Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1391
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 20:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way:
Thank you Pyrex |
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E
282
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
+1 thanks for this Void
Thanks to Pyrex for the vid too |
ANDRE T3hGIANT
TeamPlayers EoN.
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1393
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks.
if those guys were dedicated AV.... then the people who are 100% av are AV gods |
Chances Ghost
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
939
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks.
LOL level 2 granades packed AV and militia swarms is what passes as dedicated anti tank??????
hes also using a blaster tank and blaster mudrugars are the tanks that are doing the best right now.
if he straps a rail or missles to the thing he will see why thats the case rather quickly (or rather not see since thats the whole problem)
the blaster maddys are doing fine.
its the other tanks that are suffering. |
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Cult of War
231
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
someone in his squad is using a 'daemon' shotgun it seems, have not seen one of those in a long time. Kind of jealous always wanted one to add to my BPO collection. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1669
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 22:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks. You have got to be kidding me. Those guys were using either militia or standard SLs. I think I saw one advanced one. None of those guys were dedicated AV. |
Our Deepest Regret
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
251
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 22:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks.
Err, no? CPOPyrex has been a tank player for ages. This is just the first time he's gone back into tanking in a while. He got 22-0 in that game because they were up against a sh*t squad. Starting at 10:36 he got jacked up. From 6,000 heath to 2,000. If he was so OP why didn't he stand there and take it? |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
2110
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 22:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks. Admittedly I started a fortnight ago, I got 22-0 more oft than not.... thats because I learnt from the best. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1635
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 22:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
i think we all see the problem here... armor reps.
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. |
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1395
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 22:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps.
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire.
without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
8615
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:13:00 -
[12] - Quote
Thank you Pryex for being credible on the subject. |
XxWarlordxX97
Ancient Exiles
4589
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:14:00 -
[13] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex
What about my Shield tank? |
XxWarlordxX97
Ancient Exiles
4589
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:15:00 -
[14] - Quote
it stand no chance against a armor tank |
Our Deepest Regret
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
252
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:31:00 -
[15] - Quote
XxWarlordxX97 wrote:it stand no chance against a armor tank
A Wiley shield tanker running a fit filled with damage boosters and a railgun is a scary prospect for a Maddy out in the open. They'd be popping us left and right if it wasn't for our broken reps. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1635
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps.
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also.
face it the reps are the problem. when a light rep does more then what heavy rep should do they are broken. do the math, its true. if armor tank only used one light rep that would be more effective then a shield using a heavy booster. even armor LLAVs have more recovering ability then shield tanks. armor tanks survive 10x worse then what shield tanks can. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1139
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex
''Tanks Arent STrong'' ======> Doesnt die a single time even while being shot by a forge gun and a swarm launcher AT THE SAME TIME.
In the first video , our friend here calls in his tank and some other player too (2 or 3 tanks maybe?) Each time the poor enemy team would take AV out they would get ravaged by infantry. The numers are WAY too small (12 vs 12? ) To sacrifice 5+ infatry players to try and take down 2 tanks...
MLT tanks shouldnt die to 2 forge guns shot. PROTO FG vs MLT tank? SRSLY?
He runs around in a 7800 HP tank,with resistance, easily owning people (And his aim sucks) and then says that tanks are not strong. Then says that FG need a nerf while getting hit by swarms and FG alike and he just walks off with his damage resistances and armor regen modules active asit is nothing LOL....
TAnks dont need a buff, they are ok as they are. The only sane thing he said is: ''TANKERS NEVER KNOW WHEN TO GT*O''
Good for him that he knows when to fight and when to leave. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1396
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex ''Tanks Arent STrong'' ====== > Doesnt die a single time even while being shot by a forge gun and a swarm launcher AT THE SAME TIME.In the first video , our friend here calls in his tank and some other player too (2 or 3 tanks maybe?) Each time the poor enemy team would take AV out they would get ravaged by infantry. The numers are WAY too small (12 vs 12? ) To sacrifice 5+ infatry players to try and take down 2 tanks... MLT tanks shouldnt die to 2 forge guns shot. PROTO FG vs MLT tank? SRSLY? He runs around in a 7800 HP tank,with resistance, easily owning people (And his aim sucks) and then says that tanks are not strong. Then says that FG need a nerf while getting hit by swarms and FG alike and he just walks off with his damage resistances and armor regen modules active asit is nothing LOL.... TAnks dont need a buff, they are ok as they are. The only sane thing he said is : ''TANKERS NEVER KNOW WHEN TO GT*O''Good for him that he knows when to fight and when to leave. WAnt to BUFF TANKS? NERF FGs?
DO IT, but then limit a battle to a MAXIMUM of 1 tank per team. BALANCE....
lol, their AV wasn't even advanced. do you think everyone has proto AV hello no, everyone is too lazy to do that.
1 tank per team... haha no, if you want infantry only game, go play call of duty and leave us be |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1396
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps.
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. face it the reps are the problem. when a light rep does more then what heavy rep should do they are broken. do the math, its true. if armor tank only used one light rep that would be more effective then a shield using a heavy booster. even armor LLAVs have more recovering ability then shield tanks. armor tanks survive 10x worse then what shield tanks can.
the reps are a problem, they don't tell how much they rep, they need to be redone so they accurately tell you how much they rep, if you nerf it right now, youl kill tanking all together. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1636
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:
He runs around in a 7800 HP tank
the eHP is around 11,000 before you count reppers, so a 20,000 eHP armor tank. not OP or anything at all.
proto SL 6 rounds base fire 6 330damage missiles= 14,300~ abouts and takes i forgot, 12 second about to fire. |
|
XxWarlordxX97
Ancient Exiles
4590
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:49:00 -
[21] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:XxWarlordxX97 wrote:it stand no chance against a armor tank A Wiley shield tanker running a fit filled with damage boosters and a railgun is a scary prospect for a Maddy out in the open. They'd be popping us left and right if it wasn't for our broken reps.
they still win at Railguns too |
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
3631
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:50:00 -
[22] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks. Err, no? CPOPyrex has been a tank player for ages. This is just the first time he's gone back into tanking in a while. He got 22-0 in that game because they were up against a sh*t squad. Starting at 10:36 he got jacked up. From 6,000 heath to 2,000. If he was so OP why didn't he stand there and take it? He should have died from a sneeze.
OP vehicles are OP. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1140
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:53:00 -
[23] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
lol, their AV wasn't even advanced. do you think everyone has proto AV hello no, everyone is too lazy to do that.
1 tank per team... haha no, if you want infantry only game, go play call of duty and leave us be
NOT EVEYONE IS TOO LAZY TO DO THAT. I have All AV weapons at proto level,and guess what? Tanks CAN get away and CAN survive...And they are a pain to deal with...If a FGunner is NOT in an elevated place,hes useless,since he cant keep shooting the tanks unti l he gets the kill (like in the first map they played...) A swarm launcher specialist NEEDS to be at certain distance exposing himself to enemy infantry,same with AV nades.
Im sorry but its a VERY limited player per map game. 12 on each side? if one team decides to bing out 3 tanks the amount of AV weaponry needed would be of a MINIMUM of 4 AV specialistsThat will get ravaged by enemy infantry and tanks alike,plus,making taking out so many tanks will be a prriority to the AV specialists while RISKING to loose the game because of inferior OBJECTIVE focused infantry.
So you dont want 1 tank per game? then leave FGs and tanks as they are.
Our friend here who made the video,Pirex was it? Just proof how powerful tanks are.... Turrets were useless vs it, AV was useless vs him and when something HURT him,he was fast enought to get away with impunity... |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1399
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:53:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Our Deepest Regret wrote:ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks. Err, no? CPOPyrex has been a tank player for ages. This is just the first time he's gone back into tanking in a while. He got 22-0 in that game because they were up against a sh*t squad. Starting at 10:36 he got jacked up. From 6,000 heath to 2,000. If he was so OP why didn't he stand there and take it? He should have died from a sneeze. OP vehicles are OP.
infantry is OP, they have 100% influence over what happens to this game and it has ****** everything up. |
Our Deepest Regret
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
254
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:55:00 -
[25] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''Tanks Arent STrong'' ======> Doesnt die a single time even while being shot by a forge gun and a swarm launcher AT THE SAME TIME.
Didn't die because he backed off whenever they brought out AV, and he had squadmates willing to jump out of the tank to defend it.
Quote:In the first video , our friend here calls in his tank and some other player too (2 or 3 tanks maybe?) Each time the poor enemy team would take AV out they would get ravaged by infantry. The numers are WAY too small (12 vs 12? ) To sacrifice 5+ infatry players to try and take down 2 tanks..,
MLT tanks shouldnt die to 2 forge guns shot. PROTO FG vs MLT tank? SRSLY? Yeah. Teamwork? People covering each other's backs? It looked so nice. You can't nerf teamwork, Checkmate. He also redacted and said that proto should beat Militia. Don't take it out of context.
Quote:He runs around in a 7800 HP tank,with resistance, easily owning people (And his aim sucks) and then says that tanks are not strong. Then says that FG need a nerf while getting hit by swarms and FG alike and he just walks off with his damage resistances and armor regen modules active asit is nothing LOL....
Actually it's 6800 health, 2 hardeners, one pg extender, and a rep with a stage three turret. Very, very, very standard build that gets crushed in no time by good players. And what do you mean by "Getting hit by swarms and a FG like it was nothing"? He had to vamoose every time. He didn't sit and tank it, he retreated and left it to his teammates. This is smart playing. Nerf teamwork.
Anyway, He was squad-ing with his corp against some really bad pub players, and he was still taking a hammering. Imagine if those guys had been good? Nerf teamwork.
I find it amazing that tank players can watch this video and see a guy barely surviving but doing so thanks to the efforts of his team, but AV players can watch it and somehow see Godzilla rampaging through Tokyo. That is too funny.
Quote:WAnt to BUFF TANKS? NERF FGs?
DO IT, but then limit a battle to a MAXIMUM of 1 tank per team. BALANCE....
He wasn't calling for a Forge gun nerf. He loves Forge guns. He uses forge Guns. He says flat out how much the game sucked when Tanks were unstoppable. He is however, accurately pointing out the present innate imbalance between Vehicles and AV. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1399
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
lol, their AV wasn't even advanced. do you think everyone has proto AV hello no, everyone is too lazy to do that.
1 tank per team... haha no, if you want infantry only game, go play call of duty and leave us be
NOT EVEYONE IS TOO LAZY TO DO THAT. I have All AV weapons at proto level,and guess what? Tanks CAN get away and CAN survive...And they are a pain to deal with...If a FGunner is NOT in an elevated place,hes useless,since he cant keep shooting the tanks unti l he gets the kill (like in the first map they played...) A swarm launcher specialist NEEDS to be at certain distance exposing himself to enemy infantry,same with AV nades. Im sorry but its a VERY limited player per map game. 12 on each side? if one team decides to bing out 3 tanks the amount of AV weaponry needed would be of a MINIMUM of 4 AV specialistsThat will get ravaged by enemy infantry and tanks alike,plus,making taking out so many tanks will be a prriority to the AV specialists while RISKING to loose the game because of inferior OBJECTIVE focused infantry. So you dont want 1 tank per game? then leave FGs and tanks as they are. Our friend here who made the video,Pirex was it? Just proof how powerful tanks are....Turrets were useless vs it, AV was useless vs him and when something HURT him,he was fast enought to get away with impunity...
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive..
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses, and if you pay attention, none of the enemy's AV was above standard..
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice.
its not our fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about not being able to solo tankers in game, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you) |
noob cavman
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
76
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 23:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
Tanks of all shape and fits are still very killable. The best av I saw in the vid was a cbr7 with maybe 1-2 dam mods. Do not forgot he cherry picks the best bits for his vids so in all probability that was one of a few games he did not lose his tank. Tanks are not op you cretins.
A Prof 5 proto swarms scrub o/ |
JUNIOR SENIOR
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
TY Pyrex for proof positive Tanks are OP. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1140
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive.. ==> Yup, you shouldt totally kill yourself.
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses ==> Yup you should learn from him instead of whining on the forums on daily basis.
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice. ==> Even with a tank, if one guy can solo in a tank and do good,so should an infantry be able to solo a tank and do good.You just tooke the most Expensive and HP strong wise side...thats all...
@ Void: its not my fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about every single AV being able to kill you,saying you need a BUFF and FG need a nerf, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you)
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1402
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:05:00 -
[30] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive.. ==> Yup, you shouldt totally kill yourself.
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses ==> Yup you should learn from him instead of whining on the forums on daily basis.
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice. ==> Even with a tank, if one guy can solo in a tank and do good,so should an infantry be able to solo a tank and do good.You just tooke the most Expensive and HP strong wise side...thats all...
@ Void: its not my fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about every single AV being able to kill you,saying you need a BUFF and FG need a nerf, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you)
lol your calling me bad when your complaining about militia users not being able to solo a standard hull with probably proto modules?
no one guy should not be able to solo a tank unless hes very, very good at it.
in no other game does a single player ever destroy a big machine controlled by another player.
one dropsuit doesn't equal a tank, if that were the case then the heavy suit we have should be able to be fitted with a compressed particle cannon. oh whats that? it cant because its not a vehicle? who knew that |
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1402
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
JUNIOR SENIOR wrote:TY Pyrex for proof positive Tanks are OP.
nah, its just infantry intelligence has ben nerfed since they started nerfing tanks |
noob cavman
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
76
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive.. ==> Yup, you shouldt totally kill yourself.
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses ==> Yup you should learn from him instead of whining on the forums on daily basis.
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice. ==> Even with a tank, if one guy can solo in a tank and do good,so should an infantry be able to solo a tank and do good.You just tooke the most Expensive and HP strong wise side...thats all...
@ Void: its not my fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about every single AV being able to kill you,saying you need a BUFF and FG need a nerf, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you)
I know goldfish and small bacterial life that have a better capacity of thought than you. Tanks are not op in the slightest. So what if I have to give my light to carry my swarms to reign death on maddies. I have a smg to deal with reds and the two greens at my back to end any real threat. |
Our Deepest Regret
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
255
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
JUNIOR SENIOR wrote:TY Pyrex for proof positive Tanks are OP.
FFS, skip to 13:07 of that video and then press "stop." Read the list of names, and do a scavenger hunt and look for anything those names have in common.
On the left side, I see "Unholy Legion of Darkstar," a corp that Pyrex's main happens to be a member of. So we have three Darkstar stompers in good gear, and one darkstar stomper in a tank, who were undoutbedly communicating with each other using mics. On the right, I see no names in common. A pure, unorganized pub group.
Soooo wait...the coordinated squad filled with experienced players using good equipment and teamwork stomped a mud hole into the unorganized lambs waiting to be sheared? And the experienced players protected their tank? And any tank that gets protected by its team can get kills?
HAX |
noob cavman
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
76
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:JUNIOR SENIOR wrote:TY Pyrex for proof positive Tanks are OP. FFS, skip to 13:07 of that video and then press "stop." Read the list of names, and do a scavenger hunt and look for anything those names have in common. On the left side, I see "Unholy Legion of Darkstar," a corp that Pyrex's main happens to be a member of. So we have three Darkstar stompers in good gear, and one darkstar stomper in a tank, who were undoutbedly communicating with each other using mics. On the right, I see no names in common. A pure, unorganized pub group. Soooo wait...the squad filled with experienced players using good equipment stomped a mud hole into the unorganized lambs waiting to be sheared? And the experienced players protected their tank? And any tank that gets protected by its team can get kills? HAX
I don't get how logic and common sense seem to leave most people's heads. But Cleary a squad with solid fighters cant beat randoms |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1140
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:17:00 -
[35] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:
Didn't die because he backed off whenever they brought out AV, and he had squadmates willing to jump out of the tank to defend it. OK TEAMWORK.
Yeah. Teamwork? People covering each other's backs? It looked so nice. You can't nerf teamwork, Checkmate. He also redacted and said that proto should beat Militia. Don't take it out of context. Ok TEAMWORK Yes he did say that proto shoudl beat MLT,after he complained about it... So its like , OMG I GOT KILLED IN 2 SHOTS NERF! but im ok with it... WHAT?
Actually it's 6800 health, 2 hardeners, one pg extender, and a rep with a stage three turret. Very, very, very standard build that gets crushed in no time by good players. And what do you mean by "Getting hit by swarms and a FG like it was nothing"? He had to vamoose every time. He didn't sit and tank it, he retreated and left it to his teammates. This is smart playing. Nerf teamwork. Well we all saw him, he was playing smart. So...you guys should learn to use that ''teamwork'' to tank instead of keep asking for nerfs in AV and buffs in tanks. so you can solo a whole enemy tank......
Anyway, He was squad-ing with his corp against some really bad pub players, and he was still taking a hammering. Imagine if those guys had been good? Nerf teamwork. I DIDNT SEE ANY HAMMERING. He didnt die once, so i dont know what is this HAMMERING you are talking about. Hammering is dying 20 times in a game. THATS HAMMERING, of course, i dont think ANY tanker knows what that feels.
I find it amazing that tank players can watch this video and see a guy barely surviving but doing so thanks to the efforts of his team, but AV players can watch it and somehow see Godzilla rampaging through Tokyo. That is too funny. You know whats also funny? Seeing a tanker that does well because hes playing with his ''TEAM'' and having teamwork. And tankers insead of realizing hes doing good an thanks to his TEAM he doesnt die, INSTEAD of organising stuff with your corps to PLAY like taht you just want buffs and nerfs to benefit your solo tanking.
He wasn't calling for a Forge gun nerf. He loves Forge guns. He uses forge Guns. He says flat out how much the game sucked when Tanks were unstoppable. He is however, accurately pointing out the present innate imbalance between Vehicles and AV OF Course hes gonna say he loves the FG, he doesnt want to sound Biased. There is no imbalance.Just a lot of whine. 1 on 1 a Tanks defeats infantry how it should be. Point made, the rest depends on position,teamwork,level of AV weaponry etc...How can you even say imbalance after a video clearly showing a decent tank driver (he even admits he's new) OWNING everyone as if they were maggots....
.
SO BASICALLY, What our friend Tanker proved ALL of us,is that TEAMWORK is the KEY right? THEN STOP whining about your tanks sucking and play as a team. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1140
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:20:00 -
[36] - Quote
noob cavman wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive.. ==> Yup, you shouldt totally kill yourself.
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses ==> Yup you should learn from him instead of whining on the forums on daily basis.
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice. ==> Even with a tank, if one guy can solo in a tank and do good,so should an infantry be able to solo a tank and do good.You just tooke the most Expensive and HP strong wise side...thats all...
@ Void: its not my fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about every single AV being able to kill you,saying you need a BUFF and FG need a nerf, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you)
I know goldfish and small bacterial life that have a better capacity of thought than you. Tanks are not op in the slightest. So what if I have to give my light to carry my swarms to reign death on maddies. I have a smg to deal with reds and the two greens at my back to end any real threat.
AT LEAST I HAVE CAPACITY of Thought. Look you re*arded smuck, im getting realy tired of your scrubness and the only reason i havnt replied to you before is because he respect i have For ANON Illuminati (because hes my mentor). BUT PLEASE tell me WHERE IN THIS THREAD i said tanks are OP and i'll send you 5 million you way NOw. |
Our Deepest Regret
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
255
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:29:00 -
[37] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:
SO BASICALLY, What our friend Tanker proved ALL of us,is that TEAMWORK is the KEY right? THEN STOP whining about your tanks sucking and play as a team.
You're using a double standard, Checkmate. He used teamwork and excelled because of it, but you're still complaining because the tank didn't get blown up.
|
noob cavman
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
76
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:33:00 -
[38] - Quote
1) do not use anon or my crop tags in this.
2) your entire farce post are saying with your wording and mannerisms that are tanks are op. That a tank should be soloed by a one guy...,. Just no
3) anon is infact also a good tanker with a high sp alt. still gets soloed so clearly tanks are up.
4) vet tankers in our corp better than anon get soloed by forgeguns. Clearly op right there like you say
And when VET tankers are talking common sense for once (looking at you qq queen char ) about tanking and av and infantry are not. Well that is sad |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1140
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:
SO BASICALLY, What our friend Tanker proved ALL of us,is that TEAMWORK is the KEY right? THEN STOP whining about your tanks sucking and play as a team.
You're using a double standard, Checkmate. He used teamwork and excelled because of it, but you're still complaining because the tank didn't get blown up.
Same as our friend Pyrex , Saying he loves FGs but need a nerf.
IM NOT COMPLAINING, im just pinpointing the fact that he,and you , say tanks are weak, and then doesnt die. I can make a video on why scouts are weak,and go 25-9, but i will die and prove my point.
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1140
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:38:00 -
[40] - Quote
noob cavman wrote:1) do not use anon or my crop tags in this. / Do not tell me what to do, i do what i want.2) your entire farce post are saying with your wording and mannerisms that are tanks are op. That a tank should be soloed by a one guy...,. Just no / Nope, what im saying is that AV are NOT OP.3) anon is infact also a good tanker with a high sp alt. still gets soloed so clearly tanks are up./ I know, even better than you that hes a good player, and a good tanker.4) vet tankers in our corp better than anon get soloed by forgeguns. Clearly op right there like you say / Nope, they just didnt know when to get out, as Pyrex said.And when VET tankers are talking common sense for once (looking at you qq queen char ) about tanking and av and infantry are not. Well that is sad/ Im sorry i didnt quite get this.
|
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1403
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:39:00 -
[41] - Quote
actually checkmate, Pyrex is a forger, anyone who watches his videos or knows him in game knows he is a forger |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1636
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:40:00 -
[42] - Quote
i love how no one is going to fight my math on how they are OP....
" the eHP is around 11,000 before you count reppers, so a 20,000 eHP armor tank. not OP or anything at all.
proto SL 6 rounds base fire 6x330damage missiles= 14,300~ abouts and takes i forgot, 12 second about to fire.and that's with the bonus damage to armor.
the hard counter to armor tanks is more effective on shields... how hard of a counter is it then?"
does it mean i won? |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1403
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:noob cavman wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive.. ==> Yup, you shouldt totally kill yourself.
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses ==> Yup you should learn from him instead of whining on the forums on daily basis.
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice. ==> Even with a tank, if one guy can solo in a tank and do good,so should an infantry be able to solo a tank and do good.You just tooke the most Expensive and HP strong wise side...thats all...
@ Void: its not my fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about every single AV being able to kill you,saying you need a BUFF and FG need a nerf, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you)
I know goldfish and small bacterial life that have a better capacity of thought than you. Tanks are not op in the slightest. So what if I have to give my light to carry my swarms to reign death on maddies. I have a smg to deal with reds and the two greens at my back to end any real threat. AT LEAST I HAVE CAPACITY of Thought. Look you re*arded smuck, im getting realy tired of your scrubness and the only reason i havnt replied to you before is because he respect i have For ANON Illuminati (because hes my mentor). BUT PLEASE tell me WHERE IN THIS THREAD i said tanks are OP and i'll send you 5 million you way NOw.
lol, in every thread you post on, your complaining about not being able to solo us, your always claiming tanks are OP, you may not say it directly, but everyone knows you believe tanks are OP. |
Our Deepest Regret
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
255
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:51:00 -
[44] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote: I DIDNT SEE ANY HAMMERING. He didnt die once, so i dont know what is this HAMMERING you are talking about. Hammering is dying 20 times in a game. THATS HAMMERING, of course, i dont think ANY tanker knows what that feels.
At 10:38, he gets dropped from 6,000 health to 2,300 in about three seconds. He ran away. Hammered.
At 2:37, his friend's tank gets dropped from 6,700 health to 3,800 in two hits, and runs away. Hammered.
At 5:40, he gets dropped from 6,500 health to 2,700 and had to run away. Hammered.
Yeeeah.
I run starter infantry in ambush in order to fund my tanks for skirmish, Checkmate. I die all the time. Hell, I even ran into Void Echo a few times. He runs infantry and dies too. Tanking is something you do because you like doing it. It's not profitable or sustainable. Every good game as a tanker is built on a lot of frustrating losses, and boring grinding. |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
2112
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:53:00 -
[45] - Quote
Our Deepest Regret wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote: I DIDNT SEE ANY HAMMERING. He didnt die once, so i dont know what is this HAMMERING you are talking about. Hammering is dying 20 times in a game. THATS HAMMERING, of course, i dont think ANY tanker knows what that feels.
At 10:38, he gets dropped from 6,000 health to 2,300 in about three seconds. He ran away. Hammered. At 2:37, his friend's tank gets dropped from 6,700 health to 3,800 in two hits, and runs away. Hammered. At 5:40, he gets dropped from 6,500 health to 2,700 and had to run away. Hammered. Yeeeah. I run starter infantry in ambush in order to fund my tanks for skirmish, Checkmate. I die all the time. Hell, I even ran into Void Echo a few times. He runs infantry and dies too. Tanking is something you do because you like doing it. It's not profitable or sustainable. Every good game as a tanker is built on a lot of frustrating losses, and boring grinding. Admittedly Checkmate unless you are risking that 500k-1 Mill ISK per life you don't really know what a hammering is...... |
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
143
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:55:00 -
[46] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Our friend here who made the video,Pirex was it? Just proof how powerful tanks are....[/b] Turrets were useless vs it, AV was useless vs him and when something HURT him,he was fast enought to get away with impunity...
Do I win the iskies? Sounds pretty clear to me there. |
Shattered Mirage
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
269
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:57:00 -
[47] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:noob cavman wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
lol closed minded ignorant fool...
I pity the world for allowing ignorance to thrive.. ==> Yup, you shouldt totally kill yourself.
he could get away because apparently he has intelligence in tanking and knows his own weaknesses ==> Yup you should learn from him instead of whining on the forums on daily basis.
on your "AV gets ****** up by infantry" argument, get your damn blues to defend you, that's what you tell us when we go against infantry, take your own advice. ==> Even with a tank, if one guy can solo in a tank and do good,so should an infantry be able to solo a tank and do good.You just tooke the most Expensive and HP strong wise side...thats all...
@ Void: its not my fault you suck at what you do (that was to anyone that complains about every single AV being able to kill you,saying you need a BUFF and FG need a nerf, you just suck because you expect everything handed to you)
I know goldfish and small bacterial life that have a better capacity of thought than you. Tanks are not op in the slightest. So what if I have to give my light to carry my swarms to reign death on maddies. I have a smg to deal with reds and the two greens at my back to end any real threat. AT LEAST I HAVE CAPACITY of Thought. Look you re*arded smuck, im getting realy tired of your scrubness and the only reason i havnt replied to you before is because he respect i have For ANON Illuminati (because hes my mentor). BUT PLEASE tell me WHERE IN THIS THREAD i said tanks are OP and i'll send you 5 million you way NOw.
NOT EVEYONE IS TOO LAZY TO DO THAT. I have All AV weapons at proto level,and guess what? Tanks CAN get away and CAN survive...And they are a pain to deal with...If a FGunner is NOT in an elevated place,hes useless,since he cant keep shooting the tanks unti l he gets the kill (like in the first map they played...) A swarm launcher specialist NEEDS to be at certain distance exposing himself to enemy infantry,same with AV nades.
Im sorry but its a VERY limited player per map game. 12 on each side? if one team decides to bing out 3 tanks the amount of AV weaponry needed would be of a MINIMUM of 4 AV specialistsThat will get ravaged by enemy infantry and tanks alike,plus,making taking out so many tanks will be a prriority to the AV specialists while RISKING to loose the game because of inferior OBJECTIVE focused infantry.
So you dont want 1 tank per game? then leave FGs and tanks as they are.
Our friend here who made the video,Pirex was it? Just proof how powerful tanks are.... Turrets were useless vs it, AV was useless vs him and when something HURT him,he was fast enought to get away with impunity...
^ This is you pretty much complaining about tanks being OP |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1142
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 01:41:00 -
[48] - Quote
3 points you cant deny:
1-I've never said TANKS ARE OP. I say they are good. Contrary to TANKERS SAYING THEY ARE UP.Im against NERFING AV WEAPONRY, tahts about it and what really triggers my posting.I use my tales of times i cant kill a tanks as proof that good tankers can and DO survive in the battlefield. OF COURSE I CAN KILL TANKS WITH MY PROTO AV WEAPORY.If im on a roof and i have full vision of the map,my ISHIKUNE FG will rip any tank appart if he doesnt hide on time. Same with the Proto Swarms and Grenades,if i have the advantage to be able to shoot the tanks without being seen....ADD ON: Im not EVEN AGAINST Buffing tanks, if with this we get a reduction in numers deplyed per battle. (Say 1-2 tanks MAX ,considering the low player count available per game)I've even posted several times tanks and their modules + turrets SHOULD be cheaper,in an ATTEMPT TO ENCOURAGE TANKING. 2-If you are going to make a video to make a point, this point being ''tanks are UP'' , DOnt show a video owning people with a Tank. 3-@ My Compatriot True Adamance. ISK wise you are not even that far away. My adv suit costs around 85k. Bring in consideration being infantry YOU WILL DIE, doesnt matter how good you get to be,because there is always a random grenade, an enemy ambush, a tank that owns you when you dont have your AV, Charged sniper rifle etc....So i do between 5-8 deaths per game. This is between 1700000 ISK and 2720000 ISK Every 4 games. I've seen TANKERs taht dont die in 4 games.I havnt seen anyone BUT a sniper in 1.4 that can go 4 games in a row without dying once. Lets say you loose a 3 million isk tank every 4 games. Thats only 280000 more ISK, at the advantage of a much better K-D ratio and field presence.... If you loose 1 3mil tank every game,you are doing it wrong. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1406
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 01:55:00 -
[49] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:3 points you cant deny:
1-I've never said TANKS ARE OP. I say they are good. Contrary to TANKERS SAYING THEY ARE UP.Im against NERFING AV WEAPONRY, tahts about it and what really triggers my posting.I use my tales of times i cant kill a tanks as proof that good tankers can and DO survive in the battlefield. OF COURSE I CAN KILL TANKS WITH MY PROTO AV WEAPORY.If im on a roof and i have full vision of the map,my ISHIKUNE FG will rip any tank appart if he doesnt hide on time. Same with the Proto Swarms and Grenades,if i have the advantage to be able to shoot the tanks without being seen....ADD ON: Im not EVEN AGAINST Buffing tanks, if with this we get a reduction in numers deplyed per battle. (Say 1-2 tanks MAX ,considering the low player count available per game)I've even posted several times tanks and their modules + turrets SHOULD be cheaper,in an ATTEMPT TO ENCOURAGE TANKING. 2-If you are going to make a video to make a point, this point being ''tanks are UP'' , DOnt show a video owning people with a Tank. 3-@ My Compatriot True Adamance. ISK wise you are not even that far away. My adv suit costs around 85k. Bring in consideration being infantry YOU WILL DIE, doesnt matter how good you get to be,because there is always a random grenade, an enemy ambush, a tank that owns you when you dont have your AV, Charged sniper rifle etc....So i do between 5-8 deaths per game. This is between 1700000 ISK and 2720000 ISK Every 4 games. I've seen TANKERs taht dont die in 4 games.I havnt seen anyone BUT a sniper in 1.4 that can go 4 games in a row without dying once. Lets say you loose a 3 million isk tank every 4 games. Thats only 280000 more ISK, at the advantage of a much better K-D ratio and field presence.... If you loose 1 3mil tank every game,you are doing it wrong.
pyrex's video is the 1st to talk about the balance without being biased which none of us can do |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1142
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 01:57:00 -
[50] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
pyrex's video is the 1st to talk about the balance without being biased which none of us can do
We agree on somthing.
STILL, he does pretty damn good with a tanks to say they are UP.
I'll tell you wahts UP, COMMANDOS are UP, SCOUTS ARE UP...not tanks... |
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1406
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
pyrex's video is the 1st to talk about the balance without being biased which none of us can do
We agree on somthing.
STILL, he does pretty damn good with a tanks to say they are UP.I'll tell you wahts UP, COMMANDOS are UP, SCOUTS ARE UP...not tanks...
I could care less about infantry, they are the ones that got us into this mess in the 1st place.
did you even bother looking on the enemy team he was fighting against? there was NO ORGANIZATION, NO INTELLIGENCE AND NO DEDICATED AV ON THEIR SIDE, all the seem to have was standard AV.
you expect people intelligence and knowledge with what they do and with higher level modules to be soloed by some random red that is too lazy to fully skill into AV like they should that is too ******* stupid to use teamwork like they demand for us?
Call of Dusty is that way: ===================================> |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1145
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:17:00 -
[52] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
I could care less about infantry, they are the ones that got us into this mess in the 1st place.
did you even bother looking on the enemy team he was fighting against? there was NO ORGANIZATION, NO INTELLIGENCE AND NO DEDICATED AV ON THEIR SIDE, all the seem to have was standard AV.
you expect people intelligence and knowledge with what they do and with higher level modules to be soloed by some random red that is too lazy to fully skill into AV like they should that is too ******* stupid to use teamwork like they demand for us?
Call of Dusty is that way: ===================================>
-1st/ Stop it with the CoD crap.Its getting old and its not insulting,just stupid. I;ve never played that game, I played MAG. -2nd/World of TANKS is that way (XD) =========> -3rd/ The difference between you and me is i do KIND of care about vehicles ,because they are a part of the game i like. There for, making all my opinions more valid than your tank loving biased opinions. 4th/Yes i see the randoms trying to win an already finished match, but when you tankers get killed by AV weaponry, you also dont see the ifantry behind you throwing packed AV nades, the FGunner sniping you from a roof?.. NO , you only saw 2 swarms coming your way and came in to QQ how a Proto SL totally wrecks your tank. 5th/I have fully skilled Proto AV. I even have proficiency.Im an above avarege player and even with some help sometimes is impossible to drop a tank. So no, i dont want some random scrub with MLT swarms to drop a tank. I want tankers to start realizing , THEY ARE NOT BEING SOLOED. they are being hunt down by different AV players at the time .... |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
149
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:18:00 -
[53] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:3 points you cant deny:
1-I've never said TANKS ARE OP. I say they are good. Contrary to TANKERS SAYING THEY ARE UP.Im against NERFING AV WEAPONRY, tahts about it and what really triggers my posting.I use my tales of times i cant kill a tanks as proof that good tankers can and DO survive in the battlefield. OF COURSE I CAN KILL TANKS WITH MY PROTO AV WEAPORY.If im on a roof and i have full vision of the map,my ISHIKUNE FG will rip any tank appart if he doesnt hide on time. Same with the Proto Swarms and Grenades,if i have the advantage to be able to shoot the tanks without being seen....ADD ON: Im not EVEN AGAINST Buffing tanks, if with this we get a reduction in numers deplyed per battle. (Say 1-2 tanks MAX ,considering the low player count available per game)I've even posted several times tanks and their modules + turrets SHOULD be cheaper,in an ATTEMPT TO ENCOURAGE TANKING. 2-If you are going to make a video to make a point, this point being ''tanks are UP'' , DOnt show a video owning people with a Tank. 3-@ My Compatriot True Adamance. ISK wise you are not even that far away. My adv suit costs around 85k. Bring in consideration being infantry YOU WILL DIE, doesnt matter how good you get to be,because there is always a random grenade, an enemy ambush, a tank that owns you when you dont have your AV, Charged sniper rifle etc....So i do between 5-8 deaths per game. This is between 1700000 ISK and 2720000 ISK Every 4 games. I've seen TANKERs taht dont die in 4 games.I havnt seen anyone BUT a sniper in 1.4 that can go 4 games in a row without dying once. Lets say you loose a 3 million isk tank every 4 games. Thats only 280000 more ISK, at the advantage of a much better K-D ratio and field presence.... If you loose 1 3mil tank every game,you are doing it wrong.
I would like to see video footage of you going 20/0 in tanks through 4 consecutive battles with no cuts in the footage. Proof is in the pudding as they say, and if YOU can't give proof, you can't make claims. :/ |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1406
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
I could care less about infantry, they are the ones that got us into this mess in the 1st place.
did you even bother looking on the enemy team he was fighting against? there was NO ORGANIZATION, NO INTELLIGENCE AND NO DEDICATED AV ON THEIR SIDE, all the seem to have was standard AV.
you expect people intelligence and knowledge with what they do and with higher level modules to be soloed by some random red that is too lazy to fully skill into AV like they should that is too ******* stupid to use teamwork like they demand for us?
Call of Dusty is that way: ===================================>
-1st/ Stop it with the CoD crap.Its getting old and its not insulting,just stupid. I;ve never played that game, I played MAG. -2nd/World of TANKS is that way (XD) =========> -3rd/ The difference between you and me is i do KIND of care about vehicles ,because they are a part of the game i like. There for, making all my opinions more valid than your tank loving biased opinions. 4th/Yes i see the randoms trying to win an already finished match, but when you tankers get killed by AV weaponry, you also dont see the ifantry behind you throwing packed AV nades, the FGunner sniping you from a roof?.. NO , you only saw 2 swarms coming your way and came in to QQ how a Proto SL totally wrecks your tank. 5th/I have fully skilled Proto AV. I even have proficiency.Im an above avarege player and even with some help sometimes is impossible to drop a tank. So no, i dont want some random scrub with MLT swarms to drop a tank. I want tankers to start realizing , THEY ARE NOT BEING SOLOED. they are being hunt down by different AV players at the time ....
LOL your opinion matters more than a tanker on the subject of tanks?
tanks do get soloed by AV, all the ******* time, an example is lowrateshitman's video of him soloing someone with lolnades, and he has the same ****** biased mindset as you. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
296
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:20:00 -
[55] - Quote
I'm only at the start of the video for now, but hot damn is that a speedy tank! Makes the Sica look like a snail.
2.44 into the video...clearly using a mouse to aim. Correction, saw the ADSing nearing 4 minutes in. yet doing extremely well. shields barely taken down...a few kills, a supply depot destroyed. |
Flux Raeder
WarRavens League of Infamy
266
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:28:00 -
[56] - Quote
I think I was in the opposing team on that vid, we got raped because what you don't see is that they had two MORE tanks on the field. Half my team seemed to be afk'ing and I was the only one who even seemed to have av nades (those packed av nades) and my one squad mate only had a militia sl. The reason they dominated that match was because my team SUCKED, if I had squaded up with my regular corp members before the match I bet things would have gone differently. Instead I went 9-14 and was first on the damn list, it felt like I'd randomly been lumped with a bunch of noobs for that one game. Has anyone else recently experienced this kind of godawful matchmaking lately? My norm for soloing is 1st or second place with 15-2, that night I got about four games in the row of nothing but this kind of bs |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1407
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:31:00 -
[57] - Quote
Flux Raeder wrote:I think I was in the opposing team on that vid, we got raped because what you don't see is that they had two MORE tanks on the field. Half my team seemed to be afk'ing and I was the only one who even seemed to have av nades (those packed av nades) and my one squad mate only had a militia sl. The reason they dominated that match was because my team SUCKED, if I had squaded up with my regular corp members before the match I bet things would have gone differently. Instead I went 9-14 and was first on the damn list, it felt like I'd randomly been lumped with a bunch of noobs for that one game. Has anyone else recently experienced this kind of godawful matchmaking lately? My norm for soloing is 1st or second place with 15-2, that night I got about four games in the row of nothing but this kind of bs
anyone else that thinks that infantry are perfect and intelligent? read his post. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1146
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:33:00 -
[58] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Flux Raeder wrote:I think I was in the opposing team on that vid, we got raped because what you don't see is that they had two MORE tanks on the field. Half my team seemed to be afk'ing and I was the only one who even seemed to have av nades (those packed av nades) and my one squad mate only had a militia sl. The reason they dominated that match was because my team SUCKED, if I had squaded up with my regular corp members before the match I bet things would have gone differently. Instead I went 9-14 and was first on the damn list, it felt like I'd randomly been lumped with a bunch of noobs for that one game. Has anyone else recently experienced this kind of godawful matchmaking lately? My norm for soloing is 1st or second place with 15-2, that night I got about four games in the row of nothing but this kind of bs anyone else that thinks that infantry are perfect and intelligent? read his post.
Oh so now we are ALL stupid scrubs...
**** you Void. LOL
BUT he does prove 1 of my points: Tanks should get a limitation to 1-2 at the time. more than 2 is just too much |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1407
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:41:00 -
[59] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:Flux Raeder wrote:I think I was in the opposing team on that vid, we got raped because what you don't see is that they had two MORE tanks on the field. Half my team seemed to be afk'ing and I was the only one who even seemed to have av nades (those packed av nades) and my one squad mate only had a militia sl. The reason they dominated that match was because my team SUCKED, if I had squaded up with my regular corp members before the match I bet things would have gone differently. Instead I went 9-14 and was first on the damn list, it felt like I'd randomly been lumped with a bunch of noobs for that one game. Has anyone else recently experienced this kind of godawful matchmaking lately? My norm for soloing is 1st or second place with 15-2, that night I got about four games in the row of nothing but this kind of bs anyone else that thinks that infantry are perfect and intelligent? read his post. Oh so now we are ALL stupid...? **** you Void. LOL BUT he does prove 1 of my points: Tanks should get a limitation to 1-2 at the time. more than 2 is just too much (if the y get a buff that is)
your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game and not what the game is meant to be |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1146
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:43:00 -
[60] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game
Your stupid since you want to turn DUST514 into Twisted metal. ITS A FPS.
First person SHOOTER.not tanker.
SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOTER |
|
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
297
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:44:00 -
[61] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:Flux Raeder wrote:I think I was in the opposing team on that vid, we got raped because what you don't see is that they had two MORE tanks on the field. Half my team seemed to be afk'ing and I was the only one who even seemed to have av nades (those packed av nades) and my one squad mate only had a militia sl. The reason they dominated that match was because my team SUCKED, if I had squaded up with my regular corp members before the match I bet things would have gone differently. Instead I went 9-14 and was first on the damn list, it felt like I'd randomly been lumped with a bunch of noobs for that one game. Has anyone else recently experienced this kind of godawful matchmaking lately? My norm for soloing is 1st or second place with 15-2, that night I got about four games in the row of nothing but this kind of bs anyone else that thinks that infantry are perfect and intelligent? read his post. Oh so now we are ALL stupid...? **** you Void. LOL BUT he does prove 1 of my points: Tanks should get a limitation to 1-2 at the time. more than 2 is just too much (if the y get a buff that is) your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game
Couldn't ones opinion be that "You're stupid if you have the mindset, in a game of rock/paper/scissors that "Rock" should dominate three times as many "papers"
If so, i'd love to perform the move "TRIPLE PAPER!" on my nephew when he challenges me to a game.
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1407
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:44:00 -
[62] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game
Your stupid since you want to turn DUST514 into Twisted meta. ITS A FPS.First person SHOOTER.not tanker. SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOTER
its not 100% shooter you ******... another point, why would they put vehicles in if they wanted it to be about infantry mainly? |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1146
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:45:00 -
[63] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:actually checkmate, Pyrex is a forger, anyone who watches his videos or knows him in game knows he is a forger
A forger who knows plays as a tanker,and probably will stick to being a tanker.
Why? hmmm... let me think....
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1146
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:46:00 -
[64] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game
Your stupid since you want to turn DUST514 into Twisted meta. ITS A FPS.First person SHOOTER.not tanker. SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOTER its not 100% shooter you ******... another point, why would they put vehicles in if they wanted it to be about infantry mainly?
NOBODY SAYS IT HAS TO BE ONLY about infantry.
All FPS have a vehicle element. But vehicles, IN FPS GAMES, are support role. Not , LOL me tanker i own all 12 red alone... like you want it to be. |
Beck Weathers
High-Damage
80
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:48:00 -
[65] - Quote
All the vid tells me is you have to run the BEST tank fit just to tank, anything less is a waist of isk. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
298
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:49:00 -
[66] - Quote
Please comment on my post Void...i wanna hear how you try and say your opinion has more merit then someone elses, given the same context. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1407
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:50:00 -
[67] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game
Your stupid since you want to turn DUST514 into Twisted meta. ITS A FPS.First person SHOOTER.not tanker. SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOTER its not 100% shooter you ******... another point, why would they put vehicles in if they wanted it to be about infantry mainly? NOBODY SAYS IT HAS TO BE ONLY about infantry. All FPS have a vehicle element. But vehicles, IN FPS GAMES, are support role. Not , LOL me tanker i own all 12 red alone... like you want it to be.
on other FPS do you put personal investment into vehicles? in other games do you pay for vehicles with your own ingame currency?
in this game, do you see vehicles being regenerated at random in the same place over and over again, in this game does pilot not suffer from the destruction of vehicles?
so the **** what if in other games they have support vehicles, I believe that the dropship counts as the support vehicle here. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1407
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:52:00 -
[68] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Please comment on my post Void...i wanna hear how you try and say your opinion has more merit then someone elses, given the same context.
my opinion matters because I am a ******* tanker. how would you like your **** getting constantly ****** over without your consent.
I have skilled into both tanks and AV, my opinion has much more merit than some ignorant biased shithead who doesn't want Dust to be Dust |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1146
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 02:59:00 -
[69] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
on other FPS do you put personal investment into vehicles? in other games do you pay for vehicles with your own ingame currency?
in this game, do you see vehicles being regenerated at random in the same place over and over again, in this game does pilot not suffer from the destruction of vehicles?
so the **** what if in other games they have support vehicles, I believe that the dropship counts as the support vehicle here.
on other FPS do you survive 2+ AV weaponry? in other games are you able to play as a tanker and NOT DIE?
in this game, do you see a single RPG take down your tank?
'' in this game does pilot not suffer from the destruction of vehicles?'' = Well yeah. Everybody hates to die and loose money. so?
You talk like if getting ALL PROTO AV and getting killed 5+ times for hunting TAnks and somettimes not even killing them is not investment at all. I CANNOT REASON with you, you dont EVER put in someone elses shoes. You just think tank,tank,tank... I created and played as a 8 mil tanker for a whole month,just to see what it was all about. I would really LOVE to see a vid of you killing a good tank/tanker ALONE.
And dont tell me, oh yeah im an AV specialist, because every single tanke says taht to not sound biased and its bull. And , let me answer this, no YOU CANT take out a good tank/tanker alone....
(unless you are in a freakn rooftop with a proto assault FG and the tanker has nowhere to hide....) Which is unprobable.... |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1408
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:04:00 -
[70] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
on other FPS do you put personal investment into vehicles? in other games do you pay for vehicles with your own ingame currency?
in this game, do you see vehicles being regenerated at random in the same place over and over again, in this game does pilot not suffer from the destruction of vehicles?
so the **** what if in other games they have support vehicles, I believe that the dropship counts as the support vehicle here.
on other FPS do you survive 2+ AV weaponry? in other games are you able to play as a tanker and NOT DIE?in this game, do you see a single RPG take down your tank? '' in this game does pilot not suffer from the destruction of vehicles?'' = Well yeah. Everybody hates to die and loose money. so? You talk like if getting ALL PROTO AV and getting killed 5+ times for hunting TAnks and somettimes not even killing them is not investment at all. I CANNOT REASON with you, you dont EVER put in someone elses shoes. You just think tank,tank,tank... I created and played as a 8 mil tanker for a whole month,just to see what it was all about. I would really LOVE to see a vid of you killing a good tank/tanker ALONE.
seriously? I do it all the ******* time, ask other tankers how many times iv destroyed other tanks and been destroyed by them, and I do it all nearly solo, I never ask for help from AV unless its in a PC match, everywhere else, im either running solo or going with other tankers, and in every battle I destroy tanks alone..
yes I think that tanks should be taken seriously because I am bored of the same old damn dull **** I get from every FPS out there.
also, in other games, no you don't get to play as a tanker, you don't get your own personal vehicle to invest in and upgrade with your own ****. |
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1147
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:13:00 -
[71] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
seriously? I do it all the ******* time, ask other tankers how many times iv destroyed other tanks and been destroyed by them, and I do it all nearly solo, I never ask for help from AV unless its in a PC match, everywhere else, im either running solo or going with other tankers, and in every battle I destroy tanks alone.. New Flash.Then they are not good tanks/tankers. EASY.
OR he was unlucky and got AV naded by someone else and you thought (and i wouldnt be surprised) that you are allmighty there by your proto AV 1HKO's tanks
yes I think that tanks should be taken seriously because I am bored of the same old damn dull **** I get from every FPS out there. This game will not shift and change just because 1 close minded player is bored. get over yourself.
also, in other games, no you don't get to play as a tanker, you don't get your own personal vehicle to invest in and upgrade with your own ****. Might not be personal,but you CAN upgrade tanks with a lot of stuff (like BF3) and yes,you CAN BE A TANKER as a profesion.
|
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
937
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
Stop arguing with Checkmate, he is just a scrub who wants others to feel as impotent as he does.
He has no concepts of balance, and especially no idea of what is involved in tanking. Just let him be his scrubby self, and pretend he doesn't exist.
He has no value, and his opinions are even dumber than he is.
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1147
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:18:00 -
[73] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Stop arguing with Checkmate, he is just a scrub who wants others to feel as impotent as he does.
He has no concepts of balance, and especially no idea of what is involved in tanking. Just let him be his scrubby self, and pretend he doesn't exist.
He has no value, and his opinions are even dumber than he is.
I think the same of you :3 How nice.
Anyways echo. im trying to reason here wih you bu you are not responding. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
298
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:19:00 -
[74] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Please comment on my post Void...i wanna hear how you try and say your opinion has more merit then someone elses, given the same context. my opinion matters because I am a ******* tanker. how would you like your **** getting constantly ****** over without your consent. I have skilled into both tanks and AV, my opinion has much more merit than some ignorant biased shithead who doesn't want Dust to be Dust
So...now you are assuming things? based on what?
No, I don't have 15 mil SP invested into tanks. Do you?
I went pure Forge gun after the HMG was decided by CCP to become a **** weapon. And i know for a fact, that against say...Ted Nugget, after 6 Forge gun shots against his Madruger, from an Ishukone Assault Forge gun with Prof 5 skill, he was still chugging along with a little under half HP out of my line of sight.
6 Forge hits, with a proto assault FG, with prof 5, with two complex damage mods...can't kill him because he knows how to tank, and knows when he needs to retreat. Now this was DURING his self judged execution of half a dozen blueberries. He was killing ****, while taking fire from a single Proto AVer, getting kills and still managed to easily get away.
We all know that until you have the SP to properly fit a tank, its a water balloon ready to pop.
We all ALSO know that a properly fitted tank is a damn god on the battlefield.
Why can't you admit that? The entire vehicle and AV **** needs a rebalancing, and that will come eventually.
What makes me assume you aren't a high SP tanker, or at least, not a pro...is your complete "ignorance" of both sides of the coin, or your simple refusal to admit that there's a problem on both ends of the Rock/Paper system.
Either or, after 6 months you are simply sounding like a douche who cares for nothing but the resurrection of the godmode that was tanks in the past, with no argument on how to actually balance the two to be in sync.
It's rock/paper/scissors. Even tanks HAVE to have a weakness in this game, or else wtf is the point of rock/paper/scissors? |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1409
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:21:00 -
[75] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Stop arguing with Checkmate, he is just a scrub who wants others to feel as impotent as he does.
He has no concepts of balance, and especially no idea of what is involved in tanking. Just let him be his scrubby self, and pretend he doesn't exist.
He has no value, and his opinions are even dumber than he is.
I think the same of you :3 How nice. Anyways echo. im trying to reason here wih you but you are not understanding me.
Tanks are not OP. AV is not OP. If tanks get buff, there SHOULD be a limitation of the amound of tanks deployed in a 12 vs 12 battle...
everything you know about tanks is wrong, dead wrong, try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy.
tanks are not OP, av is not UP. if there would be a limitation on vehicles, CCP would kill its pilot community here, this is not call of duty. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
298
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:26:00 -
[76] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Stop arguing with Checkmate, he is just a scrub who wants others to feel as impotent as he does.
He has no concepts of balance, and especially no idea of what is involved in tanking. Just let him be his scrubby self, and pretend he doesn't exist.
He has no value, and his opinions are even dumber than he is.
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1409
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:27:00 -
[77] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Please comment on my post Void...i wanna hear how you try and say your opinion has more merit then someone elses, given the same context. my opinion matters because I am a ******* tanker. how would you like your **** getting constantly ****** over without your consent. I have skilled into both tanks and AV, my opinion has much more merit than some ignorant biased shithead who doesn't want Dust to be Dust So...now you are assuming things? based on what? No, I don't have 15 mil SP invested into tanks. Do you? I went pure Forge gun after the HMG was decided by CCP to become a **** weapon. And i know for a fact, that against say...Ted Nugget, after 6 Forge gun shots against his Madruger, from an Ishukone Assault Forge gun with Prof 5 skill, he was still chugging along with a little under half HP out of my line of sight. 6 Forge hits, with a proto assault FG, with prof 5, with two complex damage mods...can't kill him because he knows how to tank, and knows when he needs to retreat. Now this was DURING his self judged execution of half a dozen blueberries. He was killing ****, while taking fire from a single Proto AVer, getting kills and still managed to easily get away. We all know that until you have the SP to properly fit a tank, its a water balloon ready to pop. We all ALSO know that a properly fitted tank is a damn god on the battlefield. Why can't you admit that? The entire vehicle and AV **** needs a rebalancing, and that will come eventually. What makes me assume you aren't a high SP tanker, or at least, not a pro...is your complete "ignorance" of both sides of the coin, or your simple refusal to admit that there's a problem on both ends of the Rock/Paper system. Either or, after 6 months you are simply sounding like a douche who cares for nothing but the resurrection of the godmode that was tanks in the past, with no argument on how to actually balance the two to be in sync. It's rock/paper/scissors. Even tanks HAVE to have a weakness in this game, or else wtf is the point of rock/paper/scissors?
yeah I do have 15 mill invested in tanks. since when have I denied that there is a problem with the balance?
wow... I hate bringing up my popularity status on the forums and hate bragging about anything but seriously.. do you know who I am?
if you knew who I am, then you wouldn't be asking me those questions.
im the loudest vehicle advocate of the community (I probably have more haters than anyone in the game). and anyone who knows of me knows that I despise infantry for the state of the game, and my fellow tankers know exactly what I want out of tanks, and its not godmode |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1409
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:29:00 -
[78] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:It's rock/paper/scissors. Even tanks HAVE to have a weakness in this game, or else wtf is the point of rock/paper/scissors?
if tanks are so very easily taken down by any scrub with av nades, whats the point of skilling into tanks?
why would you personally invest in something that has no purpose in the game because it can be destroyed by everything? |
sixteensixty4
CAUSE 4 C0NCERN
85
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:30:00 -
[79] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
everything you know about tanks is wrong, dead wrong, try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy.
tanks are not OP, av is not UP. if there would be a limitation on vehicles, CCP would kill its pilot community here, this is not call of duty.
This is your problem, you expect to run around solo with no team help and still not get killed lol
For a tank to survive against proto av as it stands, more so if theres more than one of them, you pretty much need a good team behind you, whether they randoms or corp mates, either that or spend the match doing laps around the map
even the dude in the video gets it, like he said, have a look who you got on your team, have a look whos on the opposite and then call your tank in or not based on that.....
|
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
299
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:31:00 -
[80] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Please comment on my post Void...i wanna hear how you try and say your opinion has more merit then someone elses, given the same context. my opinion matters because I am a ******* tanker. how would you like your **** getting constantly ****** over without your consent. I have skilled into both tanks and AV, my opinion has much more merit than some ignorant biased shithead who doesn't want Dust to be Dust So...now you are assuming things? based on what? No, I don't have 15 mil SP invested into tanks. Do you? I went pure Forge gun after the HMG was decided by CCP to become a **** weapon. And i know for a fact, that against say...Ted Nugget, after 6 Forge gun shots against his Madruger, from an Ishukone Assault Forge gun with Prof 5 skill, he was still chugging along with a little under half HP out of my line of sight. 6 Forge hits, with a proto assault FG, with prof 5, with two complex damage mods...can't kill him because he knows how to tank, and knows when he needs to retreat. Now this was DURING his self judged execution of half a dozen blueberries. He was killing ****, while taking fire from a single Proto AVer, getting kills and still managed to easily get away. We all know that until you have the SP to properly fit a tank, its a water balloon ready to pop. We all ALSO know that a properly fitted tank is a damn god on the battlefield. Why can't you admit that? The entire vehicle and AV **** needs a rebalancing, and that will come eventually. What makes me assume you aren't a high SP tanker, or at least, not a pro...is your complete "ignorance" of both sides of the coin, or your simple refusal to admit that there's a problem on both ends of the Rock/Paper system. Either or, after 6 months you are simply sounding like a douche who cares for nothing but the resurrection of the godmode that was tanks in the past, with no argument on how to actually balance the two to be in sync. It's rock/paper/scissors. Even tanks HAVE to have a weakness in this game, or else wtf is the point of rock/paper/scissors? yeah I do have 15 mill invested in tanks. since when have I denied that there is a problem with the balance? wow... I hate bringing up my popularity status on the forums and hate bragging about anything but seriously.. do you know who I am? if you knew who I am, then you wouldn't be asking me those questions. im the loudest vehicle advocate of the community (I probably have more haters than anyone in the game). and anyone who knows of me knows that I despise infantry for the state of the game, and my fellow tankers know exactly what I want out of tanks, and its not godmode
Yea, I've seen you complain consistently on the forums...as well as notice your total SP rising consistently. So you clearly are playing this game you hate so much.
So, why is it that you "don't have a problem with balance", yet at every turn...complain about the balance between tanks and AV. Please link a post where you say "A properly fitted tank can do wonders on a battlefield". I couldn't find one.
The only thing i ever see from you is that tanks are so god damn weak, that ANY solo AVer can pop them in a matter of seconds.
Pray tell me where you talk about ACTUAL balance between AV and tanks, instead of simply buffing tanks to where it takes at least 3 AV to destroy, which you have stated SHOULD be the case in MANY posts. |
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1409
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:34:00 -
[81] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote: This is your problem, you expect to run around solo with no team help and still not get killed lol yeah....no, your dead wrong on that
For a tank to survive against proto av as it stands, more so if theres more than one of them, you pretty much need a good team behind you, whether they randoms or corp mates, either that or spend the match doing laps around the map. in order for you to make a profit on tanking in general, you need to be one of the best at it, in the situation, if your just average, your nothing. that's the problem
even the dude in the video gets it, like he said, have a look who you got on your team, have a look whos on the opposite and then call your tank in or not based on that..... that's fine and all, when your teamed up with competent people who will actually pay attention, listen and work for the team's victory... but no, most of the games I get in im always on the team with the stupid ass bluetards
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1155
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:37:00 -
[82] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
everything you know about tanks is wrong, dead wrong, try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy.
-You might be right, even with a 8mil + tanker accaunt i Might be wrong, no doubt on that one. Everybody makes mistakes. -You are asking me to tank SOLO. So you are implying you want to be able to TANK solo and have great matches? Again, and as some tanker was pinpointing before, TEAMWORK is the key. I can DO REALLY well with a tank,even if im a sucky tanker,because i use teamwork, the concept of this game is teamwork, and even as atanker if you are just playing solo and trying to take on another team alone, you will ,and deserve to die.
tanks are not OP, av is not UP. Agreed.
if there would be a limitation on vehicles, CCP would kill its pilot community here, this is not call of duty. AGAIN WITH CALL OF DUTY, everytime you say that i convince myself a little more that you are hmhm.. SLOW minded. OF COURSE THERE SHOULD BE A LIMITATION on vehicles. If vehicles get buffed and no limitations would exist this would be 12 tanks vs 12 tanks... i know THATS what you want,not only its stupid,but dont forget this is a FPS, and Infantry will and SHOULD always be present.
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1409
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:37:00 -
[83] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Please comment on my post Void...i wanna hear how you try and say your opinion has more merit then someone elses, given the same context. my opinion matters because I am a ******* tanker. how would you like your **** getting constantly ****** over without your consent. I have skilled into both tanks and AV, my opinion has much more merit than some ignorant biased shithead who doesn't want Dust to be Dust So...now you are assuming things? based on what? No, I don't have 15 mil SP invested into tanks. Do you? I went pure Forge gun after the HMG was decided by CCP to become a **** weapon. And i know for a fact, that against say...Ted Nugget, after 6 Forge gun shots against his Madruger, from an Ishukone Assault Forge gun with Prof 5 skill, he was still chugging along with a little under half HP out of my line of sight. 6 Forge hits, with a proto assault FG, with prof 5, with two complex damage mods...can't kill him because he knows how to tank, and knows when he needs to retreat. Now this was DURING his self judged execution of half a dozen blueberries. He was killing ****, while taking fire from a single Proto AVer, getting kills and still managed to easily get away. We all know that until you have the SP to properly fit a tank, its a water balloon ready to pop. We all ALSO know that a properly fitted tank is a damn god on the battlefield. Why can't you admit that? The entire vehicle and AV **** needs a rebalancing, and that will come eventually. What makes me assume you aren't a high SP tanker, or at least, not a pro...is your complete "ignorance" of both sides of the coin, or your simple refusal to admit that there's a problem on both ends of the Rock/Paper system. Either or, after 6 months you are simply sounding like a douche who cares for nothing but the resurrection of the godmode that was tanks in the past, with no argument on how to actually balance the two to be in sync. It's rock/paper/scissors. Even tanks HAVE to have a weakness in this game, or else wtf is the point of rock/paper/scissors? yeah I do have 15 mill invested in tanks. since when have I denied that there is a problem with the balance? wow... I hate bringing up my popularity status on the forums and hate bragging about anything but seriously.. do you know who I am? if you knew who I am, then you wouldn't be asking me those questions. im the loudest vehicle advocate of the community (I probably have more haters than anyone in the game). and anyone who knows of me knows that I despise infantry for the state of the game, and my fellow tankers know exactly what I want out of tanks, and its not godmode Yea, I've seen you complain consistently on the forums...as well as notice your total SP rising consistently. So you clearly are playing this game you hate so much. So, why is it that you "don't have a problem with balance", yet at every turn...complain about the balance between tanks and AV. Please link a post where you say "A properly fitted tank can do wonders on a battlefield". I couldn't find one. The only thing i ever see from you is that tanks are so god damn weak, that ANY solo AVer can pop them in a matter of seconds. Pray tell me where you talk about ACTUAL balance between AV and tanks, instead of simply buffing tanks to where it takes at least 3 AV to destroy, which you have stated SHOULD be the case in MANY posts.
seriously?
wow ignorance is bliss I guess, il should try it sometime, you seem to have a godly image of yourself because of it.
|
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
939
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:40:00 -
[84] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself.
You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool.
Thumbs up special guy! |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1410
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:41:00 -
[85] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
everything you know about tanks is wrong, dead wrong, try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy.
-You might be right, even with a 8mil + tanker accaunt i Might be wrong, no doubt on that one. Everybody makes mistakes. -You are asking me to tank SOLO. So you are implying you want to be able to TANK solo and have great matches? Again, and as some tanker was pinpointing before, TEAMWORK is the key. I can DO REALLY well with a tank,even if im a sucky tanker,because i use teamwork, the concept of this game is teamwork, and even as atanker if you are just playing solo and trying to take on another team alone, you will ,and deserve to die.
yeah...no I want survivability when going solo. whats wrong with being able to survive? tanks are not OP, av is not UP.
Agreed.what?
if there would be a limitation on vehicles, CCP would kill its pilot community here, this is not call of duty. AGAIN WITH CALL OF DUTY, everytime you say that i convince myself a little more that you are hmhm.. SLOW minded. OF COURSE THERE SHOULD BE A LIMITATION on vehicles. If vehicles get buffed and no limitations would exist this would be 12 tanks vs 12 tanks... i know THATS what you want,not only its stupid,but dont forget this is a FPS, and Infantry will and SHOULD always be present.
I bring up call of duty so much because everything you suggest is the way it is in call of duty, vehicles are not personally invested in any FPS game besides this one, there already is a vehicle limit genius, there can be a total of 8 vehicles on each side in skirmish
|
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
939
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:42:00 -
[86] - Quote
I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit.
Oh wait, he has never been tanking. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1155
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:46:00 -
[87] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit.
Oh wait, he has never been tanking.
I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f*** what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad.
Bro, you are sad |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:50:00 -
[88] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:The Attorney General wrote:I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit.
Oh wait, he has never been tanking. I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f*** what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad. Bro, you are sad
....what? are you actually implying that I am valuable to the community because I defend my views?
that could be why I have a lot of haters.. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1156
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:51:00 -
[89] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:The Attorney General wrote:I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit.
Oh wait, he has never been tanking. I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f*** what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad. Bro, you are sad ....what? are you actually implying that I am valuable to the community because I defend my views? that could be why I have a lot of haters..
SAme here
Wel of course, You having a different point of view than me doesnt make you ''pointless''. It would be a darn boring world if everybody thought the same. |
sixteensixty4
CAUSE 4 C0NCERN
86
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:54:00 -
[90] - Quote
Void Echo wrote: try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy. .
sixteensixty4 wrote: This is your problem, you expect to run around solo with no team help and still not get killed lol
to which you answer
Void Echo wrote: yeah....no, your dead wrong on that
and then
Void Echo wrote: that's fine and all, when your teamed up with competent people who will actually pay attention, listen and work for the team's victory... but no, most of the games I get in im always on the team with the stupid ass bluetards
contradict yourself much or what...
your a ******* idiot, plain and simple
|
|
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
939
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 03:55:00 -
[91] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:The Attorney General wrote:I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit.
Oh wait, he has never been tanking. I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f*** what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad. Bro, you are sad
Clearly, you have never taken the time to read my feedback in tanker threads, because I actually think Void wants to make tanks OP. I call for a much more rational approach to vehicle balancing than he does. I fully understand his position, but do not agree with the degree.
Out of most of the upper tier of tankers, I find myself consistently being the person arguing for no real buffs to tanks, just slight adjustments, especially with regards to shields v armor tanks.
But you would know none of these things because your sole intent is to try and rile people up. Your ridiculous statements and hilarious hyperbole is not arguing, nor is it in any way productive.
I have grown quite tired of those like you who seem to think that everything is just fine in the tank v infantry balance right now. Unlike most of you scrubs, I actually have a fully specced (16 million SP) out heavy with a prof 5 forge and proto grenades. So I know exactly how easy it is for AV to pop tanks like it is going out of style. I can consistently solo even the most stout of armor tanks.
So when I see posts about people not being able to kill tanks, I know they are either lying to prevent equilibrium from being reached, or they are just bad at what they do.
Can you say the same? Of course not. You speak only about one side of the argument, and from my experience as an AV troop, you clearly don't know what you are talking about. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:06:00 -
[92] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote:Void Echo wrote: try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy. .
sixteensixty4 wrote: This is your problem, you expect to run around solo with no team help and still not get killed lol
to which you answer Void Echo wrote: yeah....no, your dead wrong on that
and then Void Echo wrote: that's fine and all, when your teamed up with competent people who will actually pay attention, listen and work for the team's victory... but no, most of the games I get in im always on the team with the stupid ass bluetards
contradict yourself much or what... your a ******* idiot, plain and simple
haha, these quotes don't have any purpose without the posts they respond to.
truth is I have many, many opinions to talk about, I may seem contradicting at times, but only to the simple minded |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1156
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:07:00 -
[93] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:The Attorney General wrote:I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit.
Oh wait, he has never been tanking. I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f*** what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad. Bro, you are sad But you would know none of these things because your sole intent is to try and rile people up. Your ridiculous statements and hilarious hyperbole is not arguing, nor is it in any way productive. ===> ONLY IN THIS PAGE,you have 3 posts, only 1 has an actual elaborate text. Talk about being non productive.I have grown quite tired of those like you who seem to think that everything is just fine in the tank v infantry balance right now. Unlike most of you scrubs, I actually have a fully specced (16 million SP) out heavy with a prof 5 forge and proto grenades. So I know exactly how easy it is for AV to pop tanks like it is going out of style. I can consistently solo even the most stout of armor tanks. ===> Im a 15Mill AV specialist,i have proto FG, i have prof 4, and i have proto nades. You smashing weak tankers with your proto gear while in a full squad vs pub players doesnt prove anything. Any garbage player can do that.So when I see posts about people not being able to kill tanks, I know they are either lying to prevent equilibrium from being reached, or they are just bad at what they do. ===> As i stated before i only use as examples the times i CANT kill a tank as an example. Why would i use the times i own a tank as an example? like while they are in a city, eat 3 nades and then 1-2 FG shots and boom? Im not bad at what i do. Equilibrium on what? Tanks are already powerful(didnt say OP,just powerful), have you ever thought that maybe whats BALANCED for YOU,its not blanced for everyone else? havn't you thought, MAYBE , just MAYBE you might be wrong?. This video actually prooves my point on how strong a tanker can be. Can you say the same? Of course not. You speak only about one side of the argument, and from my experience as an AV troop, you clearly don't know what you are talking about.==========> Yeah i can say the same. Im only 1 mill behind you.'.Let me tell you something about experience. I play SOLO with my Proto Gear, i play to win, i dont pub stomp and actually , RARELY use my proto gear.You dont know what the battlefield looks like , TRULY.You are always with friends backing you up. Thats turned you soft,and deluded. You are the type of player that has a 5+Kd ratio,but when playing solo get owned my MLT scrambler pistols.
I know nowyou will say how awesome you are playing solo, 1HKO the enemy MCC with your prof 10 Forge gun.But not only i know its going to be BS,i dont care. |
sixteensixty4
CAUSE 4 C0NCERN
86
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:13:00 -
[94] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:haha, these quotes don't have any purpose without the posts they respond to. truth is I have many, many opinions to talk about, I may seem contradicting at times, but only to the simple minded
They clearly they do, but carry on, its rather amusing |
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S.
198
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:15:00 -
[95] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps.
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:16:00 -
[96] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote:Void Echo wrote:haha, these quotes don't have any purpose without the posts they respond to. truth is I have many, many opinions to talk about, I may seem contradicting at times, but only to the simple minded They clearly they do, but carry on, its rather amusing
LOL, that's l have to say to you |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:18:00 -
[97] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps.
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast.
and that's why we can survive the AV hammering at the current times, do you not want tanks to be use right now?
do you want them to be completely useless? sounds like you do |
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S.
199
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:33:00 -
[98] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps. Keep
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. and that's why we can survive the AV hammering at the current times, do you not want tanks to be use right now? do you want them to be completely useless? sounds like you do No I don't want them to be useless. I want them to be more like they should be. Armor tanks should have massive HP and good damage capabilities but a low repair rate, low speed with high acceleration. Shield take should be much flimsier, but have stupidly fast reps, super high damage, and high speed with slow acceleration.Armor tanks should be brawler-like, driving right into the fray and causing mayhem for awhile before they leave. While Shield tanks should be hit and run or ambush type vehicles, zipping around(compared to armor tanks) and doing massive damage as they drive by, or getting behind the enemy to surprise them with huge alpha damage. |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
941
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:35:00 -
[99] - Quote
Checkmate, you really need to learn how to quote properly. Your posts are both difficult to read, and even more difficult to respond to without making a proper mess.
I will try and dissect your post, but it will take some time because of your horrible formatting.
The numbers used refer to the bolded portions you provided in your reply to my post.
1. Non point. One does not need length to create a proper statement. In the words of GZA, "Make it brief son, half short and twice strong"
2. When I said I can consistently solo tankers, that means any tanker. Not weaklings, not scrubs, but actual tankers. No one cares about how fast we can blow up somas. Solo, in squad, doesn't matter. Because it is not difficult.
3. You would have no idea what I think is balanced, because you have never asked me. So your assumptions on my opinions of what is balanced are irrelevant. Could I be wrong? Of course. No one is infallible. But since I am not arguing for nerfs to AV aside from some slight modifications to swarms and AV nades, and since I don't want buffs to armor tanks, I would consider my approach quite rational.
4. You missed the point of my argument. I have both a 16 million SP AV troop AND a 16 million SP tanker. You do not. So when I say that I can speak as someone who has much experience on both sides of the fight, that is something you can not compare to. I have played both sides, and am quite aware of the limitations and restrictions both classes have. You make it seem like you are the only guy who ever runs solo, which is hilariously misinformed.
You don't know how I play, you don't know whom I play with, or when I do or do not run solo. So thinking that that in some way validates your argument is foolhardy and shameful as a debate tactic.
You can try and talk ****, but when I go and add you to my contacts, you better have some stats to back up that game you pretend to have. Because I don't care if you run solo, if you have some scrubby stats, I am going to get a real good laugh. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:37:00 -
[100] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Void Echo wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:i think we all see the problem here... armor reps. Keep
that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. and that's why we can survive the AV hammering at the current times, do you not want tanks to be use right now? do you want them to be completely useless? sounds like you do No I don't want them to be useless. I want them to be more like they should be. Armor tanks should have massive HP and good damage capabilities but a low repair rate, low speed with high acceleration. Shield take should be much flimsier, but have stupidly fast reps, super high damage, and high speed with slow acceleration.Armor tanks should be brawler-like, driving right into the fray and causing mayhem for awhile before they leave. While Shield tanks should be hit and run or ambush type vehicles, zipping around(compared to armor tanks) and doing massive damage as they drive by, or getting behind the enemy to surprise them with huge alpha damage.
right now, shields don't have the ability to survive for very long, like you say, as a result, they are rarely used. |
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1161
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:46:00 -
[101] - Quote
Checkmate, you really need to learn how to quote properly. Your posts are both difficult to read, and even more difficult to respond to without making a proper mess. ==> Yup Sorry about that.
I will try and dissect your post, but it will take some time because of your horrible formatting.
The numbers used refer to the bolded portions you provided in your reply to my post.
1. Non point. One does not need length to create a proper statement. In the words of GZA, "Make it brief son, half short and twice strong" ==> Yeah i was actually talking about your posts with trolling or insulting and no actual imput. You know like the one saying im to be ignored? Thing that you say it should be done but dont do yourself? yeah...very solid opinions right there...
2. When I said I can consistently solo tankers, that means any tanker. Not weaklings, not scrubs, but actual tankers. No one cares about how fast we can blow up somas. Solo, in squad, doesn't matter. Because it is not difficult. ===> Depends on the map.Depends on the tanker.If they stay still we agree.Its not difficult.
3. You would have no idea what I think is balanced, because you have never asked me. So your assumptions on my opinions of what is balanced are irrelevant. Could I be wrong? Of course. No one is infallible. But since I am not arguing for nerfs to AV aside from some slight modifications to swarms and AV nades, and since I don't want buffs to armor tanks, I would consider my approach quite rational. ===> Well it is. Now please tell me and enlighten me, and you can even quote me from any post that is tank related. WHEN HAVE I SAID TANKS NEED A NERF? So , DDo YOU KNOW what i think is balanced? no, im just countering arguments the tankers are posting.
4. You missed the point of my argument. I have both a 16 million SP AV troop AND a 16 million SP tanker. You do not. So when I say that I can speak as someone who has much experience on both sides of the fight, that is something you can not compare to. I have played both sides, and am quite aware of the limitations and restrictions both classes have. You make it seem like you are the only guy who ever runs solo, which is hilariously misinformed. ====> I have an 8 million tanker and a 15million AV.So you missed my point too, i might not be as experienced as you with both sides,and i must admit i am a pretty sucky tanker, but i have enough experience to talk about tanks in a teamwork enviroment.I dont think im the only guy who enjoys running solo and not pub stomp,sadly, this si corp related. I have never seen ANYONE of your corp play a solo match. So there by my elaboration on your lack of knowledge on what a real BF is. And please corect me if im wrong, 75% of the time,you run in a squad.
You don't know how I play, you don't know whom I play with, or when I do or do not run solo. So thinking that that in some way validates your argument is foolhardy and shameful as a debate tactic. ===> Now you are playing smartass again. You basically implied exaclty the same,before me. Implying i dont know anything,my lack of experience and scrubiness,this without knowing how i play, for whow long have i played,with whom i play,etc.... SO,This kind of invalidates YOUR point too.if you can just judge from some posts i've made, so can i.
You can try and talk ****, but when I go and add you to my contacts, you better have some stats to back up that game you pretend to have. Because I don't care if you run solo, if you have some scrubby stats, I am going to get a real good laugh. ===> HAve your laugh, i play for the win, not stats. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
299
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:46:00 -
[102] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
seriously?
wow ignorance is bliss I guess, il should try it sometime, you seem to have a godly image of yourself because of it.
So, im ignorant because i read your previous posts? You know what, i agree with you. i have a godly image of myself.
Just to humour my own ego, point out in my post where I'm "providing a godly image of myself".
|
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
299
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:48:00 -
[103] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself.
You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy!
Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing **** that doesn't make sense with anything I've said.
Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise.
I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period.
Tell me how I'm wrong?
Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter."
Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:53:00 -
[104] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself.
You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing **** that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? Edit - oh wait, you already used an insult as your entire counter argument. Well played sir. You get a like for your originality.
LOL like you have any valid points to offer, if you do then please present them, you haven't done anything otherwise |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 04:59:00 -
[105] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself.
You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing **** that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? Edit - oh wait, you already used an insult as your entire counter argument. Well played sir. You get a like for your originality. LOL like you have any valid points to offer, if you do then please present them, you haven't done anything otherwise
Are you saying you've provided valid points?
I would quote myself one page back, but I'm sure you would pass it off like you did when i typed it earlier.
You claimed you are all for a balanced Vehicle vs AV.
Yet i stated, based on ALL of your posts that corroborate my comment on you feeling tanks are so weak they should ONLY be able to be destroyed by at least 3 AV (please sir, don't make me link previous posts of yours and make you look god awful ********).
Why instead of admitting you feel that way, you resort to insults?
Please enlighten me on how thats balancing Dust again? all your other posts are just you complaining proto AVers can somehow solo you with ultimate ease. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1411
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:01:00 -
[106] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself.
You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing **** that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? Edit - oh wait, you already used an insult as your entire counter argument. Well played sir. You get a like for your originality. LOL like you have any valid points to offer, if you do then please present them, you haven't done anything otherwise Are you saying you've provided valid points? I would quote myself one page back, but I'm sure you would pass it off like you did when i typed it earlier. You claimed you are all for a balanced Vehicle vs AV. Yet i stated, based on ALL of your posts that corroborate my comment on you feeling tanks are so weak they should ONLY be able to be destroyed by at least 3 AV (please sir, don't make me link previous posts of yours and make you look god awful ********). Why instead of admitting you feel that way, you resort to insults? Please enlighten me on how thats balancing Dust again? all your other posts are just you complaining proto AVers can somehow solo you with ultimate ease.
I honestly don't know what your point here is.... that's what im trying to figure out |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:01:00 -
[107] - Quote
I've fought a single tank that has solo'd 16 AVer's in a single game.
God damn, tanks are so OP its like they are gods!
Why CCP are you letting a single tank be able to withstand 16 people with Proto AV!?
~see? Now i can post like you Void. With bold faced ******* lies. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:02:00 -
[108] - Quote
If you still can't see my point from that post above.
You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1412
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:11:00 -
[109] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:If you still can't see my point from that post above.
You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying.
lies? you think im telling lies?
humorous, tell me, do you believe I lie because your infantry and your against vehicles or did you get your information from your friends.
I don't tell lies, if you think im lying about what I post, then your the delusional one |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:15:00 -
[110] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:If you still can't see my point from that post above.
You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying. lies? you think im telling lies? humorous, tell me, do you believe I lie because your infantry and your against vehicles or did you get your information from your friends. I don't tell lies, if you think im lying about what I post, then your the delusional one
I believe you lie, because I've read a post in this thread that said "I'm all for balance with vehicle and AV", then in dozens of other posts you type "At least three AVers should be needed to take out a single tank."
Jesus man, this is what....the third post in this thread of stating the same lie you yourself typed?
How many counter posts are you gonna create saying "Where did i lie?"
I'll do you a solid, again, you claim you want balanced vehicle vs AV...yet claim you want at least 3 AVer's to be able to take out a tank. *Hint* thats not balanced at all.
Shall we go another round of repetition? |
|
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:21:00 -
[111] - Quote
Actually, i have work at 8 am.
I already have to watch 4 episodes of DVR recorded Adventure Time every morning to appease my daughter.
Please provide me with another post asking where you lied at, and how I have no idea what I'm talking about, even though all your previous posts are open for view by everyone.
I'll enjoy the humour tomorrow morning as i stack DVD's onto the shelves.
(Be sure to make fun of my current profession, lord knows the only thing you do when trapped in a corner, like a rat, is the attempt at insults.) |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1412
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:36:00 -
[112] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Actually, i have work at 8 am.
I already have to watch 4 episodes of DVR recorded Adventure Time every morning to appease my daughter.
Please provide me with another post asking where you lied at, and how I have no idea what I'm talking about, even though all your previous posts are open for view by everyone.
I'll enjoy the humour tomorrow morning as i stack DVD's onto the shelves.
(Be sure to make fun of my current profession, lord knows the only thing you do when trapped in a corner, like a rat, is the attempt at insults.)
I don't lie, everything I say is what I believe, you thinking that taking a minimum of 3 AVers to take down a tank is me countering my own posts? your the delusional one. |
Texs Red
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
54
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:40:00 -
[113] - Quote
King Checkmate why do you use bold and capitalized print all the time? I mean is it really necessary? It really does not help get your point across any better and most of the time when I read your posts I get this mental image of some red faced hater foaming at the mouth. I would like to read your posts and not get a head ache. |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 05:45:00 -
[114] - Quote
Void Echo wrote: I don't lie, everything I say is what I believe, you thinking that taking a minimum of 3 AVers to take down a tank is me countering my own posts? your the delusional one.
lol. I had to share this post with my wife and step brother.
They loved it as much as i did.
You are now my favourite forum toy.
Rest assured, I'll be looking up your forum posts and showcasing your "logic". It truly is a horribly beautiful sight. |
DootDoot
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 06:00:00 -
[115] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex
Tankers who think they should fight infantry all day and have an advantage are sick people.
There is a call in limit on tanks for maps... reduce the efficacy drastically on tanks... Make them cost slight over dropsuits... and let the tanks reign...
People who think tankers should be a privileged few... are just biased and blowing smoke up each others ass in 200 threads a month. |
Shattered Mirage
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
274
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 06:03:00 -
[116] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Duran Lex wrote:
Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better?
You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch.
Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly?
But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself.
You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy!
Dude.... heavies really are UP...
The only viable weapon for the is the FG.... the HMG is useless for the most part. |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
943
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 06:21:00 -
[117] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:
I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period.
Tell me how I'm wrong?
.
Beyond the fact that opinions on the heavy are split by those who preferred the shield heavies(most people) or armor heavies(me). Most of the shield fatties were upset because they got forced into a roll much like how I already played as a heavy.
Stats wise, your HP is up, weapon damage is up, HMG range is down, turn speed is up, strafe speed is up. With the armor buffs, 1200 HP is easy.
Sure it sucks to have only one frame, but you are stretching to make comparisons to the degree of nerf tanks have taken.
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1641
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 07:03:00 -
[118] - Quote
i accept my victory. no one wanted to fight me on the clear mathematical fact that the armor reps are the problem. its ok, i accept everyone's surrender.
" the eHP is around 11,000 before you count reppers, so a 20,000 eHP armor tank. not OP or anything at all.
proto SL 6 rounds base fire 6x330damage missiles= 14,300~ abouts and takes i forgot, 12 second about to fire.and that's with the bonus damage to armor.
the hard counter to armor tanks is more effective on shields... how hard of a counter is it then?"
that is all.
Fizzer94 wrote: But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast.
they repair between 5100-6300 btw. |
Xender17
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
637
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 07:27:00 -
[119] - Quote
Gunnlogis are crap |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
2118
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 12:17:00 -
[120] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
I could care less about infantry, they are the ones that got us into this mess in the 1st place.
did you even bother looking on the enemy team he was fighting against? there was NO ORGANIZATION, NO INTELLIGENCE AND NO DEDICATED AV ON THEIR SIDE, all the seem to have was standard AV.
you expect people intelligence and knowledge with what they do and with higher level modules to be soloed by some random red that is too lazy to fully skill into AV like they should that is too ******* stupid to use teamwork like they demand for us?
Call of Dusty is that way: ===================================>
-1st/ Stop it with the CoD crap.Its getting old and its not insulting,just stupid. I;ve never played that game, I played MAG. -2nd/World of TANKS is that way (XD) =========> -3rd/ The difference between you and me is i do KIND of care about vehicles ,because they are a part of the game i like. There for, making all my opinions more valid than your tank loving biased opinions. 4th/Yes i see the randoms trying to win an already finished match, but when you tankers get killed by AV weaponry, you also dont see the ifantry behind you throwing packed AV nades, the FGunner sniping you from a roof?.. NO , you only saw 2 swarms coming your way and came in to QQ how a Proto SL totally wrecks your tank. 5th/I have fully skilled Proto AV. I even have proficiency.Im an above avarege player and even with some help sometimes is impossible to drop a tank. So no, i dont want some random scrub with MLT swarms to drop a tank. I want tankers to start realizing , THEY ARE NOT BEING SOLOED. they are being hunt down by different AV players at the time .... That they do. LOL your opinion matters more than a tanker on the subject of tanks? tanks do get soloed by AV, all the ******* time, an example is lowrateshitman's video of him soloing someone with lolnades, and he has the same ****** biased mindset as you. I went from long time Solo AV tank killer to a tanker. The sheer amount of fire power we take during the cause of the match is insane, it worse when one player can actually, on his own, constitute 2-3 players fire power in 3 AV grenades, which withing the grand scheme of things are weapons that don't make sense.
|
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1431
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:04:00 -
[121] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote: I don't lie, everything I say is what I believe, you thinking that taking a minimum of 3 AVers to take down a tank is me countering my own posts? your the delusional one. lol. I had to share this post with my wife and step brother. They loved it as much as i did. You are now my favourite forum toy. Rest assured, I'll be looking up your forum posts and showcasing your "logic". It truly is a horribly beautiful sight.
go ahead, I don't give a **** who reads my stuff here, if you have a wife a kid who completely agrees with you, then good for you man, you have a good marriage.
but my logic is not wrong because you think its wrong, nothing I say contradicts myself and my opinions |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1431
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:07:00 -
[122] - Quote
DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex Tankers who think they should fight infantry all day and have an advantage are sick people. There is a call in limit on tanks for maps... reduce the efficacy drastically on tanks... Make them cost slight over dropsuits... and let the tanks reign... People who think tankers should be a privileged few... are just biased and blowing smoke up each others ass in 200 threads a month.
agreed on the point that tankers are ****** up if they want to kill infantry mainly with it, I myself and many others have skilled into tanks for the tank battles, destroying enemy vehicles is one of our main reasons, we could care less about infantry unless they have AV.
the efficiency is ******* low as it is, we barely survive anything, if you reduce anything we have already, you effectively kill tanks altogether. we need buffs, no more unwarranted nerfs. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1431
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:17:00 -
[123] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Void Echo wrote:Duran Lex wrote:If you still can't see my point from that post above.
You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying. lies? you think im telling lies? humorous, tell me, do you believe I lie because your infantry and your against vehicles or did you get your information from your friends. I don't tell lies, if you think im lying about what I post, then your the delusional one I believe you lie, because I've read a post in this thread that said "I'm all for balance with vehicle and AV", then in dozens of other posts you type "At least three AVers should be needed to take out a single tank." Jesus man, this is what....the third post in this thread of stating the same lie you yourself typed? How many counter posts are you gonna create saying "Where did i lie?" I'll do you a solid, again, you claim you want balanced vehicle vs AV...yet claim you want at least 3 AVer's to be able to take out a tank. *Hint* thats not balanced at all. Shall we go another round of repetition?
none of those are lies, did you ever think that my view is balance in my eyes? and others agree with me on that.
just because you think my posts contradict each other doesn't mean they do, it just means you don't understand my words or conversations. nothing I do contradicts myself.
again, if you think that, you don't know me or my words. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1168
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:19:00 -
[124] - Quote
Texs Red wrote:King Checkmate why do you use bold and capitalized print all the time? I mean is it really necessary? It really does not help get your point across any better and most of the time when I read your posts I get this mental image of some red faced hater foaming at the mouth. I would like to read your posts and not get a head ache.
HAHA BRO! X3
That was funny and not, im a little blind and lost my glasses a while ago, i dont have money to buy another pair at the moment so i use bold to better locate my OWN posts in a thread. Sorry, but as soon as i buy new glasses it should be over XD hahah.
|
Phazoid
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
39
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:24:00 -
[125] - Quote
i think tanks should have a damage resistance to swarm launchers, since swarm launcher(i think) were made to kill dropships, and forge guns were made to put a stop to tanks, the problem is why one player with skills on tanks should destroy everyone else while another player with the same skills on AV cant take down single handed the other player on the tank, see the problem?, i understand the differences on isk and SP, but why a player should be much more powerful that another player with its counter weapons is not enough to kill him?, the thing is tanks can soak damage from 80 percent of the weapons, now the weapons made to defeat them are av grenades FG and swarm launchers, the other weapons are useless, so there is that problem, now im not going to say that tanks are op, they are not but they are not up as well, the real problem to tankers is the isk cost of 1 tank that gets killed, so they hardly go positive, but of course they should not be able to tank FG hits, now there are AV weapons that are missing as well so its hard to balance. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1434
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:31:00 -
[126] - Quote
Phazoid wrote:i think tanks should have a damage resistance to swarm launchers, since swarm launcher(i think) were made to kill dropships, and forge guns were made to put a stop to tanks, the problem is why one player with skills on tanks should destroy everyone else while another player with the same skills on AV cant take down single handed the other player on the tank, see the problem?, i understand the differences on isk and SP, but why a player should be much more powerful that another player with its counter weapons is not enough to kill him?, the thing is tanks can soak damage from 80 percent of the weapons, now the weapons made to defeat them are av grenades FG and swarm launchers, the other weapons are useless, so there is that problem, now im not going to say that tanks are op, they are not but they are not up as well, the real problem to tankers is the isk cost of 1 tank that gets killed, so they hardly go positive, but of course they should not be able to tank FG hits, now there are AV weapons that are missing as well so its hard to balance.
if you think 1 dropsuit = 1 tank, then why can you not put a large rail gun on a heavy? because its not a vehicle? *gasp
if dropsuits = vehicles, then why aren't dropsuits bigger than one person? |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1168
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:32:00 -
[127] - Quote
True Adamance wrote: I went from long time Solo AV tank killer to a tanker. The sheer amount of fire power we take during the cause of the match is insane, it worse when one player can actually, on his own, constitute 2-3 players fire power in 3 AV grenades, which withing the grand scheme of things are weapons that don't make sense.
Why? is not balanced? The shotgun is a VERY powerful light weapon , capable of 1-2 HKOing any med frame. Nobody cries about it BECAUSE you need to GET CLOSE. Yet, TANKERS, with the ability to use good ACTIVE SCANNERS,have insane Armor rep abilities and 5000+ HP, COMPLAIN because an infantry man was suicidal enough to RUN TOWARDS atank ,and try to connect some AV nades.
OF COURSE,you have been a powerful AV infantry player,but it seems to me that you are thinking your ''balance'' from a tanker point of view. There by, BIASED.
Have you forgoten the lame SPEED on heavies. How everything KILLS you even MLT AR while being a heavy ? Have you forgotten the feeling of running towards an enemy tank to throw grenades and then, oops he saw me.Your dead.. Have you forgotten the TIME it takes to throw a swarm volley , and when infantry starts shooting at you the whole 3-4 seconds it takes for your character to react and acutally CHANGE weapons? When your AV nade decides to not home in on a tank and just falls dead on the floor? When you are Just about to kill a tank,but need to reload,and while you are at it the tank RUNS away or regenerated -++ his HP? ARE YOU FORGETTING THE FACT, that in the WHOLE game, there are only 4 weapons to actually damage a and 1 of them doesnt even work?
Again , i call BS on the ''SOLO AV Specialist'', im pretty sure, as every Zion i've ever met , you run in Squads most of the time and have even Stat Pad several times, SPECIALLY as a forge gunner. BUT, Putting aside the fact that most of the times you had a squad backing you up, you really cant remember any of those feelings?
Anyhow, i think tankers (And of course you and Void echo) should stop asking for Nerfs on AV weaponry and wait to see what CCP brings us with the next vehicle balance update. Until then, we are just stuck in the same cycle.... |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1434
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:47:00 -
[128] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:True Adamance wrote: I went from long time Solo AV tank killer to a tanker. The sheer amount of fire power we take during the cause of the match is insane, it worse when one player can actually, on his own, constitute 2-3 players fire power in 3 AV grenades, which withing the grand scheme of things are weapons that don't make sense.
Why? is not balanced? The shotgun is a VERY powerful light weapon , capable of 1-2 HKOing any med frame. Nobody cries about it BECAUSE you need to GET CLOSE. Yet, TANKERS, with the ability to use good ACTIVE SCANNERS,have insane Armor rep abilities and 5000+ HP, COMPLAIN because an infantry man was suicidal enough to RUN TOWARDS atank ,and try to connect some AV nades. OF COURSE,you have been a powerful AV infantry player,but it seems to me that you are thinking your ''balance'' from a tanker point of view. There by, BIASED. Have you forgoten the lame SPEED on heavies. How everything KILLS you even MLT AR while being a heavy ? Have you forgotten the feeling of running towards an enemy tank to throw grenades and then, oops he saw me.Your dead.. Have you forgotten the TIME it takes to throw a swarm volley , and when infantry starts shooting at you the whole 3-4 seconds it takes for your character to react and acutally CHANGE weapons? When your AV nade decides to not home in on a tank and just falls dead on the floor? When you are Just about to kill a tank,but need to reload,and while you are at it the tank RUNS away or regenerated -++ his HP? ARE YOU FORGETTING THE FACT, that in the WHOLE game, there are only 4 weapons to actually damage a and 1 of them doesnt even work?
Again , i call BS on the ''SOLO AV Specialist'', im pretty sure, as every Zion i've ever met , you run in Squads most of the time and have even Stat Pad several times, SPECIALLY as a forge gunner. BUT, Putting aside the fact that most of the times you had a squad backing you up, you really cant remember any of those feelings? Anyhow, i think tankers (And of course you and Void echo) should stop asking for Nerfs on AV weaponry and wait to see what CCP brings us with the next vehicle balance update. Until then, we are just stuck in the same cycle....
how many times do I have to say it before you people actually see it, do I have to put it in bold and underlined words?
I guess I have to.
IM WAITING FOR THE **** TO GET CHANGED BECAUSE THE BALANCE DOESNT EXIST. I PUT THIS VIDEO HERE TO SHOW EVERYONE A NON BIAS WAY OF EXPLAINING THE TANK SIDE. |
Fox Gaden
Immortal Guides
1100
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:12:00 -
[129] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:ANDRE T3hGIANT wrote:He goes 22-0 vs dedicated anti tank players... and he's new at it. Nerf tanks. You have got to be kidding me. Those guys were using either militia or standard SLs. I think I saw one advanced one. None of those guys were dedicated AV. Not to mention the fact that it is clear they did not read my guide: Fox Guide: Swarm Launcher, Unleashing the Swarm. Just standing out in a field with no cover.
____________________________________________________________________________ Immortal Guides, supporting knowledge dissemination in New Eden since August 31, 2013. |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
973
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:12:00 -
[130] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:True Adamance wrote: I went from long time Solo AV tank killer to a tanker. The sheer amount of fire power we take during the cause of the match is insane, it worse when one player can actually, on his own, constitute 2-3 players fire power in 3 AV grenades, which withing the grand scheme of things are weapons that don't make sense.
Why? is not balanced? The shotgun is a VERY powerful light weapon , capable of 1-2 HKOing any med frame. Nobody cries about it BECAUSE you need to GET CLOSE. Yet, TANKERS, with the ability to use good ACTIVE SCANNERS,have insane Armor rep abilities and 5000+ HP, COMPLAIN because an infantry man was suicidal enough to RUN TOWARDS atank ,and try to connect some AV nades. OF COURSE,you have been a powerful AV infantry player,but it seems to me that you are thinking your ''balance'' from a tanker point of view. There by, BIASED. Have you forgoten the lame SPEED on heavies. How everything KILLS you even MLT AR while being a heavy ? Have you forgotten the feeling of running towards an enemy tank to throw grenades and then, oops he saw me.Your dead.. Have you forgotten the TIME it takes to throw a swarm volley , and when infantry starts shooting at you the whole 3-4 seconds it takes for your character to react and acutally CHANGE weapons? When your AV nade decides to not home in on a tank and just falls dead on the floor? When you are Just about to kill a tank,but need to reload,and while you are at it the tank RUNS away or regenerated -++ his HP? ARE YOU FORGETTING THE FACT, that in the WHOLE game, there are only 4 weapons to actually damage a and 1 of them doesnt even work?
Again , i call BS on the ''SOLO AV Specialist'', im pretty sure, as every Zion i've ever met , you run in Squads most of the time and have even Stat Pad several times, SPECIALLY as a forge gunner. BUT, Putting aside the fact that most of the times you had a squad backing you up, you really cant remember any of those feelings? Anyhow, i think tankers (And of course you and Void echo) should stop asking for Nerfs on AV weaponry and wait to see what CCP brings us with the next vehicle balance update. Until then, we are just stuck in the same cycle....
Heavy in an LAV is very fast. Faster than a rail tanks turret traverse, and can almost outpace a blaster turret if they dare to get really close. But they don't need to, they just need to drive up, whip out three AV nades and then shoot the tank once with a decent forge, and bam, no more tank.
If you can't build a fat suit to withstand at least 6 hits from a blaster turret, then you don't know how to build a tank killer fit, and no wonder you are having so much trouble.
Why would you run directly at a tank when you can crash an LAV into him, obscuring your location and allowing you the time and opportunity to kill him with just your AV nades?
I don't know about swarms. I do know people who use them, and have played on a friends account with prof 3 swarms. Being able to mag dump in less than 6 seconds is just dumb. I mean it is great for swarm users, but putting out more damage than the forge is just stupid.
If your AV nade didn't home in, it is because you need to throw better. Simple really. They have a seek radius you know.
Why would you need to reload mid engagement? Hit them twice, reload, then go in for the kill. This stuff isn't rocket science, and I am amazed at how ignorant of tank fighting you seem to be.
Four weapons that can damage tanks?? You sir are not counting the creative options. Flux grenades and a Mass driver can pop shield tanks. I took out a soma with my Boundless once. So yes, there are some AV weapons, but instead of small arms fire being ineffective against armor, it actually works, which is just silly.
To top it all off, you try and call out Zion, but you are not even quoting me. You keep "playing for the win" and not getting it.
I tried to give you a chance to be something other than a complete idiot, but you have failed horribly on that front, and you still refuse to try and actually debate.
Back on the ignore list with you. |
|
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
368
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:21:00 -
[131] - Quote
if tanks r so op then why do they require shield bosters and armor reps and all the other modules JUST TO SURVIVE A SINGLE AV ENCOUNTER?! |
DootDoot
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
56
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:47:00 -
[132] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex Tankers who think they should fight infantry all day and have an advantage are sick people. There is a call in limit on tanks for maps... reduce the efficacy drastically on tanks... Make them cost slight over dropsuits... and let the tanks reign... People who think tankers should be a privileged few... are just biased and blowing smoke up each others ass in 200 threads a month. agreed on the point that tankers are ****** up if they want to kill infantry mainly with it, I myself and many others have skilled into tanks for the tank battles, destroying enemy vehicles is one of our main reasons, we could care less about infantry unless they have AV. the efficiency is ******* low as it is, we barely survive anything, if you reduce anything we have already, you effectively kill tanks altogether. we need buffs, no more unwarranted nerfs.
I disagree.
I think tanks should be weakened and made a lot cheaper and expendable... That way its a staple of DUST 514. So they are maxed out called on every battlefield... there would be ton's of vehicle on vehicle battles... and if an infantry chooses to run AV it will be to support one of his tanker buddies to kill other tanks... and would be at a massive disadvantage in the infantry vs infantry engagements.
the way it is right now is Completely broken and no way to balance or fix it.
You cant make tankers some elitist privileged group...It's game breaking. Relevant tanks should be accessible to all player groups... Then that player makes the decision if he wants to practice as a full time tanker or move on to the many other choices in DUST.... |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1440
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:01:00 -
[133] - Quote
DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex Tankers who think they should fight infantry all day and have an advantage are sick people. There is a call in limit on tanks for maps... reduce the efficacy drastically on tanks... Make them cost slight over dropsuits... and let the tanks reign... People who think tankers should be a privileged few... are just biased and blowing smoke up each others ass in 200 threads a month. agreed on the point that tankers are ****** up if they want to kill infantry mainly with it, I myself and many others have skilled into tanks for the tank battles, destroying enemy vehicles is one of our main reasons, we could care less about infantry unless they have AV. the efficiency is ******* low as it is, we barely survive anything, if you reduce anything we have already, you effectively kill tanks altogether. we need buffs, no more unwarranted nerfs. I disagree. I think tanks should be weakened and made a lot cheaper and expendable... That way its a staple of DUST 514. So they are maxed out called on every battlefield... there would be ton's of vehicle on vehicle battles... and if an infantry chooses to run AV it will be to support one of his tanker buddies to kill other tanks... and would be at a massive disadvantage in the infantry vs infantry engagements. the way it is right now is Completely broken and no way to balance or fix it. You cant make tankers some elitist privileged group...It's game breaking. Relevant tanks should be accessible to all player groups... Then that player makes the decision if he wants to practice as a full time tanker or move on to the many other choices in DUST....
with the way it is now, tanking is some kind of elitest group, only the best of us can survive every round and turn some kind of profit.
don't make tanks weaker, they are already trash, if you want to reduce anything the way it s now, reduce the price, tanks are not worth their price. |
DootDoot
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
58
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:24:00 -
[134] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex Tankers who think they should fight infantry all day and have an advantage are sick people. There is a call in limit on tanks for maps... reduce the efficacy drastically on tanks... Make them cost slight over dropsuits... and let the tanks reign... People who think tankers should be a privileged few... are just biased and blowing smoke up each others ass in 200 threads a month. agreed on the point that tankers are ****** up if they want to kill infantry mainly with it, I myself and many others have skilled into tanks for the tank battles, destroying enemy vehicles is one of our main reasons, we could care less about infantry unless they have AV. the efficiency is ******* low as it is, we barely survive anything, if you reduce anything we have already, you effectively kill tanks altogether. we need buffs, no more unwarranted nerfs. I disagree. I think tanks should be weakened and made a lot cheaper and expendable... That way its a staple of DUST 514. So they are maxed out called on every battlefield... there would be ton's of vehicle on vehicle battles... and if an infantry chooses to run AV it will be to support one of his tanker buddies to kill other tanks... and would be at a massive disadvantage in the infantry vs infantry engagements. the way it is right now is Completely broken and no way to balance or fix it. You cant make tankers some elitist privileged group...It's game breaking. Relevant tanks should be accessible to all player groups... Then that player makes the decision if he wants to practice as a full time tanker or move on to the many other choices in DUST.... with the way it is now, tanking is some kind of elitest group, only the best of us can survive every round and turn some kind of profit. don't make tanks weaker, they are already trash, if you want to reduce anything the way it s now, reduce the price, tanks are not worth their price.
Tanks are used primarily as infantry killers in everything BUT PC..... if you want to go up against a bunch of infantry all packing some AV... your gonna die... any 1 vs 3-5 situation usually doesn't yield well for a person without a lot of luck being present why a tank should be different?.
That's the problem... tanks should be fighting tanks as you said... And with its current strength either the tank is owning or they are about to explode.... because either its the tank vs 1-2 at a time or its vs 4-10+more at a time...
If tanks are playing to fight other tanks gameplay changes... the way they even fit the tanks and choose their squad's change... The entire gameplay around tanks are changed....
They are to powerful to be running full strength and numbers on maps.... they would squash everything like a joke if there was enough tankers running that way every match...
They need a complete overhaul in the way they even work in this game... And that start's from reducing the efficacy drastically so we can field more... then of course cost reductions so players will actually field them..
Running no loss's shouldn't be the only way a tanker goes isk positive in a match... and creates a MASSIVE balance problem from the word go. |
Melchiah ARANeAE
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
27
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:33:00 -
[135] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
your stupid if you have the mindset that vehicles are meant to be **** and this should be mainly or purely an infantry game
Your stupid since you want to turn DUST514 into Twisted metal. ITS A FPS.First person SHOOTER.not tanker. SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOTERYeah you can be important, not you will not be the main character .
Have you forgotten that tanks do, in fact, shoot? |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1169
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:38:00 -
[136] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
how many times do I have to say it before you people actually see it, do I have to put it in bold and underlined words?
I guess I have to.
IM WAITING FOR THE **** TO GET CHANGED BECAUSE THE BALANCE DOESNT EXIST. I PUT THIS VIDEO HERE TO SHOW EVERYONE A NON BIAS WAY OF EXPLAINING THE TANK SIDE.
That video is very biased.
Saying yeah : the forge gun, it needs to be powerful===. then: IT NEEDA A NERF. The : Tanks are UP ==> Kills somebody every 20 seconds LOL....
Yea lets wait and then e can kill each other in the forums... |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1440
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:38:00 -
[137] - Quote
DootDoot wrote: Tanks are used primarily as infantry killers in everything BUT PC..... if you want to go up against a bunch of infantry all packing some AV... your gonna die... any 1 vs 3-5 situation usually doesn't yield well for a person without a lot of luck being present why a tank should be different?.
That's the problem... tanks should be fighting tanks as you said... And with its current strength either the tank is owning or they are about to explode.... because either its the tank vs 1-2 at a time or its vs 4-10+more at a time...
If tanks are playing to fight other tanks gameplay changes... the way they even fit the tanks and choose their squad's change... The entire gameplay around tanks are changed....
They are to powerful to be running full strength and numbers on maps.... they would squash everything like a joke if there was enough tankers running that way every match...
They need a complete overhaul in the way they even work in this game... And that start's from reducing the efficacy drastically so we can field more... then of course cost reductions so players will actually field them..
Running no loss's shouldn't be the only way a tanker goes isk positive in a match... and creates a MASSIVE balance problem from the word go.
every tanker I know didn't skill into tanks to kill infantry, we all did it to kill other tanks. |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1440
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:46:00 -
[138] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
how many times do I have to say it before you people actually see it, do I have to put it in bold and underlined words?
I guess I have to.
IM WAITING FOR THE **** TO GET CHANGED BECAUSE THE BALANCE DOESNT EXIST. I PUT THIS VIDEO HERE TO SHOW EVERYONE A NON BIAS WAY OF EXPLAINING THE TANK SIDE.
That video is very biased. Saying yeah : the forge gun, it needs to be powerful===. then: IT NEEDA A NERF.The : Tanks are UP ==> Kills somebody every 20 seconds LOL....Yea lets wait and then e can kill each other in the forums...
even IWS said he made a credible video on this, and he rarely agrees with me on anything.
this video is not biased at all.
I suppose your going to tell me that lowrateshitman's video wasn't biased? |
DootDoot
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:48:00 -
[139] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote: Tanks are used primarily as infantry killers in everything BUT PC..... if you want to go up against a bunch of infantry all packing some AV... your gonna die... any 1 vs 3-5 situation usually doesn't yield well for a person without a lot of luck being present why a tank should be different?.
That's the problem... tanks should be fighting tanks as you said... And with its current strength either the tank is owning or they are about to explode.... because either its the tank vs 1-2 at a time or its vs 4-10+more at a time...
If tanks are playing to fight other tanks gameplay changes... the way they even fit the tanks and choose their squad's change... The entire gameplay around tanks are changed....
They are to powerful to be running full strength and numbers on maps.... they would squash everything like a joke if there was enough tankers running that way every match...
They need a complete overhaul in the way they even work in this game... And that start's from reducing the efficacy drastically so we can field more... then of course cost reductions so players will actually field them..
Running no loss's shouldn't be the only way a tanker goes isk positive in a match... and creates a MASSIVE balance problem from the word go.
every tanker I know didn't skill into tanks to kill infantry, we all did it to kill other tanks.
I might suggest world of tanks? its very tank focused and extremely accurate... But this is DUST... and we all know how fast tanker battles end...
These tankers didn't first start pulling it out with comfort until there was no decent enemy tanks on the field. As the learning curve of tanks are expensive..
People cut their teeth with tanks killing infantry... the entire basis around tank's in PUB's with the current game dynamic's do not promote tank fights.... and if it did... we would see spider tank squads moving around....
The way tanks are now is game breaking and damaging the entire concept of tanks, buffing them is only causing more issues for when advanced and proto tanks and *crosses fingers* other race tanks come out.
This problem will get worse and worse as they leave it too.
|
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1440
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:01:00 -
[140] - Quote
DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote: Tanks are used primarily as infantry killers in everything BUT PC..... if you want to go up against a bunch of infantry all packing some AV... your gonna die... any 1 vs 3-5 situation usually doesn't yield well for a person without a lot of luck being present why a tank should be different?.
That's the problem... tanks should be fighting tanks as you said... And with its current strength either the tank is owning or they are about to explode.... because either its the tank vs 1-2 at a time or its vs 4-10+more at a time...
If tanks are playing to fight other tanks gameplay changes... the way they even fit the tanks and choose their squad's change... The entire gameplay around tanks are changed....
They are to powerful to be running full strength and numbers on maps.... they would squash everything like a joke if there was enough tankers running that way every match...
They need a complete overhaul in the way they even work in this game... And that start's from reducing the efficacy drastically so we can field more... then of course cost reductions so players will actually field them..
Running no loss's shouldn't be the only way a tanker goes isk positive in a match... and creates a MASSIVE balance problem from the word go.
every tanker I know didn't skill into tanks to kill infantry, we all did it to kill other tanks. I might suggest world of tanks? its very tank focused and extremely accurate... But this is DUST... and we all know how fast tanker battles end... These tankers didn't first start pulling it out with comfort until there was no decent enemy tanks on the field. As the learning curve of tanks are expensive.. People cut their teeth with tanks killing infantry... the entire basis around tank's in PUB's with the current game dynamic's do not promote tank fights.... and if it did... we would see spider tank squads moving around.... The way tanks are now is game breaking and damaging the entire concept of tanks, buffing them is only causing more issues for when advanced and proto tanks and *crosses fingers* other race tanks come out. This problem will get worse and worse as they leave it too.
if you want an infantry only game, might I suggest call of duty? its 100% infantry and totally boring. but this is Dust 514. and we all know how stupid infantry is. |
|
sixteensixty4
CAUSE 4 C0NCERN
102
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:10:00 -
[141] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote: That video is very biased.
Saying yeah : the forge gun, it needs to be powerful===. then: IT NEEDA A NERF. The : Tanks are UP ==> Kills somebody every 20 seconds LOL....
Yea lets wait and then e can kill each other in the forums...
I dont see its biased, it pretty much sums up how i feel, like sometimes tanks are op, then other times they are up, it all depends on the opposite team and what they got....
1 clued up proto av dude and the tank gonna have a hard time, but given the size of maps, its manageable
2+ proto av, and it starts to become a nightmare for tank, personally i check the other team and debate whether i can bring one in or not, but when you get 5+ games that you cant call a tank, it starts to feel like a waste of isk and sp
infantry or tanker, we all been in them pubs on a side with a complete bunch of dimwits, given the cost of tanks, its a nightmare when your on that bad team
same for infantry, maybe no one got good av, then your ****** and have a crap game
its a tough thing to balance, and have a non-biased view on, but i think ccp on the right track with this "burst tanking" stuff, like, tank goes in gets a couple of mins of beast mode (still kill-able just a bit more solid), then withdraws for cooldowns, which is pretty much how it is now, except, tankers cant have a "beast" mode when theres 2+ proto av out very well, let alone escape
draw distance \ rendering need some kind of buff, or it doesnt matter wtf they do to tanks |
Void Echo
Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium
1440
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:19:00 -
[142] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote: That video is very biased.
Saying yeah : the forge gun, it needs to be powerful===. then: IT NEEDA A NERF. The : Tanks are UP ==> Kills somebody every 20 seconds LOL....
Yea lets wait and then e can kill each other in the forums...
I dont see its biased, it pretty much sums up how i feel, like sometimes tanks are op, then other times they are up, it all depends on the opposite team and what they got.... 1 clued up proto av dude and the tank gonna have a hard time, but given the size of maps, its manageable 2+ proto av, and it starts to become a nightmare for tank, personally i check the other team and debate whether i can bring one in or not, but when you get 5+ games that you cant call a tank, it starts to feel like a waste of isk and sp infantry or tanker, we all been in them pubs on a side with a complete bunch of dimwits, given the cost of tanks, its a nightmare when your on that bad team same for infantry, maybe no one got good av, then your ****** and have a crap game its a tough thing to balance, and have a non-biased view on, but i think ccp on the right track with this "burst tanking" stuff, like, tank goes in gets a couple of mins of beast mode (still kill-able just a bit more solid), then withdraws for cooldowns, which is pretty much how it is now, except, tankers cant have a "beast" mode when theres 2+ proto av out very well, let alone escape draw distance \ rendering need some kind of buff, or it doesnt matter wtf they do to tanks
burst mode makes them tanks for 1 minute, then completely useless the rest of the time, its not on the right track, if the cooldown time wasn't going to be a minute, then it would be the start of something great.
I think they had something about burst mode, I believe it was siege mode, which I do believe was scrapped. |
sixteensixty4
CAUSE 4 C0NCERN
102
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:27:00 -
[143] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:
burst mode makes them tanks for 1 minute, then completely useless the rest of the time, its not on the right track, if the cooldown time wasn't going to be a minute, then it would be the start of something great.
I think they had something about burst mode, I believe it was siege mode, which I do believe was scrapped.
Im just going off what i read on the tank sticky thread, as far as i know, it didnt give times etc just a vauge idea
even if cool downs quite a while, its not like its going to be the whole match
it kinda makes sense that it should be active modules which do the balancing, as there doesnt seem to be a way to do it other wise
i dont think just bumping the hp, pg, etc will balance, tanks just become op, they need a weakness, which should be while there in cooldown
bit like the ammo, its going to take the tank off the field for a while, which if the infantry cant kill said tank, can only be a good thing
|
DootDoot
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
60
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:34:00 -
[144] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote:Void Echo wrote:DootDoot wrote: Tanks are used primarily as infantry killers in everything BUT PC..... if you want to go up against a bunch of infantry all packing some AV... your gonna die... any 1 vs 3-5 situation usually doesn't yield well for a person without a lot of luck being present why a tank should be different?.
That's the problem... tanks should be fighting tanks as you said... And with its current strength either the tank is owning or they are about to explode.... because either its the tank vs 1-2 at a time or its vs 4-10+more at a time...
If tanks are playing to fight other tanks gameplay changes... the way they even fit the tanks and choose their squad's change... The entire gameplay around tanks are changed....
They are to powerful to be running full strength and numbers on maps.... they would squash everything like a joke if there was enough tankers running that way every match...
They need a complete overhaul in the way they even work in this game... And that start's from reducing the efficacy drastically so we can field more... then of course cost reductions so players will actually field them..
Running no loss's shouldn't be the only way a tanker goes isk positive in a match... and creates a MASSIVE balance problem from the word go.
every tanker I know didn't skill into tanks to kill infantry, we all did it to kill other tanks. I might suggest world of tanks? its very tank focused and extremely accurate... But this is DUST... and we all know how fast tanker battles end... These tankers didn't first start pulling it out with comfort until there was no decent enemy tanks on the field. As the learning curve of tanks are expensive.. People cut their teeth with tanks killing infantry... the entire basis around tank's in PUB's with the current game dynamic's do not promote tank fights.... and if it did... we would see spider tank squads moving around.... The way tanks are now is game breaking and damaging the entire concept of tanks, buffing them is only causing more issues for when advanced and proto tanks and *crosses fingers* other race tanks come out. This problem will get worse and worse as they leave it too. if you want an infantry only game, might I suggest call of duty? its 100% infantry and totally boring. but this is Dust 514. and we all know how stupid infantry is.
Nah an infantry only game would not be CoD.... and not even an accurate representation... Counter-strike would be better even... at least it was a military trainer for a while..
I got into this game because of vehicles and infantry and EVE pilots in space... and to kill them in a vehicle, out of one.. at a turret... with orbitals... with anything...
Cop out's like "All the tankers i know became a tanker to kill tanks" is hilarious... because you didn't want exactly that, you wanted to have an advantage over everything that is in DUST... even specialized weaponry made for you.
Tanks are massively more vulnerable to infantry then this game represent's... lets not even think about an aerial vehicle with missiles?
the reality of tanks and the official video portrayal's of LAV's blowing them up is vastly different. which makes vehicle combat a stagnate king of the hill atrocity.
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1170
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 01:40:00 -
[145] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote: That video is very biased.
Saying yeah : the forge gun, it needs to be powerful===. then: IT NEEDA A NERF. The : Tanks are UP ==> Kills somebody every 20 seconds LOL....
Yea lets wait and then e can kill each other in the forums...
I dont see its biased, it pretty much sums up how i feel, like sometimes tanks are op, then other times they are up, it all depends on the opposite team and what they got.... 1 clued up proto av dude and the tank gonna have a hard time, but given the size of maps, its manageable 2+ proto av, and it starts to become a nightmare for tank, personally i check the other team and debate whether i can bring one in or not, but when you get 5+ games that you cant call a tank, it starts to feel like a waste of isk and sp infantry or tanker, we all been in them pubs on a side with a complete bunch of dimwits, given the cost of tanks, its a nightmare when your on that bad team same for infantry, maybe no one got good av, then your ****** and have a crap game its a tough thing to balance, and have a non-biased view on, but i think ccp on the right track with this "burst tanking" stuff, like, tank goes in gets a couple of mins of beast mode (still kill-able just a bit more solid), then withdraws for cooldowns, which is pretty much how it is now, except, tankers cant have a "beast" mode when theres 2+ proto av out very well, let alone escape draw distance \ rendering need some kind of buff, or it doesnt matter wtf they do to tanks
What you posted is true, and does seem non biased. A tanker owning people and then saying tanksare UP is not. Atanker being hit multiple times and surviving and then asking for AV nerfs, is biased.
Again,we need to wait for vehicle ''balancing'' and then we shall be able to rant all we want. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |