nyain san districts get attacked they will need 144 or more depending to defend it if merc have not participating pc or play only 1 during the day.

Abandon the thread mate quick lol

i know the ******* way to balance pc , it clear that 16 vs 16 is extreme hard mode to high number count corp wit 95% useless low ,high sp player VS a small corp elite wit 100 % useful pro player shitload of sp , i have the solution to this problem since the ps3 hardware is weakshit 128 vs 128 is out of question, 1 merc should be only able to fight 2 pc per 24 hour wat do it
mean is tha if during the 24 hour 18 of 61 nyain san districts get attacked they will need 144 or more depending to defend it if merc have not participating pc or play only 1 during the day.

Yeah, anything constructive that would put a limit on "Super Corps" is just treated as trash. Nothing will change. It's the same as life, those who have everything fear anything constructive that could limit their power or influence and money.

i know the ******* way to balance pc , it clear that 16 vs 16 is extreme hard mode to high number count corp wit 95% useless low ,high sp player VS a small corp elite wit 100 % useful pro player shitload of sp , i have the solution to this problem since the ps3 hardware is weakshit 128 vs 128 is out of question, 1 merc should be only able to fight 2 pc per 24 hour wat do it
mean is tha if during the 24 hour 18 of 61 nyain san districts get attacked they will need 144 or more depending to defend it if merc have not participating pc or play only 1 during the day.

I remember mentioning that awhile ago, or maybe being stationed on a planet and it takes time to transfer to another depending on the distance.

I dont see how this will get more people to play pc, but i like this idea.

It's one thing that I do like about eve.....that it takes real time to get to places instead of a teleportation sort of thing. Although, guys will just sign on earlier to get there.

I dont see how this will get more people to play pc, but i like this idea.

It's one thing that I do like about eve.....that it takes real time to get to places instead of a teleportation sort of thing. Although, guys will just sign on earlier to get there.

I believe increasing the player count from 16v16 to 32v32 would increase participation and help other corps become more competitve by drawing from their size.

I think you are on to something, but I think it's more about the 24 and 48 hr until battle crap. That's the key to it and it enables these small groups of elite players to control so much.

I think districts should be attackable daily with a 8-12 hour "window" that you can set that locks the district for your corps normal downtime.

Give a 30 min to 1 hr timer for battles to commence.

This makes it impossible for small groups to control huge chunks of land.

We find giving districts up to corps that just lock their districts is pointless. So why give up land for a corp to be scared out of their minds enough to lock it and not even experience PC?

It's a good idea, we've given up probably over 50 districts by now, most for free. Then the corps that take them, turn around and lock it, so no point. So we simply quit giving up land.

In some old patch notes it stated that the maps are unlocked for 24v24 but its not actually implemented yet.

i know the ******* way to balance pc , it clear that 16 vs 16 is extreme hard mode to high number count corp wit 95% useless low ,high sp player VS a small corp elite wit 100 % useful pro player shitload of sp , i have the solution to this problem since the ps3 hardware is weakshit 128 vs 128 is out of question, 1 merc should be only able to fight 2 pc per 24 hour wat do it
mean is tha if during the 24 hour 18 of 61 nyain san districts get attacked they will need 144 or more depending to defend it if merc have not participating pc or play only 1 during the day.

But limiting the amount of matches players can do would screw smaller corps and favour mega corps.

If I'm not getting this then please enlighten me.

Limiting the amount of matches per day isn't a good idea, it would be a bad attempt at polishing a turd.

Well I don't want to play in Dust matches with MORE people on this hardware. It's not going to happen in my opinion until the move to the PS4 (hopefully).

PC was a great challenge and it was a lot of fun. We've had some great times in PC, but they are few and far between.

It was all going good until the LOI/Eon war. Many of our players started losing interest in PC as more and more corps started using ringers. To me this started the downfall of PC.

When you spent a ton of ISK and hard earned fights to go into a battle hoping to flip a district. Then you get to the war barge and see there's one dude from the corp you've attacked. You can come up with any bullshit you want to come up with, but THAT is what led to many people throwing their hands up about PC. That or going to one of the corps that would always be filling in for the corps you thought you were playing.

When you factor in the lag and the cost it just isn't worth it to many people. Truth be told PC should have been pulled from Dust months ago. I think many corps lock districts just in case PC 2.0 is more playable and don't want to be caught with their pants down at that time with two or three corps made up of a hundred or so players with a combined worth of hundreds and hundreds of billions of ISK.

The corps and players that ***** the most about being bored created this. But really that's not fair, it's the mechanics that led to this.

Non alliance ringers should have to pay a fee for their clones to be transported to a battle. And perhaps there should even be a delay as their clones are processed into the system.

We find giving districts up to corps that just lock their districts is pointless. So why give up land for a corp to be scared out of their minds enough to lock it and not even experience PC?

It's a good idea, we've given up probably over 50 districts by now, most for free. Then the corps that take them, turn around and lock it, so no point. So we simply quit giving up land.

That's the point of all of this though, Kujo. AE will take districts from a corp and give it to even weaker corps, right? But then those weaker corps will lose their districts to corps that can't compete with AE. Then what happens?...AE takes the districts back from those corps again and the cycle is repeated.

Only solution is to remove the threat of the big boys from the equation. The corps that all other corps can't compete against should just merc out. I'm 100% sure that corps will stop locking their districts if that threat is removed. And I'm sure more corps would participate in pc because they won't be scared of the big boys. They would be able to compete with all of the other corps on their level in pc.

I remember mentioning that awhile ago, or maybe being stationed on a planet and it takes time to transfer to another depending on the distance.

Limiting the amount of matches per day isn't a good idea, it would be a bad attempt at polishing a turd.