|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
299
   |
Posted - 2013.12.16 03:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:*Comes in tread to have a logical conversation*
*Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines*
*Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer...
You lost me bro, what credibility? Lol |
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
304
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 11:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Speaker, please pick up a little what were putting down:
1. You have no credibility as you are a scrub.
2. No one respects you
3. Your ideas are bad, and you should feel bad.
4. Dust like EVE is Risk vs ISK, current model does not support this
4a. Militia tank cost is too low
4b. Militia tank power is to high in respect to AV (needing proto AV for MLT tanks)
4c. Av is meant to be the counter, not a deterrent
4d. Destroying tanks is the role and purpose behind AV
4e. AV is awarded based on performance, without kills there is no purpose
5. Balance does not equal rock smashing paper and scissors while only taken out by rock
6. Realism has no place in Dust, and even if it did you'd be wrong
6a. See Javelin, AT, and a sundry other variety of Anti tank weaponry (swarms)
6b. See Railguns (currently installations) made for destroying air craft carriers
7. If you can only play tanks to get kills its obvious why you are so vocal, see points 1 and 2. Get good.
8. You are only making yourself worse with these threads whining about REs and suicide LAVs, if AV was where it should be you would not see infantry going to such extremes to destroy tanks.
I think that about covers it! King checkmate, atiim, etc. thoughts? Things I missed?
|
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
312
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 20:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:chase rowland wrote:ask yourselves this, if I have a pistol and we are locked in the same room, and you don't have one, then do you really stand a chance? its the same situation with a tank. people think they can turn into the hulk and throw it 500 meters. no, just no "Fair" to you and infantry means no vehicles whatsoever. Nothing is fair in war.
Your arguments always follow basic logical fallacies as you have no data or solid footing in reason to effectively defend your points of view.
In this post we see the classic straw man fallacy, you exaggerate or otherwise contort one person's argument into something different in order to make it easier to attack.
No one has said no vehicles, and no one has said that MLT AV should be able to take out all vehicles.
What has been said such as tier equivalence and one to one V vs. AV has been ignored, and valid claims and criticisms have been shrugged off. I'd say more but it is clear that your ADD prevents you from reading "bwig bwocks of words" at a time. |
|
|
| |
|