Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:03:00 -
[61] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. You can use commando suits and PRO sidearms. You can use 3 forge guns up high so they're equally devastating against both infantry and vehicles.
Why must pilots always figure things out for infantry? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:07:00 -
[62] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. Stop trying to use logic against tankers. Just don't. Stop spouting off your double standards. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:08:00 -
[63] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:medomai grey wrote:mmm... The damage is per missile fired, which increases the higher up in tier you go. Current STD Launcher: 330 * 4 = 1320 Nerfed PRO Launcher: 220 * 6 = 1320 Good. Maybe tanks will be the preferred AV in PC now like they should be. Only tanks can solo tanks!!! I'm happy.maybe u try teamwork, now? So, Rock trumps Paper and Scissors, tieing with itself. Stellar game balance. Can you explain to me why it's wrong to balance for PC, and why it's wrong that the best counter to a tank should be another tank? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:09:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:Just so people understand the severity of the nerf, after 1.6 proto swarms will deal the same damage as current standard swarms, with a 55% range reduction. Hardened HAVs have around the same TTK as they do now, so the comparison should be accurate, even after vehicle changes. Find a Falchion and take out your standard swarms. This is how using top tier swarms will feel in the future, but with lower range. You're welcome. Tanks get less health in the future. Also, as I have said before, if I can kill tanks with a Plasma Cannon, your easy mode swarms will do just fine. you are wrong, do the math of the announcements. the ehp will actually be higher than now. you will have to fire proto swarms ~23 to ~30s (depending on amount of damage mods) against an armor tank and that is assuming the tank driver does not bother to move at all. CharCharOdell wrote: Good. Maybe tanks will be the preferred AV in PC now like they should be.
Only tanks can solo tanks!!!
I'm happy.maybe u try teamwork, now?
how about you learn to use teamwork instead of trying to solo squads with a tank? if the values of tank and AV announcements go live you can fully except another tank nerf 1 month later and finally tank scrubs like you will be phased out. So at least you're admitting that infantry's end-game is get rid of tanks altogether.
And no, eHP won't be higher because active repair modules are going away. Did you even look at the proposed numbers, or just pull BS statements out your rear end? |
THUNDERGROOVE
ZionTCD Public Disorder.
1200
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:30:00 -
[65] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. What is a sidearm?
You know SMGs are actually pretty good and can even compete against ARs?
In fact, I often run two of them
What is a signature?
|
Skihids
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
2367
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:34:00 -
[66] - Quote
SL range is getting reduced so it can't cover the entire map without moving, or even crossing the redline.
If dropships are expected to retreat for cool down they have to have someplace to retreat to. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 03:45:00 -
[67] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:
I meant Vayu for the OP. I correct this a third of a page down. Madrugar is the only accurate baseline, though, so I apologize.
Why mention a MLT tank by another name? The Vayu is terrible, and only viable with significant infantry and sniper support.
I read the post CCP made. I read both the weapon and vehicle changes. When the vehicle stat changes were announced I wrote multiple essay length posts. Much of the math on how Madrugars would be pretty much the same as they are now with hardeners up was cut out due to the character limit.
Same? No. Any tanker that wants to survive the escape after the engagement is going for one repper and two hardeners. CCP put in the proposed module tree that after skills, active armor hardeners will last for only 45 seconds, instead of the current 60 seconds.
Oh boy. A cyclical life and power span so that HAV users will have even more reason to boost around a corner and magically disappear into the air. What fun for both pilot and swarm user!
So, what, you want hardeners removed altogether? You want NOS modules removed altogether just because you're stupid enough to try to solo every tank you come across?
It's okay that Swarm Launcher range has been reduced, because CCP can't fix draw distance? Not a valid reason. The player doesn't care because of what technical incompetence or insufficiency the change is made. The range nerf doesn't seem too bad, except in combination with the damage nerf, though.
CCP gave the single biggest buff to swarms because they couldn't make it so you can do any action immediately after firing. You're really going to complain about not being able to use extreme range to your advantage now? I hear Call of Duty is more close quarters, maybe you should give that a try.
P.S. I said try the swarms against the current Falchion. I meant Vayu. If HAVs with hardeners do last longer (some others have claimed that after stacking, they live LONGER than current HAVs), then a Vayu -> Madrugar comparison could be more accurate. It slipped my mind at the time that they were being removed, but the Madrugar stays. I know, I know. The whole concept of the OP is negated by using the word "Falchion/Vayu" instead of "Gunnlogi/Madrugar."
Again, reps are going to be passive, not active. We'll be less able to survive high-alpha damage when the pass comes. Does your brain function properly?
You're right. CCP should just post all the stats of the HAVs and Swarm Launcher changes and no one should say anything negative about them. We should all just wait until they are in front of our faces months from now, without any prior speculation.
How many other stealth tweaks, fixes, nerfs and buffs have they given us? Do you not recall how many of us angrily posted threads (rightfully so) that the powergrid skill had been stealth nerfed into the ground?
My point is simply that PRO launchers will be doing STD damage. That's a fact, unless they make them fire a different amount of missiles, which was not stated. From what I've seen of vehicles, the nerf will prevent PRO Swarms from tearing every HAV a new hole while simultaneously making anything below utter garbage. This may all be wrong, of course. I'll feel free to QQ all I want. There's no need for you to participate by QQing about QQers because you don't like me stating facts and speculating what I think that the effects of said facts might be.
Swarms are being nerfed commensurate to how tanks are being nerfed. If they kept AV stats as is when the pass comes, do you really think anybody would tank anymore? But then again, that's your goal, isn't it? To make vehicles so weak and AV so totally OP that nobody will drive a tank ever again?
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:04:00 -
[68] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Kallas Hallytyr wrote:My opinion on Swarm Launchers, they should either be: - Long range and low damage: this would allow them to apply constant nagging pressure to vehicles but it difficult to remove them in a very short period of time. This means that whilst you're doing less damage each volley, you can more likely get the volley in the first place. - Short range and high damage: this makes getting your shots of more difficult but rewards you for doing so. This allows DS pilots to escape more easily than ground vehicles (since they can hit their AB and away) but makes the Swarms do substantial alpha-damage.
I think having variant Swarm Launchers do one or the other could be a good solution by allowing players to actively choose whether they want to annoy and distract while putting sustained damage on a target or if they want to risk themselves and try to completely destroy their target in short order.
That's my thoughts as a DS pilot anyway. First reasonable thing Ive seen a vehicle pilot say on the matter, for the most part its the same HAV circle jerk crew that spent the past six months crying now going down on each other in joy Anyway I full agree with setting up two variants of the thing that work in the ways you outline You've never tanked a day on Dust, your opinion means nothing. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:05:00 -
[69] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:pegasis prime wrote:born when you say pro launchers do std damage std havs are getting mlt grade hp HAVs are getting a big buff to hardeners. I did the math when the stats were released, and a hardened Madrugar should live about as long as the one we have now with the standard hardener(s) + repair unit + plates with nitrous/heat sink/scanner. Double hardeners might make them ridiculously hard to kill, I can't remember much about the total health after resistance for that, though. Shield HAVs get a 60% reduction in damage when their hardeners go up, after the changes. Armor HAVs get a 40% reduction. They might be frail enough when not hardened to kill before they can get away but a good HAV has a ring of infantry around it. Meanwhile, you've got a swarm launcher that kills squat. So, good luck following those HAVs that decide to boost around a corner and recall, or cooldown and repair. Why are you trying to figure it out as if you're the sole person on your team, in every match, with any AV at all? You don't run in a squad with at least one other person, ever?
60 seconds > 45 seconds (after skills) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1148
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:08:00 -
[70] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:medomai grey wrote:mmm... The damage is per missile fired, which increases the higher up in tier you go. Current STD Launcher: 330 * 4 = 1320 Nerfed PRO Launcher: 220 * 6 = 1320 Good. Maybe tanks will be the preferred AV in PC now like they should be. Only tanks can solo tanks!!! I'm happy.maybe u try teamwork, now? So, Rock trumps Paper and Scissors, tieing with itself. Stellar game balance. AV is not scissors to tanks [paper]. It's more like a little poke. Only tanks can solo tanks. It was that way in Chrome and it worked great in CBs. I don't know the problem infantry had with the Chromosome build. It was the best time tanks ever had, because they were their own best counter, but that's not good enough for infantry, so they got nerfed again. |
|
Borne Velvalor
Endless Hatred
856
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:34:00 -
[71] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:
I meant Vayu for the OP. I correct this a third of a page down. Madrugar is the only accurate baseline, though, so I apologize.
Why mention a MLT tank by another name? The Vayu is terrible, and only viable with significant infantry and sniper support.
Hyperbole. But you're right. After examining the stats, the Vayu sucks. Another problem.
I read the post CCP made. I read both the weapon and vehicle changes. When the vehicle stat changes were announced I wrote multiple essay length posts. Much of the math on how Madrugars would be pretty much the same as they are now with hardeners up was cut out due to the character limit.
Same? No. Any tanker that wants to survive the escape after the engagement is going for one repper and two hardeners. CCP put in the proposed module tree that after skills, active armor hardeners will last for only 45 seconds, instead of the current 60 seconds.
So, even more cyclical if two are stacked or less in exchange for longer duration if cycled? Still can recall around a corner.
Oh boy. A cyclical life and power span so that HAV users will have even more reason to boost around a corner and magically disappear into the air. What fun for both pilot and swarm user!
So, what, you want hardeners removed altogether? You want NOS modules removed altogether just because you're stupid enough to try to solo every tank you come across?
Of course not. Fixing recall would help, though, so we can realistically hit HAVs once their hardeners drop. Maybe then I'd agree with the swarm nerf.
It's okay that Swarm Launcher range has been reduced, because CCP can't fix draw distance? Not a valid reason. The player doesn't care because of what technical incompetence or insufficiency the change is made. The range nerf doesn't seem too bad, except in combination with the damage nerf, though.
CCP gave the single biggest buff to swarms because they couldn't make it so you can do any action immediately after firing. You're really going to complain about not being able to use extreme range to your advantage now? I hear Call of Duty is more close quarters, maybe you should give that a try.
Although I was debunking the whole "oh, they nerfed swarm range because the draw distance sucks" argument, I mentioned that the range nerf would be fine if it weren't for the 33% reduction in damage at the same time. Also, I prestiged twice in BLOPS 2 and I now hate CoD.
P.S. I said try the swarms against the current Falchion. I meant Vayu. If HAVs with hardeners do last longer (some others have claimed that after stacking, they live LONGER than current HAVs), then a Vayu -> Madrugar comparison could be more accurate. It slipped my mind at the time that they were being removed, but the Madrugar stays. I know, I know. The whole concept of the OP is negated by using the word "Falchion/Vayu" instead of "Gunnlogi/Madrugar."
Again, reps are going to be passive, not active. We'll be less able to survive high-alpha damage when the pass comes. Does your brain function properly?
How often do the repair units repair? I couldn't find an answer. It seems to be the same as dropsuit passive repair. In this case, the best armor repair unit repairs 140 armor a second. The best active one repairs at 414 repair every 3 seconds. Passive would be 420 in three seconds. This doesn't seem balanced, though, so maybe it doesn't work that way. Also, maybe my brain doesn't "work." Maybe yours doesn't. Petty.
You're right. CCP should just post all the stats of the HAVs and Swarm Launcher changes and no one should say anything negative about them. We should all just wait until they are in front of our faces months from now, without any prior speculation.
How many other stealth tweaks, fixes, nerfs and buffs have they given us? Do you not recall how many of us angrily posted threads (rightfully so) that the powergrid skill had been stealth nerfed into the ground?
Is your point that we should be grateful for a forewarning or that I should stop QQing because you've got plenty to QQ about, too?
My point is simply that PRO launchers will be doing STD damage. That's a fact, unless they make them fire a different amount of missiles, which was not stated. From what I've seen of vehicles, the nerf will prevent PRO Swarms from tearing every HAV a new hole while simultaneously making anything below utter garbage. This may all be wrong, of course. I'll feel free to QQ all I want. There's no need for you to participate by QQing about QQers because you don't like me stating facts and speculating what I think that the effects of said facts might be.
Swarms are being nerfed commensurate to how tanks are being nerfed. If they kept AV stats as is when the pass comes, do you really think anybody would tank anymore? But then again, that's your goal, isn't it? To make vehicles so weak and AV so totally OP that nobody will drive a tank ever again?
Oh, boy, assumptions. I love those. No, I want vehicles to be more prevalent, not less, while also being balanced. Proto AV was OP and needed a nerf. Lower tiers were not, unless you were running several proto damage mods with proficiency. This was mostly due to the missile amount curve, rather than a damage curve. Of course, the lower tiers weren't bad against some vehicle types. This nerf affects all tiers, so that all we essentially have is STD, worse STD and even worse STD. Maybe this is in line with the vehicle changes and maybe you've thought it through better than I have. I'll admit it. I could be completely wrong.
Also, the proto to standard AV equivalency statement was to show the severity of the change, since 33% isn't very easy to relate to. It's not saying that proto AV is perfectly fine and AV to vehicle balance is all sugar and lolipops.
|
Borne Velvalor
Endless Hatred
856
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:pegasis prime wrote:born when you say pro launchers do std damage std havs are getting mlt grade hp HAVs are getting a big buff to hardeners. I did the math when the stats were released, and a hardened Madrugar should live about as long as the one we have now with the standard hardener(s) + repair unit + plates with nitrous/heat sink/scanner. Double hardeners might make them ridiculously hard to kill, I can't remember much about the total health after resistance for that, though. Shield HAVs get a 60% reduction in damage when their hardeners go up, after the changes. Armor HAVs get a 40% reduction. They might be frail enough when not hardened to kill before they can get away but a good HAV has a ring of infantry around it. Meanwhile, you've got a swarm launcher that kills squat. So, good luck following those HAVs that decide to boost around a corner and recall, or cooldown and repair. Why are you trying to figure it out as if you're the sole person on your team, in every match, with any AV at all? You don't run in a squad with at least one other person, ever? 60 seconds > 45 seconds (after skills)
I run in squads all day. I never play without a squad these days. Still, half the time I'm the only guy to pull out a swarm launcher. Now, on a good squad, a few guys may pull them out. Then we all die, because 3 guys with crappy SL's can't take out a HAV before it boosts behind a corner and gets recalled, at which point we respawn as anti-infantry and the HAV gets redeployed. Sure, we could have 2-3 players always on Swarm Launchers to prevent the HAV from being called back in, but these players can't fight and aren't having much fun running around with a purely AV weapon with no Vs to fight. HAVs are the biggest problem in Ambush, where there's often only one supply depot and the HAV blows it up. You need to lose a clone every time you want to swap to AV.
If the recall mechanic were fixed (not removed altogether) then the Swarm Launchers might indeed be in line with the vehicle changes, specifically HAVs. So, maybe I'm just blaming the wrong mechanics. You and others have brought up some valid points, so I'll just wait for the changes and see. |
Justin Tymes
Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder.
463
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:58:00 -
[73] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. You can use commando suits and PRO sidearms. You can use 3 forge guns up high so they're equally devastating against both infantry and vehicles. Why must pilots always figure things out for infantry?
Did you just try to counter the 1 v 6 argument with use lolcommando suits? Sidearms against ARs with a 1-40+ meter optimal? Light and Medium Frames can use Forge Guns now, (completely irrelevant to swarm launchers)? You actually expect people to take you seriously? |
Borne Velvalor
Endless Hatred
857
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 05:06:00 -
[74] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. You can use commando suits and PRO sidearms. You can use 3 forge guns up high so they're equally devastating against both infantry and vehicles. Why must pilots always figure things out for infantry? Did you just try to counter the 1 v 6 argument with use lolcommando suits? Sidearms against ARs with a 1-40+ meter optimal? Light and Medium Frames can use Forge Guns now, (completely irrelevant to swarm launchers)? You actually expect people to take you seriously?
Aside from that, this thread is about Swarm Launchers. This quote pyramid seemed to be about them until "lolno, use a Forge Gun" came into play. In my experience, Forge Guns have been more viable in Ambush because you don't die 3 seconds after equipping them. HAV recalls? No problem, pseudosniper mode engaged. Annoying? Yes. Fun? Yes. Even if I do get OHKO by them a lot. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
3895
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 13:18:00 -
[75] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. You can use commando suits and PRO sidearms. You can use 3 forge guns up high so they're equally devastating against both infantry and vehicles. Why must pilots always figure things out for infantry? Did you just try to counter the 1 v 6 argument with use lolcommando suits? Sidearms against ARs with a 1-40+ meter optimal? Light and Medium Frames can use Forge Guns now, (completely irrelevant to swarm launchers)? You actually expect people to take you seriously? you know, i use SMG's on my logi suit and provided you actually use your head and close the range the SMG is more than a match for the AR, unless your up against a caldari in which case unless your carrying flux's your screwed.
Lv 3 forum warrior
Bringer of Bacon
Knight of AMV's
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
465
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 13:43:00 -
[76] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:Just so people understand the severity of the nerf, after 1.6 proto swarms will deal the same damage as current standard swarms, with a 55% range reduction. Hardened HAVs have around the same TTK as they do now, so the comparison should be accurate, even after vehicle changes. Find a Falchion and take out your standard swarms. This is how using top tier swarms will feel in the future, but with lower range. You're welcome. Tanks get less health in the future. Also, as I have said before, if I can kill tanks with a Plasma Cannon, your easy mode swarms will do just fine. Kill a tank while being shot at by the tank and infantry at the same time, then call it easy mode
If you can't solo me w/MLT AV, or if you get shot by infantry, it's your fault
-Tanker's Logic
(New ones everyday!)
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
465
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 13:48:00 -
[77] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:So stop trying to solo tanks and you'll be okay. Did you know that if you get your whole squad to equip mlt swarms, you can kill any tank possible in two volleys at the most? 1 man in a tank that can kill both vehicles and infantry vs 6 men with AV that is useless against anything but Vehicles. Seems legit. You can use commando suits and PRO sidearms. You can use 3 forge guns up high so they're equally devastating against both infantry and vehicles. Why must pilots always figure things out for infantry? Did you just try to counter the 1 v 6 argument with use lolcommando suits? Sidearms against ARs with a 1-40+ meter optimal? Light and Medium Frames can use Forge Guns now, (completely irrelevant to swarm launchers)? You actually expect people to take you seriously? you know, i use SMG's on my logi suit and provided you actually use your head and close the range the SMG is more than a match for the AR, unless your up against a caldari in which case unless your carrying flux's your screwed. Your an idiot.
If I am in my AV fitting, wouldn't I have AV grenades? And yeah while you try to get into an SMGs optimal range, I'm gonna be a smart person and buttplugg you with a Duvolle.
You assume that you will always be in CQC with infantry, when you are typically in mid rang. Not all Logi's have sidearms and yeah I want you to put your theory to the test. See how long it takes to get buttpluged before you can get in the SMGs optimal range
If you can't solo me w/MLT AV, or if you get shot by infantry, it's your fault
-Tanker's Logic
(New ones everyday!)
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
465
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 13:55:00 -
[78] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:CharCharOdell wrote: Good. Maybe tanks will be the preferred AV in PC now like they should be.
Only tanks can solo tanks!!!
I'm happy.maybe u try teamwork, now?
So, Rock trumps Paper and Scissors, tieing with itself. Stellar game balance. AV is not scissors to tanks [paper]. It's more like a little poke. Only tanks can solo tanks. It was that way in Chrome and it worked great in CBs. I don't know the problem infantry had with the Chromosome build. It was the best time tanks ever had, because they were their own best counter, but that's not good enough for infantry, so they got nerfed again. Tanks should never be a better counter to themselves, especially when there is an AV class present
AV is ANTI-VEHICLE, which is and should be a tank's greatest weakness
The fact that you don't realize this and are way to biased to even attempt to use SLs is enough to prove that you have no idea of what you are talking about.
This string of posts alone is enough to prove that my "Tank 514" thread is indeed true. Thank you for proving my point.
If you can't solo me w/MLT AV, or if you get shot by infantry, it's your fault
-Tanker's Logic
(New ones everyday!)
|
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
3895
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
Atiim wrote:gbghg wrote: you know, i use SMG's on my logi suit and provided you actually use your head and close the range the SMG is more than a match for the AR, unless your up against a caldari in which case unless your carrying flux's your screwed.
Your an idiot. If I am in my AV fitting, wouldn't I have AV grenades? And yeah while you try to get into an SMGs optimal range, I'm gonna be a smart person and buttplugg you with a Duvolle. You assume that you will always be in CQC with infantry, when you are typically in mid rang. Not all Logi's have sidearms and yeah I want you to put your theory to the test. See how long it takes to get buttpluged before you can get in the SMGs optimal range the point about flux's was a general statement about how SMG's aren't as effective vs shields, besides if your going up against a shield tank carrying flux's makes some sense, however you're right, most av fits will be carrying av nades.
and my point about the use of SMG's is that an AV'er should only be using them in a worse care scenario, aka they get ambushed and trapped in a fight with enemy infantry, and the majority of those situations result in the enemy rushing you if you're able to find cover. otherwise if someone starts taking potshots at you at medium range you should displace and move on somewhere else, not try and take them on.
as for how effective my logi fit is? well if i get caught out at medium range i'm at a severe disadvantage, but thats part of the challenge, i have to use friendly infantry/vehicles as distraction, make use of cover, use the map to my advantage to close the distance into my optimal, in other words i have to use my head rather than just stand there and shoot at something with a lock on weapon.
i mean jesus, you accuse tankers of wanting to be able to take out both tanks and infantry solo and yet i'm picking up the exact same vibe from you "oh noes the fact that we can't defend against slayers is bad,, tanks must be weakened so we can kill them then quickly switch back to our slayer fits", you accuse tankers of being biased and i will admit, more than a few are, yet you are without a doubt one of the most biased individuals on these forums, if it isn't something that weakens vehicles and buffs AV then its just "TANKS514!!!!! TANKS514!!!!!!", the hypocrisy you employ is dreadful and clearly doesn't take account of the fact that these vehicles aren't spawned out of no where by the game, they are actively purchased and skilled into by other players, all this community has ever seen from you is an attempt to remove a playstyle that you believe has wronged you somehow.
Lv 3 forum warrior
Bringer of Bacon
Knight of AMV's
|
Jadu Wen
Xer Cloud Consortium
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
What people don't seem to realize is that swarm launchers make lovely direction arrows for snipers. If you're going to run vehicles have a buddy hold lookout. Problems solved.
GûÆGûêGûæGûæGûÆGûê GûÆGûêGûÇGûÇGûÇ GûÆGûêGûäGûæGûÆGûê
GûÆGûêGûÆGûêGûÆGûê GûÆGûêGûÇGûÇGûÇ GûÆGûêGûÆGûêGûÆGûê
GûÆGûêGûäGûÇGûäGûê GûÆGûêGûäGûäGûä GûÆGûêGûæGûæGûÇGûê ? SoonGäó
|
|
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
169
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:33:00 -
[81] - Quote
Tank's have had it bad for a long time and now it's their turn to get some joy, although, I don't think it is very much joy. It would be better to try and get new ppl to see the value of investing into a form of av (probably forges). If the tanks dominate with the changes, then i'll be blaming the lack of ppl with sp into av. Av is cheap and it would be nice if I wasn't the only one with a prof 5 into an av weapon and grenadier 5 on my pub match team. It will be our fault that we let them run rampant. Start investing into AV!
AV eventually learns different tactics to avoid or deal with infantry and get better at surviving. That smg is a powerful weapon with high sp.
Although, for the love of all that's good, please make a RDV come and pick up recalls. |
MassiveNine
0uter.Heaven Proficiency V.
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:37:00 -
[82] - Quote
swarms were OP and now they aren't end of discussion. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
465
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:57:00 -
[83] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Kallas Hallytyr wrote:My opinion on Swarm Launchers, they should either be: - Long range and low damage: this would allow them to apply constant nagging pressure to vehicles but it difficult to remove them in a very short period of time. This means that whilst you're doing less damage each volley, you can more likely get the volley in the first place. - Short range and high damage: this makes getting your shots of more difficult but rewards you for doing so. This allows DS pilots to escape more easily than ground vehicles (since they can hit their AB and away) but makes the Swarms do substantial alpha-damage.
I think having variant Swarm Launchers do one or the other could be a good solution by allowing players to actively choose whether they want to annoy and distract while putting sustained damage on a target or if they want to risk themselves and try to completely destroy their target in short order.
That's my thoughts as a DS pilot anyway. First reasonable thing Ive seen a vehicle pilot say on the matter, for the most part its the same HAV circle jerk crew that spent the past six months crying now going down on each other in joy Anyway I full agree with setting up two variants of the thing that work in the ways you outline You've never tanked a day on Dust, your opinion means nothing. You've never used PRO AV a day in DUST, so by that logic your opinion wouldn't matter either.
But that logic is faulty because this game is for EVERYONE, NOT JUST TANKERS AND AV.
If you can't solo me w/MLT AV, or if you get shot by infantry, it's your fault
-Tanker's Logic
(New ones everyday!)
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
465
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:58:00 -
[84] - Quote
MassiveNine wrote:swarms were OP and now they aren't end of discussion. Tanks were OP and now they aren't
Logic doesn't suit you does it?
If you can't solo me w/MLT AV, or if you get shot by infantry, it's your fault
-Tanker's Logic
(New ones everyday!)
|
Deranged Disaster
The Rainbow Effect
549
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:58:00 -
[85] - Quote
I'm against the range nerf personally but not necessarily because of the tanks. More because, believe it or not, the dropships. I've had people fly up all the way to the very top of the ceiling and be literally invincible, continuously dropping people on a letter through a CRU. Unless you took another dropship and rammed them off you couldn't do much else but sit there and wait. And no, FGs didn't even get close.
We chew nyan cats and spit rainbows.
|
MassiveNine
0uter.Heaven Proficiency V.
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:05:00 -
[86] - Quote
Atiim wrote:MassiveNine wrote:swarms were OP and now they aren't end of discussion. Tanks were OP and now they aren't Logic doesn't suit you does it?
Tanks got it a lot worse than swarms. It was pretty rediculous to call in a dropship only to instantly start being hit from a barrage of swarms from an unknown location all the way across the man. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
465
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 17:55:00 -
[87] - Quote
Pent'noir wrote:Tank's have had it bad for a long time and now it's their turn to get some joy, although, I don't think it is very much joy. It would be better to try and get new ppl to see the value of investing into a form of av (probably forges). If the tanks dominate with the changes, then i'll be blaming the lack of ppl with sp into av. Av is cheap and it would be nice if I wasn't the only one with a prof 5 into an av weapon and grenadier 5 on my pub match team. It will be our fault that we let them run rampant. Start investing into AV!
AV eventually learns different tactics to avoid or deal with infantry and get better at surviving. That smg is a powerful weapon with high sp.
Although, for the love of all that's good, please make a RDV come and pick up recalls. You aren't alone.
I'd love to play a game of Taliban tank hunters, but there are still many things that concern me with the AV nerf.
If you can't solo me w/MLT AV, or if you get shot by infantry, it's your fault
-Tanker's Logic
(New ones everyday!)
|
Fox Gaden
Immortal Guides
1463
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 18:54:00 -
[88] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:Just so people understand the severity of the nerf, after 1.6 proto swarms will deal the same damage as current standard swarms, with a 55% range reduction. Hardened HAVs have around the same TTK as they do now, so the comparison should be accurate, even after vehicle changes. Find a Falchion and take out your standard swarms. This is how using top tier swarms will feel in the future, but with lower range. You're welcome. It is irresponsible to make a post like this and not link a source. I see no mention of this in the 1.6 Patch Notes. So I am going to assume that you are reading stuff proposed for 1.7 and assuming it will be in 1.6. Unless you can provide a reliable reference that says otherwise.
Immortal Guides, supporting knowledge dissemination in New Eden since August 31, 2013.
|
Smooth Assassin
Stardust incorporation
315
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 19:14:00 -
[89] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Borne Velvalor wrote:Just so people understand the severity of the nerf, after 1.6 proto swarms will deal the same damage as current standard swarms, with a 55% range reduction. Hardened HAVs have around the same TTK as they do now, so the comparison should be accurate, even after vehicle changes. Find a Falchion and take out your standard swarms. This is how using top tier swarms will feel in the future, but with lower range. You're welcome. Tanks get less health in the future. Also, as I have said before, if I can kill tanks with a Plasma Cannon, your easy mode swarms will do just fine. Teach me.
Assassination is my thing.
|
knight of 6
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
529
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 19:17:00 -
[90] - Quote
fasten you tinfoil hats I got a theory.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=118244
thread made, please take a look, I'm not psychic but I think I may know what ccp is up too. I'd expect more heavy weapons soon(tm).
"Change the scheme!
Alter the mood!
Electrify the boys and girls if you would be so kind"
Ko6, scout, tanker.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |