Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2287
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Leither Yiltron wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:undeadsoldier90 wrote:Sounds good.... on paper. Try convincing anyone who has land to give it up, easier said than done.
My idea
AE and nyain san push for 100% control of MH, lock all districts, make CCP fix this ****.
Then sell or give away all of them. well, that's up to all of the corps to give it up, really. They would have to want pc to strive on their own to do it themselves. I know it would be hard for them...but I do read posts saying that AE is trying to help pc. It's a valiant effort Dubbs, but here's the simpler solution: The corps that want PC to survive need to come up with training programs for corps trying to break in, effective ones, and the newer corps have to be willing to engage with those programs. The issue is not only that many of these corporations don't have districts, it's that they don't even have the necessary introduction to organization and tactics in general, Skirmish 2.0 tactics in particular, to get started even. The only way they're going to get that introduction is by having their ground commanders and core players participate in some battles run by a team that already knows what they're doing. Or at least that's the quickest way. Despite that being hard, trying to get that kind of program in place and engaged isn't as hard as trying to get people to give up land. Only way to learn is to put both feet forward. What did KEQ and the rest of the original PC corps do when pc started? All that the rest of us can do is allow them to have fights on their skill level and learn that way. KEQ and the rest of the original corps were all old beta corps, and like RND and KEQ many were old MAG clans. In the worst case we at least had a great understanding of the way we needed to utilize comms, organize players, and dance with the mechanics. I'm not saying that your typical newer corp isn't totally capable of learning that, but they can learn it quite a bit faster with a quick crash course in "look at how we do it". After you have that initial realization of "okay, so this is how much organization we need to have" the tactics and strategies can follow after a few battles on skill level.
Not every old beta corp had experience like that. Some used to play 8v8 but more had no experience running 16v16 battles with tanks and 5 letter maps, etc.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
4449
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:24:00 -
[32] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:I believe increasing the player count from 16v16 to 32v32 would increase participation and help other corps become more competitve by drawing from their size. Not even close. It'd drastically reduce the number of corps who had the numbers to participate. Your best hope there, would be by excluding even more corps from the game, that some might merge up. But then all the vet corps merge together into one, and the newbie corps all merge into one and we still have the same problem.
Hmm good point size may not work.
How about 8v8 corps have their own planet/ districts with limited space to encourage these small corps to make connections and eventually build a large enough force to move into molden heath.
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2287
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:I understand why corp lock their districts its to survive however it shouldn't be profitable.
The problem with your idea is if corps do get free districts and never use them because they lock them profitably we still haven't gotten any where.
Then it also becomes extremely hard to police as any corp who has tried can tell you. Can't kick em out if they are permalocked.
If new corps want to get their foot in the door they should try and negotiate their way in. Who decides which corps can fight who?
I want a fix too I just don't think this is the one.
But having multiple fights simultaneously to take a district will certainly increase the need for more players in corps and giving more players playing time.
district locking is not the reason why more corps aren't in pc. I understand it's AE's biggest issue with PC because they want to wipe a lot of corps off the map. But it really isn't the biggest hinder.
If district locking is fixed...how does that help pc become more active?? what will happen is AE will attack those not locking their districts and then what? Even if you guys decide to hand it to a lower tiered corp.....vet corps will just attack them and take it from them anyway just to get back into pc.
The threat from stronger vet corps has to be eliminated and allow for smaller, newer, lower skilled corps to get in to pc
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
Leither Yiltron
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
834
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:
I want a fix too I just don't think this is the one.
The real fix is gutting PC and making a sincere effort to rework the mechanics from CCP's end. That and reworking Skrmish 2.0 as a game mode. Skirm 2.0 is just...it's not quite there. It has some good elements, but in general it's mostly devoid of tactical depth. That and its low player count (something that isn't going to budge for the foreseeable future due to tech, unfortunately) combine with the PC mechanics we have today into the 16-to-own-it-all dynamic we see today.
ROFL PC Coordinator
Fix framerate by 1.8
Pony
|
ReGnYuM
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
1903
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
Too many crybabies in thread pls move to general.
If you're in MH for honor and competition then you're doing it wrong.
PC is for those seaking wealth
Official Imperfect Title: Supreme Leader of the Endless Sunset
I Slay, for thy Empress
Do you even PC... Brah
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2288
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:43:00 -
[36] - Quote
ReGnYuM wrote:Too many crybabies in thread pls move to general.
If you're in MH for honor and competition then you're doing it wrong.
PC is for those seaking wealth
ISK is definitely the reward. Think about how much you'd earn if there were a multitude of corps pc'ing daily.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
KenKaniff69
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
1914
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 22:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
What do you think about the classic chromosome corp battles returning, ydubbs? maybe in both 16v16 and 8v8
So about those vehicle locks...
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2289
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:02:00 -
[38] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:What do you think about the classic chromosome corp battles returning, ydubbs? maybe in both 16v16 and 8v8
They should....no harm in them coming back.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
273
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
A coulpe of things they could do is open more district up, hopefully if they do t open more up we can set up an area for newer corps to go and put something in the game that you can do if isk you earn from district just hoarding it all into a wallet seems ridiculous, i don't know maybe a Cannon that can shot at eve support to help corps that don't have it, this idea might be good but to implemented now would be tough |
Long Evity
1131
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:06:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:A coulpe of things they could do is open more district up, hopefully if they do t open more up we can set up an area for newer corps to go and put something in the game that you can do if isk you earn from district just hoarding it all into a wallet seems ridiculous, i don't know maybe a Cannon that can shot at eve support to help corps that don't have it, this idea might be good but to implemented now would be tough pü¿püìpü½µêæpÇàpü»Nyainpé¦pâ¦püîs¦ÅpüòpüÅTÜèpü¿s£¦sƒƒtñ+S+ÜpéÆsè¬püæpéïpüôpü¿péƵ£ƒs+àpüÖpéïpüôpü¿püîpüºpüìpü+püÖn+ƒ
I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
|
|
demens grimwulff
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
124
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different.
Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten... |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2289
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
Long Evity wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:A coulpe of things they could do is open more district up, hopefully if they do t open more up we can set up an area for newer corps to go and put something in the game that you can do if isk you earn from district just hoarding it all into a wallet seems ridiculous, i don't know maybe a Cannon that can shot at eve support to help corps that don't have it, this idea might be good but to implemented now would be tough pü¿püìpü½µêæpÇàpü»Nyainpé¦pâ¦püîs¦ÅpüòpüÅTÜèpü¿s£¦sƒƒtñ+S+ÜpéÆsè¬püæpéïpüôpü¿péƵ£ƒs+àpüÖpéïpüôpü¿püîpüºpüìpü+püÖn+ƒ
He doesn't know what that means lol
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
273
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Long Evity wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:A coulpe of things they could do is open more district up, hopefully if they do t open more up we can set up an area for newer corps to go and put something in the game that you can do if isk you earn from district just hoarding it all into a wallet seems ridiculous, i don't know maybe a Cannon that can shot at eve support to help corps that don't have it, this idea might be good but to implemented now would be tough pü¿püìpü½µêæpÇàpü»Nyainpé¦pâ¦püîs¦ÅpüòpüÅTÜèpü¿s£¦sƒƒtñ+S+ÜpéÆsè¬püæpéïpüôpü¿péƵ£ƒs+àpüÖpéïpüôpü¿püîpüºpüìpü+püÖn+ƒ He doesn't know what that means lol
Im not japanese i only know a few word like Hi, good morning/night and give me gold |
Long Evity
1131
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
I'm loving the whole, " But in the past... " In the past the game wasn't nearly as dull and broken. People cared enough to get up and scream and organize 500 men campaigns. Now? We have nothing. AE isn't in the shoes EoN used to be - EoN was the foundation for how alliances should evolve - not how to regress back too.
I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
|
demens grimwulff
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
124
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:21:00 -
[45] - Quote
Long Evity wrote:I'm loving the whole, " But in the past... " In the past the game wasn't nearly as dull and broken. People cared enough to get up and scream and organize 500 men campaigns. Now? We have nothing. AE isn't in the shoes EoN used to be - EoN was the foundation for how alliances should evolve - not how to regress back too.
is this a symptom of a dying game, dying culture, or are both just sick and need to be resuscitated?
despite my love for this game, I can't but think that every minute spent on it is fruitless... and I know i am not the only one who feels that way.
Also, you left out how long no one gave a **** then about EoN holding land... |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2289
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:22:00 -
[46] - Quote
demens grimwulff wrote:Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different.
Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten...
Since you haven't had a conversation with me or know the history of Ahrendee and our intentions and what we are about....I can understand why you find humor in it.
Thing is...we never really wanted as many districts as we had when we were in EoN. We had 6 districts going into EoN and we didn't really want anymore. But they were given them away so we took them. We ended up having battles and taking the rest. If this idea was proposed when we had 28 districts and the community was down for it.....we would have been too. Because again, we wouldn't be given up all of our districts. We would keep a planet and just merc out the rest. Having too many districts isn't all that its cracked up to be unless you have 30 or so players active at random. ISK generation is cool though.
Again....if we did this and a low tiered alliance or corp got too big, then the merc corps would just take them down.
And also, if AE, NS, FA, STB or whoever else that has districts don't want to do this...then it is what it is. I'm not going to belittle or think negative of a corp that doesn't want to do this. I'm just proposing an idea because a lot of people are tired of playing the same people every single day and I think that it's a travesty that there are so many corps not in pc.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
demens grimwulff
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
124
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:26:00 -
[47] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different.
Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten... Since you haven't had a conversation with me or know the history of Ahrendee and our intentions and what we are about....I can understand why you find humor in it. Thing is...we never really wanted as many districts as we had when we were in EoN. We had 6 districts going into EoN and we didn't really want anymore. But they were given them away so we took them. We ended up having battles and taking the rest. If this idea was proposed when we had 28 districts and the community was down for it.....we would have been too. Because again, we wouldn't be given up all of our districts. We would keep a planet and just merc out the rest. Having too many districts isn't all that its cracked up to be unless you have 30 or so players active at random. ISK generation is cool though. Again....if we did this and a low tiered alliance or corp got too big, then the merc corps would just take them down. And also, if AE, NS, FA, STB or whoever else that has districts don't want to do this...then it is what it is. I'm not going to belittle or think negative of a corp that doesn't want to do this. I'm just proposing an idea because a lot of people are tired of playing the same people every single day and I think that it's a travesty that there are so many corps not in pc.
Sorry for the long, nested quotes... On my cell phone. I can appreciate that sentiment and I feel the same way as you. I am not one for PC on a large scale, but it is what it is. I just wish isk wasn't the benefit, as no one cares about that, really. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2290
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:35:00 -
[48] - Quote
demens grimwulff wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:demens grimwulff wrote:Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different.
Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten... Since you haven't had a conversation with me or know the history of Ahrendee and our intentions and what we are about....I can understand why you find humor in it. Thing is...we never really wanted as many districts as we had when we were in EoN. We had 6 districts going into EoN and we didn't really want anymore. But they were given them away so we took them. We ended up having battles and taking the rest. If this idea was proposed when we had 28 districts and the community was down for it.....we would have been too. Because again, we wouldn't be given up all of our districts. We would keep a planet and just merc out the rest. Having too many districts isn't all that its cracked up to be unless you have 30 or so players active at random. ISK generation is cool though. Again....if we did this and a low tiered alliance or corp got too big, then the merc corps would just take them down. And also, if AE, NS, FA, STB or whoever else that has districts don't want to do this...then it is what it is. I'm not going to belittle or think negative of a corp that doesn't want to do this. I'm just proposing an idea because a lot of people are tired of playing the same people every single day and I think that it's a travesty that there are so many corps not in pc. Sorry for the long, nested quotes... On my cell phone. I can appreciate that sentiment and I feel the same way as you. I am not one for PC on a large scale, but it is what it is. I just wish isk wasn't the benefit, as no one cares about that, really.
especially all of the vet corps.....we are all mostly paid.....which is another reason why this should happen.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
kiarbanor
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
285
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:35:00 -
[49] - Quote
I've been semi vocal on the fact PC is completely broken. In a video game, you should never allow one group or alliance to dominate. It's just bad for a video game. Players lose interest, and then the game suffers.
Corp contracts were fun, and I wish they came back.
If you want to help PC quickly, I think you need to come up with smaller ideas that are built on competition and fun. For instance, one of the large corps can set aside a planet. Then everyone interested in trying to conquer that planet signs up with a small entry fee. But in order to create competition and fun, you split the corps up into four tiers. You have A, B, C, and D corps. Every team has to be made up of players from each tier.
So, in four squads of four, one squad is all A corp players; one B, C, and D. Se\7eN, most likely a D tier corp, could be on a team with a four-man squad of AE, for instance.
Winning team takes the pot. Best thing is that you can rinse and repeat this process by mixing up the corps again.
Just one idea, but something fun that will generate interest. I think something everyone needs to realize is that the players control PC. Some will say that's a bad thing, but it can be turned into a huge positive. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2290
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:38:00 -
[50] - Quote
kiarbanor wrote:I've been semi vocal on the fact PC is completely broken. In a video game, you should never allow one group or alliance to dominate. It's just bad for a video game. Players lose interest, and then the game suffers.
Corp contracts were fun, and I wish they came back.
If you want to help PC quickly, I think you need to come up with smaller ideas that are built on competition and fun. For instance, one of the large corps can set aside a planet. Then everyone interested in trying to conquer that planet signs up with a small entry fee. But in order to create competition and fun, you split the corps up into four tiers. You have A, B, C, and D corps. Every team has to be made up of players from each tier.
So, in four squads of four, one squad is all A corp players; one B, C, and D. Se\7eN, most likely a D tier corp, could be on a team with a four-man squad of AE, for instance.
Winning team takes the pot. Best thing is that you can rinse and repeat this process by mixing up the corps again.
Just one idea, but something fun that will generate interest. I think something everyone needs to realize is that the players control PC. Some will say that's a bad thing, but it can be turned into a huge positive.
we don't have to be so creative.....a very simple solution would suffice. Eliminate the threat of skilled corps attacking districts and just mercing out. No corp will ever become what EoN or what RA is because the better corps will all be merc corps. Back in the early pc days, there were so many corps here...this wasn't a problem.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
|
kiarbanor
S.e.V.e.N. General Tso's Alliance
285
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:kiarbanor wrote:I've been semi vocal on the fact PC is completely broken. In a video game, you should never allow one group or alliance to dominate. It's just bad for a video game. Players lose interest, and then the game suffers.
Corp contracts were fun, and I wish they came back.
If you want to help PC quickly, I think you need to come up with smaller ideas that are built on competition and fun. For instance, one of the large corps can set aside a planet. Then everyone interested in trying to conquer that planet signs up with a small entry fee. But in order to create competition and fun, you split the corps up into four tiers. You have A, B, C, and D corps. Every team has to be made up of players from each tier.
So, in four squads of four, one squad is all A corp players; one B, C, and D. Se\7eN, most likely a D tier corp, could be on a team with a four-man squad of AE, for instance.
Winning team takes the pot. Best thing is that you can rinse and repeat this process by mixing up the corps again.
Just one idea, but something fun that will generate interest. I think something everyone needs to realize is that the players control PC. Some will say that's a bad thing, but it can be turned into a huge positive. we don't have to be so creative.....a very simple solution would suffice. Eliminate the threat of skilled corps attacking districts and just mercing out. No corp will ever become what EoN or what RA is because the better corps will all be merc corps. Back in the early pc days, there were so many corps here...this wasn't a problem.
I appreciate your optimism, but I just don't see that big of an idea happening. All you're doing is perpetuating the main issues in this game. Even if the big corps only merc, they will be the only ones playing this game. For the majority, that is all that happens now. AE will be hired to play Fatal Absolution again, and again, and again. You have to think of a better way to get everyone involved and competing.
Plus, we need a way more people learn how to compete so they can go off and actually play PC. |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo
2207
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
I think its a good idea, its just a shame the vet corps don't seem to make full use of what they have, theres a lot that relish the idea of becoming that powerful as to be able to fight regularly and fight people on their level, I think a lot of top corps don't realise what they've got and if they chilled a bit and had more fun with the game, there'd be less stagnation. Its my opinion that if all you want to do is farm isk, a worthless game currency, by passive farming then pc is wasted on them and makes it sht for everyone. That's just my opinion though.
As for the lag well your generalisation is wrong mate, a good example is swamp, we are now mind numbingly grinding shtty pubs with a raised corp tax rate to get in now that theres been a lag fix, some lag is acceptable but not what it used to be. The actual game mode mechanics mixed with lag didn't warrant the effort.
We have even created a temporary corp instead of waiting for our CEO to get back from RL issues and joined a very decent alliance. We don't care about losing, dying or whatever, we just want to play in the game mode where not only our team knows what they are doing but so do the enemy.
To put this into perspective, our first attack was against red star, we could have picked any other easier corp to fight, admittedly I chucked my corp mates who were all less than 4 months old save for two straight in the deep end, we got fking ruined hahaha, but it was fun and as I was fresh to being in charge that much, I/we learned a lot. I have to say it was impressive, we did manage to hold one objective for a good while but inevitably lost.
We then thought (swamp is very democratic) we'd choose an easier target, my guys need some glory as well right? So we attacked risings suns, we won the first match, there was minimal lag. The re up saw massive lag, rubber banding and two players getting booted, we lost. Around 50 players from both our training corp and swamp combined quit dust.
People really need to understand that a lot of that kind of broken rubbish isn't acceptable to many gamers, especially with the amount of time and effort dust takes and I can assure you, I'd have quit guaranteed if I'd not been here since beta.
I'd just like to say to any rising suns guys that were in that first match, that was an ace game, pure gun game and no bs, it was very close as well.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
BLUNT SMKR
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
oh i got n idea since the only insentive to hold lots of districts is cause of the isk. how about they take away the isk generation from holding districts n raise the isk amount a merc earns for particapating in a PC matchs. n also give the winning corp a good chunk of isk. so basically the only way a corp to earn isk is to fight. making it so corps dont need to hold lots of districts just enough to launch attacks n stuff.
also the idea of having 16v16 n 8v8 districts is a good idea cause it lets smaller corps get involved in pc n also gives vet corps a new way to test there skills in smaller battles. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2290
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 23:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
kiarbanor wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:kiarbanor wrote:I've been semi vocal on the fact PC is completely broken. In a video game, you should never allow one group or alliance to dominate. It's just bad for a video game. Players lose interest, and then the game suffers.
Corp contracts were fun, and I wish they came back.
If you want to help PC quickly, I think you need to come up with smaller ideas that are built on competition and fun. For instance, one of the large corps can set aside a planet. Then everyone interested in trying to conquer that planet signs up with a small entry fee. But in order to create competition and fun, you split the corps up into four tiers. You have A, B, C, and D corps. Every team has to be made up of players from each tier.
So, in four squads of four, one squad is all A corp players; one B, C, and D. Se\7eN, most likely a D tier corp, could be on a team with a four-man squad of AE, for instance.
Winning team takes the pot. Best thing is that you can rinse and repeat this process by mixing up the corps again.
Just one idea, but something fun that will generate interest. I think something everyone needs to realize is that the players control PC. Some will say that's a bad thing, but it can be turned into a huge positive. we don't have to be so creative.....a very simple solution would suffice. Eliminate the threat of skilled corps attacking districts and just mercing out. No corp will ever become what EoN or what RA is because the better corps will all be merc corps. Back in the early pc days, there were so many corps here...this wasn't a problem. I appreciate your optimism, but I just don't see that big of an idea happening. All you're doing is perpetuating the main issues in this game. Even if the big corps only merc, they will be the only ones playing this game. For the majority, that is all that happens now. AE will be hired to play Fatal Absolution again, and again, and again. You have to think of a better way to get everyone involved and competing. Plus, we need a way more people learn how to compete so they can go off and actually play PC.
Corps will only merc out if they need to. And this is the thing...it wouldn't be just AE vs FA. It could be AE vs AE, FA vs FA, RND vs AE, TRE vs TP or whatever. Or, it would be Top Men vs TSO. If there are a multitude of corps involved, then I believe the merc game will be in full swing. Because there are corps that can't field a full 16 but could be supplemented with merc players. Maybe you have stacked timers...I mean, I could go on.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo
2207
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 00:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
I forgot to put though that granted there will be corps too scared to compete but a large majority have certain standards when it comes to time invested vs satisfaction. A game mode that's laggy, kicks your team mates and can be exploited is simply unacceptable but the lag fix is good enough for swamp.
We might just organised matches and do crazy themed ones. Granted if our alliance wants war we'll eat that sht sandwich with them
o7
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
LittleCuteBunny
251
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 00:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
Giving indie corps a free pass to MC is not the solution... I rather see them training before they enter MH scene, instead giving them free districts just for them to lose them in a few hours or days.
The old corporate contract system needs to be put into place as an alternative which may serve merely as training, betting, indie tournaments, just like the 8vs8 system helped ppl get ready for PC last year.
@Spiritual Retreat
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2292
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 00:04:00 -
[57] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:I forgot to put though that granted there will be corps too scared to compete but a large majority have certain standards when it comes to time invested vs satisfaction. A game mode that's laggy, kicks your team mates and can be exploited is simply unacceptable but the lag fix is good enough for swamp. We might just organised matches and do crazy themed ones. Granted if our alliance wants war we'll eat that sht sandwich with them o7
I don't believe corps that can compete....don't because of lag or D/Cs. I mean, you can be d/c'ed out of a pub match or FW. Exploits are done in pub matches and FW just as bad as pc. Yet, here we all are.....if dudes can deal with it for a pub match, then they would deal with it in pc where you can actually benefit with ISK.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo
2207
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 00:05:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:I forgot to put though that granted there will be corps too scared to compete but a large majority have certain standards when it comes to time invested vs satisfaction. A game mode that's laggy, kicks your team mates and can be exploited is simply unacceptable but the lag fix is good enough for swamp. We might just organised matches and do crazy themed ones. Granted if our alliance wants war we'll eat that sht sandwich with them o7 I don't believe corps that can compete....don't because of lag or D/Cs. I mean, you can be d/c'ed out of a pub match or FW. Exploits are done in pub matches and FW just as bad as pc. Yet, here we all are.....if dudes can deal with it for a pub match, then they would deal with it in pc where you can actually benefit with ISK.
You are entitled to your own opinions.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2292
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 00:06:00 -
[59] - Quote
LittleCuteBunny wrote:Giving indie corps a free pass to MC is not the solution... I rather see them training before they enter MH scene, instead giving them free districts just for them to lose them in a few hours or days.
The old corporate contract system needs to be put into place as an alternative which may serve merely as training, betting, indie tournaments, just like the 8vs8 system helped ppl get ready for PC last year.
They would lose them to other weaker corps...that's the premise. Other sort of corps that they can come back and reattack...other corps that they have a chance of winning. Corps don't pc because who are they going to attack? I remember being attacked by unknown corps looking to break into PC but they just got smoked. If it were a corp on their level, then they may have tried again if they were close to winning. Or, maybe they would've won...or maybe they could hire a few mercs and get an edge.
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo
2207
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 00:07:00 -
[60] - Quote
Corp battles coming back would be ace, I preferred them over pc anyway. If they get implemented again, it'd be sweet to pick 6v6, 8v8 or 16v16.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |