DUST Search - Thank you CEO Pyrex

All Channels

General Discussions

Thank you CEO Pyrex

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The Attorney General ZionTCD 939	Posted - 2013.09.19 03:55:00 - [91] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: The Attorney General wrote: I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit. Oh wait, he has never been tanking. I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f*** what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad. Bro, you are sad Clearly, you have never taken the time to read my feedback in tanker threads, because I actually think Void wants to make tanks OP. I call for a much more rational approach to vehicle balancing than he does. I fully understand his position, but do not agree with the degree. Out of most of the upper tier of tankers, I find myself consistently being the person arguing for no real buffs to tanks, just slight adjustments, especially with regards to shields v armor tanks. But you would know none of these things because your sole intent is to try and rile people up. Your ridiculous statements and hilarious hyperbole is not arguing, nor is it in any way productive. I have grown quite tired of those like you who seem to think that everything is just fine in the tank v infantry balance right now. Unlike most of you scrubs, I actually have a fully specced (16 million SP) out heavy with a prof 5 forge and proto grenades. So I know exactly how easy it is for AV to pop tanks like it is going out of style. I can consistently solo even the most stout of armor tanks. So when I see posts about people not being able to kill tanks, I know they are either lying to prevent equilibrium from being reached, or they are just bad at what they do. Can you say the same? Of course not. You speak only about one side of the argument, and from my experience as an AV troop, you clearly don't know what you are talking about.
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1411	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:06:00 - [92] - Quote sixteensixty4 wrote: Void Echo wrote: try skilling into them and run them yourself (NO CORP FRIENDS HELPING YOU) and tell me that its easy. . sixteensixty4 wrote: This is your problem, you expect to run around solo with no team help and still not get killed lol to which you answer Void Echo wrote: yeah....no, your dead wrong on that and then Void Echo wrote: that's fine and all, when your teamed up with competent people who will actually pay attention, listen and work for the team's victory... but no, most of the games I get in im always on the team with the stupid ass bluetards contradict yourself much or what... your a ******* idiot, plain and simple haha, these quotes don't have any purpose without the posts they respond to. truth is I have many, many opinions to talk about, I may seem contradicting at times, but only to the simple minded
KING CHECKMATE TEAM SATISFACTION 1156	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:07:00 - [93] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: The Attorney General wrote: I love how checkmate thinks there would be 12 v 12 tanks, he has seemingly forgotten about the vehicle limit. Oh wait, he has never been tanking. I love how the ret@rded General says im to be ignored yet reads and enjoys my every post. Like i give a f* what you think. Im waiting for Void to reply.Even if i think hes demented and WRONG, he defends what he sees correct,gives input and that makes him valuable to the community. People thinking they are the smartass hot internet lol troll winners , are just sad. Bro, you are sad But you would know none of these things because your sole intent is to try and rile people up. Your ridiculous statements and hilarious hyperbole is not arguing, nor is it in any way productive.===> ONLY IN THIS PAGE,you have 3 posts, only 1 has an actual elaborate text. Talk about being non productive. I have grown quite tired of those like you who seem to think that everything is just fine in the tank v infantry balance right now. Unlike most of you scrubs, I actually have a fully specced (16 million SP) out heavy with a prof 5 forge and proto grenades. So I know exactly how easy it is for AV to pop tanks like it is going out of style. I can consistently solo even the most stout of armor tanks. ===> Im a 15Mill AV specialist,i have proto FG, i have prof 4, and i have proto nades. You smashing weak tankers with your proto gear while in a full squad vs pub players doesnt prove anything. Any garbage player can do that. So when I see posts about people not being able to kill tanks, I know they are either lying to prevent equilibrium from being reached, or they are just bad at what they do. ===> As i stated before i only use as examples the times i CANT kill a tank as an example. Why would i use the times i own a tank as an example? like while they are in a city, eat 3 nades and then 1-2 FG shots and boom? Im not bad at what i do. Equilibrium on what? Tanks are already powerful(didnt say OP,just powerful), have you ever thought that maybe whats BALANCED for YOU,its not blanced for everyone else? havn't you thought, MAYBE , just MAYBE you might be wrong?. This video actually prooves my point on how strong a tanker can be. Can you say the same? Of course not. You speak only about one side of the argument, and from my experience as an AV troop, you clearly don't know what you are talking about.==========> Yeah i can say the same. Im only 1 mill behind you.'.Let me tell you something about experience. I play SOLO with my Proto Gear, i play to win, i dont pub stomp and actually , RARELY use my proto gear.You dont know what the battlefield looks like , TRULY.You are always with friends backing you up. Thats turned you soft,and deluded. You are the type of player that has a 5+Kd ratio,but when playing solo get owned my MLT scrambler pistols. I know now**you will say how awesome you are playing solo, 1HKO the enemy MCC with your prof 10 Forge gun.But not only i know its going to be BS,i dont care.
sixteensixty4 CAUSE 4 C0NCERN 86	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:13:00 - [94] - Quote Void Echo wrote: haha, these quotes don't have any purpose without the posts they respond to. truth is I have many, many opinions to talk about, I may seem contradicting at times, but only to the simple minded They clearly they do, but carry on, its rather amusing
Fizzer94 L.O.T.I.S. 198	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:15:00 - [95] - Quote Void Echo wrote: ladwar wrote: i think we all see the problem here... armor reps. that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast.
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1411	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:16:00 - [96] - Quote sixteensixty4 wrote: Void Echo wrote: haha, these quotes don't have any purpose without the posts they respond to. truth is I have many, many opinions to talk about, I may seem contradicting at times, but only to the simple minded They clearly they do, but carry on, its rather amusing LOL, that's l have to say to you
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1411	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:18:00 - [97] - Quote Fizzer94 wrote: Void Echo wrote: ladwar wrote: i think we all see the problem here... armor reps. that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. and that's why we can survive the AV hammering at the current times, do you not want tanks to be use right now? do you want them to be completely useless? sounds like you do
Fizzer94 L.O.T.I.S. 199	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:33:00 - [98] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Void Echo wrote: ladwar wrote: i think we all see the problem here... armor reps. Keep that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. and that's why we can survive the AV hammering at the current times, do you not want tanks to be use right now? do you want them to be completely useless? sounds like you do No I don't want them to be useless. I want them to be more like they should be. Armor tanks should have massive HP and good damage capabilities but a low repair rate, low speed with high acceleration. Shield take should be much flimsier, but have stupidly fast reps, super high damage, and high speed with slow acceleration.Armor tanks should be brawler-like, driving right into the fray and causing mayhem for awhile before they leave. While Shield tanks should be hit and run or ambush type vehicles, zipping around(compared to armor tanks) and doing massive damage as they drive by, or getting behind the enemy to surprise them with huge alpha damage.
The Attorney General ZionTCD 941	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:35:00 - [99] - Quote Checkmate, you really need to learn how to quote properly. Your posts are both difficult to read, and even more difficult to respond to without making a proper mess. I will try and dissect your post, but it will take some time because of your horrible formatting. The numbers used refer to the bolded portions you provided in your reply to my post. 1. Non point. One does not need length to create a proper statement. In the words of GZA, "Make it brief son, half short and twice strong" 2. When I said I can consistently solo tankers, that means any tanker. Not weaklings, not scrubs, but actual tankers. No one cares about how fast we can blow up somas. Solo, in squad, doesn't matter. Because it is not difficult. 3. You would have no idea what I think is balanced, because you have never asked me. So your assumptions on my opinions of what is balanced are irrelevant. Could I be wrong? Of course. No one is infallible. But since I am not arguing for nerfs to AV aside from some slight modifications to swarms and AV nades, and since I don't want buffs to armor tanks, I would consider my approach quite rational. 4. You missed the point of my argument. I have both a 16 million SP AV troop AND a 16 million SP tanker. You do not. So when I say that I can speak as someone who has much experience on both sides of the fight, that is something you can not compare to. I have played both sides, and am quite aware of the limitations and restrictions both classes have. You make it seem like you are the only guy who ever runs solo, which is hilariously misinformed. You don't know how I play, you don't know whom I play with, or when I do or do not run solo. So thinking that that in some way validates your argument is foolhardy and shameful as a debate tactic. You can try and talk ****, but when I go and add you to my contacts, you better have some stats to back up that game you pretend to have. Because I don't care if you run solo, if you have some scrubby stats, I am going to get a real good laugh.
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1411	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:37:00 - [100] - Quote Fizzer94 wrote: Void Echo wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Void Echo wrote: ladwar wrote: i think we all see the problem here... armor reps. Keep that is all, well i did have one more thing to say, with vehicles getting pushed from 1.5 they should atleast change resistance for explosives to give gunnlogi missile tanks a chance to take down armor tanks. as it stands its the norm for armor tanks to recharge their health while taking large missile fire. without the armor reps we have armor tanks wouldn't last 1/10th of the amount of time they survive now. after the prophesized vehicle change hopefully the stats all get fixed but we will have survivability also. But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. and that's why we can survive the AV hammering at the current times, do you not want tanks to be use right now? do you want them to be completely useless? sounds like you do No I don't want them to be useless. I want them to be more like they should be. Armor tanks should have massive HP and good damage capabilities but a low repair rate, low speed with high acceleration. Shield take should be much flimsier, but have stupidly fast reps, super high damage, and high speed with slow acceleration.Armor tanks should be brawler-like, driving right into the fray and causing mayhem for awhile before they leave. While Shield tanks should be hit and run or ambush type vehicles, zipping around(compared to armor tanks) and doing massive damage as they drive by, or getting behind the enemy to surprise them with huge alpha damage. right now, shields don't have the ability to survive for very long, like you say, as a result, they are rarely used.

KING CHECKMATE TEAM SATISFACTION 1161	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:46:00 - [101] - Quote Checkmate, you really need to learn how to quote properly. Your posts are both difficult to read, and even more difficult to respond to without making a proper mess. ==> Yup Sorry about that. I will try and dissect your post, but it will take some time because of your horrible formatting. The numbers used refer to the bolded portions you provided in your reply to my post. 1. Non point. One does not need length to create a proper statement. In the words of GZA, "Make it brief son, half short and twice strong" ==> Yeah i was actually talking about your posts with trolling or insulting and no actual imput. You know like the one saying im to be ignored? Thing that you say it should be done but dont do yourself? yeah...very solid opinions right there... 2. When I said I can consistently solo tankers, that means any tanker. Not weaklings, not scrubs, but actual tankers. No one cares about how fast we can blow up somas. Solo, in squad, doesn't matter. Because it is not difficult. ===> Depends on the map.Depends on the tanker.If they stay still we agree.Its not difficult. 3. You would have no idea what I think is balanced, because you have never asked me. So your assumptions on my opinions of what is balanced are irrelevant. Could I be wrong? Of course. No one is infallible. But since I am not arguing for nerfs to AV aside from some slight modifications to swarms and AV nades, and since I don't want buffs to armor tanks, I would consider my approach quite rational. ===> Well it is. Now please tell me and enlighten me, and you can even quote me from any post that is tank related. WHEN HAVE I SAID TANKS NEED A NERF? So , DDo YOU KNOW what i think is balanced? no, im just countering arguments the tankers are posting. 4. You missed the point of my argument. I have both a 16 million SP AV troop AND a 16 million SP tanker. You do not. So when I say that I can speak as someone who has much experience on both sides of the fight, that is something you can not compare to. I have played both sides, and am quite aware of the limitations and restrictions both classes have. You make it seem like you are the only guy who ever runs solo, which is hilariously misinformed. ====> I have an 8 million tanker and a 15million AV.So you missed my point too, i might not be as experienced as you with both sides,and i must admit i am a pretty sucky tanker, but i have enough experience to talk about tanks in a teamwork enviroment.I dont think im the only guy who enjoys running solo and not pub stomp,sadly, this si corp related. I have never seen ANYONE of your corp play a solo match. So there by my elaboration on your lack of knowledge on what a real BF is. And please corect me if im wrong, 75% of the time,you run in a squad. You don't know how I play, you don't know whom I play with, or when I do or do not run solo. So thinking that that in some way validates your argument is foolhardy and shameful as a debate tactic. ===> Now you are playing smartass again. You basically implied exaclty the same,before me. Implying i dont know anything,my lack of experience and scrubiness,this without knowing how i play, for whow long have i played,with whom i play,etc.... SO,This kind of invalidates YOUR point too.if you can just judge from some posts i've made, so can i. You can try and talk ****, but when I go and add you to my contacts, you better have some stats to back up that game you pretend to have. Because I don't care if you run solo, if you have some scrubby stats, I am going to get a real good laugh. ===> HAve your laugh, i play for the win, not stats.
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 299	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:46:00 - [102] - Quote Void Echo wrote: seriously? wow ignorance is bliss I guess, il should try it sometime, you seem to have a godly image of yourself because of it. So, im ignorant because i read your previous posts? You know what, i agree with you. i have a godly image of myself. Just to humour my own ego, point out in my post where I'm "providing a godly image of myself".
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 299	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:48:00 - [103] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing ** better? You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch. Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly? But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself. You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing ** that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument?
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1411	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:53:00 - [104] - Quote Duran Lex wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing ** better? You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch. Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly? But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself. You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing ** that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? Edit - oh wait, you already used an insult as your entire counter argument. Well played sir. You get a like for your originality. LOL like you have any valid points to offer, if you do then please present them, you haven't done anything otherwise
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 303	Posted - 2013.09.19 04:59:00 - [105] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Duran Lex wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing ** better? You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch. Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly? But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself. You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? Edit - oh wait, you already used an insult as your entire counter argument. Well played sir. You get a like for your originality. LOL like you have any valid points to offer, if you do then please present them, you haven't done anything otherwise Are you saying you've provided valid points? I would quote myself one page back, but I'm sure you would pass it off like you did when i typed it earlier. You claimed you are all for a balanced Vehicle vs AV. Yet i stated, based on ALL of your posts that corroborate my comment on you feeling tanks are so weak they should ONLY be able to be destroyed by at least 3 AV (please sir, don't make me link previous posts of yours and make you look god awful ******). Why instead of admitting you feel that way, you resort to insults? Please enlighten me on how thats balancing Dust again? all your other posts are just you complaining proto AVers can somehow solo you with ultimate ease.
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1411	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:01:00 - [106] - Quote Duran Lex wrote: Void Echo wrote: Duran Lex wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing ** better? You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch. Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly? But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself. You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Looks like you are joining Void's bandwagon of spewing that doesn't make sense with anything I've said. Okay, instead of an insult. Prove me otherwise. I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? Or should i take a page from you and Void's book and say "Pfft, you don't have over 15mil of SP into a Heavy suit, so your opinion doesn't matter." Or are you gonna result to throwing out insults as your basis of argument? Edit - oh wait, you already used an insult as your entire counter argument. Well played sir. You get a like for your originality. LOL like you have any valid points to offer, if you do then please present them, you haven't done anything otherwise Are you saying you've provided valid points? I would quote myself one page back, but I'm sure you would pass it off like you did when i typed it earlier. You claimed you are all for a balanced Vehicle vs AV. Yet i stated, based on ALL of your posts that corroborate my comment on you feeling tanks are so weak they should ONLY be able to be destroyed by at least 3 AV (please sir, don't make me link previous posts of yours and make you look god awful ******). Why instead of admitting you feel that way, you resort to insults? Please enlighten me on how thats balancing Dust again? all your other posts are just you complaining proto AVers can somehow solo you with ultimate ease. I honestly don't know what your point here is.... that's what im trying to figure out
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 303	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:01:00 - [107] - Quote I've fought a single tank that has solo'd 16 AVer's in a single game. God damn, tanks are so OP its like they are gods! Why CCP are you letting a single tank be able to withstand 16 people with Proto AV!? ~see? Now i can post like you Void. With bold faced ******* lies.
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 303	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:02:00 - [108] - Quote If you still can't see my point from that post above. You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying.
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1412	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:11:00 - [109] - Quote Duran Lex wrote: If you still can't see my point from that post above. You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying. lies? you think im telling lies? humorous, tell me, do you believe I lie because your infantry and your against vehicles or did you get your information from your friends. I don't tell lies, if you think im lying about what I post, then your the delusional one
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 303	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:15:00 - [110] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Duran Lex wrote: If you still can't see my point from that post above. You are far too delusional that you began to believe the lies you are saying. lies? you think im telling lies? humorous, tell me, do you believe I lie because your infantry and your against vehicles or did you get your information from your friends. I don't tell lies, if you think im lying about what I post, then your the delusional one I believe you lie, because I've read a post in this thread that said "I'm all for balance with vehicle and AV", then in dozens of other posts you type "At least three AVers should be needed to take out a single tank." Jesus man, this is what....the third post in this thread of stating the same lie you yourself typed? How many counter posts are you gonna create saying "Where did i lie?" I'll do you a solid, again, you claim you want balanced vehicle vs AV...yet claim you want at least 3 AVer's to be able to take out a tank. Hint thats not balanced at all. Shall we go another round of repetition?

Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 303	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:21:00 - [111] - Quote Actually, i have work at 8 am. I already have to watch 4 episodes of DVR recorded Adventure Time every morning to appease my daughter. Please provide me with another post asking where you lied at, and how I have no idea what I'm talking about, even though all your previous posts are open for view by everyone. I'll enjoy the humour tomorrow morning as i stack DVD's onto the shelves. (Be sure to make fun of my current profession, lord knows the only thing you do when trapped in a corner, like a rat, is the attempt at insults.)
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1412	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:36:00 - [112] - Quote Duran Lex wrote: Actually, i have work at 8 am. I already have to watch 4 episodes of DVR recorded Adventure Time every morning to appease my daughter. Please provide me with another post asking where you lied at, and how I have no idea what I'm talking about, even though all your previous posts are open for view by everyone. I'll enjoy the humour tomorrow morning as i stack DVD's onto the shelves. (Be sure to make fun of my current profession, lord knows the only thing you do when trapped in a corner, like a rat, is the attempt at insults.) I don't lie, everything I say is what I believe, you thinking that taking a minimum of 3 AVers to take down a tank is me countering my own posts? your the delusional one.
Texs Red SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 54	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:40:00 - [113] - Quote King Checkmate why do you use bold and capitalized print all the time? I mean is it really necessary? It really does not help get your point across any better and most of the time when I read your posts I get this mental image of some red faced hater foaming at the mouth. I would like to read your posts and not get a head ache.
Duran Lex Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 303	Posted - 2013.09.19 05:45:00 - [114] - Quote Void Echo wrote: I don't lie, everything I say is what I believe, you thinking that taking a minimum of 3 AVers to take down a tank is me countering my own posts? your the delusional one. lol. I had to share this post with my wife and step brother. They loved it as much as i did. You are now my favourite forum toy. Rest assured, I'll be looking up your forum posts and showcasing your "logic". It truly is a horribly beautiful sight.
DootDoot Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 47	Posted - 2013.09.19 06:00:00 - [115] - Quote Void Echo wrote: for the 1st time someone actually explains our side of the argument, in a non bias way: Thank you Pyrex Tankers who think they should fight infantry all day and have an advantage are sick people. There is a call in limit on tanks for maps... reduce the efficacy drastically on tanks... Make them cost slight over dropsuits... and let the tanks reign... People who think tankers should be a privileged few... are just biased and blowing smoke up each others ass in 200 threads a month.
Shattered Mirage Intara Direct Action Caldari State 274	Posted - 2013.09.19 06:03:00 - [116] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Don't you have some Dev response threads to say they should be developing **** better? You have such a high concept of balancing, that you get angry at CCP for holding back a rework of vehicles to make a better balancing patch. Aren't you satisfied with knowing you're a hypocrite, instead of making posts that explain it so vividly? But then again, anyone else having an opinion contrary to yours is a mistake in itself. You think heavies are UP. So yeah, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are a tool. Thumbs up special guy! Dude.... heavies really are UP... The only viable weapon for the is the FG.... the HMG is useless for the most part.
The Attorney General ZionTCD 943	Posted - 2013.09.19 06:21:00 - [117] - Quote Duran Lex wrote: I already told you as a Heavy, I've suffered through hardships over a 6 month period. Tell me how I'm wrong? . Beyond the fact that opinions on the heavy are split by those who preferred the shield heavies(most people) or armor heavies(me). Most of the shield fatties were upset because they got forced into a roll much like how I already played as a heavy. Stats wise, your HP is up, weapon damage is up, HMG range is down, turn speed is up, strafe speed is up. With the armor buffs, 1200 HP is easy. Sure it sucks to have only one frame, but you are stretching to make comparisons to the degree of nerf tanks have taken.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1641	Posted - 2013.09.19 07:03:00 - [118] - Quote i accept my victory. no one wanted to fight me on the clear mathematical fact that the armor reps are the problem. its ok, i accept everyone's surrender. " the eHP is around 11,000 before you count reppers, so a 20,000 eHP armor tank. not OP or anything at all. proto SL 6 rounds base fire 6x330damage missiles= 14,300~ abouts and takes i forgot, 12 second about to fire.and that's with the bonus damage to armor. the hard counter to armor tanks is more effective on shields... how hard of a counter is it then?" that is all. Fizzer94 wrote: But armor is supposed to be(or at least traditionally is) low reps and big buffer.Right now armor has a biggish buffer and HUGE reps. A complex level heavy repair module repairs like 4000-5000 HP really fast. they repair between 5100-6300 btw.
Xender17 Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 637	Posted - 2013.09.19 07:27:00 - [119] - Quote Gunnlogis are crap
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 2118	Posted - 2013.09.19 12:17:00 - [120] - Quote Void Echo wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Void Echo wrote: I could care less about infantry, they are the ones that got us into this mess in the 1st place. did you even bother looking on the enemy team he was fighting against? there was NO ORGANIZATION, NO INTELLIGENCE AND NO DEDICATED AV ON THEIR SIDE, all the seem to have was standard AV. you expect people intelligence and knowledge with what they do and with higher level modules to be soloed by some random red that is too lazy to fully skill into AV like they should that is too ***** stupid to use teamwork like they demand for us? Call of Dusty is that way: ===================================> -1st/ Stop it with the CoD crap.Its getting old and its not insulting,just stupid. I;ve never played that game, I played MAG. -2nd/World of TANKS is that way (XD) =========> -3rd/ The difference between you and me is i do KIND of care about vehicles ,because they are a part of the game i like. There for, making all my opinions more valid than your tank loving biased opinions. 4th/Yes i see the randoms trying to win an already finished match, but when you tankers get killed by AV weaponry, you also dont see the ifantry behind you throwing packed AV nades, the FGunner sniping you from a roof?.. NO , you only saw 2 swarms coming your way and came in to QQ how a Proto SL totally wrecks your tank. 5th/I have fully skilled Proto AV. I even have proficiency.Im an above avarege player and even with some help sometimes is impossible to drop a tank. So no, i dont want some random scrub with MLT swarms to drop a tank. I want tankers to start realizing , THEY ARE NOT BEING SOLOED. they are being hunt down by different AV players at the time .... That they do. LOL your opinion matters more than a tanker on the subject of tanks? tanks do get soloed by AV, all the *** time, an example is lowrateshitman's video of him soloing someone with lolnades, and he has the same **** biased mindset as you. I went from long time Solo AV tank killer to a tanker. The sheer amount of fire power we take during the cause of the match is insane, it worse when one player can actually, on his own, constitute 2-3 players fire power in 3 AV grenades, which withing the grand scheme of things are weapons that don't make sense.



Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.