DUST Search - Making PC More Active....only solution??

Ydubbs81 RND wrote:

demens grimwulff wrote:

Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different.

Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten...

Since you haven't had a conversation with me or know the history of Ahrendee and our intentions and what we are about....I can understand why you find humor in it.

Thing is...we never really wanted as many districts as we had when we were in EoN. We had 6 districts going into EoN and we didn't really want anymore. But they were given them away so we took them. We ended up having battles and taking the rest. If this idea was proposed when we had 28 districts and the community was down for it.....we would have been too. Because again, we wouldn't be given up all of our districts. We would keep a planet and just merc out the rest. Having too many districts isn't all that its cracked up to be unless you have 30 or so players active at random. ISK generation is cool though.

Again....if we did this and a low tiered alliance or corp got too big, then the merc corps would just take them down.

And also, if AE, NS, FA, STB or whoever else that has districts don't want to do this...then it is what it is. I'm not going to belittle or think negative of a corp that doesn't want to do this. I'm just proposing an idea because a lot of people are tired of playing the same people every single day and I think that it's a travesty that there are so many corps not in pc.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
demens grimwulff Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 124	Posted - 2014.01.18 23:12:00 - [1] - Quote Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different. Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten...
demens grimwulff Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 124	Posted - 2014.01.18 23:21:00 - [2] - Quote Long Evity wrote: I'm loving the whole, " But in the past... " In the past the game wasn't nearly as dull and broken. People cared enough to get up and scream and organize 500 men campaigns. Now? We have nothing. AE isn't in the shoes EoN used to be - EoN was the foundation for how alliances should evolve - not how to regress back too. is this a symptom of a dying game, dying culture, or are both just sick and need to be resuscitated? despite my love for this game, I can't but think that every minute spent on it is fruitless... and I know i am not the only one who feels that way. Also, you left out how long no one gave a **** then about EoN holding land...
demens grimwulff Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 124	Posted - 2014.01.18 23:26:00 - [3] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: demens grimwulff wrote: Ydubbs, I have never talked to you in game or held a real conversation with you on the forum outside of persnickety comments back and forth, so I have no good founding for what to think about your post. I have always been vocal about wanting to help indie corps and voted to keep ANON's share low because I think gorging yourself on land is generally a bad thing, but I find a bit of humor in this coming from the CEO of a corp that was in EoN. and one that had held as much land as AE does now. You did not bring up this idea then and your very corp members act like what is going on is somehow different. Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt considering I feel your altruism is genuine, but what will happen when the next big push goes on? I think what EoN. and now Renegade have proven is that this game is inherently shallow... outside of broken, boring, and ultra repetitive game modes there is no true expansion. For such a grandiose and expansive game when it comes to weapons and suits and what not, there is little else to enjoy. Maybe PC should burn and be forgotten... Since you haven't had a conversation with me or know the history of Ahrendee and our intentions and what we are about....I can understand why you find humor in it. Thing is...we never really wanted as many districts as we had when we were in EoN. We had 6 districts going into EoN and we didn't really want anymore. But they were given them away so we took them. We ended up having battles and taking the rest. If this idea was proposed when we had 28 districts and the community was down for it.....we would have been too. Because again, we wouldn't be given up all of our districts. We would keep a planet and just merc out the rest. Having too many districts isn't all that its cracked up to be unless you have 30 or so players active at random. ISK generation is cool though. Again....if we did this and a low tiered alliance or corp got too big, then the merc corps would just take them down. And also, if AE, NS, FA, STB or whoever else that has districts don't want to do this...then it is what it is. I'm not going to belittle or think negative of a corp that doesn't want to do this. I'm just proposing an idea because a lot of people are tired of playing the same people every single day and I think that it's a travesty that there are so many corps not in pc. Sorry for the long, nested quotes... On my cell phone. I can appreciate that sentiment and I feel the same way as you. I am not one for PC on a large scale, but it is what it is. I just wish isk wasn't the benefit, as no one cares about that, really.
demens grimwulff Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 127	Posted - 2014.01.19 19:52:00 - [4] - Quote Confligration wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Confligration wrote: One simple way to help fix PC is by limiting the amount of districts a corp can have at any given time. And furthermore how many of those districts may be locked at any given time. Abandon the thread mate quick lol Yeah, anything constructive that would put a limit on "Super Corps" is just treated as trash. Nothing will change. It's the same as life, those who have everything fear anything constructive that could limit their power or influence and money. You said this to someone who isn't in a "super corp"... gg...