DUST Search - Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles

KING CHECKMATE wrote:

Spkr4theDead wrote:

KING CHECKMATE wrote:

Spkr4theDead wrote:

The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it.

Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it.

What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard?

ITs not so hard.
But its wrong to HAVE to play with a tanker in order to have a Chance.Its not balance.
Its stupid.

like this thread.

You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker?

there is nothing wrong.
BUT WHAT IF I CANNOT squad with a tanker said day.
The only tanker i know that would play with me is TRUE ADAMANCE.
If hes not connected , then i have to suck it up and NOT play?
Or play and get butt plugged without counter?
Or i have to deploy a tank to be able to actually compete?

THIS IS YOUR REASONING?

Because if it is its really flawed.

Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1482	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:53:00 - [1] - Quote The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3224	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:55:00 - [2] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? ITs not so hard. But its wrong to HAVE to play with a tanker in order to have a Chance.Its not balance. Its stupid. like this thread. AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
Sinboto Simmons SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 3169	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:55:00 - [3] - Quote Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread Sinboto - The True Blood Minja Forum Warrior level 3 STB-Infantry (Demolition)
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3224	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:55:00 - [4] - Quote Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer... AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
Mortedeamor WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men. 1006	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:57:00 - [5] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? nothing absolutely nothing
True Adamance Scions of Athra 4914	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:58:00 - [6] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? ITs not so hard. But its wrong to HAVE to play with a tanker in order to have a Chance.Its not balance. Its stupid. like this thread. Sure its balance. I have a tanker.....so you must have a tanker. "Shudder. Again another smart idea from an Amarr..."- Forlorn Destrier (11/12/13) LAWL
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:59:00 - [7] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? ITs not so hard. But its wrong to HAVE to play with a tanker in order to have a Chance.Its not balance. Its stupid. like this thread. You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker? Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:00:00 - [8] - Quote Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread They're remote explosives, and they also detonate if a friendly tank rolls over them. Therefore, it's a bug, and should be fixed. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:00:00 - [9] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer... I'm the one that offers logical explanations. You can't even tell me why it's wrong or difficult to squad with a tanker. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 1328	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:01:00 - [10] - Quote This a FPS game. When you say you need one weapon to counter the other its called... wait for it... no, you know the word for it. Cause your not dumb. You yourself can see what your asking. infantry wanted a cod? no. BF by far holds the belt for HAV and AV balance. (even in it's current state) Maybe one or two guys can wreck a tank there. But guess what? by the time that tank is put down he would have taken 10 blokes with him. What does AV mean? The letters? When was it design as a deterrent? My question to you is why do you want it to be just a deterrent? I wanted tanks cheap. I didn't care if they were many on the field, cause of it. But I never asked for my FPS comrades to be obliterated from no gun skill nerds who dust is there first FPS game.

KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3227	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:01:00 - [11] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? ITs not so hard. But its wrong to HAVE to play with a tanker in order to have a Chance.Its not balance. Its stupid. like this thread. You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker? there is nothing wrong. BUT WHAT IF I CANNOT squad with a tanker said day. The only tanker i know that would play with me is TRUE ADAMANCE. If hes not connected , then i have to suck it up and NOT play? Or play and get butt plugged without counter? Or i have to deploy a tank to be able to actually compete? THIS IS YOUR REASONING? Because if it is its really flawed. EDIT: ''You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker?'' Im sorry i took 2 minutes in answer you princess. next time i'll be hitting F5 repeatedly until i spot one of your answers to intermediately respond and explain to you, because you are worth all of my time.... ( -.- ) ..I.. AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
THUNDERGROOVE ZionTCD Public Disorder. 402	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:03:00 - [12] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer... I'm the one that offers logical explanations. You can't even tell me why it's wrong or difficult to squad with a tanker. This, even if it's some scrub with militia tanks. At least their tankers will be too busy steamrolling him then your infantry, ZionTCD Director & Ammar Loyalist Amarr Sentinel \| Amarr Logi \| *Losematar* Scout What is a signature?
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:04:00 - [13] - Quote Surt gods end wrote: This a FPS game. When you say you need one weapon to counter the other its called... wait for it... no, you know the word for it. Cause your not dumb. You yourself can see what your asking. infantry wanted a cod? no. BF by far holds the belt for HAV and AV balance. (even in it's current state) Maybe one or two guys can wreck a tank there. But guess what? by the time that tank is put down he would have taken 10 blokes with him. What does AV mean? The letters? When was it design as a deterrent? My question to you is why do you want it to be just a deterrent? I wanted tanks cheap. I didn't care if they were many on the field, cause of it. But I never asked for my FPS comrades to be obliterated from no gun skill nerds who dust is there first FPS game. To you, FPS means no vehicles. Did you ever think that some of us have a long history of gaming? I was playing shooters before they were brought online. I first learned how to handle vehicles in SOCOM III. Dust is most certainly NOT my first shooter. If you don't like vehicles that much, maybe you should go to Call of Duty instead of ruining the game for an entire style of play just because you don't like them. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:05:00 - [14] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP made it so the best counter to a tank is another one. See a Madrugar with a blaster ruining infantry? Have someone call in a Gunnlogi with a missile turret. See a Gunnlogi with a blaster ruining infantry? Call in a tank with a railgun to destroy it. What's so hard about rolling with a competent tanker? I want someone to explain that to me. Why is that so hard? ITs not so hard. But its wrong to HAVE to play with a tanker in order to have a Chance.Its not balance. Its stupid. like this thread. You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker? there is nothing wrong. BUT WHAT IF I CANNOT squad with a tanker said day. The only tanker i know that would play with me is TRUE ADAMANCE. If hes not connected , then i have to suck it up and NOT play? Or play and get butt plugged without counter? Or i have to deploy a tank to be able to actually compete? THIS IS YOUR REASONING? Because if it is its really flawed. So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
ReGnYuM Imperfects 1499	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:05:00 - [15] - Quote Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... *Regnum cringes If you never heard of ReGnYuM, you're neither Good or Relevant in Dust 514. KDR>ALL Sig Move: Minmatar Crub Stomp
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 1663	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:06:00 - [16] - Quote Surt gods end wrote: This a FPS game. When you say you need one weapon to counter the other its called... wait for it... no, you know the word for it. Cause your not dumb. You yourself can see what your asking. infantry wanted a cod? no. BF by far holds the belt for HAV and AV balance. (even in it's current state) Maybe one or two guys can wreck a tank there. But guess what? by the time that tank is put down he would have taken 10 blokes with him. What does AV mean? The letters? When was it design as a deterrent? My question to you is why do you want it to be just a deterrent? I wanted tanks cheap. I didn't care if they were many on the field, cause of it. But I never asked for my FPS comrades to be obliterated from no gun skill nerds who dust is there first FPS game. Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Going to stay out of AV/V debates, better for my sanity. GÿåTank driverGÿå
Keri Starlight 0uter.Heaven Proficiency V. 1932	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:06:00 - [17] - Quote Spkr, it's not about having a good tanker in your squad all the time, which is already limiting and frustrating. When you run into 6 enemy tanks you might take down 1 or 2 of them if they are dumb and spread too much, but you're not going to win by yourself. I drive tanks, by the way. 100% Achura "I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
Thumb Green Novashift 569	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:07:00 - [18] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer... ....Uhm.... What credibility? Never mind the president, let's overgrow the government.
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 1663	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:08:00 - [19] - Quote ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... *Regnum cringes Because infantry with OP rifles is better? Or maybe it's just all the other weapons that are up? Going to stay out of AV/V debates, better for my sanity. GÿåTank driverGÿå
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3227	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:08:00 - [20] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Well thats what you are saying! = Have a tank on your team or you cant win. AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446

Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:08:00 - [21] - Quote ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... *Regnum cringes Letting infantry dictate balance resulted in tanks being nerfed what, 5 or 6 builds in a row? CCP for the first time nerfs AV and to infantry, the game is broken. Tankers have the tank battles of Chromosome back, but that's not fair, because infantry is supposed to do everything. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Slag Emberforge Immortal Retribution 299	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:09:00 - [22] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer... You lost me bro, what credibility? Lol
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:09:00 - [23] - Quote Keri Starlight wrote: Spkr, it's not about having a good tanker in your squad all the time, which is already limiting and frustrating. When you run into 6 enemy tanks you might take down 1 or 2 of them if they are dumb and spread too much, but you're not going to win by yourself. I drive tanks, by the way. LOL If you drive tanks and you can only take down so few, you're obviously doing it wrong. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3230	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:10:00 - [24] - Quote Flix Keptick wrote: Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Again , my MLT tanks are cheaper than my Dropsuits.and 100% more effective in everything but capping points. After 1.7, please dont use the ISK argument. Its ridiculous..... AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:10:00 - [25] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: Comes in tread to have a logical conversation Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines Leaves thread +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer... ....Uhm.... What credibility? Not having been in RND and actually able to understand vehicle dynamics. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:11:00 - [26] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Well thats what you are saying! = Have a tank on your team or you cant win. I'll say it again. 16 Cal Logis on a team with Duvolle TARs or Core Flaylocks, but only 7 tanks. And at that, not all of them could be piloted well. You don't even have a logical argument against me. Why do you bother? Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3230	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:12:00 - [27] - Quote Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... *Regnum cringes Because infantry with OP rifles is better? Or maybe it's just all the other weapons that are up? At least infantry with OP Rifles have a counter. AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:13:00 - [28] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Again , my MLT tanks are cheaper than my Dropsuits.and 100% more effective in everything but capping points. After 1.7, please dont use the ISK argument. Its ridiculous..... Another one still angry that MLT is cheaper than PRO. Do you not see the ridiculousness of your statement? Would you rather MLT hulls go for 300,000 ISK? In that case, let's petition CCP to make PRO cost what they used to, 317,000 ISK. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3230	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:14:00 - [29] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Well thats what you are saying! = Have a tank on your team or you cant win. I'll say it again. 16 Cal Logis on a team with Duvolle TARs or Core Flaylocks, but only 7 tanks. And at that, not all of them could be piloted well. You don't even have a logical argument against me. Why do you bother? The difference is , i can take on 16 cal logis with Duvolle Tars or Flaylocks. Or at least i have a chance WITHOUT having to use the same equipment. I dont have a chance vs the 7 tanks unless i use a tank myself. You being slow and arrogant wont see it, but others do..... AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1486	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:14:00 - [30] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... *Regnum cringes Because infantry with OP rifles is better? Or maybe it's just all the other weapons that are up? At least infantry with OP Rifles have a counter. Maybe someday soon you'll see the fallacy in running 6 PRO stomping assaults. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page